Log in

Estimation of Joint Roughness Coefficient from Three-Dimensional Discontinuity Surface

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Abbreviations

λ :

Roughness index

R p :

Roughness profile

Z 2′:

The modified root mean square value

R p :

Roughness profile index

D :

Fractal dimension

θ * :

The inclination of the individual line segments

D r1d × K v :

A parameter of capturing the overall roughness characteristics of natural rock joints well by fractal techniques

R s :

Roughness coefficients

B :

A parameter relate to JRC

H :

The mean height of surface asperities in the mean line

L :

The length of the 2D-profile

M :

The divided number of discontinuity surface

T :

The peak shear strength of rock joints

σ n :

The effective normal stress

τ :

The peak shear strength of the joint

ϕ b :

The total friction angle of the flat surface

A c :

The potential contact area

A 0 :

The maximum possible contact area

\(\theta_{ \hbox{max} }^{*}\) :

The maximum apparent dip angle in the shear direction

C :

A “roughness” parameter

σ c :

The compressive strength of the intact material obtained from a standard uniaxial test

ϕ r :

The residual friction angle

α :

The angle between the schistosity plane and the normal to the joint

Z :

The position of the horizontal plane

L x :

Length in the x-direction of roughness surface sample

L y :

Length in the y-direction of roughness surface sample

\(\mathop{a}\limits^{\rightharpoonup}, \,\mathop{b}\limits^{\rightharpoonup}, \,\mathop{c}\limits^{\rightharpoonup}\) :

The vectors of the tetrahedron sides

L eq :

The equivalent length in the shear direction

dS τ :

The projections of shear direction

dS xy :

The projections of horizontal plane

x n, y n, z n :

The inner normal vector of ABC plane

x τ , y τ :

The unit vectors in x- and y-direction

θ τ :

The included angle of ABC with the shear plane

θ x, y :

The included angle of ABC with the horizontal plane

S ABC :

The area of ABC

S τ,ABC :

The projected area of ABC in the shear plane

S xy,ABC :

The projected area of ABC in the horizontal plane

References

  • Alameda-Hernández P, Jiménez-Perálvarez J, Palenzuela JA et al (2014) Improvement of the JRC calculation using different parameters obtained through a new survey method applied to rock discontinuities. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47(6):2047–2060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (1973) Review of a new shear-strength criterion for rock joints. Eng Geol 7:287–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Choubey V (1977) The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mech Rock Eng 10:1–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown SR, Scholz CH (1985) Broad bandwidth study of the topography of natural rock surfaces. J Geophys Res Solid Earth Planets 90:2575–2582

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge Y, Kulatilake PHSW, Tang H, **ong C (2014) Investigation of natural rock joint roughness. Comput Geotech 55:290–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasselli G (2001) Shear strength of rock joints based on quantified surface description. Ph.D. Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland

  • Herda HHW (2006) An algorithmic 3D rock roughness measure using local depth measurement clusters. Rock Mech Rock Eng 39:147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang SL, Oelfke SM, Speck RC (1992) Applicability of fractal characterization and modeling to rock joint profiles. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech 29:89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmen F (2010) Determining the surface roughness coefficient by 3D Scanner. Geologija 53(2):147–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilake P, Shou G, Huang TH, Morgan RM (1995) New peak shear-strength criteria for anisotropic rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech 32:673–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilake PHSW, Balasingam P, Park JY, Morgan R (2006) Natural rock joint roughness quantification through fractal techniques. Geotech Geol Eng 24:1181–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanaro F (2000) A random field model for surface roughness and aperture of rock fractures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:1195–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee YH, Carr JR, Barr DJ, Haas CJ (1990) The fractal dimension as a measure of the roughness of rock discontinuity profiles. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech 27:453–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maerz NH, Franklin JA (1990) Roughness scale effect and fractal dimension. In: Proceedings of 1st international workshop on scale effects in rock masses, Leon, Amsterdam, pp 121–125

  • Mandelbrot BB (1985) Self-affine fractals and fractal dimension. Phys Scr 32:257–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers NO (1962) Characterization of surface roughness. Wear 5:182–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatone BSA, Grasselli G (2010) A new 2D discontinuity roughness parameter and its correlation with JRC. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:1391–1400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatone BSA, Grasselli G (2012) Quantitative measurements of fracture aperture and directional roughness from rock cores. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:619–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatone BSA, Grasselli G (2013) An investigation of discontinuity roughness scale dependency using high-resolution surface measurements. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46:657–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse R, Cruden DM (1979) Estimating joint roughness coefficients. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 16:303–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZY, Lo SC, Di CC (2001) Reassessing the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) estimation using Z(2). Rock Mech Rock Eng 34:243–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GC, Karakus M, Tang HM, Ge YF, Zhang L (2014) A new method estimating the 2D Joint Roughness Coefficient for discontinuity surfaces in rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 72:191–198

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China through research Grant No. 41472265 and National Basic Research Program No. 2011CB710600 are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Karakus.

Appendix

Appendix

See Figs. 7, 8 and 9.

Fig. 7
figure 7

3D digital surface model (note: the positive x-direction is set to the zero angle and contra-rotates with the positive z-direction)

Fig. 8
figure 8

Space relationship of triangle of the unit with the mean plane (notes ABC—part of roughness surface, ABC’—the projection of roughness surface in mean plane)

Fig. 9
figure 9

Calculation of the equivalent length

1.1 The Mean Plane

As shown in Fig. 7a, a 3D surface can be digitized by 3D laser technology. According to the surface size and scanning precision, it can be divided into N + 1 in x-direction and M + 1 in y-direction. Thus, the 3D surface is discretized into N×M units and made up of (N + 1)×(M + 1) points, and each unit contains four points. Any unit made up of points A (i, j), B (i + 1, j), C (i, j + 1) and D (i + 1, j + 1) will have coordinates of (x i, j , y i, j , z i, j ), (x i+1, j , y i+1, j , z i+1, j ), (x i, j+1, y i, j+1, z i, j+1) and (x i+1, j+1, y i+1, j+1, z i+1, j+1), respectively. The unit can be thought of as two triangles of ABC and BCD, as shown in Fig. 7b. The whole 3D surface can be divided into 2(N × M) triangles. Their relationship with the horizontal plane A’B’C’D’ is shown in Fig. 7b, where A’, B’, C’ and D’ are the projection of A, B, C and D in the horizontal plane, respectively. Then, for the whole 3D roughness surface, the mean asperity height can be obtained by:

$$h = \frac{{V_{\text{total}} }}{{L_{x} L_{y} }} = \frac{1}{{L_{x} L_{y} }}\int_{0}^{{L_{x} }} {\int_{0}^{{L_{y} }} {\left| {z - z^{\prime}} \right|{\text{d}}x} {\text{d}}y} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N + 1} {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{M + 1} {\frac{{V_{(i,j)(i + 1,j)(i,j + 1)} + V_{(i + 1,j)(i,j + 1)(i + 1,j + 1)} }}{{L_{x} L_{y} }}} }$$
(9)
$$V_{(i,j)(i + 1,j)(i,j + 1)} = V_{ABCC'B'A'} ,V_{(i + 1,j)(i,j + 1)(i + 1,j + 1)} = V_{BCDD'C'B'}$$
(10)

where z’ represents the position of the horizontal plane, L x and L y are the length in the x-direction and y-direction of roughness surface sample, respectively. The value of h varies by changing the position of the horizontal plane, which is called the mean plane, where the value of h is the minimum. In fact, according to the relative relationship between each triangle and the mean plane, the volume in Fig. 7b can be divided into four conditions as shown in Fig. 8.

As shown in Fig. 8, the volume of each case should be calculated by different formulae because of the different shapes. However, no matter how complex the shape is, it always can be divided into several tetrahedrons, for which the volume can be calculated easily according to the coordinates of four vertexes. Assume there is a tetrahedron with known vertexes, such as (x 1, y 1, z 1), (x 2, y 2, z 2), (x 3, y 3, z 3) and (x 4, y 4, z 4). Its volume can be calculated by

$$V = \frac{1}{6}(\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup}$}}{a} \times \overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup}$}}{b} ) \cdot \overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup}$}}{c}$$
(11)

where \(\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup}$}}{a}\), \(\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup}$}}{b}\) and \(\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup}$}}{c}\) are the vectors of the tetrahedron sides, and they can be calculated by

$$\left\{ \begin{aligned} \overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup}$}}{a} = (x_{2} - x_{1} ,y_{2} - y_{1} ,z_{2} - z_{1} ) \hfill \\ \overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup}$}}{b} = (x_{3} - x_{1} ,y_{3} - y_{1} ,z_{3} - z_{1} ) \hfill \\ \overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup}$}}{c} = (x_{4} - x_{1} ,y_{4} - y_{1} ,z_{4} - z_{1} ) \hfill \\ \end{aligned} \right.$$
(12)

In Fig. 8, the first case can be divided into AA’B’C’, ABCC’ and ABB’C’, the second case is made up of AA’B’D, ABB’D, BB’OD and CC’OD, the third is made up of CC’B’D, CBB’D, BB’OD and AA’OD, and the last is made up of AA’C’D, ACC’D, CC’OD and BB’OD. Therefore, the volume of each can be calculated by Eq. (11). Additionally, it is substituted into Eqs. (10) and (9), such that the mean asperity height can be obtained.

In addition, the length of the rock sample in the shear direction should be obtained in order to calculate the parameter, λ, in Eq. (2). However, it is difficult to determine this shear length in reality. Instead, an equivalent value can be used, as shown in Fig. 9, where the ellipse is made up of the end-point of the equivalent length. Then, the formula for the equivalent shear length is given as:

$$L_{\text{eq}} = \frac{{L_{x} L_{y} }}{{\sqrt {(L_{x} \sin \alpha )^{2} + (L_{y} \cos \alpha )^{2} } }}$$
(13)

where L eq is the equivalent length in the shear direction, and α is the angle between the shear direction and the x-coordinate.

1.2 The Modified Root Mean Square Method

The Root Mean Square is the second step in calculating the roughness index. We will now transfer Eq. (4) to a new form in order to meet the three-dimensional requirement as follows:

$$Z_{2}^{'} = \sqrt {\int {\frac{1}{{L_{x} L_{y} }}\left( {\hbox{max} (0,\frac{{{\text{d}}S_{\tau } }}{{{\text{d}}S_{xy} }})} \right)^{2} {\text{d}}S_{xy} } } = \sqrt {\frac{1}{{L_{x} L_{y} }}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{2(N \times M)} {\frac{{\left( {\hbox{max} (0,S_{\tau ,i} )} \right)^{2} }}{{S_{xy,i} }}} }$$
(14)

where dS τ and dS xy are the projections of a triangle in the shear plane whose normal vector is the shear direction and the horizontal plane, respectively. They can be calculated by the coordinates of three vertexes in the triangle. Taking ABC as an example in Fig. 7b, the inner normal vector of ABC plane can be expressed by (x n , y n , z n ) (here z n should be a negative), which are calculated by

$$\left\{ \begin{aligned} x_{n} = (y_{i + 1,j} - y_{i,j} )(z_{i,j + 1} - z_{i,j} ) - (z_{i + 1,j} - z_{i,j} )(y_{i,j + 1} - y_{i,j} ) \hfill \\ y_{n} = (z_{i + 1,j} - z_{i,j} )(x_{i,j + 1} - x_{i,j} ) - (x_{i + 1,j} - x_{i,j} )(z_{i,j + 1} - z_{i,j} ) \hfill \\ z_{n} = (x_{i + 1,j} - x_{i,j} )(y_{i,j + 1} - y_{i,j} ) - (y_{i + 1,j} - y_{i,j} )(x_{i,j + 1} - x_{i,j} ) \hfill \\ \end{aligned} \right.$$
(15)

Assuming the shear direction is horizontal, its unit vector might be written as (x τ , y τ , 0), where we can calculate x τ and y τ as:

$$x_{\tau } = \cos \alpha ,y_{\tau } = \sin \alpha$$
(16)

Therefore, according to the formula for calculating the included angles of two vectors, the angles of the plane ABC (as shown in Fig. 7b) with the shear direction and ABC with the horizontal plane are given by, respectively

$$\left\{ \begin{array}{l} \cos \theta_{\tau } = \frac{{x_{n} \cos \alpha + y_{n} \sin \alpha }}{{\sqrt {x_{n}^{2} + y_{n}^{2} + z_{n}^{2} } }} \hfill \\ \cos \theta_{xy} = \frac{{z_{n} }}{{\sqrt {x_{n}^{2} + y_{n}^{2} + z_{n}^{2} } }} \hfill \\ \end{array} \right.$$
(17)

where θ τ and θ xy are the included angles of ABC with the shear plane and the horizontal plane, respectively. Thus, the projected areas of ABC in the shear plane and the horizontal plane can be given by,

$$S_{\tau ,ABC} = S_{ABC} \cos \theta_{\tau } ,S_{xy,ABC} = S_{ABC} \cos \theta_{xy}$$
(18)

where S ABC is the area of ABC, S τ,ABC is the projected area of ABC in the shear plane, and S xy,ABC is the projected area of ABC in the horizontal plane. Similarly, S τ,i and S xy,i can be calculated in the same manner.

It should be pointed out that the revised RMS method proposed by Zhang et al. (2014) considers the shear direction. Firstly, the plane does not affect the shear strength calculated by the method proposed in this paper if it reverses to the shear direction. Therefore, those planes are not to be considered in Eq. (14) if the angles of the inner normal vector of those planes with the shear direction are larger than 90°. Furthermore, the projected area of any ABC in the shear plane is considered if the plane faces to the shear direction as given in Eq. (18). The detailed steps for calculating the 3D JRC are as follows:

  1. 1.

    Obtain the real joint surface profile, 3D geometry (x i , y i , z i ), by scanning the joint surface shown in Fig. 7a. Then, triangulate the roughness surface.

  2. 2.

    According to the shear direction, divide the roughness surface into a rectangle for which the long edge is L eq and parallel to the shear direction. The short edge is perpendicular to the shear direction as shown in Fig. 7. Then, L eq is equal to the quadrature length of the inner ellipse of the roughness surface in the shear direction given in Eq. (13).

  3. 3.

    Assess every triangle to determine whether it is in reverse or in the shear direction. If the triangles are in the reverse direction, then they are to be disregarded in the analysis. Only the projected areas of the triangle that are in the shear direction and the horizontal plane are to be calculated in Eq. (18).

  4. 4.

    Lastly, obtain the modified RMS, Z 2′, using Eq. (14).

According to the above equations and steps, we implemented the theoretical approach using Compaq Visual FORTRAN 6 to calculate 3D JRC. Furthermore, the 2D JRCs of every roughness surface in different shear direction were calculated using the method proposed by Zhang et al. (2014).

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, G., Karakus, M., Tang, H. et al. Estimation of Joint Roughness Coefficient from Three-Dimensional Discontinuity Surface. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50, 2535–2546 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1264-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1264-5

Keywords

Navigation