Log in

Defining surgical risk in octogenarians undergoing paraesophageal hernia repair

  • 2023 SAGES Oral
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

With an aging population, the utility of surgery in elderly patients, particularly octogenarians, is of increasing interest. The goal of this study was to analyze outcomes of octogenarians versus non-octogenarians undergoing paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHR).

Methods

The Nationwide Readmission Database was queried for patients > 18 years old who underwent PEHR from 2016 to 2018. Exclusion criteria included a diagnosis of gastrointestinal malignancy or a concurrent bariatric procedure. Patients ≥ 80 were compared to those 18–79 years old using standard statistical methods, and subgroup analyses of elective and non-elective PEHRs were performed.

Results

From 2016 to 2018, 46,450 patients were identified with 5425 (11.7%) octogenarians and 41,025 (88.3%) non-octogenarians. Octogenarians were more likely to have a non-elective operation (46.3% vs 18.2%, p < 0.001), and those undergoing non-elective PEHR had a higher mortality (5.5% vs 1.2%, p < 0.001). Outcomes were improved with elective PEHR, but octogenarians still had higher mortality (1.3% vs 0.2%, p < 0.001), longer LOS (3[2, 5] vs 2[1, 3] days, p < 0.001), and higher readmission rates within 30 days (11.1% vs 6.5%, p < 0.001) compared to non-octogenarian elective patients. Multivariable logistic regression showed that being an octogenarian was not independently predictive of mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.373[95% confidence interval 0.962–1.959], p = 0.081), but a non-elective operation was (OR 3.180[2.492–4.057], p < 0.001). Being an octogenarian was a risk factor for readmission within 30 days (OR 1.512[1.348–1.697], p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Octogenarians represented a substantial proportion of patients undergoing PEHR and were more likely to undergo a non-elective operation. Being an octogenarian was not an independent predictor of perioperative mortality, but a non-elective operation was. Octogenarians' morbidity and mortality was reduced in elective procedures but was still higher than non-octogenarians. Elective PEHR in octogenarians is reasonable but should involve a thorough risk–benefit analysis.

Visual abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Skinner DB, Belsey RH (1967) Surgical management of esophageal reflux and hiatus hernia. Long-term results with 1,030 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 53(1):33–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hill LD (1973) Incarcerated paraesophageal hernia. A surgical emergency. Am J Surg 126(2):286–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(73)80165-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hallissey MT, Ratliff DA, Temple JG (1992) Paraoesophageal hiatus hernia: surgery for all ages. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 74(1):23–25

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Stylopoulos N, Gazelle GS, Rattner DW (2002) Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation? Ann Surg 236(4):492–500; discussion 500–501. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200210000-00012.

  5. Schlottmann F, Strassle PD, Allaix ME, Patti MG (2017) Paraesophageal hernia repair in the USA: trends of utilization stratified by surgical volume and consequent impact on perioperative outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 21(8):1199–1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3469-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sorial RK, Ali M, Kaneva P, Fiore JF Jr, Vassiliou M, Fried GM, Feldman LS, Ferri LE, Lee L, Mueller CL (2020) Modern era surgical outcomes of elective and emergency giant paraesophageal hernia repair at a high-volume referral center. Surg Endosc 34(1):284–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06764-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019) World population prospects 2019: highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/423). https://population.un.org/wpp/publications/files/wpp2019_highlights.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2023.

  8. Jaul E, Barron J (2017) Age-related diseases and clinical and public health implications for the 85 years old and over population. Front Public Health 11(5):335. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sfara A, Dumitrascu DL (2019) The management of hiatal hernia: an update on diagnosis and treatment. Med Pharm Rep 92(4):321–325. https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-1323

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Poulose BK, Gosen C, Marks JM, Khaitan L, Rosen MJ, Onders RP, Trunzo JA, Ponsky JL (2008) Inpatient mortality analysis of paraesophageal hernia repair in octogenarians. J Gastrointest Surg 12(11):1888–1892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0625-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Straatman J, Groen LCB, van der Wielen N, Jansma EP, Daams F, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL (2018) Treatment of paraesophageal hiatal hernia in octogenarians: a systematic review and retrospective cohort study. Dis Esophagus. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doy010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Staerkle RF, Rosenblum I, Köckerling F, Adolf D, Bittner R, Kirchhoff P, Lehmann FS, Hoffmann H, Glauser PM (2019) Outcome of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair in octogenarians: a registry-based, propensity score-matched comparison of 360 patients. Surg Endosc 33(10):3291–3299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06619-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Damani T, Ray JJ, Farag M, Shah PC (2022) Elective paraesophageal hernia repair in elderly patients: an analysis of ACS-NSQIP database for contemporary morbidity and mortality. Surg Endosc 36(2):1407–1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08425-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2022) Healthcare cost and utilization project. NRD Overview. www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nrdoverview.jsp. Accessed 22 Feb 2023.

  15. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative STROBE (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370(9596):1453–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jassim H, Seligman JT, Frelich M, Goldblatt M, Kastenmeier A, Wallace J, Zhao HS, Szabo A, Gould JC (2014) A population-based analysis of emergent versus elective paraesophageal hernia repair using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Surg Endosc 28(12):3473–3478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3626-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Schulman AR, Dolan R, Abougergi MS, Telem D, Cohen-Mekelburg S (2020) Impact of fragmentation on rehospitalization after bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 35(1):291–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07395-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ayuso SA, Colavita PD, Augenstein VA, Aladegbami BG, Nayak RB, Davis BR, Janis JE, Fischer JP, Heniford BT (2022) Nationwide increase in component separation without concomitant rise in readmissions: a nationwide readmissions database analysis. Surgery 171(3):799–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.09.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ayuso SA, Katzen MM, Aladegbami BG, Nayak RB, Augenstein VA, Heniford BT, Colavita PD (2022) Nationwide readmissions analysis of minimally invasive versus open ventral hernia repair: a retrospective population-based study. Am Surg 88(3):463–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348211050835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, Saunders LD, Beck CA, Feasby TE, Ghali WA (2005) Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 43(11):1130–1139. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Storesund A, Haugen AS, Hjortås M, Nortvedt MW, Flaatten H, Eide GE, Boermeester MA, Sevdalis N, Søfteland E (2019) Accuracy of surgical complication rate estimation using ICD-10 codes. Br J Surg 106(3):236–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sherrill W 3rd, Rossi I, Genz M, Matthews BD, Reinke CE (2021) Non-elective paraesophageal hernia repair: surgical approaches and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 35(7):3405–3411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07782-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Parker DM, Rambhajan AA, Horsley RD, Johanson K, Gabrielsen JD, Petrick AT (2017) Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair is safe in elderly patients. Surg Endosc 31(3):1186–1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5089-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Merkow RP, Ju MH, Chung JW, Hall BL, Cohen ME, Williams MV, Tsai TC, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY (2015) Underlying reasons associated with hospital readmission following surgery in the United States. JAMA 313(5):483–495. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.18614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsai TC, Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Gawande AA, Jha AK (2013) Variation in surgical-readmission rates and quality of hospital care. N Engl J Med 369(12):1134–1142. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1303118

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Elhage SA, Kao AM, Katzen M, Shao JM, Prasad T, Augenstein VA, Heniford BT, Colavita PD (2022) Outcomes and CT scan three-dimensional volumetric analysis of emergent paraesophageal hernia repairs: predicting patients who will require emergent repair. Surg Endosc 36(2):1650–1656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08415-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schlosser KA, Maloney SR, Prasad T, Colavita PD, Augenstein VA, Heniford BT (2020) Three-dimensional hernia analysis: the impact of size on surgical outcomes. Surg Endosc 34(4):1795–1801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06931-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Elhage SA, Deerenberg EB, Ayuso SA, Murphy KJ, Shao JM, Kercher KW, Smart NJ, Fischer JP, Augenstein VA, Colavita PD, Heniford BT (2021) Development and validation of image-based deep learning models to predict surgical complexity and complications in abdominal wall reconstruction. JAMA Surg 156(10):933–940. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3012

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ayuso SA, Elhage SA, Zhang Y, Aladegbami BG, Gersin KS, Fischer JP, Augenstein VA, Colavita PD, Heniford BT (2023) Predicting rare outcomes in abdominal wall reconstruction using image-based deep learning models. Surgery 173(3):748–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2022.06.048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jalilvand AD, Jones EL, Martin Del Campo SE, Perry KA (2020) Octogenarians exhibit quality of life improvement but increased morbidity after paraesophageal hernia repair. Am J Surg 219(6):958–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Todd Heniford.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Paul Colavita has an investigator-initiated research grant with Medtronic. Dr. Vedra Augenstein receives speaking honoraria from Medtronic, Allergan, Intuitive, Acelity, and Bard. Dr. Todd Heniford receives surgical research and education grants and speaking honoraria from WL Gore and previously from Allergan. Dr. Hadley Wilson, Dr. Sullivan Ayuso, Ms. Mikayla Rose, Mr. Dau Ku, and Mr. Gregory Scarola have no disclosures to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilson, H.H., Ayuso, S.A., Rose, M. et al. Defining surgical risk in octogenarians undergoing paraesophageal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 37, 8644–8654 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10270-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10270-z

Keywords

Navigation