Log in

PML risk is the main factor driving the choice of discontinuing natalizumab in a large multiple sclerosis population: results from an Italian multicenter retrospective study

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Natalizumab (NTZ) is an effective treatment for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). However, patients and physicians may consider discontinuing NTZ therapy due to safety or efficacy issues. The aim of our study was to evaluate the NTZ discontinuation rate and reasons of discontinuation in a large Italian population of RRMS patients.

Materials and methods

The data were extracted from the Italian MS registry in May 2018 and were collected from 51,845 patients in 69 Italian multiple sclerosis centers. MS patients with at least one NTZ infusion in the period between June 1st 2012 to May 15th 2018 were included. Discontinuation rates at each time point were calculated. Reasons for NTZ discontinuation were classified as “lack of efficacy”, “progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) risk” or “other”.

Results

Out of 51,845, 5151 patients, 3019 (58.6%) females, with a mean age of 43.6 ± 10.1 years (median 40), were analyzed. Out of 2037 (39.5%) who discontinued NTZ, a significantly higher percentage suspended NTZ because of PML risk compared to lack of efficacy [1682 (32.7% of 5151) vs 221 (4.3%), p < 0.001]; other reasons were identified for 99 (1.9%) patients. Patients discontinuing treatment were older, had longer disease duration and worse EDSS at the time of NTZ initiation and at last follow-up on NTZ treatment. The JCV index and EDSS at baseline were predictors for stop** therapy (HR 2.94, 95% CI 1.22–4.75; p = 0.02; HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.18–5.41; p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Roughly 60% of MS patients stayed on NTZ treatment during the observation period. For those patients in whom NTZ discontinuation was required, it was mainly due to PML concerns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Dataset is available under reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Polman CH, O’Connor PW, Havrdova E, Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Miller DH, Phillips JT, Lublin FD, Giovannoni G, Wajgt A, Toal M, Lynn F, Panzara MA, Sandrock AW, Investigators A (2006) A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 354(9):899–910. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa044397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Radue EW, Stuart WH, Calabresi PA, Confavreux C, Galetta SL, Rudick RA, Lublin FD, Weinstock-Guttman B, Wynn DR, Fisher E, Papadopoulou A, Lynn F, Panzara MA, Sandrock AW, Investigators S (2010) Natalizumab plus interferon beta-1a reduces lesion formation in relapsing multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 292(1–2):28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2010.02.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fernandez O, Oreja-Guevara C, Arroyo R, Izquierdo G, Perez JL, Montalban X (2012) Natalizumab treatment of multiple sclerosis in Spain: results of an extensive observational study. J Neurol 259(9):1814–1823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6414-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Prosperini L, Gianni C, Barletta V, Mancinelli C, Fubelli F, Borriello G, Pozzilli C (2012) Predictors of freedom from disease activity in natalizumab treated-patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 323(1–2):104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2012.08.027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baldwin KJ, Hogg JP (2013) Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in patients with multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol 26(3):318–323. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0b013e328360279f

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vukusic S, Rollot F, Casey R, Pique J, Marignier R, Mathey G, Edan G, Brassat D, Ruet A, De Seze J, Maillart E, Zephir H, Labauge P, Derache N, Lebrun-Frenay C, Moreau T, Wiertlewski S, Berger E, Moisset X, Rico-Lamy A, Stankoff B, Bensa C, Thouvenot E, Heinzlef O, Al-Khedr A, Bourre B, Vaillant M, Cabre P, Montcuquet A, Wahab A, Camdessanche JP, Tourbah A, Guennoc AM, Hankiewicz K, Patry I, Nifle C, Maubeuge N, Labeyrie C, Vermersch P, Laplaud DA, Investigators O (2019) Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy incidence and risk stratification among natalizumab users in France. JAMA Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D’Amico E, Zanghi A, Leone C, Tumani H, Patti F (2016) Treatment-related progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in multiple sclerosis: a comprehensive review of current evidence and future needs. Drug Saf 39(12):1163–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-016-0461-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McGuigan C, Craner M, Guadagno J, Kapoor R, Mazibrada G, Molyneux P, Nicholas R, Palace J, Pearson OR, Rog D, Young CA (2016) Stratification and monitoring of natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy risk: recommendations from an expert group. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 87(2):117–125. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2015-311100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fox RJ, Cree BA, De Seze J, Gold R, Hartung HP, Jeffery D, Kappos L, Kaufman M, Montalban X, Weinstock-Guttman B, Anderson B, Natarajan A, Ticho B, Duda P, Restore (2014) MS disease activity in RESTORE: a randomized 24 week natalizumab treatment interruption study. Neurology 82(17):1491–1498. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rammohan KW, Ortega MR, Delgado SR, Tornes L (2011) Disease activity return during natalizumab treatment interruption in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 77(21):1930. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823c1200 (discussion 1930–1931)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berger JR, Centonze D, Comi G, Confavreux C, Cutter G, Giovannoni G, Gold R, Hartung HP, Lublin F, Miravalle A, Montalban X, O’Connor P, Olsson T, Polman CH, Stuve O, Wolinsky JS, Ziemssen T (2010) Considerations on discontinuing natalizumab for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 68(3):409–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Evdoshenko E, Stepanova A, Shumilina M, Davydovskaya M, Khachanova N, Neofidov N, Kalinin I, Popova E, Dubchenko E, Pozhidaeva N, Volkov A, Sivertseva S, Prilenskaya A, Malkova N, Korobko D, Vergunova I, Shchur S, Makshakov G (2019) Real-world study of efficacy, risk management and reasons for discontinuation of natalizumab for treatment of multiple sclerosis in Russia. PLoS ONE 14(5):e0217303. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Patti F, Leone C, Zappia M (2015) Clinical and radiologic rebound after discontinuation of natalizumab therapy in a highly active multiple sclerosis patient was not halted by dimethyl-fumarate: a case report. BMC Neurol 15:252. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-015-0512-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Vellinga MM, Castelijns JA, Barkhof F, Uitdehaag BM, Polman CH (2008) Postwithdrawal rebound increase in T2 lesional activity in natalizumab-treated MS patients. Neurology 70(13 Pt 2):1150–1151. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000265393.03231.e5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miravalle A, Jensen R, Kinkel RP (2011) Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in patients with multiple sclerosis following cessation of natalizumab therapy. Arch Neurol 68(2):186–191. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2010.257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Borriello G, Prosperini L, Marinelli F, Fubelli F, Pozzilli C (2011) Observations during an elective interruption of natalizumab treatment: a post-marketing study. Mult Scler 17(3):372–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458510392098

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Havla J, Gerdes LA, Meinl I, Krumbholz M, Faber H, Weber F, Pellkofer HL, Hohlfeld R, Kumpfel T (2011) De-escalation from natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: recurrence of disease activity despite switching to glatiramer acetate. J Neurol 258(9):1665–1669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-5996-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. West TW, Cree BA (2010) Natalizumab dosage suspension: are we hel** or hurting? Ann Neurol 68(3):395–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Montalban X, Gold R, Thompson AJ, Otero-Romero S, Amato MP, Chandraratna D, Clanet M, Comi G, Derfuss T, Fazekas F, Hartung HP, Havrdova E, Hemmer B, Kappos L, Liblau R, Lubetzki C, Marcus E, Miller DH, Olsson T, Pilling S, Selmaj K, Siva A, Sorensen PS, Sormani MP, Thalheim C, Wiendl H, Zipp F (2018) ECTRIMS/EAN guideline on the pharmacological treatment of people with multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 25(2):215–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13536

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fine AJ, Sorbello A, Kortepeter C, Scarazzini L (2014) Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy after natalizumab discontinuation. Ann Neurol 75(1):108–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24051

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Trojano M, Bergamaschi R, Amato MP, Comi G, Ghezzi A, Lepore V, Marrosu MG, Mosconi P, Patti F, Ponzio M, Zaratin P, Battaglia MA, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Register Centers G (2019) The Italian multiple sclerosis register. Neurol Sci 40(1):155–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-018-3610-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Prosperini L, de Rossi N, Scarpazza C, Moiola L, Cosottini M, Gerevini S, Capra R, Italian PMLsg (2016) Natalizumab-related progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in multiple sclerosis: findings from an Italian independent registry. PLoS ONE 11(12):e0168376. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, Fujihara K, Havrdova E, Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Montalban X, O’Connor P, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Thompson AJ, Waubant E, Weinshenker B, Wolinsky JS (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69(2):292–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22366

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wolinsky JS, Narayana PA, O’Connor P, Coyle PK, Ford C, Johnson K, Miller A, Pardo L, Kadosh S, Ladkani D, Group PRTS (2007) Glatiramer acetate in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: results of a multinational, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Neurol 61(1):14–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Butzkueven H, Kappos L, Pellegrini F, Trojano M, Wiendl H, Patel RN, Zhang A, Hotermans C, Belachew S, Investigators TOP (2014) Efficacy and safety of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: interim observational programme results. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 85(11):1190–1197. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2013-306936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Butzkueven H, Kappos L, Wiendl H, Trojano M, Spelman T, Chang I, Kasliwal R, Jaitly S, Campbell N, Ho PR, Licata S, Tysabri Observational Program I (2020) Long-term safety and effectiveness of natalizumab treatment in clinical practice: 10 years of real-world data from the Tysabri observational program (TOP). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2019-322326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Trojano M, Butzkueven H, Kappos L, Wiendl H, Spelman T, Pellegrini F, Chen Y, Dong Q, Koendgen H, Belachew S, Tysabri Observational Program I (2018) Natalizumab treatment shows low cumulative probabilities of confirmed disability worsening to EDSS milestones in the long-term setting. Mult Scler Relat Disord 24:11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2018.04.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kramer J, Tenberge JG, Kleiter I, Gaissmaier W, Ruck T, Heesen C, Meuth SG (2017) Is the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy the real reason for natalizumab discontinuation in patients with multiple sclerosis? PLoS ONE 12(4):e0174858. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Putzki N, Yaldizli O, Buhler R, Schwegler G, Curtius D, Tettenborn B (2010) Natalizumab reduces clinical and MRI activity in multiple sclerosis patients with high disease activity: results from a multicenter study in Switzerland. Eur Neurol 63(2):101–106. https://doi.org/10.1159/000276400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Oturai AB, Koch-Henriksen N, Petersen T, Jensen PE, Sellebjerg F, Sorensen PS (2009) Efficacy of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis patients with high disease activity: a Danish nationwide study. Eur J Neurol 16(3):420–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02517.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sangalli F, Moiola L, Bucello S, Annovazzi P, Rizzo A, Radaelli M, Vitello G, Grimaldi LM, Ghezzi A, Martinelli V, Comi G (2011) Efficacy and tolerability of natalizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: a post-marketing observational study. Neurol Sci 31(Suppl 3):299–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-010-0344-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Outteryck O, Ongagna JC, Duhamel A, Zephir H, Collongues N, Lacour A, Fleury MC, Berteloot AS, Blanc F, Giroux M, Vermersch P, de Seze J (2012) Anti-JCV antibody prevalence in a French cohort of MS patients under natalizumab therapy. J Neurol 259(11):2293–2298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6487-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Prosperini L, Borriello G, Fubelli F, Marinelli F, Pozzilli C (2011) Natalizumab treatment in multiple sclerosis: the experience of S. Andrea MS Centre in Rome. Neurol Sci 31(Suppl 3):303–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-010-0348-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mancardi GL, Tedeschi G, Amato MP, D’Alessandro R, Drago F, Milanese C, Popoli P, Rossi P, Savettieri G, Tola MR, Comi G, Pozzilli C, Bertolotto A, Marrosu MG, Grimaldi LM, Laroni A, Vanacore N, Covezzoli A, De Rosa M, Piccinni C, Montanaro N, Periotto L, Iommelli R, Tomino C, Provinciali L (2011) Three years of experience: the Italian registry and safety data update. Neurol Sci 31(Suppl 3):295–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-010-0356-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Putzki N, Yaldizli O, Maurer M, Cursiefen S, Kuckert S, Klawe C, Maschke M, Tettenborn B, Limmroth V (2010) Efficacy of natalizumab in second line therapy of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results from a multi-center study in German speaking countries. Eur J Neurol 17(1):31–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02728.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Piehl F, Holmen C, Hillert J, Olsson T (2011) Swedish natalizumab (Tysabri) multiple sclerosis surveillance study. Neurol Sci 31(Suppl 3):289–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-010-0345-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Horga A, Castillo J, Rio J, Tintore M, Auger C, Sastre-Garriga J, Edo MC, Perez-Miralles F, Tur C, Nos C, Huerga E, Comabella M, Rovira A, Montalban X (2011) An observational study of the effectiveness and safety of natalizumab in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Rev Neurol 52(6):321–330

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Prosperini L, Annovazzi P, Capobianco M, Capra R, Buttari F, Gasperini C, Galgani S, Solaro C, Centonze D, Bertolotto A, Pozzilli C, Ghezzi A (2015) Natalizumab discontinuation in patients with multiple sclerosis: profiling risk and benefits at therapeutic crossroads. Mult Scler 21(13):1713–1722. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458515570768

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Plavina T, Subramanyam M, Bloomgren G, Richman S, Pace A, Lee S, Schlain B, Campagnolo D, Belachew S, Ticho B (2014) Anti-JC virus antibody levels in serum or plasma further define risk of natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Ann Neurol 76(6):802–812. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kartau M, Sipila JO, Auvinen E, Palomaki M, Verkkoniemi-Ahola A (2019) Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: current Insights. Degener Neurol Neuromuscul Dis 9:109–121. https://doi.org/10.2147/DNND.S203405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Sgarlata E, Chisari CG, D’Amico E, Millefiorini E, Patti F (2020) Changes in anti-JCV antibody status in a large population of multiple sclerosis patients treated with natalizumab. CNS Drugs. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-020-00716-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bozic C, Richman S, Plavina T, Natarajan A, Scanlon JV, Subramanyam M, Sandrock A, Bloomgren G (2011) Anti-John Cunnigham virus antibody prevalence in multiple sclerosis patients: baseline results of STRATIFY-1. Ann Neurol 70(5):742–750. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ho PR, Koendgen H, Campbell N, Haddock B, Richman S, Chang I (2017) Risk of natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in patients with multiple sclerosis: a retrospective analysis of data from four clinical studies. Lancet Neurol 16(11):925–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30282-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sgarlata E, Chisari CG, D’Amico E, Millefiorini E, Patti F (2020) Changes in Anti-JCV antibody status in a large population of multiple sclerosis patients treated with natalizumab. CNS Drugs 34(5):535–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-020-00716-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Conway DS, Hersh CM, Harris HC, Hua LH (2020) Duration of natalizumab therapy and reasons for discontinuation in a multiple sclerosis population. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 6(1):2055217320902488. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055217320902488

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Tur C, Tintore M, Vidal-Jordana A, Castillo J, Galan I, Rio J, Arrambide G, Comabella M, Arevalo MJ, Horno R, Vicente MJ, Caminero A, Nos C, Sastre-Garriga J, Montalban X (2012) Natalizumab discontinuation after PML risk stratification: outcome from a shared and informed decision. Mult Scler 18(8):1193–1196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458512439238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tugemann B (2019) The risk of PML from natalizumab. Lancet Neurol 18(3):230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30021-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Vennegoor A, Rispens T, Strijbis EM, Seewann A, Uitdehaag BM, Balk LJ, Barkhof F, Polman CH, Wolbink G, Killestein J (2013) Clinical relevance of serum natalizumab concentration and anti-natalizumab antibodies in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 19(5):593–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458512460604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Carlo Avolio, Roberto Balgera, Paola Banfi, Paolo Bellantonio, Placido Bramanti, Lorenzo Capone, Guido Cavalletti, Luca Chiveri, Raffaella Clerici, Marinella Clerico, Francesco Corea, Vincenzo Dattola, Francesca De Robertis, Giancarlo Di Battista, Simonetta Galgani, Maurizia Gatto, Maria Grazia Grasso, Lorenzo Lo Russo, Francesco Ottavio Logullo, Renato Mantegazza, Alessandra Protti, Monica Rezzonico, Mariarosa Rottoli, Marco Salvetti, Elio Scarpini, Leonardo Sinisi, Maddalena Sparaco, Daniele Spitaleri, Tiziana Tassinari, Simone Tonietti, Paola Valentino, Franco Valzania, Simonetta Venturi.

Funding

This study was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

CGC: contributed to the data collection, performed the statistical analysis and interpreted data, drafted the work and revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper. GC: contributed to the data collection, approved the final version of the paper. MF contributed to the data collection, revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper. DP contributed to the design of the work and to the data collection, approved the final version of the paper. PI: contributed to the data collection, approved the final version of the paper. MZ: contributed to the data collection, approved the final version of the paper. VBM: contributed to the data collection, approved the final version of the paper. EC: contributed to the data collection, approved the final version of the paper. GAM: contributed to the data collection, revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper. LMG: contributed to the data collection, revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper. MI: contributed to the data collection, revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper. SB: contributed to the data collection, revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper. AL contributed to the data collection, revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper. Giuseppe Salemi: contributed to the data collection, approved the final version of the paper. GDL: contributed to the data collection, approved the final version of the paper. SC: contributed to the data collection, approved the final version of the paper. AC: contributed to the data collection, approved the final version of the paper. PS: contributed to the data collection, approved the final version of the paper. UA: contributed to the data collection, approved the final version of the paper. GTM: contributed to the data collection, revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper. CG: contributed to the data collection, approved the final version of the paper. MTF: contributed to the data collection, revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper. IP: contributed to the data collection, approved the final version of the paper. MPA: contributed to the data collection, revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper. MR: contributed to the data collection, revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper. CS: contributed to the data collection, revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper. GL: contributed to the data collection, approved the final version of the paper. DM: contributed to the data collection, approved the final version of the paper. RB: contributed to the data collection, revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper. FG: contributed to the data collection, revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper. ADS: contributed to the data collection, revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper. AB: contributed to the data collection, revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper. RT: contributed to the data collection, revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper. MV: contributed to the data collection, revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper. PC: contributed to the data collection, revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper. PB: contributed to the data collection, revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper. VL: contributed to the study design, approved the final version of the paper. FP: contributed to the data collection, performed the statistical analysis and interpreted data, drafted the work and revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Patti.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Clara Grazia Chisari has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. Giancarlo Comi has served as a Biogen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme and Teva Advisory Board Member. He received congress and travel/accommodation expense compensations or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva and Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (FISM). Massimo Filippi is Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Neurology; received compensation for consulting services and/or speaking activities from Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries; and receives research support from Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Roche, Italian Ministry of Health, Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla, and ARiSLA (Fondazione Italiana di Ricerca per la SLA). Damiano Paolicelli has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. Pietro Iaffaldano has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. Mauro Zaffaroni has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. Vincenzo Brescia Morra: has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. Eleonora Cocco has no conflict of interest. Girolama Alessandra Marfia: has served as an advisory board member and received speaker honoraria, congress, travel and accommodation expense compensations from Merck, Teva, Mylan, Bayer, Novartis, Roche, Almirall, Biogen and Sanofi Genzyme. Luigi Maria Grimaldi: has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. Matilde Inglese: received honoraria or consultation fees from Roche, Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Genzyme and research grants from NIH, NMSS, FISM, and Teva Neuroscience. Simona Bonavita: Speaker and/or advisory board fee, and7or travel grant from Novartis, Teva, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Biogen-Idec, Merck-Serono. Alessandra Lugaresi has served as a Biogen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/ Genzyme and Teva Advisory Board Member. She received congress and travel/accommodation expense compensations or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva and Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (FISM). Her institutions received research grants from Novartis. Paola Cavalla has served as an advisory board member for Almirall, Biogen, Merck-Serono, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Teva; she has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. Giuseppe Salemi: has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. Giovanna De Luca has no conflict of interest. Salvatore Cottone: has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. Antonella Conte: declares no conflict of interest. Patrizia Sola declares no conflict of interest. Umberto Aguglia has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. Giorgia Teresa Maniscalco has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. Claudio Gasperini declares no conflict of interest. Maria Teresa Ferrò: has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. Ilaria Pesci declares no conflict of interest. Maria Pia Amato has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. Marco Rovaris: received travel grants and fees for consulting and public speaking from Almirall, Biogen, Genzyme-Sanofi, Merck Serono, Mylan and Novartis. Claudio Solaro has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. Giacomo Lus declares no conflict of interest. Davide Maimone declares no conflict of interest. Roberto Bergamaschi: declares no conflict of interest. Franco Granella has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. Alessia Di Sapio received personal compensation for speaking and consulting by Biogen and Novartis and has been reimbursed by Merck, Biogen, Genzyme and Roche for attending several conferences. Antonio Bertolotto has received grants to attend scientific congresses or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva. Rocco Totaro: declares no conflict of interest. Marika Vianello declares no conflict of interest. Paolo Bellantonio declares no conflict of interest. Vito Lepore declares no conflict of interest. Francesco Patti has received honoraria for speaking activities by Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA; he also served as advisory board member the following companies: Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA; he was also funded by Pfizer and FISM for epidemiological studies; he received grants for congress participation from Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA.

Ethical approval

This study protocol was approved by the local Ethical Committee of the University of Catania (Catania 1) and by the Ethical Committee of the participating centers.

Informed consent

Each patient participating to the study signed an Informed Consent specifically designed to participate to the Italian MS Register.

Additional information

The members of the Italian MS Register Study Group are listed in acknowledgements.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chisari, C.G., Comi, G., Filippi, M. et al. PML risk is the main factor driving the choice of discontinuing natalizumab in a large multiple sclerosis population: results from an Italian multicenter retrospective study. J Neurol 269, 933–944 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10676-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10676-6

Keywords

Navigation