Log in

Sonication of removed implants improves microbiological diagnosis of postoperative spinal infections

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In total joint replacement, culturing of the sonication fluid of removed implants has proven to be more sensitive than conventional periprosthetic tissue culture for the microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. However, its role in postoperative spinal implant infection (PSII) is not well investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the validity of sonication in detecting infection following instrumented spine surgery.

Methods

In this prospective controlled consecutive cohort study, patients undergoing spinal revision between September 2016 and March 2018 were analyzed. In all patients sonication of removed spinal implants and at least one peri-implant tissue culture were performed. Demographic data, including age, gender, clinical manifestation, comorbidities, laboratory values (CRP and blood leukocytes), were recorded. Microorganisms causing PSII were documented. Sensitivity and specificity of sonication and peri-implant tissue culture were evaluated.

Results

A total of 118 patients were included. PSII was diagnosed in 35 patients, representing 29.6% of the study cohort. Sensitivities of tissue and sonication fluid culture were 65.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 48.6–80.0) and 94.3% (95% CI 85.7–100) (p value = 0.002) and specificities 96.4% (95% CI 91.6–100) and 98.8% (95% CI 96.4–100), respectively. The most common microorganisms found in PSII were coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Propionibacterium acnes. Eleven PSIIs were detected only by sonicate fluid culture.

Conclusions

Culture of samples obtained by spinal implant sonication was more sensitive than conventional peri-implant tissue culture for the microbiological diagnosis of PSII. Therefore, sonication should be used as a routine tool in the diagnostic workup of PSII.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pumberger M, Chiu YL, Ma Y, Girardi FP, Mazumdar M, Memtsoudis SG (2012) National in-hospital morbidity and mortality trends after lumbar fusion surgery between 1998 and 2008. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:359–364. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B3.27825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sivasubramaniam V, Patel HC, Ozdemir BA, Papadopoulos MC (2015) Trends in hospital admissions and surgical procedures for degenerative lumbar spine disease in England: a 15-year time-series study. BMJ Open 5:e009011. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009011

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kasliwal MK, Tan LA, Traynelis VC (2013) Infection with spinal instrumentation: review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and management. Surg Neurol Int 4:S392–S403. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.120783

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Parchi PD, Evangelisti G, Andreani L, Girardi F, Darren L, Sama A, Lisanti M (2015) Postoperative spine infections. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 7:5900. https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2015.5900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Patel H, Khoury H, Girgenti D, Welner S, Yu H (2017) Burden of surgical site infections associated with select spine operations and involvement of Staphylococcus aureus. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 18:461–473. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2016.186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meredith DS, Kepler CK, Huang RC, Brause BD, Boachie-Adjei O (2012) Postoperative infections of the lumbar spine: presentation and management. Int Orthop 36:439–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1427-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zimmerli W, Sendi P (2017) Orthopaedic biofilm infections. APMIS 125:353–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Janz V, Wassilew GI, Hasart O, Matziolis G, Tohtz S, Perka C (2013) Evaluation of sonicate fluid cultures in comparison to histological analysis of the periprosthetic membrane for the detection of periprosthetic joint infection. Int Orthop 37:931–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1853-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, Hanssen AD, Unni KK, Osmon DR, Mandrekar JN, Cockerill FR, Steckelberg JM, Greenleaf JF, Patel R (2007) Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med 357:654–663. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa061588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Trampuz A, Piper KE, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, Cockerill FR, Steckelberg JM, Patel R (2006) Sonication of explanted prosthetic components in bags for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is associated with risk of contamination. J Clin Microbiol 44:628–631. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.44.2.628-631.2006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sampedro MF, Huddleston PM, Piper KE, Karau MJ, Dekutoski MB, Yaszemski MJ, Currier BL, Mandrekar JN, Osmon DR, McDowell A, Patrick S, Steckelberg JM, Patel R (2010) A biofilm approach to detect bacteria on removed spinal implants. Spine 35:1218–1224. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3181c3b2f3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative S (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Epidemiology 18:800–804. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Krenn V, Morawietz L, Perino G, Kienapfel H, Ascherl R, Hassenpflug GJ, Thomsen M, Thomas P, Huber M, Kendoff D, Baumhoer D, Krukemeyer MG, Natu S, Boettner F, Zustin J, Kolbel B, Ruther W, Kretzer JP, Tiemann A, Trampuz A, Frommelt L, Tichilow R, Soder S, Muller S, Parvizi J, Illgner U, Gehrke T (2014) Revised histopathological consensus classification of joint implant related pathology. Pathol Res Pract 210:779–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.09.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nana A, Nelson SB, McLaren A, Chen AF (2016) What’s new in musculoskeletal infection: update on biofilms. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98:1226–1234. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Romano CL, Trentinaglia MT, De Vecchi E, Logoluso N, George DA, Morelli I, Drago L (2018) Cost-benefit analysis of antibiofilm microbiological techniques for peri-prosthetic joint infection diagnosis. BMC Infect Dis 18:154. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3050-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Piper KE, Fernandez-Sampedro M, Steckelberg KE, Mandrekar JN, Karau MJ, Steckelberg JM, Berbari EF, Osmon DR, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG, Cofield RH, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Huddleston PM, Dekutoski MB, Yaszemski M, Currier B, Patel R (2010) C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and orthopedic implant infection. PLoS ONE 5:e9358. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bagrosky BM, Hayes KL, Koo PJ, Fenton LZ (2013) 18F-FDG PET/CT evaluation of children and young adults with suspected spinal fusion hardware infection. Pediatr Radiol 43:991–1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2654-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kowalski TJ, Berbari EF, Huddleston PM, Steckelberg JM, Mandrekar JN, Osmon DR (2007) The management and outcome of spinal implant infections: contemporary retrospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 44:913–920. https://doi.org/10.1086/512194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bemer P, Corvec S, Tariel S, Asseray N, Boutoille D, Langlois C, Tequi B, Drugeon H, Passuti N, Touchais S (2008) Significance of Propionibacterium acnes-positive samples in spinal instrumentation. Spine 33:E971–E976. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31818e28dc

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shifflett GD, Bjerke-Kroll BT, Nwachukwu BU, Kueper J, Burket J, Sama AA, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP, Hughes AP (2016) Microbiologic profile of infections in presumed aseptic revision spine surgery. Eur Spine J 25:3902–3907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4539-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abdul-Jabbar A, Berven SH, Hu SS, Chou D, Mummaneni PV, Takemoto S, Ames C, Deviren V, Tay B, Weinstein P, Burch S, Liu C (2013) Surgical site infections in spine surgery: identification of microbiologic and surgical characteristics in 239 cases. Spine 38:E1425–E1431. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3182a42a68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hahn F, Zbinden R, Min K (2005) Late implant infections caused by Propionibacterium acnes in scoliosis surgery. Eur Spine J 14:783–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0854-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Collins I, Wilson-MacDonald J, Chami G, Burgoyne W, Vineyakam P, Berendt T, Fairbank J (2008) The diagnosis and management of infection following instrumented spinal fusion. Eur Spine J 17:445–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0559-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jakab E, Zbinden R, Gubler J, Ruef C, von Graevenitz A, Krause M (1996) Severe infections caused by Propionibacterium acnes: an underestimated pathogen in late postoperative infections. Yale J Biol Med 69:477–482

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Butler-Wu SM, Burns EM, Pottinger PS, Magaret AS, Rakeman JL, Matsen FA 3rd, Cookson BT (2011) Optimization of periprosthetic culture for diagnosis of Propionibacterium acnes prosthetic joint infection. J Clin Microbiol 49:2490–2495. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00450-11

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Brolin TJ, Hackett DJ, Abboud JA, Hsu JE, Namdari S (2017) Routine cultures for seemingly aseptic revision shoulder arthroplasty: are they necessary? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:2060–2066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.07.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Berbari EF, Marculescu C, Sia I, Lahr BD, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, Gullerud R, Osmon DR (2007) Culture-negative prosthetic joint infection. Clin Infect Dis 45:1113–1119. https://doi.org/10.1086/522184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pereira BJ, de Holanda CV, Ribeiro CA, Holanda LF, Cabral CD, Caravalho LL, de Oliveira JG (2016) Spinal surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease: predictors of outcome. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 140:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.11.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pull ter Gunne AF, Cohen DB (2009) Incidence, prevalence, and analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection following adult spinal surgery. Spine 34:1422–1428. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3181a03013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Putzier.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conficts of interest for the current study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 140 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bürger, J., Akgün, D., Strube, P. et al. Sonication of removed implants improves microbiological diagnosis of postoperative spinal infections. Eur Spine J 28, 768–774 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05881-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05881-x

Keywords

Navigation