Log in

Transatlantic registries for minimally invasive liver surgery: towards harmonization

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 30 January 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Several registries focus on patients undergoing minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS). This study compared transatlantic registries focusing on the variables collected and differences in baseline characteristics, indications, and treatment in patients undergoing MILS. Furthermore, key variables were identified.

Methods

The five registries for liver surgery from North America (ACS-NSQIP), Italy, Norway, the Netherlands, and Europe were compared. A set of key variables were established by consensus expert opinion and compared between the registries. Anonymized data of all MILS procedures were collected (January 2014–December 2019). To summarize differences for all patient characteristics, treatment, and outcome, the relative and absolute largest differences (RLD, ALD) between the smallest and largest outcome per variable among the registries are presented.

Results

In total, 13,571 patients after MILS were included. Both 30- and 90-day mortality after MILS were below 1.1% in all registries. The largest differences in baseline characteristics were seen in ASA grade 3–4 (RLD 3.0, ALD 46.1%) and the presence of liver cirrhosis (RLD 6.4, ALD 21.2%). The largest difference in treatment was the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (RLD 4.3, ALD 20.6%). The number of variables collected per registry varied from 28 to 303. From the 46 key variables, 34 were missing in at least one of the registries.

Conclusion

Despite considerable variation in baseline characteristics, indications, and treatment of patients undergoing MILS in the five transatlantic registries, overall mortality after MILS was consistently below 1.1%. The registries should be harmonized to facilitate future collaborative research on MILS for which the identified 46 key variables will be instrumental.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Abbreviations

MILS:

Minimally invasive liver surgery

STROBE:

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology

ACS-NSQIP:

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

IGoMILS:

Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery

NoRGast:

Norwegian Registry for Gastrointestinal Surgery

DHBA:

Dutch Hepato Biliary Audit

E-MILS Registry:

European Registry on Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery

ISGLS:

International study group on liver surgery

SD:

Standard deviation

IQR:

Interquartile range

RLD:

Relative largest differences

ALD:

Absolute largest differences

References

  1. Scuderi V, Barkhatov L, Montalti R, Ratti F, Cipriani F, Pardo F, Tranchart H, Dagher I, Rotellar F, Abu Hilal M, Edwin B, Vivarelli M, Aldrighetti L, Troisi RI (2017) Outcome after laparoscopic and open resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver. Br J Surg 104:751–759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Di Fabio F, Samim M, Di Gioia P, Godeseth R, Pearce NW, Abu Hilal M (2014) Laparoscopic major hepatectomies: clinical outcomes and classification. World J Surg 38:3169–3174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G (2016) Comparative Short-term Benefits of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: 9000 Cases and Climbing. Ann Surg 263:761-777

  4. Fretland AA, Dagenborg VJ, Bjornelv GMW, Kazaryan AM, Kristiansen R, Fagerland MW, Hausken J, Tonnessen TI, Abildgaard A, Barkhatov L, Yaqub S, Rosok BI, Bjornbeth BA, Andersen MH, Flatmark K, Aas E, Edwin B (2018) Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: the OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 267:199–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kasai M, Cipriani F, Gayet B, Aldrighetti L, Ratti F, Sarmiento JM, Scatton O, Kim KH, Dagher I, Topal B, Primrose J, Nomi T, Fuks D, Abu Hilal M (2018) Laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Surgery 163:985–995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cipriani F, Rawashdeh M, Stanton L, Armstrong T, Takhar A, Pearce NW, Primrose J, Abu Hilal M (2016) Propensity score-based analysis of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal metastases. Br J Surg 103:1504–1512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Martinez-Cecilia D, Cipriani F, Shelat V, Ratti F, Tranchart H, Barkhatov L, Tomassini F, Montalti R, Halls M, Troisi RI, Dagher I, Aldrighetti L, Edwin B, Abu Hilal M (2017) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal metastases in elderly and octogenarian patients: a multicenter propensity score based analysis of short- and long-term outcomes. Ann Surg 265:1192–1200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, Edwin B, Troisi RI, Alikhanov R, Aroori S, Belli G, Besselink M, Briceno J, Gayet B, D’Hondt M, Lesurtel M, Menon K, Lodge P, Rotellar F, Santoyo J, Scatton O, Soubrane O, Sutcliffe R, Van Dam R, White S, Halls MC, Cipriani F, Van der Poel M, Ciria R, Barkhatov L, Gomez-Luque Y, Ocana-Garcia S, Cook A, Buell J, Clavien PA, Dervenis C, Fusai G, Geller D, Lang H, Primrose J, Taylor M, Van Gulik T, Wakabayashi G, Asbun H, Cherqui D (2018) The Southampton consensus guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: from indication to implementation. Ann Surg 268:11–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ding G, Cai W, Qin M (2015) Pure laparoscopic versus open liver resection in treatment of hepatolithiasis within the left lobes: a randomized trial study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25:392–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Robles-Campos R, Lopez-Lopez V, Brusadin R, Lopez-Conesa A, Gil-Vazquez PJ, Navarro-Barrios A, Parrilla P (2019) Open versus minimally invasive liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases (LapOpHuva): a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 33:3926–3936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van der Poel MJ, Huisman F, Busch OR, Abu Hilal M, van Gulik TM, Tanis PJ, Besselink MG (2017) Stepwise introduction of laparoscopic liver surgery: validation of guideline recommendations. HPB (Oxford) 19:894–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aldrighetti L, Ratti F, Cillo U, Ferrero A, Ettorre GM, Guglielmi A, Giuliante F, Calise F (2017) Diffusion, outcomes and implementation of minimally invasive liver surgery: a snapshot from the I Go MILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) registry. Updates Surg 69:271–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Farges O, Goutte N, Dokmak S, Bendersky N, Falissard B (2014) How surgical technology translates into practice: the model of laparoscopic liver resections performed in France. Ann Surg 260:916–921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative S (2014) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg 12:1495–1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pitt HA, Kilbane M, Strasberg SM, Pawlik TM, Dixon E, Zyromski NJ, Aloia TA, Henderson JM, Mulvihill SJ (2009) ACS-NSQIP has the potential to create an HPB-NSQIP option. HPB (Oxford) 11:405–413

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lassen K, Nymo LS, Korner H, Thon K, Grindstein T, Wasmuth HH, Moger T, Bjornbeth BA, Norderval S, Eriksen MT, Viste A (2018) The new national registry for gastrointestinal surgery in Norway: NoRGast. Scand J Surg 107:201–207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. van der Werf LR, Kok NFM, Buis CI, Grunhagen DJ, Hoogwater FJH, Swijnenburg RJ, Dulk MD, Dejong K, Klaase JM, Audit DHB, G, (2019) Implementation and first results of a mandatory, nationwide audit on liver surgery. HPB (Oxford) 21:1400–1410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2009) The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg 250:177–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L, Fan ST, Yokoyama Y, Crawford M, Makuuchi M, Christophi C, Banting S, Brooke-Smith M, Usatoff V, Nagino M, Maddern G, Hugh TJ, Vauthey JN, Greig P, Rees M, Nimura Y, Figueras J, DeMatteo RP, Buchler MW, Weitz J (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study group of liver surgery. Surgery 149:680–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mackay TM, Gleeson EM, Wellner UF, Williamsson C, Busch OR, Groot Koerkamp B, Keck T, van Santvoort HC, Tingstedt B, Pitt HA, Besselink MG, Audits G, on Pancreatic Surgery G, (2021) Transatlantic registries of pancreatic surgery in the United States of America, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden: Comparing design, variables, patients, treatment strategies, and outcomes. Surgery 169:396–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Birkmeyer JD, Shahian DM, Dimick JB, Finlayson SR, Flum DR, Ko CY, Hall BL (2008) Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg 207:777–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fagenson AM, Gleeson EM, Pitt HA, Lau KN (2021) Minimally invasive hepatectomy in North America: laparoscopic versus robotic. J Gastrointest Surg 25:85–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schifftner TL, Grunwald GK, Henderson WG, Main D, Khuri SF (2007) Relationship of processes and structures of care in general surgery to postoperative outcomes: a hierarchical analysis. J Am Coll Surg 204:1166–1177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. van der Heijde N, Vissers FL, Boggi U, Dokmak S, Edwin B, Hackert T, Khatkov IE, Keck T, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M (2020) European consortium of minimally invasive pancreatic S designing the European registry on minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: a pan-European survey. HPB 5:566–574

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cipriani F, Ratti F, Fiorentini G, Catena M, Paganelli M, Aldrighetti L (2018) Effect of previous abdominal surgery on laparoscopic liver resection: analysis of feasibility and risk factors for conversion. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 28:785–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Clavien PA, Vetter D, Staiger RD, Slankamenac K, Mehra T, Graf R, Puhan MA (2017) The comprehensive complication index (CCI(R)): added value and clinical perspectives 3 years “Down the Line.” Ann Surg 265:1045–1050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ishizawa T, Gumbs AA, Kokudo N, Gayet B (2012) Laparoscopic segmentectomy of the liver: from segment I to VIII. Ann Surg 256:959–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS, Shin SH (2008) Feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for tumors located in the posterosuperior segments of the liver, with a special reference to overcoming current limitations on tumor location. Surgery 144:32–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y, Hasegawa Y, Katagiri T, Takagi C, Itano O, Kaneko H, Wakabayashi G (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21:745–753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Arita J, Sakamaki K, Saiura A, Konishi M, Sakamoto Y, Hashimoto M, Sano T, Uesaka K, Kokudo N, Yamanaka T, Shimada K (2021) Drain placement after uncomplicated hepatic resection increases severe postoperative complication rate: a Japanese multi-institutional randomized controlled trial (ND-trial). Ann Surg 273:224–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Riley R, Holman C, Fletcher D (2014) Inter-rater reliability of the ASA physical status classification in a sample of anaesthetists in Western Australia. Anaesth Intensive Care 42:614–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sankar A, Johnson SR, Beattie WS, Tait G, Wijeysundera DN (2014) Reliability of the American society of anesthesiologists physical status scale in clinical practice. Br J Anaesth 113:424–432

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pimpin L, Cortez-Pinto H, Negro F, Corbould E, Lazarus JV, Webber L, Sheron N, Committee EHS (2018) Burden of liver disease in europe: epidemiology and analysis of risk factors to identify prevention policies. J Hepatol 69:718–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Collaborators GBDC (2020) The global, regional, and national burden of cirrhosis by cause in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:245–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rubbia-Brandt L, Audard V, Sartoretti P, Roth AD, Brezault C, Le Charpentier M, Dousset B, Morel P, Soubrane O, Chaussade S, Mentha G, Terris B (2004) Severe hepatic sinusoidal obstruction associated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 15:460–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Vauthey JN, Pawlik TM, Ribero D, Wu TT, Zorzi D, Hoff PM, **ong HQ, Eng C, Lauwers GY, Mino-Kenudson M, Risio M, Muratore A, Capussotti L, Curley SA, Abdalla EK (2006) Chemotherapy regimen predicts steatohepatitis and an increase in 90-day mortality after surgery for hepatic colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol 24:2065–2072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. van der Poel MJ, Fichtinger RS, Bemelmans M, Bosscha K, Braat AE, de Boer MT, Dejong CHC, Doornebosch PG, Draaisma WA, Gerhards MF, Gobardhan PD, Gorgec B, Hagendoorn J, Kazemier G, Klaase J, Leclercq WKG, Liem MS, Lips DJ, Marsman HA, Mieog JSD, Molenaar QI, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Nota CL, Patijn GA, Rijken AM, Slooter GD, Stommel MWJ, Swijnenburg RJ, Tanis PJ, Te Riele WW, Terkivatan T, van den Tol PM, van den Boezem PB, van der Hoeven JA, Vermaas M, Abu Hilal M, van Dam RM, Besselink MG, Dutch Liver Collaborative G (2019) Implementation and outcome of minor and major minimally invasive liver surgery in the Netherlands. HPB (Oxford) 21:1734–1743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the following collaborators: Federica Cipriani (Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy), Rafael Diaz-Nieto (Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK), Jean-Marc Régimbeau (Department of Surgery, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France), Mathieu D’Hondt (Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium), Carlos Domingo-Del Pozo (Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain), Miguel Angel Suárez Muñoz (Department of Surgery, Liver Transplantation Unit, Regional University Hospital, Málaga, Spain), Krzysztof Zieniewicz (Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery Medical University of Warsaw Poland), Marco Vivarelli (Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy), Gregor Stavrou (Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Klinikum Saarbruecken, Winterberg 1, 66199, Saarbrücken, Germany), Dirk J. Grünhagen (Department of Surgical Oncology and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), and Marcel den Dulk (Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mohammad Abu Hilal or Marc G. Besselink.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Nicky van der Heijde, Burak Görgec, Joal D. Beane, Francesca Ratti, Giulio Belli, Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra, Fulvio Calise, Umberto Cillo, Marieke T. De Boer, Alexander M. Fagenson, Åsmund A. Fretland, Elizabeth M. Gleeson, Michelle R. de Graaff, Niels F.M. Kok, Kristoffer Lassen, Marcel J. van der Poel, Andrea Ruzzenente, Robert P. Sutcliffe, Bjørn Edwin, Luca Aldrighetti, Henry A. Pitt, Mohammad Abu Hilal, and Marc G. Besselink have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This is the updated corresponding author information we received from the authors. This change has been approved by editorial.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 57 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van der Heijde, N., Görgec, B., Beane, J.D. et al. Transatlantic registries for minimally invasive liver surgery: towards harmonization. Surg Endosc 37, 3580–3592 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09765-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09765-y

Keywords

Navigation