Abstract
Orexinergic neurons are critically involved in regulating arousal, wakefulness, and appetite. Their dysfunction has been associated with slee** disorders, and non-peptide drugs are currently being developed to treat insomnia and narcolepsy. Yet, no light-regulated agents are available to reversibly control their activity. To meet this need, a photoswitchable peptide analogue of the endogenous neuroexcitatory peptide orexin-B was designed, synthesized, and tested in vitro and in vivo. This compound – photorexin – is the first photo-reversible ligand reported for orexin receptors. It allows dynamic control of activity in vitro (including almost the same efficacy as orexin-B, high nanomolar potency, and subtype selectivity to human OX2 receptors) and in vivo in zebrafish larvae by direct application in water. Photorexin induces dose- and light-dependent changes in locomotion and a reduction in the successive induction reflex that is associated with sleep behavior. Molecular dynamics calculations indicate that trans and cis photorexin adopt similar bent conformations and that the only discriminant between their structures and activities is the positioning of the N-terminus. This, in the case of the more active trans isomer, points towards the OX2 N-terminus and extra-cellular loop 2, a region of the receptor known to be involved in ligand binding and recognition consistent with a “message-address” system. Thus, our approach could be extended to several important families of endogenous peptides, such as endothelins, nociceptin, and dynorphins among others, that bind to their cognate receptors through a similar mechanism: a “message” domain involved in receptor activation and signal transduction, and an “address” sequence for receptor occupation and improved binding affinity.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Optical methods, and optogenetics in particular, have revolutionized neuroscience by aiding our understanding of brain circuits through light-mediated monitoring and/or manipulation of neuronal activity [1,2,3,4]. Despite broad applications in terms of targeted pathways, optogenetics has several limitations [5]. While photocontrol over the exogenous light-sensitive opsins is robust, viral expression in tissues can display poor homogeneity and specificity. Moreover, the kinetics of light-gated channels differ from those of endogenous receptors and their overexpression might lead to unintended neuroplastic phenomena. Finally, irreversible optogenetic manipulations are subject to safety and regulatory requirements that hamper or slow down their therapeutic potential [6]. In recent years, photopharmacology has emerged as a complementary approach to control with light the function of endogenous proteins as well as lipids and ribonucleic acids [7, 8]. The method relies on incorporating a photoswitchable moiety into the structure of a bioactive compound and regulating the local concentration of (in)active drug through reversible illumination [9, 10]. In principle, the metabolism, pharmacokinetics, and safety of the compounds can be characterized as for conventional drugs and biologicals, in contrast to genetic manipulation methods [10]. Despite the versatility and attractiveness of the approach, many endogenous targets are yet to be addressed with synthetic photoswitches [11]. In particular, neuropeptides have received limited attention compared to small molecule synthetic ligands.
Among these, a family of neuroexcitatory peptides known as orexins (or hypocretins) [12, 13] is critically involved in regulating sleep and wakefulness [14], energy homeostasis, and reward [12]. Orexin signaling is mediated by two closely related G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) ̶ OX1 and OX2 (orexin) receptors ̶ which are strongly conserved among mammals [12, 15]. While orexin cell bodies are concentrated in the hypothalamic area [12, 13], orexin receptors are widely expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) [16, 17]. Their endogenous ligands are two peptides, named orexin-A (OX-A) and -B (OX-B), which bind to the cognate receptors with different selectivity profiles. OX-A displays high affinity towards both receptors, whereas OX-B is selective for OX2 [12]. In both cases, agonist activity transduces into a robust rise in intracellular calcium concentration when tested in recombinant cells expressing OX1 or OX2 [18, 19]. Small molecule antagonists are currently being developed as safe insomnia treatments [20], whereas dysfunctions of the orexinergic system have been associated with narcolepsy [21,22,23]. However, the discovery of non-peptide agonists to treat this and other forms of hypersomnia disorders has been challenging [24,25,26]. Besides, these compounds might find limited applications as orexin receptors are widely expressed in the CNS. Consequently, their activity would suffer from poor spatiotemporal selectivity and might cause adverse effects. A photocaged analogue of OX-B was recently developed to address these constraints [27], however, local diffusion limits spatial control over the release of such irreversibly light-activated ligands. In addition, byproducts released upon photouncaging might be toxic or interfere with biological processes, complicating result interpretation and eventually the use of these ligands. Lastly, photocaged compounds are difficult to store and handle, as accidental exposure to light can lead to the irreversible release of the caged molecule. Here, we present a light-regulated analogue of the orexin-B peptide, which displays similar agonist activity and can be reversibly toggled between two isomeric states characterized by different potencies at the orexin receptors in vitro. We further present preliminary results showing that photorexin allows dynamic control over endogenous OX2 activity in zebrafish larvae, making it one of the few photoswitchable peptides displaying activity in vivo and the first one for a CNS target. Thus, photorexin is a versatile and promising tool to modulate orexinergic transmission in research and in therapeutic contexts.
Materials and methods
Photorexin synthesis
Photorexin was synthesized by standard 9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl (Fmoc) solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) on a 0.1 mmol scale. Peptide elongation was performed using an automated microwave-assisted peptide synthesizer combined with subsequent manual elongation of the chain. The Fmoc-protected photoswitchable amino acid [3-(3-aminomethyl) phenylazo] phenylacetic acid (AMPP) was synthesized adapting a protocol published by Podewin et al. [28]. Synthesis, purification, and analytical characterization of all compounds are detailed in the Supplementary Information (SI).
Photochromic characterization
Peptide quantification
After purification, lyophilized samples were reconstituted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) and quantified by measuring the absorption of the azobenzene moiety at 323 nm with a micro-volume spectrophotometer. The peptide concentration was then determined using the Lambert-Beer law:
where c is the calculated concentration (M), A is the absorbance (AU) measured at a given wavelength, ε is the corresponding molar extinction coefficient (25 000 M− 1cm− 1 at λ323) [29], and l is the optical path length (cm).
UV-Vis absorption spectra
Ultraviolet-Visible (UV-Vis) absorption spectra were recorded with a Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer using a far-UV quartz cuvette (Hellma, Jena, DE) with an ultra-micro cell (10 mm optical path). Samples were prepared in milliQ H2O at 20 µM. UV-Vis absorbance scans were performed at 25 °C in the dark-adapted state (0 min, dashed curve in Fig. S2.1) and at different irradiation times. An Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (ARG-235-UVGI) torch, which has multiple emission lines in addition to the nominal 311 nm, was used as light source. The power density (20.8 mW∙cm− 2) was measured with a PM101 Power Meter Interface with USB, RS232, UART, and Analog Operation (Thorlabs GmbH), coupled to a sensor (S470C - Thermal Power Sensor Head, Volume Absorber, 0.25–10.6 μm, 100 µW − 5 W, Ø15 mm, Thorlabs GmbH) placed at 2.5 cm from the lamp and processed using Optical Power Monitor Version 4.1.4204.742 (Thorlabs GmbH).
Photostationary states
Identical phOX samples were obtained from a 50 µM dilution in PBS (pH 7.4, 25 °C) and were exposed to light of different wavelengths in order to study their photochromic behavior. The samples were injected for chromatographic analysis immediately after being illuminated. Trans→cis photoisomerization was studied after illumination with an ARG-235-UVGI torch light, or at 365 and 380 nm, whereas cis→trans back-isomerization was induced at 455 and 500 nm. Custom-made multi-LED dual-wavelength lamps (FC Tècnics, Barcelona, ES) were used as light sources. Light power densities were measured as previously described and ranged from 16.9 mW∙cm− 2 (455 nm), 2.2 mW∙cm− 2 (365 nm), 0.83 mW∙cm− 2 (500 nm) to 0.51 mW∙cm− 2 (380 nm).
The photostationary states were quantified integrating the area of the peaks corresponding to the cis and trans isomers in the chromatograms visualized at 220 nm. Photoisomerization kinetics were obtained by plotting the fractions of the cis and trans isomers over cumulative irradiation times. Chromatographic gradients are described in the analytical section of the SI.
Resistance to photofatigue
Stability to photodegradation was evaluated by exposing a phOX sample (25 µM in PBS at pH 7.4 and 25 °C) to alternating intervals (3 min each) of UV and visible light illumination (365 and 455 nm, respectively). The trans-cis isomeric distributions under different illumination conditions were measured by integrating the area of the corresponding peaks after UPLC analysis. These values were then converted to isomer percentages and plotted. After several cycles, no reduction could be observed in the isomers’ peak area, thus confirming photorexin stability to photodegradation.
Thermal relaxation
The thermal relaxation rate at 37 °C was investigated using an Infinite M200 PRO microplate reader (Tecan, Männedorf, CH). A phOX sample (50 µM in milliQ water) was placed in a 96-multiwell plate and pre-irradiated for 10 min at 365 nm. Subsequently, the plate was moved into the microplate reader and kept in the dark at 37 °C within the instrument. Data were collected every 30 min for 24.5 h and analyzed by nonlinear regression with GraphPad Prism 9. The half-life was calculated using the monoexponential decay model provided by the software.
Photopharmacology
Photorexin sample preparation
Samples of trans phOX were kept in the dark both prior to and during the whole duration of the experiment to avoid undesired photoconversion caused by environmental light. Unless differently stated, data for cis phOX were obtained by pre-illuminating the samples for 10 min with 365 nm UV light.
PFSK-1 and CHO-K1 cell culture
PFSK-1 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Chinese hamster ovary-K1 (CHO-K1) cells stably transfected to express human OX1 were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12 Ham (DMEM/F12 1:1) medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 600 µg/ml G418. All cell lines were grown at 37 °C in 5% CO2.
FLIPR Tetra calcium mobilization assay
Cells were plated at 50,000 cells/well in 96-well black-wall plates with poly-D-lysine-coated clear bottoms and grown overnight at 37 °C in 5% CO2. On the day of the assay, an equal volume of loading solution (2X) containing a calcium-sensitive fluorescent dye (BD Calcium Assay Kit, BD Biosciences, USA) was added to the cells and incubated for 60 min at 37 °C in 5% CO2. During the incubation period, 8-points half-log serial dilutions of the peptides were prepared in Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) supplemented with 0.1% BSA starting from 345 µM stocks in milliQ water. In the assay, final concentrations of the peptides ranged from 1 µM to 0.3 nM. Calcium-mediated changes in fluorescence were monitored in a Fluorometric Imaging Plate Reader (FLIPR) Tetra instrument (Molecular Devices, USA). Fluorescence intensity was measured for 12 s to establish baseline fluorescence before addition of the test compound (20 µL/well) and further readings for a total of 155 s (excitation at 470–495 nm, detection at 515–575 nm). FLIPR parameters were set as follows: light intensity, 20%; exposure time, 0.4 s; gain, 120.
Raw data from the FLIPR Tetra was exported as the difference between maximum and minimum fluorescence observed for each well. Relative fluorescent units (RFU) were plotted against compound concentration and the curves fitted by non-linear regression using GraphPad Prism. Results are from two independent experiments each run in triplicates. Agonist potencies (EC50) are expressed as means + SD.
TsA201 cell culture
Transformed human kidney tsA201 cells were purchased from the European Collection of Authenticated Cell Culture. Cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 and grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12 Ham (DMEM/F12 1:1) medium (Life Technologies), supplemented with 10% FBS (Life Technologies) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich).
Cell transfection
Clones of GFP-labelled orexin receptors were kindly provided by Prof. Jyrki Kukkonen and the exact protein sequences have been reported by Putula et al. [30]. The plasmid for the genetically encoded calcium indicator R-GECO1 was acquired from Addgene. Cells were transiently transfected with hOX1 or hOX2 receptors and R-GECO1 with X-tremeGENE 9 DNA Transfection Reagent (Roche Applied Science) following the manufacturer’s instructions. After 24 h, cells were harvested with accutase (Sigma-Aldrich) and plated onto 16-mm glass coverslips (Fisher Scientific) pre-treated with poly-L-Lysine (Sigma-Aldrich) to allow cell adhesion. Experiments were performed using pre-confluent cultures between 48 and 72 h after transfection.
In vitro single-cell calcium imaging
The buffer used for single-cell intracellular calcium recordings contained: 140 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM glucose and 2 mM CaCl2 (pH 7.4). Before each experiment, cells were mounted on the recording chamber (Open Diamond Bath Imaging Chamber for Round Coverslips from Warner Instruments, Holliston, USA) and rinsed with fresh solution. The recording chamber was filled with 1 ml buffer and placed on an IX71 inverted microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, JP) with a XLUMPLFLN 20XW x20/1 water immersion objective (Olympus). R-GECO1 was excited during 50 ms at 562 nm by using a Polychrome V light source (Till Photonics, Kaufbeuren, DE) equipped with a Xenon Short Arc lamp (Ushio, Oude Meer, NL) and a 585-nm dichroic beam splitter (Chroma Technology, USA). Emission at 600 nm was filtered by an ET 630/75 nm emission filter (Chroma Technology) and finally collected by a C9100-13 EM-CCD camera (Hamamatsu). The compound was applied during imaging acquisition by pipetting a small volume into the accessory pool of the recording chamber. The final dilution was approximately 1:1000.
Photostimulation during recordings was performed illuminating the entire focused field using the Polychrome V connected to a personal computer. Shutter and wavelength were controlled using the Patchmaster software (HEKA, DE). Light intervals lasted a total of 5 min for all the experiments with flashes of blue (455 nm, 3.5-seconds duration) and UV (365 nm, 3.5-seconds duration) light. Images were acquired at room temperature at a 4-s interval using the SmartLux software (HEKA).
Images were analyzed using FIJI (ImageJ). Data were analyzed and processed using GraphPad Prism v8.3.1. Statistical differences were determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Animal housing
Wild-type zebrafish embryos (Tüpfel long-fin strain) were purchased from the animal facility of the Barcelona Biomedical Research Park (PRBB) and raised in darkness for 7 days at 28.5 °C in UV-sterilized tap water. Petri dishes housing the animals were cleaned and replenished with fresh water on a daily basis. Animal development was checked every 24 h. Unhealthy or abnormal embryos and larvae were removed and euthanatized in tricaine methanosulfonate 0.02%. All experiments and procedures were conducted according to the European Directive 2010/63/EU.
General methods for locomotor assays
All photorexin solutions were freshly prepared prior to any experiment from 5 mM stock solutions and stored in the dark at -20 °C. The stock solutions were diluted with UV-sterilized water to reach the desired final concentrations. Larvae were recorded and video analyzed using the Zebrabox and Zebralab software (ViewPoint Life Sciences, Lyon, FR). Briefly, larvae at 7 days postfertilization (dpf) were randomly distributed over the different treatment groups. Each individual was placed in a well of a 96-well plate containing 200 µL of fresh UV-sterilized water per well. Each treatment included 12 specimens. The larvae were left undisturbed for 40 min in the dark. Continuously, 100 µL of water was removed from each well and replaced with a double-concentrated treatment solution before video recording began. Photorexin solutions were added with a multichannel pipette to exclude differences due to delays in the application of each dose. For the first 20 min, larvae were kept in darkness to measure their basal activity, named resting period (RP). Subsequently, 365 nm and 455 nm light cycles were applied to photoisomerize the peptide between its respective cis and trans photostationary states. Illumination periods at the beforementioned wavelengths lasted for 1, 2, and 5 min (plotted with purple and blue background areas to indicate 365 nm and 455 nm light, respectively).
Illumination was performed at each wavelength with built-in arrays of 12 light-emitting diodes (LEDs) placed 12 cm away from the 96-well plate. Light intensities, measured with an optical power meter (model Newport 1916-C from Newport Corporation, Irvine, USA), were 0.59 mW·cm− 2 for 365 nm (UV light) and 0.24 mW·cm− 2 for 455 nm (visible blue light). All experimental procedures were performed at 12:00 pm (CET).
Tracking and analysis of swimming activity
Tracking of each individual was performed in real time and the acquired data was integrated using 1-, 2- or 5-minute intervals with the Zebralab software (ViewPoint Life Science). Locomotor activity was measured as the sum of all the swimming distances during burst activities (movements faster than 6 mm·s− 1) and reported as millimeters swum during 1-minute intervals. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9. Results are represented as means ± SEM. Statistical differences were determined by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s or Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. P-values less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistically significant differences. Further details can be found in the figure captions.
Structural characterization
Circular dichroism
The solution structure of photorexin was investigated by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to assess the impact of the photoswitchable amino acid on the secondary structure of the peptide. PhOX was dissolved in PBS (pH 7.4) ̶ with or without 30% 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (TFE) ̶ at a final concentration of 25 µM. Spectra were recorded on a J-815 spectrophotometer (Jasco, Easton, USA) in the dark-adapted state or after exposure of the samples to UV light (10 min illumination at 365 nm). Absorbance was measured in a quartz cuvette (0.1 cm optical path) at 28 °C. Scan speed was set at 100 nm/min, with a 1.0-nm bandwidth and a 1-s response time. For baseline correction, spectra of the pure buffers were also recorded. All high-tension voltage traces were below 900 V between 190 and 300 nm. Molar ellipticity (deg·cm2·dmol−1) values were calculated from experimental ellipticity using the following equation:
where [θexp] is the measured ellipticity (mdeg), l is the length of the optical path (cm), c is the concentration of the peptide (µM). Spectra were then normalized into mean residue ellipticity (MRE) dividing molar ellipticity values by the number of residues in the peptide. The percentage of α-helicity was calculated knowing that the MRE of a 100% helical peptide at 222 nm measures:
where n is the number of residues [31]. The recorded spectra were processed with OriginPro 8.5 (Origin Lab, Northampton, USA) and smoothed with a 21-points Savitzky-Golay filter before being plotted using GraphPad Prism 9.
Replica exchange molecular dynamics (REMD)
Replica exchange with solute tempering (REST) molecular dynamics were performed to assess the structures of all the peptides while in solution. Atom coordinates for the native OX-B peptide were extracted from the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID: 1CQ0), and the structure was manually modified to yield the desired truncated orexin analogue (residues 6–28, C-terminal carboxamide). For the photoswitchable analogues, the atom coordinates for the azobenzene moiety were extracted from PDB ID: 2H4B, a solution NMR-solved structure of a cis-AMPP peptide. This moiety was then inserted into the appropriate position of the orexin peptide scaffold and a short minimization was performed to relieve local clashes (restraints were imposed on the cis isomer). To obtain the initial coordinates of the trans azobenzene peptide, a short unrestrained molecular dynamics simulation was performed to relax the azo bond from cis to trans. All peptides were then solvated using the SPC explicit water model and 10 REST replicas were performed with the Desmond-2018 software (Schrödinger, USA) at temperatures ranging from 300 to 522 K. The NPT ensemble was employed, and frames were collected every 20 ps for a total of 20 ns for each replica, thus accounting for a total of 200 ns simulation time for each peptide. The first replica (at 300 K) of each simulation was inspected, analyzed and representative clustering of all frames was performed to assess the most populated structures.
Results and discussion
As revealed by two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance (2D NMR) spectroscopy, both orexin isoforms present relatively high helical content in their aqueous solution state [32,33,34]. OX-B comprises two α-helices spanning residues Leu7-Gly19 (helix I) and Ala23-Met28 (helix II), respectively. A flexible linker (residues Asn20 and His21) connects them orienting their axis about 60–80° relative to one another (PDB ID:1CQ0) (Fig. 1a-b) [32]. OX-A shows similar structural features to OX-B, however, its N-terminus contains a third helix located between residues Cys6-Gln9 (helix III) and conformationally restrained by two disulfide bridges (PDB ID:1WSO) (Fig. 1d) [34].
So far, stapling with a photoswitchable crosslinker has enabled light-regulation over the secondary structure of helical peptides to control a diversity of cellular processes [35,36,37,38,39,40]. However, this methodology, which relies on the formation of a bisthioether between a photoswitch and two strategically site-mutated Cys residues, is complicated by the presence of disulfide bonds in the peptide sequence [41]. Unfortunately, previous studies show that removing OX-A disulfide bonds by reduction or by isosteric replacement of the Cys residues can lead to a nearly 10-fold loss in agonist activity towards both orexin receptors [42,43,44]. In addition, shortening the OX-A N-terminus also causes a reduction in peptide activity [44, 45]. Thus, based on these considerations, in our proof of concept demonstration we decided to focus on OX-B structure to minimize the structural and synthetic complexity, and the impact of chemical modifications on biological activity.
Recently, Hong et al. determined the activated-state structure of OX2 by cryogenic-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and demonstrated that OX-B C-terminus (helix II in the aqueous solution structure) is anchored deep into the receptor binding pocket [46]. In contrast, residues corresponding to the flexible linker (Asn20-His21) are exposed towards the receptor extracellular surface (Fig. 1c). The cryo-EM density map also shows a less-defined density feature, whose shape and location suggest that the N-terminus of the peptide interacts via an α-helical structure with the extra-cellular loop (ECL) 2 and N-terminus of OX2. The formation of a similar hydrophobic interface has been described between OX-A and both orexin receptors and its involvement in receptor activation is supported by mutagenesis studies and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations [47, 48]. Surprisingly, Hong and coworkers also found that OX-B C-terminal segment binds to the receptor in an extended conformation rather than adopting a helical structure (Fig. 1c) [46]. Considering both the technical hurdles and the limited impact of photoregulating orexin helicity [49], we reasoned that replacing the flexible hinge of OX-B with a photoswitchable amino acid might allow to reversibly disrupt the overall geometry of the ligand.
Rational design of photorexin (phOX) (a) NMR-derived aqueous solution structure of the orexin-B peptide (PDB: 1CQ0). A flexible linker (N20 and H21) is located between Helix I (L7-G19) and the biologically active GILT-motif in Helix II (A23-M28). (b) Helical wheel projections of OX-B Helix I (L7-G19, left) and Helix II (A23-M28, right). Aliphatic residues are represented in yellow, polar residues are in pink, positively charged residues are in cyan, and small residues are in grey. The N- and C-termini of each helix are indicated with N or C, respectively. (c) Structure of OX-B (residues N20-M28) bound to OX2 in an extended conformation as determined by single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (PDB: 7L1U). The peptide C-terminus is anchored deep into the receptor binding pocket with flexible residues N20-H21 exposed to the extracellular surface. OX-B GILT-motif is represented in purple, whereas other residues are in grey. (d) Comparison of the amino acid sequences and secondary structures of orexin-A (OX-A), orexin-B (OX-B), and photorexin (phOX). In the latter, the unstructured N-terminus (in grey in OX-B) was removed, while the flexible linker (N20 and H21, in blue in OX-B) was replaced with a photoswitchable amino acid (azo, in red in phOX). *E represents pyroglutamic acid, C-termini are amidated and indicated as -NH2 at the end of the sequences. In the scheme, α-helices are pictured in purple, turns are shown in blue, and intramolecular disulfide bridges as yellow lines. (e) Trans and cis structures of the photoswitchable ω-amino acid [3-(3-aminomethyl)phenylazo]phenylacetic acid (AMPP, in red)
Consequently, we designed a photoswitchable analogue of orexin-B as follows: (i) Asn20 and His21 were replaced by an ω-amino acid containing an azobenzene moiety; (ii) the linear sequence of the peptide was reduced to the minimum required for receptor activation (OX-B6-28) by removing the N-terminus; and (iii) the C-terminal amidation was maintained as beneficial for both peptide activity and stability (Fig. 1d). As molecular switch, we chose [3-(3-aminomethyl)phenylazo]phenylacetic acid (AMPP) (Fig. 1e). This choice took into account the excellent photochromic properties of azobenzene, the possibility of obtaining great alterations in geometry upon photoisomerization, and several successful reports where the switch component had been inserted into β-turns and within α-helices to photoregulate the orientation of the associated secondary structures [28, 50,51,52,53]. In addition, the two methylene bridges adjacent to the azobenzene core could guarantee enough flexibility to the system [54].
Fmoc-protected AMPP was synthesized as reported in the literature and incorporated into the backbone of photorexin combining automated and manual solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) with a standard Fmoc-based strategy [28]. Insertion of the azo-amino acid was confirmed by UV-Vis spectroscopy (Fig. S2.1). Furthermore, taking advantage of the thermal bistability reported for this azobenzene [52], the photochromism of photorexin could be characterized by UPLC analysis. Thus, the percentages of the two isomers were quantified while testing a variety of illumination conditions. In particular, we studied switching kinetics and photostationary states using a UVGI torch light at our disposal as well as 365 and 380 nm UV light for the trans→cis photoisomerization (Fig. 2a); and 455 and 500 nm visible light (blue and green, respectively) for the reverse process (cis→trans) (Fig. 2b).
Trans photorexin could be readily converted to the cis isomer by illuminating between 311 and 365 nm, whereas the extent of photoisomerization was lower at longer wavelengths (e.g. 380 nm). From an initial photostationary state of 13% cis and 87% trans under benchtop conditions, an excellent 20:80 (trans:cis) ratio was achieved after 2 min of illumination at 365 nm (Fig. 2a). In contrast, exposure to blue light for 3 min back-isomerized the compound and reverted the ratio to 74:26 (trans:cis). Similar values could also be reached by illuminating with green light for a longer time (~ 5 min) (Fig. 2b).
We then tested the photochromic stability of our peptide. Photorexin could be readily toggled between 87% cis and 74% trans with alternating cycles of UV and blue light of 3 min each. The process was repeated several times without significant degradation or bleaching (Fig. 2c and Fig. S2.2). Finally, the thermal relaxation of the cis isomer (t1/2 ̴ 38 h at 37 °C) was determined as displayed in Fig. 2d.
It must be noted that although UV wavelengths required to photoswitch our peptide do not penetrate deep into tissue, symmetric azobenzenes like AMPP can also be isomerized with mid-infrared light using three-photon excitation. Multiphoton (two- and three-photon) excitation offers deep penetration and three-dimensional focusing at the microscale [55].
Photorexin photochromic characterization. (a-b) Isomeric distribution of a phOX sample (50 µM in PBS at pH 7.4 and 25 °C) when photoswitching from trans to cis (a) or from cis to trans (b) after cumulative illumination at different wavelengths. Percentages of the two species were quantitatively determined by UPLC analysis upon resolving the peaks of the two isomers at given illumination times. Data were fitted to a monoexponential decay model. (c) Reversibility and stability of the photochromic behavior of phOX (25 µM in PBS at pH 7.4 and 25 °C) over several cycles (3 min each) of photoinduced isomerization at 365 nm (trans→cis) and 455 nm (cis→trans). Percentages of the two isomers were determined by UPLC analysis after each cycle. (d) Thermal relaxation of phOX at 37 °C in PBS (pH 7.4) as monitored by UV-Vis spectroscopy at 325 nm. Data were fitted to a monoexponential decay model for cis half-life determination (t1/2 = 38 h)
Photorexin pharmacodynamics were then examined to understand: (i) how replacement of the flexible hinge with the photoswitchable AMPP amino acid affected both potency and maximal efficacy of the peptide; and (ii) to which extent these properties could be photoregulated. Given the convenient bistability of the two isomers, pre-illuminated samples were tested using an in vitro functional assay that monitors real-time intracellular calcium responses through a Fluorometric Imaging Plate Reader (FLIPR Tetra®).
The activity was evaluated either in CHO-K1 cells stably transfected with the human OX1 receptor or in PFSK-1 cells. The latter is a human neuroectodermal cell line, derived from a brain tumor, that innately expresses the hOX2 receptor [56]. Both orexin-B and our photoswitchable analogue increased calcium release in a concentration-dependent manner, unambiguously indicating agonist activity (Fig. S3.2). The potency of the native peptide was consistent with the reported values [12, 44]. Promisingly, photorexin displayed almost the same efficacy as OX-B and high nanomolar potency towards both receptor subtypes. The EC50 of dark-adapted photorexin (trans-enriched) at hOX2 was only 4-fold shifted to the right compared to the dose-response curve of the endogenous peptide. This reduction in potency was slightly higher at hOX1, where trans-enriched photorexin displayed a 9-fold decrease in activity (Table S3.1).
Despite modest light-induced changes, dark-adapted photorexin consistently exhibited statistically significant higher potency compared to the cis-enriched peptide (1.4-fold and 2.0-fold at OX1 and OX2, respectively). As the calcium-sensitive dye used in the assay requires 470–495 nm excitation, blue light was likely to back-isomerize pre-illuminated photorexin (cis-enriched) to mainly trans, thereby reducing any difference in activity between the two samples. To overcome this limitation, we decided to assess intracellular calcium responses in a different system.
Calcium fluorescence imaging also allows the quantification of real-time changes in cytosolic calcium concentration but with single-cell or subcellular resolution. These experiments were performed in a line of transformed human kidney cells - tsA201 - expressing either OX1 or OX2 along with R-GECO1, a genetically encoded calcium indicator sensitive to green light excitation (λex = 562 nm). In addition to overcoming the aforementioned limitations of blue light excitation, R-GECO1 red-shifted absorption spectrum offered the possibility of photoisomerizing the peptide in situ, which proved advantageous compared to testing only pre-irradiated samples.
Photorexin was first applied as a control to tsA201 cells transfected only with the calcium indicator. The absence of response to the compound and concomitant UV or blue illumination ruled out light-induced artifacts due to non-specific R-GECO1 stimulation (Fig. S3.3). Subsequently, 100 nM photorexin was applied to cells co-transfected with R-GECO1 and GFP-labelled hOX2. The peptide evoked a sharp transient response in the dark, displaying oscillations with a period of 1–3 min depending on each cell. Illumination with UV light terminated these responses in a few seconds, and oscillatory activity was resumed upon exposure to blue light (Fig. 3a-b). Similar patterns of calcium signals could be reproduced in at least two cycles of alternating UV and visible light as well as at lower doses (30 nM, Fig. S3.4), thus demonstrating that photorexin can robustly and reversibly regulate the activity of orexin receptors with light and that it behaves as a trans-active agonist with nanomolar potency. The dynamic photocontrol of orexin receptor activity enabled by photorexin is in contrast to the irreversible photorelease of caged OX-B demonstrated in vitro [27]. In hOX1-expressing cells, the dark-adapted peptide also produced an increase in calcium influx, although smaller in magnitude than in tsA201-hOX2. UV- and blue-light illumination (365 and 455 nm, respectively) elicited no effect (Fig. 3c and Fig. S3.5).
Calcium traces from different cells were then integrated to quantify the observed responses. Noticeably, UV-illuminated photorexin (cis-enriched) retained only 6% of the dark-adapted peptide activity towards hOX2. While illumination with blue light rapidly restored calcium mobilization, recovery was partial (52% of the initial responses) probably owing to receptor desensitization after prolonged agonist exposure (Fig. 3d). In the dose-response curves, dark-adapted photorexin displayed significantly lower potency towards hOX1. In contrast, both the UV- and blue-light illuminated forms evoked no response on this receptor, thus demonstrating selectivity towards hOX2 (Fig. S3.5 and Fig. 3e). In light of the promising results obtained through calcium fluorescence, we moved on to test photorexin activity in vivo.
Photorexin pharmacodynamics (a) Representative single-cell calcium traces (n = 12) in tsA201 cells transiently expressing GFP-hOX2 and R-GECO1. Upon application of 100 nM photorexin (green bar) in its dark-adapted state (trans, white area) cells gave sharp responses. Calcium oscillations were then abolished upon exposure to cycles of UV light (365 nm, cis-enriched state in pink) and recovered with blue illumination (455 nm, trans-enriched state in blue). (b) Real-time intracellular calcium recordings (averaged traces, black line, n = 20) from tsA201 cells co-expressing hOX2 and R-GECO1 upon application of 100 nM photorexin (green bar). Traces were recorded in the dark (white area) and under cycles of illumination with UV (365 nm, pink) and blue (455 nm, blue) light. Grey area represents ± SEM. (c) Real-time calcium imaging responses (averaged traces, black line, n = 20 cells) from tsA201 cells co-expressing hOX1 and R-GECO1. Application of photorexin (100 nM, green bar) evokes mild responses in the dark and under blue light. Grey area represent ± SEM. (d) Efficacy of phOX (100 nM) on tsA201-hOX2 quantified in the dark (green bar) and after subsequent illumination with 365 nm UV light (pink bar, cis enriched) and back-isomerization to trans with 455 nm blue light (blue bar). Responses were quantified as Area Under the Curve (AUC) and normalized to those obtained with dark-adapted phOX. Data represent means ± SEM (n = 20 cells). Statistical differences were determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (***, p-value ≤ 0.001; ****, p-value ≤ 0.0001). (e) Selectivity of phOX (100 nM) over tsA201-hOX2 (full-colored bars) and tsA201-hOX1 (dashed bars) compared after illumination with 365 nm UV light (cis enriched, in pink) and after back-isomerization to trans with 455 nm blue light (in blue). Data represent amplitude means ± SEM (n = 20 cells). Statistical differences were determined by one-way ANOVA with paired-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test (ns, not significant; ****, p-value ≤ 0.0001)
The orexin neural network in zebrafish has been studied in detail and, as in mammals, it is involved in many physiological functions including sleep/wake cycles, homeostasis, feeding, and locomotor activity [57,58,59,60,61,62]. Between 16 and 60 neurons compose the zebrafish’s network with a similar gene to mammals encoding for two orexins neuropeptides (OX-A/-B) [61]. Only one orexin receptor has been found in zebrafish, closely related to mammalian OX2 (70%). Its binding pocket is highly conserved throughout species [15, 61]. The simplicity of the network in zebrafish and its close resemblance to higher mammals, along with the advantages of using an established neuropharmacological [63,64,65,66] and photopharmacological [7, 67] animal model, allowed us to investigate the effects of photorexin on locomotor activities of wildtype larvae.
Individual larvae were placed in separate wells of a 96-well plate, each containing increasing concentrations of photorexin. Each individual was tracked and monitored over 68 min under different illumination conditions, alternating between 365 nm, 455 nm, and dark periods (respectively indicated by pink, blue, and no background in Fig. 4a). The time courses of 12 larvae per concentration group integrated every minute are shown in Fig. 4a. All applied concentrations are shown in Fig. 4b (0–10 µM).
High doses of photorexin (1 and 10 µM) significantly enhanced locomotion (distance swum over 1-min integration intervals) under 365 nm light compared to non-treated larvae, for all UV-illuminated periods (three 1-min bouts at 20, 22, 24 min; three 2-min bouts at 26, 30, 34, and one 4-min bout at 38 min). This increase in activity was sharply reverted under visible blue light and all treated larvae swam distances similar to non-treated individuals (three 1-min bouts at 21, 23, 25 min; three 2-min bouts at 28, 32, 36, and one 4-min bout at 42 min). Interestingly, the successive induction reflex (i.e., the fast increase and slow decrease in locomotion observed upon switching off visible light) [68, 69] is significantly reduced for all photorexin-treated groups in comparison to controls as observed at t = 49 min (Fig. 4a). These preliminary findings are consistent with sleep behaviors in zebrafish after exposure to orexin agonists, which elicit lower responsiveness upon light-to-dark changes [60]. Several photoswitchable small molecules with µM-mM potencies [70,71,72,73] and photoswitchable peptides with 1-100 µM potencies [74] are active in zebrafish by simple addition in water. Therefore, it is not surprising that photorexin, which displays low-nM potencies in vitro, readily enables photocontrol of behavior at sub-µM concentrations (500 nM, Fig. 4b) in vivo. Photoswitchable small molecules targeting the CNS are absorbed by the skin, gills, and pum** system, and produce behavioral effects in about 20 min [70,71,72,73]. While OX-A has been shown to penetrate the blood-brain barrier by simple diffusion after intravenous administration or blood-free perfusion in mammals [75,76,77], OX-B is not as lipophilic and is readily metabolized [75]. Shortening a peptide sequence and replacing polar residues with a hydrophobic moiety could generally benefit permeability, however, the chemical modifications introduced into the structure of photorexin are unlikely to alter significantly the overall physicochemical properties of the molecule compared to the parent compound. Thus, the effects observed in zebrafish might originate from intranasal delivery to the CNS [78,79,80] and/or result from the activation of peripheral orexin receptors expressed in the gastrointestinal tract [81,82,83,84].
It must be noted that rodents have been the model of choice for develo** hypnotics and psychostimulants despite their different sleep patterns from humans. As an alternative, zebrafish larvae show peak daytime activity and rest at night, are cost-effective, and are amenable to high-throughput screening as shown in Fig. 4. Thus, photorexin is an in vivo neuroactive photoswitchable peptide that holds high relevance to study physiology and to develop future phototherapies.
Photorexin in vivo activity in wildtype zebrafish (a) Fast-swimming distances (faster than 6 mm·s− 1) are plotted for larvae treated with different doses of phOX (vehicle – black, 10 nM – yellow, 100 nM – green, 1 µM – blue, and 10 µM – red traces). Distances were integrated over 1-min intervals. UV illumination periods increased the swimming activity of larvae exposed to high phOX doses (1 and 10 µM), while blue light reversed activity to levels of non-treated larvae. This different behavior was maintained over several light cycles. After the last illumination interval (5 min at 455 nm), all treated larvae showed a weaker induction response (i.e., the fast increase and slow decrease in locomotion observed upon switching off visible light). Patterned areas represent ± SEM (n = 12 larvae per condition). (b) Dose-response curves (distance swum in mm) in zebrafish larvae of cis (365 nm, in purple) and trans (455 nm, in blue) phOX upon integrating the 3 consecutive 1-min illumination intervals between minutes 20 and 26 for each wavelength (365 nm and 455 nm, purple and blue traces respectively). Data at 0 nM corresponds to the vehicle under both illumination conditions. Error bars represent ± SD (n = 12 larvae per treatment group). Solid traces are fitted to a log(agonist) vs. response model. Statistical differences were determined by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (**, p-value ≤ 0.01; ***, p-value ≤ 0.001)
Overall, both in vitro and in vivo results validate the rationale behind our photoswitchable peptide ligand design. While interventions at the flexible hinge are compatible with preserving the functional activity of the peptide, peptide ligands require proper orientation of the axis to ensure receptor agonism and intracellular signaling. This achievement offers the ability to control endogenous orexin receptors remotely and in the different regions of the brain that receive orexinergic projections, and allows reversible and repeatable activation of orexin receptors at high temporal resolution to investigate gating mechanisms. To examine this question, we further studied photorexin structures associated with the observed differences in receptor activity.
In order to correlate the functional potencies of the trans and cis isomers with their respective conformations, we performed circular dichroism (CD) studies and molecular dynamics calculations. Photorexin CD spectra in phosphate buffer saline displayed a strong positive band at 195 nm and a negative one at 218 nm (Fig. S4.1A). This behavior suggests the presence of a β-strand conformation. The measurements were then repeated in the presence of trifluoroethanol (TFE), a cosolvent that creates a more hydrophobic environment and promotes helicogenic intramolecular interactions. Similarly to what had been reported for the native OX-B, the addition of 30% TFE enhanced the peptide helicity (40%) as indicated by a negative band at 207 nm and a shoulder at 220 nm (Fig. S4.1B) [32, 43]. These results confirmed that the replacement of the flexible linker with a photoswitchable moiety did not prevent the peptide from adopting a helical conformation. Interestingly, while in 30% TFE photorexin helicity was not affected by light-induced photoisomerization of AMPP, the CD spectrum recorded in PBS displayed a loss in secondary structure after exposure to UV light. Despite the variation being mild, we investigated if the detected structural changes were restricted to photorexin helix I or helix II and could partially account for the loss of potency of the cis isomer.
We thus performed replica exchange with solute tempering (REST) molecular dynamics simulations in explicit water to analyze the secondary structures of trans and cis photorexin and to relate them to their closest non-photoswitchable analogue (truncated OX-B, residues 6–28, with no amino acid replacement at the flexible hinge). Atom coordinates were extracted from the solution structure reported by Lee et al. (PDB ID: 1CQ0) [32] and we manually modified them to truncate the N-terminus and, in the case of our analogues, insert those of NMR-solved trans and cis AMPP (PDB ID: 2H4B) [85]. As an indicator of helicity, the average number of backbone H-bonds formed during the simulations was plotted for helix I (Gly6-Gly19) and helix II (Ala23-Met28) and compared between the three analogues (Fig. S4.2). Additionally, dihedral angles of residues at helix I and helix II were analyzed for the 300 K trajectory as a complementary indication of secondary structure (Fig. S4.3A-B). Surprisingly, no significant variations in helicity content and/or in the conformational preferences of the residues were observed among the three analogues. Thus, the difference in activity observed between trans and cis photorexin cannot be directly attributed to partial losses in secondary structure.
As photoisomerization was expected to affect the spatial arrangement of the two helices, we moved on to study the evolution of the intramolecular helix I - helix II angle. During REST simulations, all the peptides displayed a high degree of “hinge” flexibility which resulted in significant angle fluctuations. However, while OX-B(6−28) helices were on average inclined at 45° (Fig. S4.4A), the angles in cis and trans photorexin were both closer to 90° (Fig. S4.4B-C), thus suggesting that: (i) the azobenzene moiety prevents closing of the inter-helix angle compared to the flexible hinge of the native peptide; and (ii) its photoisomerization does not further influence the angle between the two peptide fragments.
Finally, we analyzed the main clusters of conformations explored by each molecule during the 200 ns REST simulations. The most populated conformations for each derivative were locally aligned by the backbone of helix II - GILT- residues, as these constitute the hotspots for receptor binding and activation [46]. As observed from the alignment, trans photorexin (in green) preferentially places helix I in a similar orientation as for OX-B(6−28) (in grey) (Fig. S4.5). In contrast, helix I of the cis isomer (in pink) is orientated in the opposite direction.
As previously demonstrated by mutagenesis studies and recently supported by cryo-EM, the α-helical N-termini of OX-B and OX2 as well as the ECL-2 of the latter actively engage in the formation of the receptor-peptide complex through a “message-address system” based on polytopic interactions [46, 48]. According to this model, the “address” (OX-B N-terminus) directs binding to the receptor, whereas the “message” (OX-B C-terminus) conveys the functional information [86,87,88,89]. In addition, multiple weak interactions mediate affinity towards the receptors, overall contributing to the nM potency of the peptide [48].
Among these hotspots for receptor binding and activation, two key residues (Leu11 and Leu15) have been identified to form a hydrophobic patch located on helix I [47, 90]. Our functional and structural data converge on attributing the lower activity displayed by cis photorexin to the reverse orientation adopted by its N-terminus relative to the receptor binding pocket. In particular, the UV-illuminated analogue might be unable to establish productive hydrophobic interactions, such as those predicted between the beforementioned leucine residues and Phe346 and His350 located on the extracellular region of OX2 (Fig. S4.6) [90, 91].
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have rationally designed and developed a reliable and efficient molecular tool to photocontrol orexinergic neurotransmission. Photorexin shows that introducing a photoswitchable amino acid into the backbone of signaling peptides allows for regulating their activity in vitro and in vivo by controlling the spatial arrangement of their C- and N- terminal fragments [52]. Potentially, this approach could be extended to several endogenous peptides, that bind to their cognate receptors via a “message-address” mechanism. These include the adrenocorticotropic hormone [92], endothelins [86], and various opioid peptides [93] such as nociceptin [87, 88] and dynorphins [89] among others. Our light-regulated analogue possesses almost the same efficacy as OX-B, high nanomolar potency, and selectivity towards hOX2, thus showing that interventions at the flexible hinge are compatible with preserving the functional activity of the peptide. The long thermal stability and low intrinsic activity of the cis isomer enable administration and subsequent activation of the compound with blue light, thus offering unprecedented spatiotemporal precision to manipulate orexinergic circuits. Photorexin is the first photo-reversible ligand reported for orexin receptors. It allows dynamic control of activity in vitro and in zebrafish larvae by direct application in water. Photorexin induces dose- and light-dependent changes in locomotion and a reduction in the successive induction reflex that is associated to sleep behavior.
Data availability
Supplementary data of this article is included in the Supplementary Information file. Other data is available from the authors upon reasonable request.
References
Lee C, Lavoie A, Liu J, Chen SX, Liu B (2020) Light up the brain: the application of optogenetics in cell-type specific dissection of mouse brain circuits. Front Neural Circuits 14
Kim CK, Adhikari A, Deisseroth K (2017) Integration of optogenetics with complementary methodologies in systems neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 18:222–235
Fiala A, Suska A, Schlüter OM (2010) Optogenetic approaches in neuroscience. Curr Biol 20:897–903
Nagel G et al (2005) Light activation of Channelrhodopsin-2 in excitable cells of caenorhabditis elegans triggers rapid behavioral responses. Curr Biol 15:2279–2284
Deisseroth K, Optogenetics (2015) 10 years of microbial opsins in neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 18:1213–1225
Zalocusky KA, Fenno LE, Deisseroth K (2013) 2 Current challenges in optogenetics. In: Optogenetics. De Gruyter, p. 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110270723.23
Hüll K, Morstein J, Trauner D (2018) In vivo photopharmacology. Chem Rev 118:10710–10747
Lerch MM, Hansen MJ, van Dam GM, Szymanski W, Feringa BL (2016) Emerging targets in photopharmacology. Angew Chemie - Int Ed 55:10978–10999
Velema WA, Szymanski W, Feringa BL (2014) Photopharmacology: beyond proof of principle. J Am Chem Soc 136:2178–2191
Fuchter MJ (2020) On the Promise of Photopharmacology using photoswitches: a Medicinal Chemist’s perspective. J Med Chem 63:11436–11447
Morstein J, Awale M, Reymond JL, Trauner D (2019) Map** the azolog space enables the optical control of new biological targets. ACS Cent Sci 5:607–618
Sakurai T et al (1998) Orexins and orexin receptors: a family of hypothalamic neuropeptides and G protein-coupled receptors that regulate feeding behavior. Cell 92:573–585
De Lecea L et al (1998) The hypocretins: hypothalamus-specific peptides with neuroexcitatory activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:322–327
Sakurai T (2007) The neural circuit of orexin (hypocretin): maintaining sleep and wakefulness. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:171–181
Wong KKY, Ng SYL, Lee LTO, Ng HKH, Chow BKC (2011) Orexins and their receptors from fish to mammals: a comparative approach. Gen Comp Endocrinol 171:124–130
Nambu T et al (1999) Distribution of orexin neurons in the adult rat brain. Brain Res 827:243–260
Peyron C et al (1998) Neurons containing hypocretin (orexin) project to multiple neuronal systems. J Neurosci 18:9996–10015
Van Den Pol AN, Gao XB, Obrietan K, Kilduff TS, Belousov AB (1998) Presynaptic and postsynaptic actions and modulation of neuroendocrine neurons by a new hypothalamic peptide, hypocretin/orexin. J Neurosci 18:7962–7971
Kukkonen JP, Leonard CS (2014) Orexin/hypocretin receptor signalling cascades. Br J Pharmacol 171:314–331
Jacobson LH, Hoyer D, de Lecea L (2022) Hypocretins (orexins): the ultimate translational neuropeptides. J Intern Med 291:533–556
Lin L et al (1999) The sleep disorder canine narcolepsy is caused by a mutation in the hypocretin (orexin) receptor 2 gene. Cell 98:365–376
Thannickal TC et al (2000) Reduced number of hypocretin neurons in human narcolepsy. Neuron 27:469–474
Peyron C et al (2000) A mutation in a case of early onset narcolepsy and a generalized absence of hypocretin peptides in human narcoleptic brains. Nat Med 6:991–997
Nagahara T et al (2015) Design and synthesis of non-peptide, selective orexin receptor 2 agonists. J Med Chem 58:7931–7937
Irukayama-Tomobe Y et al (2017) Non-peptide orexin type-2 receptor agonist ameliorates narcolepsy-cataplexy symptoms in mouse models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:5731–5736
Yukitake H et al (2019) TAK-925, an orexin 2 receptor-selective agonist, shows robust wake-promoting effects in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 187:172794
Duffet L et al (2022) A photocaged orexin-B for spatiotemporally precise control of orexin signaling. Cell Chem Biol 29:1729–1738e8
Podewin T et al (2015) Photocontrolled chignolin-derived β-hairpin peptidomimetics. Chem Commun 51:4001–4004
Zhang Z, Burns DC, Kumita JR, Smart OS, Woolley GA (2003) A water-soluble azobenzene cross-linker for photocontrol of peptide conformation. Bioconjug Chem 14:824–829
Putula J, Turunen PM, Jäntti MH, Ekholm ME, Kukkonen JP (2011) Agonist ligand discrimination by the two orexin receptors depends on the expression system. Neurosci Lett 494:57–60
Flint DG, Kumita JR, Smart OS, Woolley GA (2002) Using an azobenzene cross-linker to either increase or decrease peptide helix content upon trans-to-cis photoisomerization. Chem Biol 9:391–397
Lee JH et al (1999) Solution structure of a new hypothalamic neuropeptide, human hypocretin- 2/orexin-B. Eur J Biochem 266:831–839
Kim HY, Hong E, Kim JI, Lee W (2004) Solution structure of human orexin-A: regulator of appetite and wakefulness. J Biochem Mol Biol 37:565–573
Takai T et al (2006) Orexin-A is composed of a highly conserved C-terminal and a specific, hydrophilic N-terminal region, revealing the structural basis of specific recognition by the orexin-1 receptor. J Pept Sci 12:443–454
Guerrero L et al (2005) Photochemical regulation of DNA-binding specificity of MyoD. Angew Chemie - Int Ed 44:7778–7782
Kneissl S, Loveridge EJ, Williams C, Crump MP, Allemann RK (2008) Photocontrollable peptide-based switches target the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-xL. ChemBioChem 9:3046–3054
Zhang F, Timm KA, Arndt KM, Woolley GA (2010) Photocontrol of coiled-coil proteins in living cells. Angew Chemie - Int Ed 49:3943–3946
Strizhak AV et al (2020) Diarylethene moiety as an enthalpy-entropy switch: photoisomerizable stapled peptides for modulating p53/MDM2 interaction. Org Biomol Chem 18:5359–5369
Martín-Quirós A et al (2015) Absence of a stable secondary structure is not a limitation for photoswitchable inhibitors of β-arrestin/β-adaptin 2 protein-protein interaction. Chem Biol 22:31–37
Prischich D et al (2023) Light-dependent inhibition of clathrin-mediated endocytosis in yeast unveils conserved functions of the AP2 complex. iScience 26:107899
Burns DC, Zhang F, Woolley GA (2007) Synthesis of 3,3′-bis(sulfonato)-4,4′-bis(chloroacetamido) azobenzene and cysteine cross-linking for photo-control of protein conformation and activity. Nat Protoc 2:251–258
Okumura T et al (2001) Requirement of intact disulfide bonds in orexin-A-induced stimulation of gastric acid secretion that is mediated by OX1 receptor activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 280:976–981
Lang M et al (2006) Structural properties of orexins for activation of their receptors. J Pept Sci 12:258–266
Lang M, Söll RM, Dürrenberger F, Dautzenberg FM, Beck-Sickinger AG (2004) Structure-activity studies of orexin A and orexin B at the human orexin 1 and orexin 2 receptors led to orexin 2 receptor selective and orexin 1 receptor preferring ligands. J Med Chem 47:1153–1160
Ammoun S et al (2003) Distinct recognition of OX1 and OX2 receptors by orexin peptides. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 305:507–514
Hong C et al (2021) Structures of active-state orexin receptor 2 rationalize peptide and small-molecule agonist recognition and receptor activation. Nat Commun 12:815
Malherbe P et al (2010) Map** the binding pocket of dual antagonist almorexant to human orexin 1 and orexin 2 receptors: comparison with the selective OX 1 antagonist SB-674042 and the selective OX 2 antagonist N -ethyl-2-[(6-methoxy-pyridin-3-yl)-(toluene-2-sulfonyl)-amino]-. Mol Pharmacol 78:81–93
Yin J et al (2016) Structure and ligand-binding mechanism of the human OX 1 and OX 2 orexin receptors. Nat Struct Mol Biol 23:293–299
Karhu L et al (2018) Stapled truncated orexin peptides as orexin receptor agonists. Peptides 102:54–60
Hoppmann C et al (2009) Light-directed protein binding of a biologically relevant β-sheet. Angew Chemie - Int Ed 48:6636–6639
Hoppmann C et al (2011) Photocontrol of contracting muscle fibers. Angew Chemie - Int Ed 50:7699–7702
Broichhagen J et al (2015) Optical control of insulin secretion using an incretin switch. Angew Chemie - Int Ed 54:15565–15569
Albert L et al (2017) Controlled inhibition of methyltransferases using photoswitchable peptidomimetics: towards an epigenetic regulation of leukemia. Chem Sci 8:4612–4618
Dong SL et al (2006) A photocontrolled β-hairpin peptide. Chem - Eur J 12:1114–1120
Sortino R et al (2023) Three-photon infrared stimulation of endogenous neuroreceptors in vivo. Angew Chemie Int Ed 62
Bonaventure P et al (2015) A selective orexin-1 receptor antagonist attenuates stress-induced hyperarousal without hypnotic effects. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 352:590–601
Yokobori E et al (2011) Stimulatory effect of intracerebroventricular administration of orexin A on food intake in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Peptides 32:1357–1362
Elbaz I, Foulkes NS, Gothilf Y, Appelbaum L (2013) Circadian clocks, rhythmic synaptic plasticity and the sleep-wake cycle in zebrafish. Front Neural Circuits 7:1–7
Prober DA, Rihel J, Onah AA, Sung RJ, Schier AF (2006) Hypocretin/orexin overexpression induces an insomnia-like phenotype in zebrafish. J Neurosci 26:13400–13410
Pardon M et al (2022) Modulation of sleep behavior in zebrafish larvae by pharmacological targeting of the orexin receptor. Front Pharmacol 13:1–14
Lawrence AJ, De Lecea L (2017) Behav Neurosci Orexin/Hypocretin, vol. 33
Yokogawa T et al (2007) Characterization of sleep in zebrafish and insomnia in hypocretin receptor mutants. PLoS Biol 5:2379–2397
Kalueff AV, Stewart AM, Gerlai R (2014) Zebrafish as an emerging model for studying complex brain disorders. Trends Pharmacol Sci 35:63–75
Khan KM et al (2017) Zebrafish models in neuropsychopharmacology and CNS drug discovery. Br J Pharmacol 174:1925–1944
Basnet RM, Zizioli D, Taweedet S, Finazzi D, Memo M (2019) Zebrafish larvae as a behavioral model in neuropharmacology. Biomedicines 7
Cassar S et al (2020) Use of zebrafish in drug discovery toxicology. Chem Res Toxicol 33:95–118
Gomila AMJ, Gorostiza P (2022) In vivo applications of photoswitchable bioactive compounds. In: Molecular Photoswitches. Wiley, p 811–842. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527827626.ch34
Staddon J, Macphail R, Padilla S (2009) Successive induction in larval zebrafish. Nat Preced 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2009.3659.1
Staddon JER, MacPhail RC, Padilla S (2010) The dynamics of successive induction in larval zebrafish. J Exp Anal Behav 94:261–266
Prischich D et al (2021) Adrenergic modulation with photochromic ligands. Angew Chemie Int Ed 60:3625–3631
Rustler K et al (2020) Optical control of GABA A receptors with a fulgimide-based potentiator. Chem – Eur J 26:12722–12727
Gomila AMJ et al (2020) Photocontrol of endogenous glycine receptors in vivo. Cell Chem Biol 27:1425–1433e7
Matera C et al (2022) Reversible photocontrol of dopaminergic transmission in wild-type animals. Int J Mol Sci 23:10114
Afonin S et al (2020) Light-controllable dithienylethene-modified cyclic peptides: photoswitching the in vivo toxicity in zebrafish embryos. Beilstein J Org Chem 16:39–49
Kastin AJ, Akerstrom V, (1999) Orexin A but not orexin B rapidly enters brain from blood by simple diffusion. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 289:219–223
John J, Wu M-F, Kodama T, Siegel JM (2003) Intravenously administered hypocretin-1 alters brain amino acid release: an in vivo microdialysis study in rats. J Physiol 548:557–562
Fujiki N, Yoshida Y, Ripley B, Mignot E, Nishino S (2003) Effects of IV and ICV hypocretin-1 (orexin A) in hypocretin receptor-2 gene mutated narcoleptic dogs and IV hypocretin-1 replacement therapy in a hypocretin-ligand-deficient narcoleptic dog. Sleep 26:953–959
Hanson LR, Frey WH (2008) Intranasal delivery bypasses the blood-brain barrier to target therapeutic agents to the central nervous system and treat neurodegenerative disease. BMC Neurosci 9:S5
Dhuria SV, Hanson LR, Frey WH (2009) Intranasal drug targeting of hypocretin-1 (orexin-A) to the central nervous system. J Pharm Sci 98:2501–2515
Villamayor PR et al (2021) A comprehensive structural, lectin and immunohistochemical characterization of the zebrafish olfactory system. Sci Rep 11:8865
Gatta C et al (2014) The orexin system in the enteric nervous system of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). PLoS ONE 9:e105009
Kirchgessner AL, Liu M (1999) Orexin synthesis and response in the gut. Neuron 24:941–951
Kirchgessner AL (2002) Orexins in the brain-gut axis. Endocr Rev 23:1–15
Mediavilla C (2020) Bidirectional gut-brain communication: a role for orexin-A. Neurochem Int 141:104882
Jurt S, Aemissegger A, Güntert P, Zerbe O, Hilvert D (2006) A photoswitchable miniprotein based on the sequence of avian pancreatic polypeptide. Angew Chemie - Int Ed 45:6297–6300
Sakamoto A et al (1993) The ligand-receptor interactions of the endothelin systems are mediated by distinct message and address domains. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 22:S113–S116
Guerrini R et al (1997) Address and message sequences for the nociceptin receptor: a structure – activity study of nociceptin-(1 – 13)-peptide amide. J Med Chem 40:1789–1793
della Longa S, Arcovito A (2016) A dynamic picture of the early events in nociceptin binding to the NOP receptor by metadynamics. Biophys J 111:1203–1213
Paterlini, Portoghese PS, Ferguson DM (1997) Molecular simulation of dynorphin A-(1 – 10) binding to extracellular loop 2 of the κ-opioid receptor. A model for receptor activation. J Med Chem 40:3254–3262
Heifetz A et al (2013) Toward an understanding of agonist binding to human orexin-1 and orexin-2 receptors with G-protein-coupled receptor modeling and site-directed mutagenesis. Biochemistry 52:8246–8260
Yin J, Mobarec JC, Kolb P, Rosenbaum DM (2015) Crystal structure of the human OX2 orexin receptor bound to the insomnia drug suvorexant. Nature 519:247–250
Schwyzer R (1977) ACTH: a short introductory review. Ann N Y Acad Sci 297:3–26
Wang Y et al (2023) Structures of the entire human opioid receptor family. Cell 186:413–427e17
Acknowledgements
We thank Professor Jyrki P. Kukkonen for the kind gift of the expression vectors containing the cDNA of the GFP-tagged human orexin receptors.
Funding
This research received funding from the European Union Research and Innovation Programme Horizon 2020 including the European Innovation Council Pathfinder (Phototheraport, 101130883) and the Human Brain Project SGA3 (945539), DEEPER (ICT-36-2020-101016787), Agency for Management of University and Research Grants/Generalitat de Catalunya (CERCA Programme; 2021-SGR‐01410 project), Fonds Européen de Dévelopement Économique et Régional (FEDER) funds, MICINN (Grant PID2019-111493RB-I00, DEEP RED; PID2022-142609OB-I00, EPILLUM), Fundaluce and “la Caixa” foundations (ID 100010434, agreement LCF/PR/HR19/52160010). IBEC and IRB Barcelona are recipients of a Severo Ochoa Award of Excellence from MICINN. D.P. was supported by fellowship BES-2015-072657. R. S. was supported by fellowship BES-2017-082496.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.P., R.S., A.G.J., C.M., S.G., D.N., and M.V. designed, performed, and analyzed the experiments. P.B. and E.G. contributed to experimental design and data analysis. L.D.L., E.G. and P.G. contributed to conceptualization and supervision of the project. D.P. and P.G. wrote the manuscript, and all authors contributed to manuscript editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All authors have revised and authorized the contents of this manuscript for publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they do not have any competing interest in this project.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Prischich, D., Sortino, R., Gomila-Juaneda, A. et al. In vivo photocontrol of orexin receptors with a nanomolar light-regulated analogue of orexin-B. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 81, 288 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-024-05308-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-024-05308-x