Abstract
For more plant species to be suitable for plant factory production, their optimal light regimes need to be optimized. We evaluated the effects of light quality, light intensity, and photoperiod on the growth and yield of cherry radish grown under red plus blue LEDs in a controlled environment. Radish plants were cultivated under two light qualities with different red:blue ratios (1R:1B, 2R:1B) at three light intensities (180, 240, 300 μmol m−2 s−1) or two photoperiods (12 h/12 h, 16 h/8 h), respectively. The light quality 2R:1B increased root diameter, root volume, and the biomass of shoot and root compared to light quality 1R:1B under a light intensity of 240 and 300 μmol m−2 s−1, but the growth differences between 1R:1B and 2R:1B were significant when the light intensity was 240 μmol m−2 s−1. New leaf chlorophyll content, root growth indices and the root-shoot ratio increased with light intensity. Cherry radish only formed storage roots with commercial value when light intensity was equal to or over 240 μmol m−2 s−1. The root diameter, root volume, root-shoot ratio, and the biomass of shoot and root of plants grown in the 2R:1B treatment was significantly higher than those in the 1R:1B treatment under the 16 h/8 h photoperiod. However, no significant difference was observed in the 12 h/12 h photoperiod. These results indicated that light regime in combination with a light intensity between 240 and 300 μmol m−2 s−1, the light quality 2R:1B, and a 16 h/8 h photoperiod produced appropriate growth of cherry radish in plant factory settings using an LED light source. In conclusion, the production of commercial storage roots in cherry radish is primarily dependent on light intensity, followed by light quality and photoperiod. Furthermore, the effectiveness of light quality regulation of storage roots was highly depended on light intensity and photoperiod.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13580-018-0048-5/MediaObjects/13580_2018_48_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13580-018-0048-5/MediaObjects/13580_2018_48_Fig2_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams SR, Langton FA (2005) Photoperiod and plant growth: a review. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 80:2–10
Bukhov NG, Bondar VV, Drozdova IS (1995) Long-term effects of blue and red light on ATP and ADP contents in primary barley leaves. Planta 196:211–216
Bukhov NG, Bondar VV, Drozdova IS, Kara AN, Kotov AA, Maevskaya SN, Vasil’ev AA, Voevudskaya SY, Voronin PY, Mokronosov AT (1996) Development of storage roots in radish (Raphanus sativus) plants as affected by light quality. J Plant Physiol 149:405–412
Bula RJ, Tibbitts TW (1992) Importance of ‘blue’ photon levels for lettuce seedlings grown under red-light-emitting diodes. HortScience 27:427–430
Bula RJ, Morrow RC, Tibbitts TW, Barta DJ, Ignatius RW, Martin TS (1991) Light-emitting diodes as a radiation source for plants. HortScience 26:203–205
Cope KR, Snowden MC, Bugbee B (2014) Photobiological interactions of blue light and photosynthetic photon flux: effects of monochromatic and broad-spectrum light sources. Photochem Photobiol 90:574–584
Craker LE, Seibert M, Clifford JT (1983) Growth and development of radish raphanus sativus l. under selected light environments. Ann Bot-Lond 51:59–64
Drozdova IS, Bondar VV, Voskresenskaya NP (1987) Red and blue light coordinated photoregulatory effect on photosynthesis and morphogenesis in radish plants. Fiziol Rast Mosc 34:786–794
Drozdova IS, Bondar VV, Bukhov NG, Kotov AA, Kotova LM, Maevskaya SN, Mokronosov AT (2001) Effects of light spectral quality on morphogenesis and source–sink relations in radish plants. Rus J Plant Phys 48:415–420
Furuyama S, Ishigami Y, Hikosaka S, Goto E (2014) Effects of blue/red ratio and light intensity on photomorphogenesis and photosynthesis of red leaf lettuce. Acta Hortic 1037:317–322
Goins GD, Yorio NC, Sanwo MM, Brown CS (1997) Photomorphogenesis, photosynthesis, and seed yield of wheat plants grown under red light-emitting diodes (LEDs) with and without supplemental blue lighting. J Exp Bot 48:1407–1413
Goto E (2012) Plant production in a closed plant factory with artificial lighting. Acta Hortic 956:37–49
Hall CB (1990) Relation of light intensity to radish root shape. Proc Fla State Hortic Soc 103:100–101
Hogewoning SW, Trouwborst G, Maljaars H, Poorter H, Ieperen WV, Harbinson J (2010) Blue light dose–responses of leaf photosynthesis, morphology, and chemical composition of Cucumis sativus grown under different combinations of red and blue light. J Exp Bot 61:3107–3117
Hole CC, Dearman J (1993) The effect of photon flux density on distribution of assimilate between shoot and storage root of carrot, red beet and radish. Sci Hortic 55:213–225
Ikeda A, Nakayama S, Kitaya Y, Yabuki K (1988) Effects of photoperiod, CO2 concentration, and light intensity on growth and net photosynthetic rates of lettuce and turnip. Acta Hortic 10:273–282
Inada K, Yasumoto Y (1989) Effects of light quality, daylength and periodic temperature variation on the growth of lettuce and radish plants. Jpn J Crop Sci 58:689–694
Kang JH, Krishnakumar S, Atulba SLS, Jeong BR, Hwang SJ (2013) Light intensity and photoperiod influence the growth and development of hydroponically grown leaf lettuce in a closed-type plant factory system. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 54:501–509
Kara AN, Kotov AA, Bukhov NG (1997) Specific distribution of gibberellins, cytokinins, indole-3-acetic acid, and abscisic acid in radish plants closely correlates with photomorphogenetic responses to blue or red light. J Plant Physiol 151:51–59
Kozai T (2013) Plant factory in Japan-current situation and perspectives. Chron Hortic 53:8–11
Lee SH, Tewari RK, Hahn EJ, Paek KY (2007) Photon flux density and light quality induce changes in growth, stomatal development, photosynthesis and transpiration of Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal. plantlets. Plant Cell 90:141–151
Liu WK, Jiang CQ (2016) Effects of light quality and intensity of LED on growth and biomass accumulation of radish seedlings. China Light Lighting 12:24–32
Marcelis LFM, Heuvelink E, Dijk DV (1997) Pithiness and growth of radish tubers as affected by irradiance and plant density. Ann Bot-Lond 79:397–402
Palmer CE, Smith OE (1969) Cytokinins and tuber initiation in the potato Solanum tuberosum. Nature 221:279–280
Samuolienė G, Sirtautas R, Brazaitytė A, Sakalauskaitė J, Sakalauskienė S, Duchovskis P (2011) The impact of red and blue light-emitting diode illumination on radish physiological indices. Cent Eur J Biol 6:821–828
Shiina T, Hosokawa D, Roy P, Nakamura N, Thammawong M, Orikasa T (2011) Life cycle inventory analysis of leafy vegetables grown in two types of plant factories. Acta Hortic 919:115–122
Sirtautas R, Samuolienė G, Brazaitytė A, Duchovskis P (2011) Temperature and photoperiod effects on photosynthetic indices of radish raphanus sativus l. Zemdirbyste-Agric 98:57–62
Soffe RW, Lenton JR, Milford GFJ (1977) Effects of photoperiod on some vegetable species. Ann Appl Biol 85:411–415
Warrington IJ, Norton RA (1991) An evaluation of plant growth and development under various daily quantum integrals. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 116:544–551
Watanabe H (2011) Light-controlled plant cultivation system in Japan-development of a vegetable factory using LEDs as a light source for plants. Acta Hortic 907:37–44
Yorio NC, Goins GD, Kagie HR, Wheeler RM, Sager JC (2001) Improving spinach, radish, and lettuce growth under red light-emitting diodes LEDs with blue light supplementation. HortScience 36:380–383
Acknowledgements
This research was financially supported by the Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31672202) and the Basic Scientific Research Fund of National Nonprofit Institutes (2017).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zha, L., Liu, W. Effects of light quality, light intensity, and photoperiod on growth and yield of cherry radish grown under red plus blue LEDs. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 59, 511–518 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-018-0048-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-018-0048-5