Log in

Comparative Analysis of Lower Island Flap Transposition (LIFT) in Wise-Pattern Mastopexy: Does It Improve Upper Pole Fullness and Breast Harmony?

  • Original Articles
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Utilization of autologous parenchymal flaps aims to attain enduringly favourable outcomes and uphold volume in the upper breast pole after mastopexy procedures. The objective of this study was to juxtapose and scrutinize postoperative upper pole fullness, upper/lower pole ratios, occurrences of bottoming-out deformity, and complication rates between two patient cohorts: those who underwent the wise-pattern superior pedicle mastopexy with the LIFT technique and those who underwent the conventional wise-pattern superior pedicle mastopexy.

Materials and Methods

All the patients in this study were appropriately categorized as primary patients, signifying their lack of any prior breast surgery history. These individuals presented with grades II and III breast ptosis on both breasts, ranging from moderate to severe deformities per the Regnault classification. Importantly, all patients uniformly expressed their desire to achieve a firmer breast appearance without recourse to using breast implants. The patients’ ages and preoperative breast measurements were recorded for analysis. Measurements, including the distance from the NAC to the inframammary fold and from the sternal notch to the NAC, were systematically measured both before the surgery and at the 1-year postoperative mark.

Results

The upper and lower pole ratios, defined by Mallucci and Branford, were found to be 45.22% ± 2.20% and 54.88% ± 2.20%, respectively, within the LIFT group. In 13 instances, a lower pole distance exceeding 55% indicated a potential bottoming-out deformity (value lower than 45%/55% ratio or 0.818). Conversely, within the control group, the upper and lower pole ratios were determined as 43.22% ± 2.80% and 56.88% ± 2.80%, respectively. These findings demonstrated statistical significance. Notably, in 39 cases within the superior pedicle wise-pattern mastopexy group, a lower pole distance surpassing 55% (value lower than 45%/55% ratio or 0.818) suggested a leaning towards a bottoming-out deformity (p: 0.003). A postoperative period of at least 12 months was essential to discern the emergence of upper pole fullness and the potential development of bottoming-out deformities. Among the cases within the LIFT group, 93% exhibited successful attainment of upper pole fullness, while in the control group, this outcome was achieved in 82% of cases (p>0.05).

Conclusion

Implementing the LIFT technique alongside the wise-pattern superior pedicle mastopexy decreases the occurrence of bottoming-out deformity after 1 year. Although there is no statistically significant difference, the LIFT flap technique has contributed to some extent to upper pole fullness.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  1. Yilmaz KB (2021) A modified superior pedicle mastopexy technique with an inferolateral-based auto augmentation flap. Aesth Plast Surg 45:884–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hammond DC, O’Connor EA (2014) The lower ısland flap transposition (LIFT) technique for control of the upper pole in circumvertical mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:655–660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Losken A, Holtz DJ (2007) The versatility of the superomedial pedicle in managing the massive weight loss breast: the rotation-advancement technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:1060–1068

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Graf RM, Mansur AE, Tenius FP, Ono MC, Romano GG, Cruz GA (2008) Mastopexy after massive weight loss: extended chest wall-based flap associated with a loop of pectoralis muscle. Aesth Plast Surg 32:371–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rubin JP, Khachi G (2008) Mastopexy after massive weight loss: Dermal suspension and selective auto-augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 35:123–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, Blondeel P, Hijjawi JB, Roche N, Monstrey S (2009) Autologous breast augmentation with the lateral intercostal artery perforator flap in massive weight loss patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg 62:65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Modolin M, Cintra W Jr, Silva MM, Ribeiro L, Gemperli R, Ferreira MC (2010) Mammaplasty with inferior pedicle flap after massive weight loss. Aesth Plast Surg 34:596–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thornton DJ, le Fourie R (2010) Autologous augmentation-mastopexy after bariatric surgery: waste not want not! Aesth Plast Surg 34:519–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Okada A, Saito FL, Hiraki PY et al (2012) Mastopexy after massive weight loss: dermal suspension, parenchymal resha**, and augmentation with autologous tissue. Rev Bras Cir Plast 27:283–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mallucci P, Branford O (2014) Population analysis of the perfect breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:436–447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis: definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3:193–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ribeiro L, Accorsi A Jr, Buss A, Marcal-Pessoa M (2002) Creation and evolution of 30 years of the inferior pedicle in reduction mammaplasties. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:960–970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ribeiro L (1975) A new technique for reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 55:330–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Daniel M (1995) Mammaplasty with pectoral muscle flap. Paper presented at: 64th Annual ASPRS/PSEF/ASMS Scientific Meeting; October 7–11,1995; Montreal, Quebec, Canada

  15. Cerqueira AA (1998) Mammaplasty: breast fixation with dermoglandular mono upper pedicle flap under the pectoralis muscle. Aesth Plast Surg 22:276–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Graf R, Biggs TM, Steely RL (2000) Breast shape: a technique for better upper pole fullness. Aesth Plast Surg 24:348–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Graf R, Biggs TM (2002) In search of better shape in mastopexy and reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Graf R, Reis de Araujo LR, Rippel R, Neto LG, Pace DT, Biggs T (2003) Reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy using the vertical scar and thoracic wall flap technique. Aesth Plast Surg 27:6–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Botti G (1999) Vertical scar mammaplasty: Stable padding of the superior pole by means of a posteriorly based pedicle autoprosthesis. Aesth Surg J 19:116–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Foustanos A, Zavrides H (2007) A double-flap technique: an alternative mastopexy approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:55–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hidalgo DA (2013) Mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:642e–656e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Altınel D, Serin M, Toplu G (2022) Comparison of classic mastopexy method with double-pedicled auto augmentation mastopexy with conic-shaped modified ınferior butterfly flap. Aesth Plast Sur 46:1641–1649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Raafat SS, Ezzat SZ, Khachaba YA, Aboul-Nasr LA (2020) Autologous mastopexy and autoaugmention of the breast. Plastic Reconstr Surg Global Open 8:e3126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Calobrace MB, Gabriel A (2021) Mastopexy with autoaugmentation and fat transfer. Clin Plastic Surg 48:17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Graf RM, Ono MCC, Pace D, Balbinot P, Pazio ALB, de Paula DR (2019) Breast auto-augmentation (mastopexy and lipofilling): An option for quitting breast implants. Aesth Plast Surg 43:1133–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ors S (2018) Augmentation mastopexy with a dermal encapsulated round or anatomic autoprosthesis. Aesth Plast Surg 42:88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Weiner DL, Aiache AE, Silver L et al (1973) A single dermal pedicle for nipple transposition in subcutaneous mastectomy, reduction mammaplasty, or mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 51:115–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Swanson E (2015) Breast autoaugmentation: an enduring myth. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:779e–781e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Graf R, Tolazzi AR, Balbinot P, Pazio A, Valente PM, Freitas RS (2016) Influence of the pectoralis major muscle sling in chest wall-based flap suspension after vertical mammaplasty: ten-year follow-up. Aesth Surg J 36(10):1113–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alpay Duran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest concerning the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

Informed consent

This study was conducted under the principles of the Helsinki Declaration by obtaining informed consent from the subjects.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Elevation of the autoprosthesis flap and preparation of the subglandular plane (MOV 23146 kb)

Adaptation of the autoprosthesis flap with PDS sutures (MOV 170346 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duran, A., Eroglu, S. Comparative Analysis of Lower Island Flap Transposition (LIFT) in Wise-Pattern Mastopexy: Does It Improve Upper Pole Fullness and Breast Harmony?. Aesth Plast Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03858-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03858-w

Keywords

Navigation