Log in

Laser-assisted lipolysis for arm contouring in Teimourian grades I and II: a prospective study of 45 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Upper arm deformities secondary to weight loss or senile elastosis have led to an increased demand for aesthetic contouring procedures. We conducted this study to objectively assess if, in Teimourian low-grade upper arm remodelling, one session of laser-assisted lypolisis (LAL) could result in full patient satisfaction. Between 2011 and 2013, 45 patients were treated for unsightly fat arm Teimourian grade I (15 patients), grade IIa (15 patients) and grade IIb (15 patients) with one session of LAL. The laser used in this study was a 1470-nm diode laser (Alma Lasers, Cesarea, Israel) with the following parameters: continuous mode, 15 W power and transmission through a 600-μm optical fibre. Previous mathematical modelling suggested that 0.1 kJ was required in order to destroy 1 ml of fat. Treatment parameters and adverse effects were recorded.The arm circumference and skin pinch measurements were assessed pre and postoperatively. Patients were asked to file a satisfaction questionnaire. Pain during the anaesthesia and discomfort after the procedure were minimal. Complications included prolonged oedema in 11 patients. The average arm circumference decreased by 4.9 ± 0.4 cm in the right arm (p < 0.01) and 4.7 ± 0.5 cm in the left arm (p < 0.01) in grade I patients, 5.5 ± 0.6 cm in the right arm (p < 0.01) and 5.2 ± 0.5 cm in the left arm (p < 0.01) in grade IIa patients and 5.4 ± 0.5 cm in the right arm (p < 0.01) and 5.3 ± 0.5 cm in the left arm (p < 0.01) in grade IIB patients. The skin tightening effect was confirmed by the reduction of the skin calliper measurements in all three groups. Overall mean opinion of treatment was high for both patients and investigators. Of the 45 patients, all but one would recommend this treatment. A single session of LAL in upper arm remodelling for Teimourian grades I to IIb is a safe and reproducible technique. The procedure allows reduction in the amount of adipose deposits while providing full skin tightening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2012 Cosmetic plastic surgery statistics [Internet]. Arlington Heights, IL: American Society of Plastic Surgeons; c2012 [cited 2013 May 1]. Available from: http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Documents/news-resources/statistics/2012-Plastic-Surgery-Statistics/Cosmetic-Procedure-Trends-2012.pdf

  2. Teimourian B, Malekzadeh S (1998) Rejuvenation of the upper arm. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:545–551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. El Khatib H (2007) Classification of brachial ptosis: strategy for treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:1337–1342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Duncan DI (2012) Improving outcomes in upper arm liposuction: adding radiofrequency-assisted liposuction to induce skin contraction. Aesthet Surg J 32:84–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zocchi M (1992) Ultrasonic liposculpturing. Aesthet Plast Surg 16:287–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Silberg BN (1998) The technique of external ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 101:552–560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mordon SR, Wassmer M, Reynaud JP, Zemmouri J (2008) Mathematical modeling of laser lipolysis. Biomed Eng Online 29:7–10

    Google Scholar 

  8. Trelles M, Bonanad E, Moreno-Moraga J, Alcolea J, Mordon S, Leclère FM (2013) Laser-assisted lipolysis for gynecomastia: safe and effective skin retraction. Rev Col Bras Cir 40:23–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leclère FM, Moreno-Moraga J, Mordon S, Servell P, Unglaub F, Kolb F, Rimareix F, Trelles MA (2014) Laser-assisted lipolysis for cankle remodelling: a prospective study in 30 patients. Lasers Med Sci 29:131–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leclère FM, Trelles M, Moreno-Moraga J, Servell P, Unglaub F, Mordon SR (2012) 980-nm laser lipolysis (LAL): About 674 procedures in 359 patients. J Cosmet Laser Ther 14:67–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moreno-Moraga J, Trelles MA, Mordon S, Unglaub F, Bravo E, Royo de La Torre J, Sanz I, Servell P, Betrouni N, Leclère FM (2012) Laser-assisted lipolysis for knee remodelling: a prospective study in 30 patients. J Cosmet Laser Ther 14:59–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Trelles MA, Mordon SR, Bonanad E, Moreno Moraga J, Heckmann A, Unglaub F, Betrouni N, Leclère FM (2013) Laser-assisted lipolysis in the treatment of gynecomastia: a prospective study in 28 patients. Lasers Med Sci 28:375–382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leclère FM, Moreno-Moraga J, Alcolea JM, Casoli V, Mordon SR, Vogt PM, Trelles MA (2014) Laser assisted lipolysis for neck and submental remodeling in Rohrich type I to III aging neck: a prospective study in 30 patients. J Cosmet Laser Ther 16(6):284–289

  14. Leclère FM, Vogt PM, Moreno-Moraga J, Alcolea JM, Casoli V, Mordon SR, Trelles MA (2014) Laser assisted lipolysis for neck and submental remodeling in Rohrich type IV patient: fact or fiction? J Cosmet Laser Ther 13:1–6

  15. Leclère FM, Mordon SR, Trelles MA. Laser lipolysis. Chapter in textbook of aesthetic and cosmetic dermatology, Publisher Informa Healthcare Books, Informa Uk Limited, Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH. Pending publication

  16. Klein JA (1990) Tumescent technique for regional anesthesia permits lidocaine doses of 35 mg/kg for liposuction. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 16:248–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Klein JA (1990) The tumescent technique. Anesthesia and modified liposuction technique. Dermatol Clin 8:425–437

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kotlus BS, Mok C (2011) Patient satisfaction after upper extremity laser lipolysis without suction. Plast Surg Int 2011:352451

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dudelzak J, Hussain M, Goldberg DJ (2009) Laser lipolysis of the arm with and without suction aspiration: clinical and histologic changes. J Cosmet Laser Ther 11:70–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reynaud JP, Skibinski M, Wassmer B, Rochon P, Mordon S (2009) Lipolysis using a 980-nm diode laser: a retrospective analysis of 534 procedures. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Dr. Emma Hayton for review of the english manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario A. Trelles.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leclère, F.M., Alcolea, J.M., Vogt, P. et al. Laser-assisted lipolysis for arm contouring in Teimourian grades I and II: a prospective study of 45 patients. Lasers Med Sci 30, 1053–1059 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1705-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1705-2

Keywords

Navigation