Log in

Diffusion, outcomes and implementation of minimally invasive liver surgery: a snapshot from the I Go MILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) Registry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 11 December 2017

This article has been updated

Abstract

The Italian Group of MILS (I Go MILS) prospective registry was established in 2014 with the goals to create a hub for data and projects on a national basis and to promote the diffusion and implementation of MILS programs on a national scale. The primary endpoint of the present study is to give a snapshot of the real diffusion and outcomes of MILS in Italy, while analyzing the role of the registry in the implementation of MILS programs nationwide. The I Go MILS Registry is a prospective and intention-to-treat registry opened to any Italian center performing MILS, without restriction criteria based on number of procedures. The Registry is developed through the eClinical, an electronic platform for the management of clinical trials and is based on 34 clinical variables, regarding indication, intra- and postoperative course. Clinical outcomes and data regarding implementation of MILS activity have been analyzed for the aim of the study. Between November 2014 and June 2017, data from 1678 MILS performed in 48 centers have been collected (mean number of procedures per center 35, range 1–302). 22% of procedures were performed for benign and 78% for malignant disease (HCC constituted the 49.1% and CRLM the 31.2% of malignant tumors). Major liver resections (>3 liver segments), including right and left hepatectomies, trisectionectomies and ALPPS procedures were 10% of the series. Mean blood loss was 200 ± 230 mL Morbidity rate was 20.5% and mortality was 0.3%. 10.4% of cases were converted to open approach. Median length of stay was 5 days. MILS/total resections ratio in 13 experienced centers increased from 14 to 30% after Registry establishment. MILS programs are well established in Italy, with progressive increase both in the number of cases and in the numerosity of centers. The I Go MILS Registry is playing a crucial role in monitoring the development of MILS in the real world on a national basis while giving a significant contribution to the implementation of MILS programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 11 December 2017

    A technical error led to incorrect rendering of the author group in this article. The correct authorship is as follows:

Abbreviations

LR:

Liver resection

I Go MILS:

Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery

MILS:

Minimally invasive liver surgery

References

  1. Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aldrighetti L, Belli G, Boni L et al (2015) Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery (I GO MILS). Italian experience in minimally invasive liver surgery: a national survey. Updates Surg 67(2):129–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gagner M, RheaultM Dubuc J (1992) Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver tumor. Surg Endosc 6:97–98

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abu Hilal M, van der Poel MJ, Samim M et al (2015) Laparoscopic liver resection for lesions adjacent to major vasculature: feasibility, safety and oncological efficiency. J Gastrointest Surg 19:692–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aldrighetti L, Pulitanò C, Catena M et al (2008) A prospective evaluation of laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 12:457–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Edwin B, Nordin A, Kazaryan AM (2011) Laparoscopic liver surgery: new frontiers. Scand J Surg 100:54–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mirnezami R, Mirnezami AH, Chandrakumaran K et al (2011) Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 13:295–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aldrighetti L, Guzzetti E, Pulitanò C et al (2010) Case-matched analysis of totally laparoscopic versus open liver resection for HCC: short and middle term results. J Surg Oncol 102:82–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. **e SM, **ong JJ, Liu XT et al (2017) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 7(1):1012

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Martínez-Cecilia D, Cipriani F, Vishal S et al (2017) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal metastases in elderly and octogenarian patients: a multicenter propensity score based analysis of short- and long-term outcomes. Ann Surg 265(6):1192–1200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ratti F, Cipriani F, Ariotti R et al (2016) Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection with associated lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-based case-matched analysis from a single institution. Surg Endosc 30(5):1999–2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rao A, Rao G, Ahmed I (2011) Laparoscopic left lateral liver resection should be a standard operation. Surg Endosc 25:1603–1610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Belli G, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G et al (2013) Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy a consideration for acceptance as standard of care. Surg Endosc 27:2721–2726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhatt DL, Drozda JP Jr, Shahian DM et al (2015) ACC/AHA/STS statement on the future of registries and the performance measurement enterprise: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg 100(5):1926–1941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tyson MD, Barocas DA (2017) Improving quality through clinical registries in urology. Curr Opin Urol 27(4):375–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Strasberg SM (2000) International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Terminology Committee Survey. The Brisbane terminology of liver anatomy and resections (2000). HPB Surg 2:333–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cipriani F, Fantini C, Ratti F, Lauro R, Tranchart H, Halls M, Scuderi V, Barkhatov L, Edwin B, Troisi RI, Dagher I, Reggiani P, Belli G, Aldrighetti L, Abu Hilal M (2017) Laparoscopic liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma. Can we extend the surgical indication in cirrhotic patients? Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-017-5711-x

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sposito C, Battiston C, Facciorusso A, Mazzola M et al (2016) Propensity score analysis of outcomes following laparoscopic or open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 103(7):871–880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Felli E, Cillo U, Pinna AD, De Carlis L, Ercolani G et al (2015) Salvage liver transplantation after laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Updates Surg 67(2):215–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fedeli U, Grande E, Grippo F, Frova L (2017) Mortality associated with hepatitis C and hepatitis B virus infection: a nationwide study on multiple causes of death data. World J Gastroenterol 23(10):1866–1871

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Bertuccio P, Turati F, Carioli G, Rodriguez T, La Vecchia C, Malvezzi M, Negri E (2017) Global trends and predictions in hepatocellular carcinoma mortality. J Hepatol 67(2):302–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Descottes B, Glineur D, Lachachi F et al (2003) Laparoscopic liver resection of benign liver tumors. Surg Endosc 17:23–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ, Godfrey DA, Primrose JN, Pearce NW (2011) Surgical management of benign and indeterminate hepatic lesions in the era of laparoscopic liver surgery. Dig Surg 28:232–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ardito F, Tayar C, Laurent A, Karoui M et al (2007) Laparoscopic liver resection for benign disease. Arch Surg 142(12):1188–1193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ratti F, Cipriani F, Ariotti R, Giannone F, Paganelli M, Aldrighetti L (2015) Laparoscopic major hepatectomies: current trends and indications: A comparison with the open technique. Updates Surg 67(2):157–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cipriani F, Shelat VG, Rawashdeh M, Francone E, Aldrighetti L, Takhar A, Armstrong T, Pearce NW, Abu Hilal M (2015) Laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing resections for nonperipheral liver lesions, the diamond technique: technical aspects, clinical outcomes, and oncologic efficiency. J Am Coll Surg 221(2):265–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ban D, Kudo A, Ito H, Mitsunori Y, Matsumura S, Aihara A, Ochiai T, Tanaka S, Tanabe M, Itano O, Kaneko H, Wakabayashi G (2015) The difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection. Updates Surg 67(2):123–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263(4):761–777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Giuliani A, Aldrighetti L, Di Benedetto F, Ettorre GM et al (2015) Total abdominal approach for postero-superior segments (7, 8) in laparoscopic liver surgery: a multicentric experience. Updates Surg 67(2):169–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Donadon M, Torzilli G (2013) Intraoperative ultrasound in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: from daily practice to future trends. Liver Cancer 2(1):16–24

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ferrero A, Lo Tesoriere R, Russolillo N, Viganò L et al (2015) Ultrasound-guided laparoscopic liver resections. Surg Endosc 29(4):1002–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. He J, Amini N, Spolverato G, Hirose K, Makary M, Wolfgang CL, Weiss MJ, Pawlik TM (2015) National trends with a laparoscopic liver resection: results from a population-based analysis. HPB (Oxford) 17(10):919–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gotoh M, Miyata H, Hashimoto H, Wakabayashi G, Konno H, Miyakawa S, Sugihara K, Mori M, Satomi S, Kokudo N, Iwanaka T (2016) National clinical database feedback implementation for quality improvement of cancer treatment in Japan: from good to great through transparency. Surg Today 46(1):38–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kaneko H, Otsuka Y, Kubota Y, Wakabayashi G (2017) Evolution and revolution of laparoscopic liver resection in Japan. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 1:33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, Formisano G, Buchwald H, Scopinaro N (2015) Bariatric surgery worldwide. Obes Surg 25(10):1822–1832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Califf RM, Peterson ED, Gibbons RJ, Garson A Jr, Brindis RG, Beller GA, Smith SC Jr (2002) Integrating quality into the cycle of therapeutic development. J Am Coll Cardiol 40(11):1895–1901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jakobsen E, Green A, Oesterlind K, Rasmussen TR, Iachina M, Palshof T (2013) Nationwide quality improvement in lung cancer care: the role of the Danish Lung Cancer Group and Registry. J Thorac Oncol 8(10):1238–1247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

(1) The list of the authors of the Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery is given below: Dalla Valle Raffaele, AOU Parma, Parma; Mazzaferro Vincenzo, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano; Jovine Elio, Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna; De Carlis Luciano Gregorio, Ospedale Niguarda Ca’ Granda, Milano; Boggi Ugo, AOU Pisana, Pisa; Gruttadauria Salvatore, ISMETT, Palermo; Di Benedetto Fabrizio, AOU Policlinico di Modena, Modena; Reggiani Paolo, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano; Berti Stefano, Ospedale Civile S.Andrea, La Spezia; Ceccarelli Graziano, Ospedale San Donato, Arezzo; Vincenti Leonardo, AOU Consorziale Policlinico, Bari; Belli Giulio, Ospedale SM Loreto Nuovo, Napoli; Torzilli Guido, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano; Zamboni Fausto, Ospedale Brotzu, Cagliari; Coratti Andrea, AOU Careggi, Firenze; Mezzatesta Pietro, Casa di Cura La Maddalena, Palermo; Santambrogio Roberto, AO San Paolo, Milano; Navarra Giuseppe, AOU Policlinico G. Martino, Messina; Giuliani Antonio, AO R.N. Cardarelli, Napoli; Pinna Antonio Daniele, Policlinico Sant’Orsola Malpighi, Bologna; Parisi Amilcare, AO Santa Maria di Terni, Terni; Colledan Michele, AO Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo; Slim Abdallah, AO Desio e Vimercate, Vimercate; Antonucci Adelmo, Policlinico di Monza, Monza; Grazi Gian Luca, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena, Roma; Frena Antonio, Ospedale Centrale, Bolzano; Sgroi Giovanni, AO Treviglio-Caravaggio, Treviglio; Brolese Alberto, Ospedale S.Chiara, Trento; Morelli Luca, AOU Pisana, Pisa; Floridi Antonio, AO Ospedale Maggiore, Crema; Patriti Alberto, Ospedale San Matteo degli Infermi, Spoleto; Veneroni Luigi, Ospedale Infermi AUSL Romagna, Rimini; Ercolani Giorgio, Ospedale Morgagni Pierantoni, Forlì; Boni Luigi, AOU Fondazione Macchi, Varese; Maida Pietro, Ospedale Villa Betania, Napoli; Griseri Guido, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona; Percivale Andrea, Ospedale Santa Corona, Pietraligure; Filauro Marco, AO Galliera, Genova; Guerriero Silvio, Ospedale San Martino, Belluno; Tisone Giuseppe, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Roma; Romito Raffaele, AOU Maggiore della Carità, Novara; Tedeschi Umberto, AOU Integrata Verona, Verona; Zimmitti Giuseppe, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia. (2) The authors acknowledge CR-Technology and specifically Dr. Giovanni Cucchiara and Dr. Carmen Caruso for their outstanding and valuable support to the project of the I Go MILS group.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Aldrighetti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All listed authors have participated in the study and have approved the final manuscript. There are no personal conflicts of interest or financial disclosure for any of the authors.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Members of the Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery (I Go MILS) are listed in the “Acknowledgements” at the end of the article.

A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-017-0500-6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aldrighetti, L., Ratti, F., Cillo, U. et al. Diffusion, outcomes and implementation of minimally invasive liver surgery: a snapshot from the I Go MILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) Registry. Updates Surg 69, 271–283 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-017-0489-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-017-0489-x

Keywords

Navigation