Abstract
The electrostatic properties of clay (or other charged) mineral surfaces play a significant role in the fate, transport, persistence, and remediation of subsurface contaminant plumes. This study presents a stochastic assessment of the impact and relevance of microscale electrostatic effects on macroscopic, field-scale contaminant transport in heterogeneous groundwater systems involving spatially distributed clay zones. We present Monte Carlo simulations in two-dimensional heterogeneous fields, comprising heterogeneous distributions of physical (i.e., hydraulic conductivity, porosity, tortuosity) and electrostatic (i.e., surface charge) properties, and compare scenarios with different combination and extent of physical and electrostatic processes. The simulations were performed with the multi-continua based reactive transport code, MMIT-Clay, and considering an explicit treatment of the diffuse layer processes. The results reveal that the microscopic electrostatic mechanisms within clay’s diffuse layer can significantly accelerate or retard a particular contaminant depending on its charge, leading to considerably different solute breakthroughs and mass loading/release behaviors in low permeability inclusions. Furthermore, we show that such variations in the macroscale transport behavior, solely driven by charge interactions, are statistically significant over the ensembles of Monte Carlo realizations. The simulations also demonstrate that the omission of electrostatic processes, which is still a common practice in subsurface hydrology, can lead to substantial over- or underestimation of contaminant migration.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In the last decades, the investigations of clays, clay rocks, and clay-rich low permeability media have emerged as research areas of growing interest in many scientific disciplines and engineering applications, primarily because of their unique physical, chemical, and mineralogical properties. The low permeability of clay-rich formations makes them ideal for the confinement of radionuclides and/or other contaminants in applications such as long-term nuclear waste disposal in geologic repositories (e.g., Nagra 2002; Posiva 2008; Wersin et al. 2022) or carbon dioxide sequestration in geologic formations (e.g., Bourg et al. 2015; Song and Zhang 2013; Charlet et al. 2017). In the context of contaminant transport in groundwater systems, the presence of such low permeability zones and aquitards can significantly impact the persistence, fate, retention, and migration of contaminant plumes by effectively trap** the contaminants in low-conductive regions and/or subsequently acting as long-term secondary contaminant source (e.g., Liu and Ball 2002; Cherry et al. 2004; Parker et al. 2004; 2008; Chapman and Parker 2005; Rasa et al. 2011; Seyedabbasi et al. 2012; Bianchi et al. 2013; Rezaei et al. 2013; Yang et al. 2014, 2016; Tatti et al. 2016; 2019; Muskus and Falta 2018; Sundell et al. 2019; Mosthaf et al. 2021; Muniruzzaman and Rolle 2021; Petrova et al. 2023). Besides hydraulic properties, one of the most distinctive characteristics of clayey media is the abundance of certain minerals containing a higher density of surface charge at the mineral–water interface (e.g., Sposito 1992; Descostes et al. 2008; Gimmi and Kosakowski 2011; Tournassat and Steefel 2015; Tinnacher et al. 2016; Tertre et al. 2018; Soler et al. 2019; Wigger and Van Loon 2017). Electrostatic processes at such charged surfaces lead to the formation of a diffuse ion swarm typically known as the diffuse layer (DL), and give rise to the adsorption of counter-ions and exclusion of co-ions in the proximity of the surface (e.g., Muurinen 2004; Birgersson and Karnland 2009; Tournassat and Appelo 2011). These diffuse layer mechanisms, solely caused by charged minerals, are typically described by the Donnan equilibrium (Donnan and Guggenheim 1932), especially within the framework of continuum-based solute transport models (e.g., Appelo and Wersin 2007; Jougnot et al. 2009; Alt-Ep** et al. 2015; Tournassat and Steefel 2019). This approach is based on the assumption that the total pore space is composed of two individual sub-continua: a charge-balanced free water (FW) or bulk water porosity, and a diffuse layer or Donnan porosity containing charged water with a deficit of co-ions and excess of counterions. The diffusive movement of charged solutes in both sub-continua is described by the Nernst–Planck equation, which expresses the flux of a solute as a function of the electrochemical potential gradient, charge density of clay, and porewater solution composition (e.g., Cussler 2009; Appelo 2017).
In subsurface hydrology, low permeability media, aquitards, and clay-rich formations have historically received less attention compared to the permeable porous media, partly because it was traditionally believed that such media are inaccessible for contaminants due to their low hydraulic conductivity. An emerging number of studies have investigated contaminant transport in low-permeability settings, highlighting the importance of diffusion-controlled mass exchange mechanisms between high and low permeability zones (e.g., Ball et al. 2018). These studies, typically involving lab-scale diffusion experiments, diffusion-dominated field studies, and/or modeling investigations, have established the relevance of charge-induced mechanisms for solute migration in clayey media. Electrostatic effects specifically control the transport of charged species in two ways: (i) via Coulombic interactions between different charged solutes, caused by the diffusion potential derived from the variations in individual ionic diffusivities (e.g., Felmy and Weare 1991; Giambalvo et al. 2002; Boudreau et al. 2004; Appelo and Wersin 2007; Liu et al. 2011; Rolle et al. 2013a; Muniruzzaman et al. 2014; Muniruzzaman and Rolle 2015; 2017), and (ii) through surface-solute interactions at the diffuse layer adjacent to the negatively charged surfaces, leading to the adsorption of cations and exclusion of anions (e.g., Muurinen et al. 2004; Leroy et al. 2006; Van Loon et al. 2007; Appelo et al. 2008; 2010; Tournassat and Appelo 2011; Glaus et al. 2013; Tertre et al. 2015). The impacts of such electrostatic mechanisms on field-scale contaminant transport in complex, heterogeneous subsurface systems containing both low and high permeability zones are not yet understood, although heterogeneous subsurface sandy-clayey systems are widespread and important in many sedimentary environments (Nichols 2009).
In this study, we perform a stochastic assessment of the key role of charge interactions on field-scale subsurface contaminant transport in complex, heterogeneous sandy-clayey domains involving spatially variable distributions of physical and electrostatic properties. The investigation is based on Monte Carlo simulations considering ensembles of two-dimensional binary heterogeneous fields, which are representative of vertical cross-sections of a groundwater aquifer comprising clayey inclusions embedded within a sandy matrix. In each heterogeneous realization, we performed three distinct simulations with different levels of complexity and different combinations of physical and electrostatic processes along with their parameter distributions. The simulations were performed with the multi-continua based reactive transport code, MMIT-Clay (Muniruzzaman and Rolle 2019), and the effects of the diffuse layer processes are thoroughly analyzed by comparing the solute transport and mass-exchange behavior from the analogous scenarios considering and excluding these microscopic electrostatic processes.
2 Problem statement
We perform stochastic reactive transport simulations of differently charged radionuclide solutes in ensembles of two-dimensional heterogeneous domains (20 m long and 2 m thick), representing transects of sandy groundwater aquifer systems containing low-permeability clayey inclusions (Fig. 1). We specifically focus on the surface charge (σClay) of the clay minerals and investigate the impact of the charge-driven electrostatic processes in clay nanopores on the overall mass transfer behavior of the transported solutes between the low-permeability clay zones and the background high-permeability sandy matrix. The simulations are performed considering steady-state flow and transient transport conditions, and Fig. 1 illustrates a schematic of the model setup, boundary/initial conditions, and the relevant microscopic mechanisms. We consider four radionuclides (HTO, I−, 22Na+, Cs+) as model charged contaminants that are injected through the inlet boundary for a period of 500 days (“loading phase”), followed by the injection of a tracer-free solution (NaCl) for another 500 days (“unloading phase”). These radionuclide species are the most extensively studied tracers in the context of clay and nuclear waste repository studies. Investigations based on these tracers have been carried out both in laboratory setups (e.g., Glaus et al. 2007; 2013; Tachi and Yotsuji 2014) and in field experiments (e.g., Appelo et al. 2008; 2010; Soler et al. 2019). For the initial condition, the entire simulation domain was assumed to be initially in equilibrium with a 1 mM NaCl solution.
2.1 Generation of heterogeneous conductivity fields and groundwater flow equation
To create the desired heterogeneous sandy-clayey domains, we first generate random fields of an auxiliary variable (a = lnK) using a Gaussian covariance model and by following the spectral approach of Dykaar and Kitanidis (1992). We consider an ensemble of 100 Monte Carlo realizations for the auxiliary variable, a, with zero mean, variance of 1, and length scale parameters of lx = 2 m and lz = 0.1 m in the horizontal and transverse directions, respectively. As a next step, we define a cutoff value for the variable a in order to generate the binary sandy-clayey conductivity fields (e.g., Werth et al. 2006; Chiogna et al. 2011). The locations with the a-values lower than the cutoff value are assigned to the clayey inclusions, whereas the remaining points containing a-values higher than the cutoff are assigned to the background sandy matrix (Fig. 2). In this thresholding process, the clay inclusions are designed to specifically occupy ~ 20% of the total domain area in all Monte Carlo realizations by following the approach of Lee et al. (2018). Finally, the hydraulic conductivity value is set to 6.14 × 10–4 m/s in the sandy matrix, whereas the conductivity that is several orders of magnitude smaller (6.14 × 10–9 m/s) is assigned in the clayey inclusions. The porosity of the matrix and inclusions are kept as 0.41 and 0.71, respectively.
Based on the generated hydraulic conductivity fields, we solve groundwater flow in two-dimensional sandy-clayey domains. Under steady-state flow conditions, the governing equations for hydraulic head, h [m], and stream function, ψ [m2/s], in such domains read as (e.g., Cirpka et al. 1999a):
where K [m/s] is the tensor for hydraulic conductivity. Equation (1) and (2) are solved with a mixed finite element method in rectangular grids (with Δx = 0.4 m, Δz = 0.02 m) to obtain the velocity field required in the solute transport problem. The hydraulic head is solved by applying Dirichlet boundary conditions at the left and right boundaries and no-flow boundaries at the top and bottom boundaries. For the stream function, we consider fixed values at the bottom and top boundaries. The difference between these two boundary values is equal to the total volumetric water flux through the domain.
Figure 2 illustrates the complex patterns of the simulated streamlines (black lines) for two selected realizations. The results show that the streamlines clearly diverge around the low permeability clay zones (blue-colored zones), where the flow velocity is orders of magnitude smaller (blue color) than in the sandy regions where the streamlines are focused (red colors) (Fig. 2c, d). In all simulations, we considered an average flow velocity of ~ 0.1 m/d, which lies in the typical range of groundwater values. Based on the computed distribution of hydraulic head and stream function, we construct streamline-oriented grids for each realization, following the approach of Cirpka et at. (1999a). As detailed in the next section, the governing multicomponent transport equations are resolved in the streamline-oriented grids. This is advantageous since it allows for minimizing numerical dispersion by eliminating the off-diagonal entries of the hydrodynamic dispersion tensor (Cirpka et al. 1999b).
2.2 Multicomponent transport equation including electrostatic effects
In charged porous media, the consideration of the charge-induced electrostatic processes, occurring at the micro- to nanopores located at the vicinity of the charged surfaces (i.e., diffuse layer), is of utmost importance in assessing migration of charged solutes. Therefore, the description of solute transport in such systems requires explicit treatment of these microscopic diffuse layer processes in connection with the classical advective–dispersive transport mechanisms. In the continuum description of reactive transport processes, these electrostatic effects are treated by considering a multi-continua based multicomponent reactive transport formulation (Fig. 1, inset), which, for a dual-porosity system involving diffuse layer and free water as the individual sub-continua, can be written as (e.g., Appelo 2017; Muniruzzaman and Rolle 2019):
where θ [-] is the total porosity, fFWand fDL [-] represent the fractions of the total porosity occupied by the free water and diffuse layer, respectively (fFW + fDL = 1), t [s] is time, q [m/s] is the specific discharge vector in the free water porosity, Rr [mol/m2/s] is the reactive source/sink term, υir [-] is the stoichiometric coefficient of species i for r-th reaction, and \(c_{i}^{FW}\) and \(c_{i}^{DL}\)[mol/L] are the concentrations in the free water and diffuse layer porosities, respectively. These two sub-domains are assumed to be in chemical equilibrium and their concentrations are related via Boltzmann equation (e.g., Donnan and Guggenheim 1932; Appelo et al. 2010):
where Γi [-] represents the ratio of the activity coefficients in the free and diffuse layer water \(\left( { = {{{\upgamma }_{i}^{FW} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{\upgamma }_{i}^{FW} } {{\upgamma }_{i}^{DL} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {{\upgamma }_{i}^{DL} }}} \right)\), zi [-] is the charge number of species i, φDL [V] is the mean electrostatic potential in the diffuse layer water (Fig. 1), F [J/V/eq] is Faraday’s constant, R [J/mol/K] is the ideal gas constant, and T [K] is the temperature. While the free water porosity is electroneutral, the net charge balance in the diffuse layer water is described by the Donnan polynomial (e.g., Appelo and Wersin 2007; Gimmi and Alt-Ep** 2018):
where VDL [L] is the volume of water in the diffuse layer, and Su [mol] is the total charge at the mineral surface.
In Eq. (3), \({\mathbf{J}}_{i}^{FW}\) and \({\mathbf{J}}_{i}^{DL}\)[m2/s] are the vectors for the diffusive/dispersive fluxes in the free water and diffuse layer porosities, respectively. Instead of the classical Fickian formulation, we consider the Nernst-Planck equation, which allows a more rigorous description of charged solutes’ fluxes by explicitly considering ion-ion Coulombic interactions and local electroneutrality constraints (e.g., Boudreau et al. 2004; Rasouli et al. 2015; Muniruzzaman and Rolle 2016; Rolle et al. 2018; Huang et al. 2022; Trinchero et al. 2022):
where, \(J_{L,i}^{FW}\), \(J_{T,i}^{FW}\) and \(J_{L,i}^{DL}\), \(J_{T,i}^{DL}\) represent the longitudinal and transverse components of the diffusive/dispersive fluxes in the free water and diffuse layer, respectively, \(\phi_{d}^{FW}\) and \(\phi_{d}^{DL}\)[V] are the electrical potentials in the two sub-continua, and \({\mathbf{D}}_{i}^{FW}\), \({\mathbf{D}}_{i}^{DL}\) [m2/s] are the tensors for the local hydrodynamic self-dispersion coefficients. In a two-dimensional local coordinate system oriented along the principal flow directions (xL, xT), as in the streamline-oriented grids considered in this study, the local dispersion tensors have only nonzero diagonal entries (e.g., Cirpka et al. 1999a):
where \(D_{L,i}^{FW}\), \(D_{T,i}^{FW}\) and \(D_{L,i}^{DL}\),\(D_{T,i}^{DL}\) [m2/s] are the longitudinal and transverse components of the hydrodynamic self-dispersion coefficients (i.e., when a particular charged solute is transported independently, i.e., “liberated state”, from the other ions in a multicomponent solute environment, e.g., Boudreau et al. 2004; Muniruzzaman et al. 2014) in the corresponding domains. In the free water, the longitudinal and transverse components of the dispersion coefficients are parameterized by the following linear (Guedes de Carvalho and Delgado 2005; Kurotori et al. 2019) and nonlinear compound-specific (Chiogna et al. 2010; Rolle et al. 2012) relations:
where \(D_{P,i}^{FW}\) [m2/s] is the pore-diffusion coefficient, v [m/s] is the seepage velocity in the free water domain, d [m] is the average grain size diameter, δ [-] is the ratio between the length of a pore channel and its hydraulic radius, β [-] is an empirical exponent that accounts for the effects of incomplete mixing in the pore channels, and Pei [-]\(\left( { = vd/D_{aq,i} } \right)\) is the grain Péclet number with Daq,i [m2/s] being the aqueous diffusion coefficient. We consider δ = 5.37 and β = 0.5, which were provided by a comprehensive analysis of transverse dispersion datasets in two-dimensional and three-dimensional setups (Ye et al. 2015a). In both expressions, the grain size, d is required as an input parameter at each location in the domain, and we calculate this quantity from the local hydraulic conductivity values by adopting the Hazen approximation (Hazen 1892): \(d \approx c\sqrt K\), (where c = 0.01 m0.5s0.5 is an empirical proportionality constant), which was also adopted in previous studies on high-resolution transport in heterogeneous domains (e.g., Eckert et al. 2012; Rolle et al. 2013b). In this study, we consider advective transport only in the free water porosity, hence, the hydrodynamic self-dispersion coefficients in the diffuse layer water reduce to pore-diffusion coefficients (i.e., \(D_{L,i}^{DL} = D_{P,i}^{DL}\) and \(D_{T,i}^{DL} = D_{P,i}^{DL}\)). In both sub-porosities, the pore-diffusion terms are parameterized as the ratio between the aqueous diffusion coefficient and the tortuosity, τ [-] (\(D_{P,i}^{FW} = D_{aq,i}^{FW} /\uptau^{FW}\) and \(D_{P,i}^{DL} = D_{aq,i}^{DL} /\uptau^{DL}\)).
In Eq. (6) and (7), the electrical potentials arise due to Coulombic interactions driven by the variation in the diffusive mobility of charged solutes or because of the application of an external electric potential. However, in the absence of any external electric field, there is no electrical current \(\left( {\sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^{N} {z_{i} } J_{{_{L,i} }}^{FW} = 0} \right., \, \sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^{N} {z_{i} } J_{{_{T,i} }}^{FW} = 0, \, \sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^{N} {z_{i} } J_{{_{L,i} }}^{DL} = 0\), and \(\left. {\sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^{N} {z_{i} } J_{{_{T,i} }}^{DL} = 0} \right)\), hence, the longitudinal and transverse components of the individual electrical gradient terms in two sub-continua can be expressed as:
After substituting these expressions, Eq. (6) and (7) can be recast as:
These equations can be further rearranged to a more compact notation as:
where \({\mathbf{D}}_{ij}^{FW}\) and \({\mathbf{D}}_{ij}^{DL}\)[m2/s] are now the tensors for the cross-coupled diffusive/dispersive terms in the free water and diffuse layer, respectively (e.g., Muniruzzaman and Rolle 2016; 2019):
where δij is the Kronecker delta function, which is equal to 1 when i = j and equal to 0 if i ≠ j.
Compared to classical single continuum description of solute transport and/or common Fick’s law, this multi-continua formulation ensures a greatly improved representation of the conservative and reactive multicomponent transport of charged solutes in physically and electrostatically heterogeneous charged porous media by explicitly considering the i) electrostatic processes in the diffuse layer, ii) inter-ionic coupling between diffusive/dispersive fluxes, concentration and activity gradients, and iii) spatially variable description of the local hydrodynamic self-dispersion coefficients. We solve the reactive transport problem with a finite volume method in streamline-oriented grids, as explained in Sect. 2.1. To solve the flow and transport equations presented above, we use a recently developed multi-continua based reactive transport simulator, MMIT-Clay (Muniruzzaman and Rolle 2019). MMIT-Clay uses PHREEQC (Parkhurst and Appelo 2013) as a reaction engine, with the PhreeqcRM module (Parkhurst and Wissmeier 2015) allowing accessing all the chemistry and thermodynamic capabilities of PHREEQC (e.g., Jara et al. 2017; Healy et al. 2018; Rolle et al. 2018; Sprocati et al. 2019; Muniruzzaman et al. 2020).
2.3 Simulation scenarios
We perform a series of numerical experiments involving stochastic reactive transport simulations to explore the impact and relevance of charge-induced mechanisms within the clay diffuse layer during solute transport in complex, physically and electrostatically heterogeneous domains. In each Monte Carlo realization, we consider three distinct simulation scenarios specifically focusing on the different combinations of spatially variable physical and electrostatic properties in the model domain. These scenarios are summarized in Table 1. They are designed to include levels of increasing complexity in terms of incorporating different mechanisms and distributions of physical and electrostatic properties.
Physical heterogeneity (P): This scenario reflects typical stochastic numerical analysis of flow and solute transport in heterogeneous groundwater systems (e.g., Rubin et al. 1994, Dagan 2004; Fiori 2003; Jankovic et al. 2003). The focus is on the physical solute transport mechanisms of advection and dispersion, without considering the electrostatic processes generated by the charge of solutes and/or clay surface. These simulations are run with a single-continuum model description, including Fick’s law for diffusive/dispersive fluxes. The stochastic realizations of the heterogeneous domains consist of spatially variable distributions of physical properties, such as hydraulic conductivity (K), porosity (θ) and tortuosity (τ), resulting in spatially variable flow velocity (v) (Fig. 2) and dispersion coefficients (DL and DT, Eqs. 10 and 11).
Physical and electrostatic heterogeneity 1 (P/E 1): This scenario explicitly considers both the physical transport processes and the electrostatic processes within the diffuse layer water in binary sandy-clayey domains. We use the multi-continua formulation including full Nernst-Planck description for solute fluxes in these simulations. In addition to the heterogeneous physical parameters, as considered in scenario P, this scenario also resolves a spatially variable distribution of the electrostatic properties in the domain, homogeneous within each clay inclusion. In this study, we specifically refer to the surface charge of the porous matrix as the key electrostatic property. In each realization, we set a surface charge of 0.11 eq/kg in the clay inclusions, which is representative of the charge density of Opalinus clay (e.g., Appelo et al. 2008; 2010). In contrast, the background matrix is assumed to be charge neutral for simplicity, although sandy media can also contain charged minerals (e.g., McNeece and Hesse 2017; Stolze et al. 2020).
Physical and electrostatic heterogeneity 2 (P/E 2): This scenario is essentially an extension of the previous case (P/E 1), and the ultimate difference is associated with the distribution of surface charge density within the clay inclusions. Unlike a fixed value of surface charge as assigned in P/E 1, we generate a random distribution of this electrostatic property within each clay inclusion. In this step, we consider a range of values between 0 and 2 eq/kg, which is representative of a wide variety of clay minerals (e.g., Appelo and Postma 2005). For specific surface area (As = 37 m2/g) and fractions of free water and diffuse layer porosities (fFW = 20% and fDL = 80%) of clay, we use the values reported in Opalinus clay studies (e.g., Appelo and Wersin 2007; Appelo et al. 2008; 2010) in P/E 1 and P/E 2 scenarios.
In all three scenarios, a tortuosity of 6.25 and 2.44 is assigned in the clayey and sandy zones, respectively. Among these cases, Scenario P can be considered representative of conventional high-resolution subsurface solute transport simulations, whereas the electrostatic heterogeneity scenarios (P/E 1, P/E 2) represent a novel reactive transport description that requires a multi-continua based simulator, such as MMIT-Clay. All simulations are performed with a suite of radionuclide tracers, and Table 2 reports the composition of the initial and boundary solutions along with the self-diffusion coefficients of the solute species.
3 Results and discussion
In this section, we present the results illuminating the electrostatic controls on the transport behavior of different solute species in heterogeneous fields containing different combinations of physical and electrostatic properties (Table 1). The results obtained from the three defined scenarios (P, P/E 1, and P/E 2, Sect. 2.3) are compared across the entire ensemble of Monte Carlo realizations. We interpret and discuss the specific impacts of diffuse layer processes on solute breakthrough, mass-exchange between the low- and high-permeability zones, and contaminant storage within (and release from) the low-permeability clay inclusions.
3.1 Concentration distribution
Figure 3 shows an example of the results obtained from the multi-continua transport simulations in scenario P/E 1 for a single Monte Carlo realization. The top row panels illustrate maps of the free water concentrations, whereas the solute concentrations in the charged diffuse layer water are shown in the bottom row panels. Upon injection from the left-hand side boundary, the solute species travel along the streamlines, as illustrated in Fig. 2, and gradually enter the low permeability clay inclusions via sandy-clayey interfaces. The effects of physical heterogeneity (hydraulic conductivity and flow velocity, Fig. 2) are evident because the plumes of different solutes show clearly irregular shapes in the free water porosity. Particularly, all the tracer species in the free water domain tend to diverge around the clayey inclusions due to their considerably low hydraulic conductivity (Fig. 3a–d). This implies that the mass-transfer between the clayey inclusions and the background sandy matrix is predominantly controlled by diffusive/dispersive mechanisms.
Directly at the inclusions, the electrostatic processes occurring in the clay diffuse layer dominate the transport of different radionuclide species, leading to considerably different plume shapes for the uncharged, negatively charged, and positively charged tracers. For instance, the charge-neutral species, HTO, shows similar concentration distribution and magnitude in both the free water and diffuse layer porosities in the clay zones (Fig. 3a, e). In contrast, the anionic species (I−) tends to show relatively higher concentrations in the free water (dark red colors, Fig. 3b) and a clear depletion (e.g., by almost 3 orders of magnitude compared to the inlet concentration) in the diffuse layer concentrations (orange colors, Fig. 3f) compared to the other species. These phenomena can be explained by the fact that HTO is not affected by the diffuse layer mechanisms, as it can be present and travel similarly in both sub-porosity domains, whereas the electrostatic repulsion in the charged clay domain leads to the anion exclusion effect for I− (e.g., Gvirtzman and Gorelick 1991). The situation is opposite for the cationic tracers (22Na+ and Cs+), which show significant enrichment (up to almost ten-fold compared to HTO) in the diffuse layer (Fig. 3g, h) but relatively smaller concentration in the free water (Fig. 3c, d). This behavior is due to the electrostatic attraction of these solutes with the negatively charged clay surface.
3.2 Breakthrough curves and solute mass evolution
Figure 4 shows the flux-averaged breakthrough curves of the different tracer species at the outlet of the domain. The results are obtained in the considered heterogeneous scenarios for the entire ensemble of Monte Carlo realizations. The blue lines represent the outlet concentration profiles for the scenario considering only physical processes (P), whereas the red and green lines correspond to the scenarios including the effects of the electrostatic processes (P/E 1 and P/E 2). The difference between the two electrostatic heterogeneity scenarios stems from the fact that P/E 1 considers a uniform charge density distribution in clayey inclusions (red lines), whereas a random distribution of charge density within each clay inclusion is considered in the P/E 2 case (green lines). In each plot, the thin light-colored lines denote the results from the individual realizations of the heterogeneous fields, whereas the thick dark-colored lines in each simulation scenario represent the median of the computed breakthrough curves over the ensemble of realizations.
All four solutes show trends of smoothening of the invading and receding fronts of the temporal concentration profiles with signatures of long-term tailing, which is indicative of mass-transfer limitations in a dual-domain type system such as sandy-clayey domains. The computed breakthrough curves exemplify a consistent behavior, clearly indicating the influence of the charge driven processes on each tracer species as observed in the 2-D concentration maps (Fig. 3). For instance, HTO breakthroughs do not show any visible difference between the specific scenarios considering (P/E 1 and P/E 2) and neglecting (P) electrostatic heterogeneity, and exhibit overlap** profiles in each realization (Fig. 4a). Conversely, the effects of electrostatic interactions at the charged clay surfaces and the resulting distinct behavior between the three simulation types are clearly observed for the charged species over the entire ensemble (Fig. 4b–d). I− shows distinct patterns with relatively sharper fronts and less pronounced tailings in P/E 1 and P/E 2 compared to scenario P (Fig. 4b). The breakthroughs of the cationic species have remarkably different shapes with significantly lower peak concentrations in the simulation scenarios where charge interactions were considered (Fig. 4c, d). However, the cationic breakthroughs still exhibit less pronounced tailings behavior with much smaller concentration in P/E 1 and P/E 2 scenarios. Such tailings behavior of the ionic tracers is controlled by the electrostatic mechanisms because I− mass storage in clayey inclusions is inhibited by the anion exclusion effect, leading to lower loading and thus lower available mass to release during elution. In contrast, the electrostatic attraction in the clay’s diffuse layer enhances cationic adsorption in the inclusions and also hinders the release of the trapped 22Na+ and Cs+ from clay inclusions when concentration gradient is reversed. This leads to much smaller tailing concentrations for these cationic solutes in the electrostatic scenarios. The observed breakthrough trends can be further explained by visualizing the temporal evolution of the total solute mass within clay inclusions in the domain (Fig. 5). This quantity is calculated by integrating the solute concentrations in the free water and diffuse layer sub-continua over the entire volume of clay inclusions (Vclay):
In most cases, the stored mass in the low permeability inclusions generally shows an increasing trend, which peaks at ~ 500 days when the injection of the tracer species was turned off at the left-hand side boundary of the domain (Fig. 5). Afterwards, the solute mass gradually decreases because of the reversal of the concentration gradients due to flushing the domain with a tracer-free solution and the induced mass-transfer from the clayey inclusions to the background sandy matrix. However, the evolution of the tracer masses for different species (Fig. 5) is consistent with the observed trends in the solute breakthroughs (Fig. 4), and confirms that the diffuse layer mechanisms do not influence the mass transfer of the uncharged solute (HTO) at sandy-clayey interfaces, as reflected in the identical mass profiles of HTO in P, P/E 1 and P/E 2 scenarios (Fig. 5a). Conversely, the anion exclusion effect significantly affects the mass evolution of I− because the electrostatic repulsion within the clay’s diffuse layer hinders mass loading in low permeability zones. This is reflected in the lower extent (i.e., less than half) of the stored I− masses in P/E 1 and P/E 2 scenarios compared to scenario P (Fig. 5b).
For positively charged species (22Na+ and Cs+), the mass storage in the clay inclusions is significantly enhanced (i.e., ~ three-fold in P/E 2 and ~ five-fold in P/E 1 compared to P) when electrostatic processes were considered (Fig. 5c, d). In addition to the magnitudes, the shapes of the cationic mass profiles also considerably vary in the electrostatic scenarios (P/E 1 and P/E 2) compared to the analogous physical heterogeneity case (P) and/or other tracer species in different scenarios. Instead of a gradually decreasing pattern after 500 days, 22Na+ and Cs+ profiles appear to reach a stable plateau, which does not seem to decrease within the simulation time considered in this study (red and green lines, Fig. 5c, d). Such behavior is driven by the electrostatic forces in the charged sub-continuum, which attract positively charged ions to counterbalance the negatively charged surface of clay. Consequently, 22Na+ and Cs+ mass storage in the clayey zones is significantly enriched during the loading phase (t = 0–500 days). The predominant electrostatic attraction by the charged clay surface greatly inhibits the release of these loaded cations from the clayey inclusions upon reversal of the concentration gradient during the unloading phase (t = 500–1000 days). In scenario P, these charge-driven mechanisms were not considered, and this allowed the cations to behave as uncharged species, leading to breakthroughs and mass profiles similar to those of HTO. These electrostatic mechanisms, inducing enhanced mass storage for cations and diminished for anions, explain the observed trends in the higher peak concentrations in the cationic and relatively sharper profiles for the anionic breakthrough curves in the electrostatic scenarios (Fig. 4). Among the electrostatic heterogeneity scenarios, the effects of the heterogeneous distribution of charge density in P/E 2 are also persistently observed throughout the entire ensemble because both the solute breakthroughs (Fig. 4) and the mass temporal profiles (Fig. 5) deviate in P/E 2 compared to P/E 1. Specifically, the mass storage is comparatively lower for the cations but higher for the anion in P/E 2 compared to P/E 1, which may be due to slightly higher charge capacity, and thus enhanced cation retention, and anion exclusion effects in P/E 1.
3.3 Statistics of breakthrough concentrations and solute masses
The solute transport behavior in the different scenarios can be further analyzed by illustrating the distribution of the breakthrough concentration and solute mass populations over the entire ensemble of heterogeneous realizations. Figure 6 shows the histograms of the probability density function (pdf) for the breakthrough peak concentrations (i.e., concentration at t = 500 days, left column panels) and the final stored solute masses (i.e., loaded mass at t = 1000 days, right column panels). Similar to the breakthrough and mass temporal profiles, the pdfs of HTO tend to show an identical distribution in the three different scenarios (P, P/E 1 and P/E 2) as reflected by their overlap** histograms (Fig. 6a, b). In contrast, the pdfs of the charged species concentrations and masses are significantly different in the electrostatic heterogeneity cases compared to the analogous P scenario. For the anion I−, there is a partial overlap between the concentration and mass populations obtained from P/E 1 and P/E 2 (red and green histograms), but these distributions from the multi-continua simulations are clearly different from the one obtained from the single-continuum based simulations in P (blue histogram, Fig. 6c, d). Furthermore, the distributions for the mass and concentration datasets for the cations are clearly distinct in three different scenarios (Fig. 6e–h).
Table 3 summarizes the statistics for the concentration and mass populations. It is interesting to note that the electrostatic processes lead to a relatively wider distribution for the cations and a narrower distribution for the anion in both datasets. For instance, the computed standard deviation (SD) for the breakthrough concentrations (left panel, Fig. 6) reveals that HTO has an identical value in all cases, whereas such values are relatively smaller for I− and much higher for 22Na+ and Cs+ in the electrostatic scenarios (P/E 1 and P/E 2).
The statistical significance of these deviations in the concentration and solute mass distributions for different solutes in different scenarios can also be assessed. To this end, we perform the Wilcoxon rank sum test (5% significance level in all tests) to analyze these datasets. For HTO, the rank sum test does not show enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis for both the concentration and mass datasets, and suggests that the datasets in P vs P/E 1 (p-value = 0.93 and 0.95 for concentration and mass, respectively) and P versus P/E 2 (p-value = 0.97 and 0.96 for concentration and mass, respectively) cases indeed come from an identical continuous distribution. In contrast, the test result confirms that the corresponding datasets for I−, 22Na+, and Cs+, representing the breakthrough concentrations and solute masses from the two types of simulations neglecting (P) and including (P/E 1 and P/E 2) electrostatic processes, reject the null hypothesis and, hence, show that they are not samples from the same continuous distribution. We conclude that an explicit treatment of the charge-driven processes in clay nanopores is required to correctly characterize this electrostatically driven macroscopic transport behavior. Between the two electrostatic scenarios (P/E 1 and P/E 2), the rank sum test confirms that the datasets for 22Na+ and Cs+ are not samples from identical distributions, which is somewhat expected. Interestingly, I− datasets also suggest a clear shift between P/E 1 and P/E 2 cases by rejecting the null hypothesis, despite the partial overlaps of their mass and concentration populations.
Figure 7 summarizes the datasets of the solute mass distributions for the different heterogeneous scenarios. These box plots further confirm that HTO shows the same mass statistics with an identical median, 25%-75% bounds, and min–max limits for P, P/E 1, and P/E 2 scenarios (Fig. 7a). Conversely, the distributions of I−, 22Na+, and Cs+ masses have considerably different ranges when diffuse layer processes are active compared to scenario P, which neglects electrostatic interactions. Specifically, the anionic mass populations have relatively smaller medians with narrower distribution in both P/E 1 and P/E 2 scenarios (Fig. 7b). In fact, the standard deviation (SD) for HTO and I− reveals that HTO has an identical value in all scenarios, whereas the anion shows smaller values when charge effects are considered compared to the simulations with only physical processes (Table 3).
Furthermore, the cationic masses show an opposite trend with much higher median values in P/E 1 and P/E 2 compared to scenario P (Fig. 7c, d). Interestingly, the electrostatic heterogeneity leads to an enhancement in the variations of cationic mass distributions as reflected in their wider distributions and much higher standard deviation in P/E 1 and P/E 2 scenarios compared to the ones of the P case (Table 3). Among the electrostatic scenarios, the corresponding values of SD and the observed trends in Fig. 7 for the charged species are also consistent with the breakthrough and mass evolution behaviors reported in Figs. 4 and 5.
4 Conclusions
We have presented a stochastic analysis of subsurface solute transport simulations in two-dimensional heterogeneous sandy-clayey formations, including different combinations of spatially distributed physical and electrostatic properties. In particular, we systematically analyzed the relevance of the electrostatic effects occurring in the diffuse layer of the clay in the context of field-scale contaminant transport through a series of numerical experiments based on Monte Carlo simulations in different heterogeneous domains. The results obtained from the simulated scenarios highlighted the following key points:
-
The electrostatic interactions, resulting from the clay negatively charged surface and mainly occurring at the length scales of nano- to micrometers adjacent to the surface, are still relevant at the field scale. These microscopic Coulombic interactions have macroscale impacts on subsurface transport of charged contaminants in geologic formations with low permeability zones and/or charged porous media. Depending on the contaminant charge, its migration is strongly affected by the electrostatic attraction or repulsion within the charged diffuse layer water, thus considerably retarding or accelerating its transport, persistence, and mass storage/release behavior in clay inclusions.
-
Significant differences have been observed in breakthrough curves (up to 10% increase for the anion and 80% decrease for the cations in peak concentrations) and solute mass evolution (up to 14-fold lower and 15-fold higher stored mass in the clay inclusions for the anion and cations, respectively) when electrostatic mechanisms were explicitly considered. Moreover, the charged solutes consistently showed distinct behavior compared to the uncharged species, with a maximum relative difference of 10% and 93% for the anionic breakthrough concentrations and masses, and 80% and 1481% for the cationic breakthrough concentrations and masses, respectively, in the electrostatically heterogeneous scenarios.
-
The observed transport behavior and the associated impacts of the charge-driven mechanisms are significant not only in each individual realization, but also in a statistical average sense. The mean behavior over the ensemble of Monte Carlo realizations still retains clear signatures of the control by microscopic diffuse layer processes on macroscopic solute transport. Distinct distributions of the electrostatic properties (charge density) also led to considerably different statistical distributions of breakthrough concentrations and solute masses.
This study highlights the need for an explicit treatment of the diffuse layer processes in subsurface solute transport studies at field scales, at least when charged media such as clay are in focus. Neglecting such mechanisms can extremely under- or overpredict the behavior of charged contaminants. Multi-continua based reactive transport formulation, as used in this study, are convenient approaches to rigorously capture coupled physical and electrostatic processes, as well as the effects of the spatially variable distribution of the associated parameters. In this view, classical subsurface solute transport codes and their internal formulations may need to be further developed in order to include important microscale effects such as diffuse layer processes.
The findings of this study are relevant for a wide variety of contaminant transport problems, especially including charged solutes/contaminants and/or porous/fractured media containing charged mineral surfaces. However, the key controls of surface-charge driven mechanisms and the specific effects on contaminant transport should be thoroughly explored beyond the assumptions and limitations of the current study, such as steady state flow, dimensionality, and the lack of reactive processes. Therefore, it would be of interest to investigate the effects of dynamic water flow conditions (e.g., Haberer et al. 2012; Qi et al. 2020), fully 3-D domains involving anisotropy and complex flow topology (e.g., Chiogna et al. 2014; 2015; Ye et al. 2015b), presence of other charged minerals (e.g., Prigiobbe and Bryant 2014; McNeece and Hesse 2017; Stolze et al. 2019; Cogorno et al. 2022), biogeochemical (e.g., Bauer et al. 2009; Purkamo et al. 2022) and mineral dissolution/precipitation reactions (e.g., Tartakovsky et al. 2008; Poonoosamy et al. 2016; Soltanian et al. 2015; Fakhreddine et al. 2016; Battistel et al. 2019; 2020; Pieretti et al. 2022), multiphase flow and transport (e.g., Ahmadi et al. 2022; Muniruzzaman et al. 2021). Further extension of this approach is also envisioned in synergy with hydrogeophysical exploration (e.g., ERT, DCIP), as well as in the context of engineered remediation involving electrokinetic transport (e.g., Wu et al. 2012; Martens et al. 2021; Alizadeh et al. 2019; Sprocati et al. 2020; López-Vizcaíno et al. 2022). In addition to the developments of theoretical concepts, modeling tools and approaches, and numerical studies, we think that further high-resolution experimental investigations, specifically targeting sandy-clayey domains in laboratory setups and/or field environments, will contribute to significantly advance our capability to understand and describe mass transfer and diffuse layer processes in complex subsurface environments.
References
Adamson DT, de Blanc PC, Farhat SK, Newell CJ (2016) Implications of matrix diffusion on 1,4-dioxane persistence at contaminated groundwater sites. Sci Total Environ 562:98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.211
Ahmadi N, Muniruzzaman M, Sprocati R, Heck K, Mosthaf K, Rolle M (2022) Coupling soil/atmosphere interactions and geochemical processes: a multiphase and multicomponent reactive transport approach. Adv Water Resour 169:104303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2022.104303
Alizadeh A, ** X, Wang M (2019) Pore-scale study of ion transport mechanisms in inhomogeneously charged nanoporous rocks: impacts of interface properties on macroscopic transport. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB017200
Alt-Ep** P, Tournassat C, Rasouli P, Steefel CI, Mayer KU, Jenni A, Mäder U, Sengor SS, Fernández R (2015) Benchmark reactive transport simulations of a column experiment in compacted bentonite with multispecies diffusion and explicit treatment of electrostatic effects. Comput Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-014-9451-x
Appelo CAJ (2017) Solute transport solved with the Nernst-Planck equation for concrete pores with ‘free’ water and a double layer. Cem Concr Res 101:102–113
Appelo CAJ, Postma D (2005) Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution, 2nd edn. CRC Press
Appelo CAJ, Wersin P (2007) Multicomponent diffusion modeling in clay systems with application to the diffusion of tritium, iodide, and sodium in Opalinus clay. Environ Sci Technol 41:5002–5007
Appelo CAJ, Vinsot A, Mettler S, Wechner S (2008) Obtaining the porewater composition of a clay rock by modeling the in- and out-diffusion of anions and cations from an in-situ experiment. J Contam Hydrol 101:67–76
Appelo CAJ, Van Loon LR, Wersin P (2010) Multicomponent diffusion of a suite of tracers (HTO, Cl, Br, I, Na, Sr, Cs) in a single sample of Opalinus clay. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 74:1201–1219
Ball WP, Liu C, **a G, Young DF (1997) A diffusion-based interpretation of tetrachloroethene and trichloroethene concentration profiles in a groundwater aquitard. Water Resour Res 33(12):2741–2757
Battistel M, Muniruzzaman M, Onses F, Lee J, Rolle M (2019) Reactive fronts in chemically heterogeneous porous media: experimental and modeling investigation of pyrite oxidation. Appl Geochem 100:77–89
Battistel M, Stolze L, Muniruzzaman M, Rolle M (2020) Arsenic release and transport during oxidative dissolution of spatially-distributed sulfide minerals. J Hazard Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124651
Bauer RD, Rolle M, Bauer S, Eberhardt C, Grathwohl P, Kolditz O, Meckenstock RU, Griebler C (2009) Enhanced biodegradation by hydraulic heterogeneities in petroleum hydrocarbon plumes. J Contam Hydrol 105:56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCONHYD.2008.11.004
Bianchi M, Liu H-H, Birkholzer JT (2013) Equivalent diffusion coefficient of clay-rich geological formations: comparison between numerical and analytical estimates. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27:1081–1091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-012-0646-1
Birgersson M, Karnland O (2009) Ion equilibrium between montmorillonite interlayer space and an external solution—consequences for diffusional transport. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 73:1908–1923
Boudreau BP, Meysman FJR, Middelburg JJ (2004) Multicomponent ionic diffusion in porewaters: coulombic effects revisited. Earth Planet Sci Lett 222:653–666
Bourg IC, Beckingham LE, DePaolo DJ (2015) The nanoscale basis of CO2 trap** for geologic storage. Environ Sci Technol 49(17):10265–10284. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03003
Chapman SW, Parker BL (2005) Plume persistence due to aquitard back diffusion following dense nonaqueous phase liquid removal or isolation. Water Resour Res 41(12):W12411
Chapman SW, Parker BL, Sale TC, Doner LA (2012) Testing high resolution numerical models for analysis of contaminant storage and release from low permeability zones. J Contam Hydrol 136–137:106–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2012.04.006
Charlet L, Alt-Ep** P, Wersin P, Gilbert B (2017) Diffusive transport and reaction in clay rocks: a storage (nuclear waste, CO2, H2), energy (shale gas) and water quality issue. Adv Water Resour 106:39–59
Cherry JA, Parker BL, Bradbury KR, Eaton TT, Gotkowitz MG, Hart DJ, Borchardt MA (2004) Role of aquitards in the protection of aquifers from contamination: a “state of the science” report. Awwa Research Foundation, Denver, Colorado
Chiogna G, Eberhardt C, Grathwohl P, Cirpka OA, Rolle M (2010) Evidence of compound-dependent hydrodynamic and mechanical transverse dispersion by multitracer laboratory experiments. Environ Sci Technol 44:688–693
Chiogna G, Cirpka OA, Grathwohl P, Rolle M (2011) Relevance of local compound-specific transverse dispersion for conservative and reactive mixing in heterogeneous porous media. Water Resour Res 47:W06515. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010270
Chiogna G, Rolle M, Bellin A, Cirpka OA (2014) Helicity and flow topology in three-dimensional anisotropic porous media. Adv Water Resour 73:134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.06.017
Chiogna G, Cirpka OA, Rolle M, Bellin A (2015) Helical flow in three-dimensional nonstationary anisotropic heterogeneous porous media. Water Resour Res 50:261–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015331
Cirpka OA, Frind EO, Helmig R (1999a) Streamline-oriented grid generation for transport modelling in two-dimensional domains including wells. Adv Water Resour 22:697–710
Cirpka OA, Frind EO, Helmig R (1999b) Numerical methods for reactive transport on rectangular and streamline-oriented grids. Adv Water Resour 22:711–728
Cogorno J, Stolze L, Muniruzzaman M, Rolle M (2022) Dimensionality effects on multicomponent ionic transport and surface complexation in porous media. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 318:230–246 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2021.11.037
Cussler EL (2009) Diffusion: mass transfer in fluid systems. Cambridge University Press
Dagan G (2004) On application of stochastic modeling of groundwater flow and transport. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 18:266–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-004-0191-7
Descostes M, Blin V, Bazer-Bachi F, Meier P, Grenut B, Radwan J, Schlegel ML, Buschaert S, Coelho D, Tevissen E (2008) Diffusion of anionic species in Callovo-Oxfordian argillites and Oxfordian limestones (Meuse/Haute–Marne, France). Appl Geochem 23:655–677
Donnan EG, Guggenheim EA (1932) Die genaue thermodynamik der membran-gleichgewichte. Z Phys Chem 162:346–360
Dykaar BB, Kitanidis PK (1992) Determination of the effective hydraulic conductivity for heterogeneous porous media using a numerical spectral approach: 1 method. Water Resour Res 28:1155–1166
Eckert D, Rolle M, Cirpka OA (2012) Numerical simulation of isotope fractionation in steady-state bioreactive transport controlled by transverse mixing. J Contam Hydrol 140–141:95–106
Fakhreddine S, Lee J, Kitanidis PK, Fendorf S, Rolle M (2016) Imaging geochemical heterogeneities using inverse reactive transport modeling: an example relevant for characterizing arsenic mobilization and distribution. Adv Water Resour 88:186–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.12.005
Falta RW, Wang W (2017) A semi-analytical method for simulating matrix diffusion in numerical transport models. J Contam Hydrol 197:39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2016.12.007
Felmy AR, Weare JH (1991) Calculation of multicomponent ionic diffusion from zero to high concentration: I. The system Na–K–Ca–Mg–Cl–SO4–H2O at 25 °C. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 55:113–131
Fiori A, Jankovic I, Dagan G (2003) Flow and transport through two-dimensional isotropic media of binary conductivity distribution. Part 1: NUMERICAL methodology and semi-analytical solutions. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 17:370–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-003-0166-0
Giambalvo ER, Steefel CI, Fisher AT, Rosenberg ND, Wheat CG (2002) Effect of fluid-sediment reaction on hydrothermal fluxes of major elements, eastern flank of the Juan de Fuca Ridge. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 66:1739–1757
Gimmi T, Alt-Ep** P (2018) Simulating Donnan equilibria based on the Nernst–Planck equation. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 232:1–13
Gimmi T, Kosakowski G (2011) How mobile are sorbed cations in clays and clay rocks? Environ Sci Technol 45:1443–1449
Glaus MA, Baeyens B, Bradbury MH, Jakob A, Van Loon LR, Yaroshchuk A (2007) Diffusion of 22Na and 85Sr in montmorillonite: evidence of interlayer diffusion being the dominant pathway at high compaction. Environ Sci Technol 41:478–485
Glaus MA, Birgersson M, Karnland O, Van Loon LR (2013) Seeming steady-state uphill diffusion of Na-22(+) in compacted montmorillonite. Environ Sci Technol 47:11522–11527. https://doi.org/10.1021/es401968c
Guedes de Carvalho JRF, Delgado JMPQ (2005) Overall map and correlation of dispersion data for flow through granular packed beds. Chem Eng Sci 60:365–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2004.07.121
Gusawa AJ, Freyberg DL (2000) Slow advection through low permeability inclusions. J Contam Hydrol 46:205–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(00)00136-4
Gvirtzman H, Gorelick SM (1991) Dispersion and advection in unsaturated porous media enhanced by anion exclusion. Nature 352:793–795
Haberer CM, Rolle M, Cirpka OA, Grathwohl P (2012) Oxygen transfer in a fluctuating capillary fringe. Vadose Zone J. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2011.0056
Hazen A (1892) Some physical properties of sands and gravels special reference to their use in filtration. Ann Rep State Board Health Mass 24:541–556
Healy RW, Haile SS, Parkhurst DL, Charlton SR (2018) VS2DRTI: simulating heat and reactive solute transport in variably saturated porous media. Groundwater 56:810–815. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12640
Huang P-W, Flemisch B, Qin C-Z, Saar MO, Ebigbo A (2022) Validating the Nernst–Planck transport model under reaction-driven flow conditions using RetroPy v1.0, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1205
Jankovic I, Fiori A, Dagan G (2003) Flow and transport through two-dimensional isotropic media of binary conductivity distribution. Part 2: NUMERICAL simulations and comparison with theoretical results. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 17:384–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-003-0167-z
Jara D, de Dreuzy JR, Cochepin B (2017) TReacLab: an object-oriented implementation of non-intrusive splitting methods to couple independent transport and geochemical software. Comput Geosci 109:281–294
Jougnot D, Revil A, Leroy P (2009) Diffusion of ionic tracers in the Callovo-Oxfordian clay-rock using the Donnan equilibrium model and the formation factor. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 73:2712–2726
Kurotori T, Zahasky C, Hejazi S, Shah S, Benson SM, Pini R (2019) Measuring, imaging and modelling solute transport in a microporous limestone. Chem Eng Sci 196:366–383
LaBolle EM, Fogg GE (2001) Role of molecular diffusion in contaminant migration and recovery in alluvial aquifer system. Transp Porous Med 42:155–179
Lee J, Rolle M, Kitanidis PK (2018) Longitudinal dispersion coefficients for numerical modeling of groundwater solute transport in heterogeneous formations. J Contam Hydrol 212:41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2017.09.004
Leroy P, Revil A, Coelho D (2006) Diffusion of ionic species in bentonite. J Colloid Interface Sci 296:248–255
Liu C, Ball WP (2002) Back diffusion of chlorinated solvent contaminants from a natural aquitard to a remediated aquifer under well-controlled field conditions: predictions and measurements. Groundwater 40(2):175–184
Liu H, Bodvarsson G, Zhang G (2004) Scale dependency of the effective matrix diffusion coefficient. Vadose Zone J 3(1):312–315
Liu C, Shang J, Zachara JM (2011) Multispecies diffusion models: a study of uranyl species diffusion. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010575
López-Vizcaíno R, Cabrera V, Sprocati R, Muniruzzaman M, Rolle M, Navarro V, Yustres A (2022) A modeling approach for electrokinetic transport in double-porosity media. Electrochim Acta 431:141139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2022.141139
Marble JC, Carroll KC, Janousek H, Brusseau ML (2010) In situ oxidation and associated mass-flux-reduction/mass-removal behavior for systems with organic liquid located in lower-permeability sediments. J Contam Hydrol 117(1–4):82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2010.07.002
Martens E, Prommer H, Sprocati R, Sun J, Dai X, Crane R, Jamieson J, Tong PO, Rolle M, Fourie A (2021) Toward a more sustainable mining future with electrokinetic in situ leaching. Sci Adv 7(18):eabf9971. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf9971
McNeece CJ, Hesse MA (2017) Challenges in coupling acidity and salinity transport. Environ Sci Technol 51(20):11799–11808
Mosthaf K, Rolle M, Petursdottir U, Aamand J, Jørgensen PR (2021) Transport of tracers and pesticides through fractured clayey till: large undisturbed column experiments and model‐based interpretation. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028019
Muniruzzaman M, Rolle M (2015) Impact of multicomponent ionic transport on pH fronts propagation in saturated porous media. Water Resour Res 51:6739–6755
Muniruzzaman M, Rolle M (2016) Modeling multicomponent ionic transport in groundwater with IPhreeqc coupling: electrostatic interactions and geochemical reactions in homogeneous and heterogeneous domains. Adv Water Resour 98:1–15
Muniruzzaman M, Rolle M (2017) Experimental investigation of the impact of compound-specific dispersion and electrostatic interactions on transient transport and solute breakthrough. Water Resour Res 53:1189–1209. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019727
Muniruzzaman M, Rolle M (2019) Multicomponent ionic transport modeling in physically and electrostatically heterogeneous porous media with PhreeqcRM coupling for geochemical reactions. Water Resour Res 55:11121–11143. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026373
Muniruzzaman M, Rolle M (2021) Impact of diffuse layer processes on contaminant forward and back diffusion in heterogeneous sandy-clayey domains. J Contam Hydrol 237:103754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2020.103754
Muniruzzaman M, Haberer CM, Grathwohl P, Rolle M (2014) Multicomponent ionic dispersion during transport of electrolytes in heterogeneous porous media: experiments and model-based interpretation. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 141:656–669
Muniruzzaman M, Karlsson T, Ahmadi N, Rolle M (2020) Multiphase and multicomponent simulation of acid mine drainage in unsaturated mine waste: modeling approach, benchmarks and application examples. Appl Geochem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2020.104677
Muniruzzaman M, Karlsson T, Ahmadi N, Kauppila PM, Kauppila T, Rolle M (2021) Weathering of unsaturated waste rocks from Kevitsa and Hitura mines: pilot-scale lysimeter experiments and reactive transport modeling. Appl Geochem 130:104984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2021.104984
Muskus N, Falta RW (2018) Semi-analytical method for matrix diffusion in heterogeneous and fractured systems with parent-daughter reactions. J Contam Hydrol 218:94–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2018.10.002
Muurinen A, Karnland O, Lehikoinen J (2004) Ion concentration caused by an external solution into the porewater of compacted bentonite. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 29:119–127
Nagra (2002) Project Opalinus clay. Safety report: demonstration of disposal feasibility for spent fuel, vitrified high‐level waste and long-lived intermediate‐level waste (Entsorgungsnachweiss). Nagra Technical Report NTB 02–05, Wettingen, Switzerland
Nichols G (2009) Sedimentology and stratigraphy, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, pp 419
Parker JC, Kim U (2015) An upscaled approach for transport in media with extended tailing due to back-diffusion using analytical and numerical solutions of the advection dispersion equation. J Contam Hydrol 182:157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2015.09.008
Parker BL, Cherry JA, Chapman SW (2004) Field study of TCE diffusion profiles below DNAPL to assess aquitard integrity. J Contam Hydrol 74(1):197–230
Parker BL, Chapman SW, Guilbeault MA (2008) Plume persistence caused by back diffusion from thin clay layers in a sand aquifer following TCE source-zone hydraulic isolation. J Contam Hydrol 102:86–104
Parkhurst DL, Appelo CAJ (2013) USGS—Description of input and examples for PHREEQC version 3—a computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations. Accessed 10 June 2019 https://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/06/a43/
Parkhurst DL, Wissmeier L (2015) PhreeqcRM: a reaction module for transport simulators based on the geochemical model PHREEQC. Adv Water Resour 83:176–189
Petrova E, Meierdierks J, Finkel M, Grathwohl, (2023) Legacy pollutants in fractured aquifers: analytical approximations for back diffusion to predict atrazine concentrations under uncertainty. J Contam Hydrol 25:104161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2023.104161
Pieretti M, Karlsson T, Arvilommi S, Muniruzzaman M (2022) Challenges in predicting the reactivity of mine waste rocks based on kinetic testing: humidity cell tests and reactive transport modeling. J Geochem Explr 237:106996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2022.106996
Poonoosamy J, Curti E, Kosakowski G, Grolimund D, Van Loon LR, Mäder U (2016) Barite precipitation following celestite dissolution in a porous medium: a SEM/BSE and μ-XRD/XRF study. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 182:131–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2016.03.011
Posiva (2008) Safety case plan 2008, Posiva Report 2008‐05. http://www.posiva.fi/files/490/POSIVA_2008‐05_28.8web.pdf
Prigiobbe V, Bryant SL (2014) pH-dependent transport of metal cations in porous media. Environ Sci Technol 48(7):3752–3759
Purkamo L, von Ahn CME, Jilbert T, Muniruzzaman M, Bange HW, Jenner A-K, Böttcher ME, Virtasalo JJ (2022) Impact of submarine groundwater discharge on biogeochemistry and microbial communities in pockmarks. Geochem Cosmochim Acta 334:14–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2022.06.040
Qi S, Luo J, O’Connor D, Cao X, Hou D (2020) Influence of groundwater table fluctuation on the non-equilibrium transport of volatile organic contaminants in the vadose zone. J Hydrol 580:124353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124353
Rasa E, Chapman SW, Bekins BA, Fogg GE, Scow KM, Mackay DM (2011) Role of back diffusion and biodegradation reactions in sustaining an MTBE/TBA plume in alluvial media. J Contam Hydrol 126:235–247
Rasouli P, Steefel CI, Mayer KU, Rolle M (2015) Benchmarks for multicomponent diffusion and electrochemical migration. Comput Geosci 19:523–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-015-9481-z
Rezaei A, Zhan H, Zare M (2013) Impact of thin aquitards on two-dimensional solute transport in an aquifer. J Contam Hydrol 152:117–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2013.06.008
Rolle M, Hochstetler D, Chiogna G, Kitanidis PK, Grathwohl P (2012) Experimental investigation and pore-scale modeling interpretation of compound-specific transverse dispersion in porous media. Transp Porous Med 93:347–362
Rolle M, Chiogna G, Hochstetler DL, Kitanidis PK (2013a) On the importance of diffusion and compound-specific mixing for groundwater transport: an investigation from pore to field scale. J Contam Hydrol 153:51–68
Rolle M, Muniruzzaman M, Haberer CM, Grathwohl P (2013b) Coulombic effects in advection-dominated transport of electrolytes in porous media: multicomponent ionic dispersion. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 120:195–205
Rolle M, Sprocati R, Masi M, ** B, Muniruzzaman M (2018) Nernst–Planck-based description of transport, coulombic interactions, and geochemical reactions in porous media: modeling approach and benchmark experiments. Water Resour Res 54:3176–3195
Rosenberg L, Mosthaf K, Broholm MM, Fjordbøge AS, Tuxen N, Kerrn-Jespersen IH, Rønde V, Bjerg PL (2023) A novel concept for estimating the contaminant mass discharge of chlorinated ethenes emanating from clay till sites. J Contam Hydrol 252:104121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2022.104121
Rubin Y, Cushey MA, Bellin A (1994) Modeling of transport in groundwater for environmental risk assessment. Stoch Hydrol Hydraul 8:57–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581390
Sale TC, Zimbron JA, Dandy DS (2008) Effects of reduced contaminant loading on downgradient water quality in an idealized two-layer granular porous media. J Contam Hydrol 102:72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.08.002
Seyedabbasi MA, Newell CJ, Adamson DT, Thomas C, Sale TC (2012) Relative contribution of DNAPL dissolution and matrix diffusion to the long-term persistence of chlorinated solvent source zones. J Contam Hydrol 134–135:69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2012.03.010
Soler JM, Steefel CI, Gimmi T, Leupin OX, Cloet V (2019) Modeling the ionic strength effect on diffusion in clay. The DR-A experiment at Mont Terri. ACS Earth Space Chem 3:442–451
Soltanian MR, Ritzi RW, Dai Z, Huang CC (2015) Reactive solute transport in physically and chemically heterogeneous porous media with multimodal reactive mineral facies: the Lagrangian approach. Chemosphere 122:235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.11.064
Song J, Zhang D (2013) Comprehensive review of caprock-sealing mechanisms for geologic carbon sequestration. Environ Sci Technol 47(1):9–22. https://doi.org/10.1021/es301610p
Sposito G (1992) The diffuse-ion swarm near smectite particles suspended in 1:1 electrolyte solutions: modified Gouy-Chapman theory and quasicrystal formation. In: Güven N, Pollastro RM (eds) Clay-water interface and its rheological implications. Clay Minerals Society, pp 127–156
Sprocati R, Masi M, Muniruzzaman M, Rolle M (2019) Modeling electrokinetic transport and biogeochemical reactions in porous media: a multidimensional Nernst–Planck–Poisson approach with PHREEQC coupling. Adv Water Resour 127:134–147
Sprocati R, Flyvbjerg J, Tuxen RM (2020) Process-based modeling of electrokinetic enhanced bioremediation of chlorinated ethenes. J Hazard Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122787
Stolze L, Zhang D, Guo H, Rolle M (2019) Surface complexation modeling of arsenic mobilization from goethite: Interpretation of an in-situ experiment. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 248:274–288
Stolze L, Wagner JB, Damsgaard CD, Rolle M (2020) Impact of surface complexation and electrostatic interactions on pH front propagation in silica porous media. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2020.03.016
Sundell J, Haaf E, Tornberg J, Rosén L (2019) Comprehensive risk assessment of groundwater drawdown induced subsidence. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 33:427–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-01647-x
Tachi Y, Yotsuji K (2014) Diffusion and sorption of Cs+, Na+, I− and HTO in compacted sodium montmorillonite as a function of porewater salinity: integrated sorption and diffusion model. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 132:75–93
Tartakovsky AM, Redden G, Lichtner PC, Scheibe TD, Meakin P (2008) Mixing- induced precipitation: experimental study and multiscale numerical analysis. Water Resour Res 44:W06s04. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005725
Tatti F, Papini MP, Raboni M, Viotti P (2016) Image analysis procedure for studying back-diffusion phenomena from low-permeability layers in laboratory tests. Sci Rep 6:30400. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30400
Tatti F, Papini MP, Sappa G, Raboni M, Arjmand F, Viotti P (2018) Contaminant back-diffusion from low-permeability layers as affected by groundwater velocity: a laboratory investigation by box model and image analysis. Sci Total Environ 622–623:164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.347
Tatti F, Papini MP, Torretta V, Mancini G, Boni MR, Viotti P (2019) Experimental and numerical evaluation of groundwater circulation wells as a remediation technology for persistent, low permeability contaminant source zones. J Contam Hydrol 222:89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2019.03.001
Tertre E, Delville A, Prêt D, Hubert F, Ferrage E (2015) Cation diffusion in the interlayer space of swelling clay minerals: a combined macroscopic and microscopic study. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 149:251–267
Tertre E, Savoye S, Hubert F, Prêt D, Dabat T, Ferrage E (2018) Diffusion of water through the dual-porosity swelling clay mineral vermiculite. Environ Sci Technol 52:1899–1907
Tinnacher RM, Holmboe M, Tournassat C, Bourg IC, Davis JA (2016) Ion adsorption and diffusion in smectite: molecular, pore, and continuum scale views. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 177:130–149
Tournassat C, Appelo CAJ (2011) Modelling approaches for anion-exclusion in compacted Na-bentonite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 75:3698–3710
Tournassat C, Steefel CI (2015) Ionic transport in nano-porous clays with consideration of electrostatic effects. Rev Miner Geochem 80:287–329
Tournassat C, Steefel CI (2019) Reactive transport modeling of coupled processes in nanoporous media. Rev Miner Geochem 85(1):75–109
Trinchero P, Nardi A, Silva O, Bruch P (2022) Simulating electrochemical migration and anion exclusion in porous and fractured media using PFLOTRANNP. Comput Geosci 166:105166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105166
Van Loon LR, Glaus MA, Müller W (2007) Anion exclusion effects in compacted bentonites: towards a better understanding of anion diffusion. Appl Geochem 22:2536–2552
Wersin P, Gimmi T, Mazurek M, Alt-Ep** P, Pękala M, Traber D (2018) Multicomponent diffusion in a 280 m thick argillaceous rock sequence. Appl Geochem 95:110–123
Wersin P, Mazurek M, Gimmi T (2022) Porewater chemistry of Opaninus clay revisited: findings from 25 years of data collection at the Mont Terri rock laboratory. Appl Geochem 138:105234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2022.105234
Werth CJ, Cirpka OA, Grathwohl P (2006) Enhanced mixing and reaction through flow focusing in heterogeneous porous media. Water Resour Res 42:W12414. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004511
Wigger C, Van Loon LR (2017) Importance of interlayer equivalent pores for anion diffusion in clay-rich sedimentary rocks. Environ Sci Technol 51:1998–2006
Wu MZ, Reynolds DA, Fourie A, Prommer H, Thomas DG (2012) Electrokinetic in situ oxidation remediation: Assessment of parameter sensitivities and the influence of aquifer heterogeneity on remediation efficiency. J Contam Hydrol 136–137:72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2012.04.005
Yang M, Annable MD, Jawitz JW (2014) Light reflection visualization to determine solute diffusion into clays. J Contam Hydrol 161:1–9
Yang M, Annable MD, Jawitz JW (2015) Back diffusion from thin low permeability zones. Environ Sci Technol 49:415–422
Yang M, Annable MD, Jawitz JW (2016) Solute source depletion control of forward and back diffusion through low-permeability zones. J Contam Hydrol 193:54–62
Yang M, Annable MD, Jawitz JW (2017) Field-scale forward and back diffusion through low-permeability zones. J Contam Hydrol 202:47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2017.05.001
Ye Y, Chiogna G, Cirpka O, Grathwohl P, Rolle M (2015a) Experimental investigation of compound-specific dilution of solute plumes in saturated porous media: 2-D vs. 3-D flow-through systems. J Contam Hydrol 172:33–47
Ye Y, Chiogna G, Cirpka OA, Grathwohl P, Rolle M (2015b) Experimental evidence of helical flow in porous media. Phys Rev Lett 115(19):194502
Zhan H, Wen Z, Huang G, Sun D (2009) Analytical solution of two-dimensional solute transport in an aquifer–aquitard system. J Contam Hydrol 107(3–4):162–174
Zhang X, Chen J, Hu BX, Yu Y, So J, Zhang J, Dai Z, Yin S, Soltanian MR, Ren W (2020) Application of risk assessment in determination of soil remediation targets. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 34:1659–1673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01857-2
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the support of the Independent Research Fund Denmark (EK-Rem project, DFF 1127-00013B), the internal funding from the Geological Survey of Finland (HyGlo project), and the Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation (Grant no. 220021). We also acknowledge the constructive comments from two anonymous reviewers.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by Geological Survey of Finland (GTK, GTK Mintec). The study was supported by the Independent Research Fund Denmark (EK-Rem project, DFF 1127-00013B), the internal funding from the Geological Survey of Finland (HyGlo project), and the Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation (Grant No. 220021)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MM performed the simulations and wrote the original draft of the manuscript. Both MM and MR contributed to the conceptualization, design, analysis, and review of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Muniruzzaman, M., Rolle, M. Relevance of charge interactions for contaminant transport in heterogeneous formations: a stochastic analysis. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 37, 4399–4416 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02514-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02514-0