Abstract
Introduction
Repair of giant paraesophageal hernia (PEH) has historically been associated with significant morbidity and mortality such that elective repair is only offered to symptomatic patients. Recent reports suggest modern era outcomes have improved such that elective repair may now be safer than historically thought. Furthermore, the morbidity of emergency surgery may still be significant. These changes may have important implications for patient selection for elective repair.
The objectives of this study were to determine and compare modern era surgical outcomes after elective and emergency repair of giant PEHs at a high-volume tertiary care center.
Methods
A retrospective review was conducted for all Type II–IV giant PEH repairs performed between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2017. Type 1 hiatal hernias, fundoplication for reflux, and any co-surgery other than cholecystectomy were excluded from the final analysis. Baseline patient demographics, operative details, postoperative complications within 30 days and in-hospital or 30-day mortality were tabulated from the electronic medical record. Data were reported as median (interquartile range) unless otherwise specified.
Results
A total of 352 cases were reviewed, of which 204 met inclusion criteria (18 emergency, 186 elective). Eight had Type II PEH, 146 had Type III, and 50 had Type IV. Median length of stay was shorter in the elective group [1 (1) day elective vs. 5 (7) days emergency, p < 0.0001], and emergency patients were less likely to return directly to their original residence at discharge (13, 72% emergency vs 185, 99.4% elective, p < 0.0001). There were significantly more major complications (Clavien–Dindo score ≥ 3) in the emergency group (5, 28% emergency vs. 10, 5% elective, p = 0.005). There were no perioperative deaths in either group. Morbidity and mortality in both groups were less than historically reported.
Conclusions
Informed consent discussions and patient selection for repair of giant PEHs should reflect modern era and institution-specific outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schlottmann F, Strassle PD, Farrell TM, Patti MG (2017) Minimally invasive surgery should be the standard of care for paraesophageal hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg 21(5):778–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3345-2
Gantert W, Arcerito M et al (1997) Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias. J Am Coll Surg 186(4):428–432
Diaz S, Brunt LM, Klingensmith ME et al (2003) Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair, a challenging operation: medium-term outcome of 116 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 7(1):59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1091-255x(02)00151-8
Stylopoulos N, Gazelle GS, Rattner DW (2002) Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation? Ann Surg 236(4):492–501. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200210000-00012
Pitcher DE, Curet MJ, Martin DT, Diana M, Mason MAJJ, Zucker KA (1995) Successful laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Arch Surg 130:590–596
Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter J et al (2006) Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 244(4):481–488. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000237759.42831.03
Polomsky M, Jones CE, Sepesi B et al (2010) Should elective repair of intrathoracic stomach be encouraged? J Gastrointest Surg 14(2):203–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-1106-1
Mueller C, Fried G (2016) Emerging technologies in surgery. In: Townsend C (ed) Sabiston’s textbook of surgery, the biological basis of modern surgical practice, 20th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Bruns SD, Davis BR, Demirjian AN et al (2014) The subspecialization of surgery: a paradigm shift. J Gastrointest Surg 18(8):1523–1531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2514-4
Finks J, Osborne N, Birkmeyer J (2011) Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med 364(22):2128–2137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2010.12.017.two-stage
Jung JJ, Naimark DM, Behman R, Grantcharov TP (2017) Approach to asymptomatic paraesophageal hernia: watchful waiting or elective laparoscopic hernia repair? Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5755-y
Kaplan JA, Schecter S, Lin MYC, Rogers SJ, Carter JT (2015) Morbidity and mortality associated with elective or emergency paraesophageal hernia repair. JAMA Surg 150(11):1094. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1867
Clavien P, Barkun J, de Oliveira M et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196
Skinner D, Besley R (1967) Surgical management of esophageal reflux and hiatus hernia. Long-term results with 1,030 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 53:33–54
Hill L (1973) Incarcerated paraesophageal hernia. A surgical emergency. Am J Surg 126:268–291
Schlottmann F, Strassle PD, Allaix ME, Patti MG (2017) Paraesophageal hernia repair in the USA: trends of utilization stratified by surgical volume and consequent impact on perioperative outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 21(8):1199–1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3469-z
Begg C, Cramer L, Hoskins W (1998) Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 280(20):1747–1751
Schoenfeld A, Ferrone M, Sturgeon D et al (2017) Volume–outcome relationship in surgical interventions for spinal metastases. JBJS 99(20):1753–1759
Pecorelli N, Balzano G, Capretti G et al (2012) Effect of surgeon volume on outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high-volume hospital. J Gastrointest Surg 16(3):518–523
Whealon MD, Blondet JJ, Gahagan JV, Phelan MJ, Nguyen NT (2017) Volume and outcomes relationship in laparoscopic diaphragmatic hernia repair. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 31(10):4224–4230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5482-4
Baxter N, Urbach D (2004) Does it matter what a hospital is “high volume” for? Specificity of hospital volume–outcome associations for surgical procedures: analysis of administrative data. BMJ 328:737–740. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj
Shabbir A, Dargan D (2014) Advancement and benefit of energy sealing in minimally invasive surgery. Asian J Endosc Surg 7(2):95–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12101
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Drs. Sorial, Ali, Kaneva, Fiore Jr, Vassiliou, Fried, Feldman, Ferri, Lee and Mueller have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sorial, R.K., Ali, M., Kaneva, P. et al. Modern era surgical outcomes of elective and emergency giant paraesophageal hernia repair at a high-volume referral center. Surg Endosc 34, 284–289 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06764-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06764-4