Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Erratum to: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol DOI 10.1007/s00270-015-1209-x
In the above-mentioned manuscript, relative frequencies have been falsely determined as cumulative probabilities in some cases. Corrections are in bold.
Page 4, Technical Follow-up
Overall primary patency rate was 89 % [occlusion (n = 10) and stenosis requiring revision (n = 8)/163…]. Probability of 14 days primary patency was 87.5 % (group 1) and 100 % (group 2).
Page 5, Clinical Progress
Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival yielded 1-year survival rate of 84 %. One-year survival rates were 79.2 % (group 1) and 86.8 % (group 2). Subgroup analysis for Child–Pugh class yielded 1-year survival rates of 100 % (A), 85.8 % (B) and 66.8 % (C). Liver capsule perforation was associated with significantly lower probability of 1-year survival (38.1 vs. 86.4 %; p < 0.001). The small number of variceal embolizations did not allow valid analysis… (83 % against 89 %).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s00270-015-1209-x.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lauermann, J., Potthoff, A., Mc Cavert, M. et al. Erratum to: Comparison of Technical and Clinical Outcome of Transjugular Portosystemic Shunt Placement Between a Bare Metal Stent and a PTFE-Stentgraft Device. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 39, 635–636 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1262-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1262-5