Log in

Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Circumferential Upper Arm Liposuction with Double Incision: A Study of 496 Cases

  • Original Articles
  • Body Contouring
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In cases where the upper arm exhibits an irregular cylindrical appearance with subcutaneous fat concentrated primarily in the posterior lateral aspect, traditional localized fat suction techniques may lead to uneven or disharmonious results when addressing this concern. Many practitioners have turned to circumferential fat suction methods using multi-incision approaches to ensure effective results and fat removal. However, these methods often involve numerous incisions and complex procedures, necessitating the development of new, more efficient surgical techniques.

Methods

We collected and screened patients who underwent upper arm circumferential liposuction with a double incision technique at our hospital from October 2020 to February 2023. A total of 496 cases were included in our retrospective analysis, in which we examined factors such as the length of surgery, arm circumference before and after surgery, subcutaneous tissue thickness before and after surgery, fat suction volume, postoperative satisfaction, and postoperative complications of the patients.

Results

The average length of surgery was 71.7 min. 458 cases (92.3%) showed significant improvement, 23 cases (4.6%) reported satisfaction, and 10 cases (2.0%) were essentially satisfied. Additionally, 339 cases (68.3%) experienced an improvement in skin laxity. Four cases (0.8%) developed localized hard nodules with slight tenderness in the early postoperative period, which resolved without special treatment after observation and follow-up for 1–3 months. Three cases (0.6%) reported localized pain or numbness, and they were given oral medication. Their symptoms disappeared after 1–3 months of observation and follow-up. Three cases (0.6%) had localized pain or numbness, and their symptoms disappeared. All of these cases improved and resolved after one month of taking mecobalamin tablets. There were also three cases (0.6%) with mild pigmentation of the incision and two cases (0.4%) with mild limitation of unilateral upper arm abduction movement. However, upper arm activities were not affected after three months to one year of follow-up. No serious complications were reported, resulting in an overall satisfaction rate of 99.0%.

Conclusion

The double incision upper arm liposuction is safe, effective, time-saving, with high satisfaction and fewer complications, and is worthy of clinical popularization and application.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Vasilakis V et al (2020) Four-position four-entry site circumferential arm liposuction: technique overview and experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 44(5):1596–1603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stevens WG, Pietrzak LK, Spring MA (2013) Broad overview of a clinical and commercial experience with CoolSculpting. Aesthet Surg J 33(6):835–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stevens WG (2014) Does cryolipolysis lead to skin tightening? A first report of cryodermadstringo. Aesthet Surg J 34(6):NP32–NP34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carruthers JD, Humphrey S, Rivers JK (2017) Cryolipolysis for reduction of arm fat: safety and efficacy of a prototype coolcup applicator with flat contour. Dermatol Surg 43(7):940–949

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sugawara J et al (2017) Application for lower facial fat reduction and tightening by static type monopolar 1-MHz radio frequency for body contouring. Lasers Surg Med 49(8):750–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu DC et al (2016) Subdermal radiofrequency for skin tightening of the posterior upper arms. Dermatol Surg 42(9):1089–1093

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alster TS, Tanzi EL (2012) Noninvasive lifting of arm, thigh, and knee skin with transcutaneous intense focused ultrasound. Dermatol Surg 38(5):754–759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Putra IB, Jusuf NK, Dewi NK (2019) Utilisation of cryolipolysis among asians: a review on efficacy and safety. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 7(9):1548–1554

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chia CT et al (2015) Radiofrequency-assisted liposuction compared with aggressive superficial, subdermal liposuction of the arms: a bilateral quantitative comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3(7):e459

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Leclere FM et al (2015) Laser-assisted lipolysis for arm contouring in Teimourian grades I and II: a prospective study of 45 patients. Lasers Med Sci 30(3):1053–1059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nilforoushzadeh MA et al (2023) Efficacy of endolift laser for arm and under abdomen fat reduction. J Cosmet Dermatol 22(7):2018–2022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Katz B, Doherty S (2018) Safety and efficacy of a noninvasive 1,060-nm diode laser for fat reduction of the flanks. Dermatol Surg 44(3):388–396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Apfelberg DB (1996) Results of multicenter study of laser-assisted liposuction. Clin Plast Surg 23(4):713–719

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shermak MA (2014) Aesthetic refinements in body contouring in the massive weight loss patient: part 2. Arms. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(5):726e–735e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nagrath N, Winters R (2023) Brachioplasty. In: StatPearls. 2023: Treasure Island, FL

  16. Sergesketter AR, Erdmann D (2022) A personal approach to brachioplasty. Ann Plast Surg 88(5 Suppl 5):S433–S438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. (2022) Aesthetic Plastic Surgery National Databank Statistics 2020–2021. Aesthet Surg J 42(Suppl 1):1-18

  18. Hoyos A, Perez M (2012) Arm dynamic definition by liposculpture and fat grafting. Aesthet Surg J 32(8):974–987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hong JY et al (2020) Efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound for noninvasive abdominal subcutaneous fat reduction. Dermatol Surg 46(2):213–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Duncan DI (2012) Improving outcomes in upper arm liposuction: adding radiofrequency-assisted liposuction to induce skin contraction. Aesthet Surg J 32(1):84–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Paul M, Mulholland RS (2009) A new approach for adipose tissue treatment and body contouring using radiofrequency-assisted liposuction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33(5):687–694

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Flynn TC et al (2000) History of liposuction. Dermatol Surg 26(6):515–520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Klein JA (1990) Tumescent technique for regional anesthesia permits lidocaine doses of 35 mg/kg for liposuction. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 16(3):248–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Collins PS, Moyer KE (2018) Evidence-based practice in liposuction. Ann Plast Surg 80(6S Suppl 6):S403–S405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Holt NF (2017) Tumescent anaesthesia: its applications and well tolerated use in the out-of-operating room setting. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 30(4):518–524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hong YG et al (2012) Three-dimensional circumferential liposuction of the overweight or obese upper arm. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(3):497–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lillis PJ (1999) Liposuction of the arms. Dermatol Clin 17(4):783–797

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Deng M, Gu Y, Lei H, Liu Z, Ma G (2014) Application of adjacent aesthetic unit combined liposuction in upper arm. Chin J Plast Surg 30(6):439–442

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gu Y et al (2021) Application of a proposed multi-positional circumferential arm liposuction method and quantification of its clinical efficacy evaluation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 45(3):1115–1124

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Garibyan L et al (2014) Three-dimensional volumetric quantification of fat loss following cryolipolysis. Lasers Surg Med 46(2):75–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Leclere FM et al (2016) Laser-assisted lipolysis for arm contouring in Teimourian grades III and IV: a prospective study involving 22 patients. Plast Surg (Oakv) 24(1):35–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No.

Funding

No.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guoliang Shen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

All the participants in this work gave their informed consent in writing.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 159462 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Han, W., Deng, Q. et al. Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Circumferential Upper Arm Liposuction with Double Incision: A Study of 496 Cases. Aesth Plast Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03875-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03875-9

Keywords

Navigation