Log in

An Analytical Hierarchy Process Approach for Prioritization of Objectives and Parameters for an Integrated Urban Water Management

  • Water Resources and Hydrologic Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

For sustainable development of urban areas, it is essential to address urban water management integrated with the urban water systems and spatial planning of the cities and the subsequent uncertainties. An integrated urban water management and planning model will help ensure water security, mitigate floods and droughts, reduce the negative environmental impact of urbanization and climate change, and bring coherence in the water supply management with the cities’ spatial planning and relevant policies. In the present research, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), a multi-criteria decision analysis, has been implemented to calculate the weightage of different parameters associated with urban water management and planning. AHP uses linguistic and quantitative variables based on experts’ opinions for selecting and prioritizing the objectives and parameters for an integrated approach to urban water management and spatial planning under uncertainties. The local and global weights of objectives, parameters, key indicators, and sub-indicators were calculated after pairwise comparison by 32 experts from academia and industry in urban planning and civil and environmental engineering for the case of Ranchi, a city in eastern India. The study establishes the financial factors (36.97%) as one of the important attributes, followed by environmental factors (26.71%) for consideration in integrated urban water management. Further, Alternative D (45.256%) is framed by collaborating different objectives of IUWM, such as ensuring water security through alternative water sources, mitigating floods and droughts, and water supply planning considering land use, management policies, and climate change. The research findings can assist decision-makers in prioritizing the various objectives and parameters for integrated urban water management in cities with similar population sizes and organic growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharya NK, Dai Lee Y, Kim JK (2006) Critical construction conflicting factors identification using analytical hierarchy process. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 10(3):165–174, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02824057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alemu ZA, Dioha MO (2020) Modelling scenarios for sustainable water supply and demand in Addis Ababa city, Ethiopia. Environmental Systems Research 9(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-020-00168-3

  • Allende-Prieto C, Méndez-Fernández BI, Sañudo-Fontaneda LA, Charlesworth SM (2018) Development of a geospatial data-based methodology for stormwater management in urban areas using freely-available software. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(8), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081703

  • Bagheri A, Asgary A, Levy J, Rafieian M (2006) A performance index for assessing urban water systems: A fuzzy inference approach. Water Works Association. Journal 98

  • Basu S, Chahar BR (2012) Practicable Water Management in a Typical Indian City

  • Bayram BÇ (2021) A sustainable forest management criteria and indicators assessment using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 193(7), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09176-x

  • Beh EHY, Zheng F, Dandy GC, Maier HR, Kapelan Z (2017) Robust optimization of water infrastructure planning under deep uncertainty using metamodels. Environmental Modelling and Software 93:92–105, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Daoud M, Mahrad B el, Elhassnaoui I, Moumen A, Sayad A, ELbouhadioui M, Moroşanu GA, Mezouary L el, Essahlaoui A, Eljaafari S (2021) Integrated water resources management: An indicator framework for water management system assessment in the R’Dom sub-basin, morocco. Environmental Challenges 3: 100062, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernal D, Restrepo I, Grueso-Casquete S (2021) Key criteria for considering decentralization in municipal wastewater management. Heliyon 7(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06375

  • Bose A (2020) Using genetic algorithm to improve consistency and retain authenticity in the analytic hierarchy process. OPSEARCH 57(4):1070–1092, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-020-00450-z

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Canco I, Kruja D, Iancu T (2021) Ahp, a reliable method for quality decision making: A case study in business. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(24), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413932

  • Candelieri A, Conti D, Archetti F (2014) Improving analytics in urban water management: A spectral clustering-based approach for leakage localization. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences 108:235–248, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cap-Net, & UNDP (n.d.) Climate change adaptation and integrated water resources management. Retrieved September 16, 2023, https://cap-net.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Cap-Net-CCA-and-IWRM.pdf

  • Capodaglio AG (2017) Integrated, decentralized wastewater management for resource recovery in rural and peri-urban areas. In Resources (Vol. 6, Issue 2). MDPI AG, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/resources6020022

  • Chen DC, Maksimovic C, Voulvoulis N (2011) Institutional capacity and policy options for integrated urban water management: A Singapore case study. Water Policy 13(1):53–68, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2010.073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Wu G, Wu Y, Wu Q, Shi Q, Ngo HH, Vargas Saucedo OA, Hu HY (2020) Water Eco-Nexus Cycle System (WaterEcoNet) as a key solution for water shortage and water environment problems in urban areas. Water Cycle 1:71–77, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watcyc.2020.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi SJ, Kim JH, Lee DR (2012) Decision of the water shortage mitigation policy using multi-criteria decision analysis. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 16(2):247–253, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-0008-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong J (2014) Climate-readiness, competition and sustainability: An analysis of the legal and regulatory frameworks for providing water services in Sydney. Water Policy 16(1):1–18, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2013.058

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • CGWB (2022) Dynamic Ground Water Resources of India, 2022, https://cgwb.gov.in/sites/default/files/inline-files/2022-11-11-gwra_2022_1_compressed.pdf

  • Dolan JG (2010) Multi-criteria clinical decision support a primer on the use of multiple-criteria decision-making methods to promote evidence-based, patient-centered healthcare. Patient 3(4):229–248

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Durbach IN, Stewart TJ (2012) Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 223(1): 1–14, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.04.038

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eshtehardian E, Ghodousi P, Bejanpour A (2013) Using ANP and AHP for the supplier selection in the construction and civil engineering companies; Case study of Iranian company. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 17(2):262–270, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-1141-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmail BA, Suleiman L (2020) Analyzing evidence of sustainable urban water management systems: A review through the lenses of sociotechnical transitions. Sustainability (Switzerland) 12(11), MDPI, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114481

  • Farmani R, Butler D (2014) Implications of urban form on water distribution systems performance. Water Resources Management 28(1):83–97, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0472-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman EH, Gass SI (2001) The analytic hierarchy process — An exposition. Operations Research 49(4):469–486, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.49.4.469.11231

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gao X, Liu Y, Sun B (2018) Water shortage risk assessment considering large-scale regional transfers: A copula-based uncertainty case study in Lunan, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25(23):23328–23341, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2408-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia M, Koebele E, Deslatte A, Ernst K, Manago KF, Treuer G (2019) Towards urban water sustainability: Analyzing management transitions in Miami, Las Vegas, and Los Angeles. Global Environmental Change 58, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101967

  • Gleason JA, Flores CC (2021) Challenges of water sensitive cities in Mexico: The case of the metropolitan area of Guadalajara. Water (Switzerland) 13(5), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13050601

  • Guan H, Chen L, Huang S, Yan C, Wang Y (2020) Multi-objective optimal allocation of water resources based on “three red lines” in Qinzhou, China. Water Policy 22(4):541–560, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2020.131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GWP (2013) Integrated Urban Water Management (IUWM): Toward Diversification and Sustainability Moving to Integrated Urban Water Management, https://www.gwp.org

  • Hargreaves AJ, Farmani R, Ward S, Butler D (2019) Modelling the future impacts of urban spatial planning on the viability of alternative water supply. Water Research 162:200–213, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.06.029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel JM, Bridges JFP, IJzerman MJ (2014) Group decision making with the analytic hierarchy process in benefit-risk assessment: A tutorial. Patient 7(2):129–140, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-014-0050-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlimann A, Wilson E (2018) Sustainable urban water management under a changing climate: The role of spatial planning. Water (Switzerland) 10(5), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w10050546

  • Huyghe W, Hernández-Pacheco Algaba M, van Leeuwen K, Koop S, Eisenreich S (2021) Assessment of the urban water cycle in Antwerp (BE): The City Blueprint Approach (CBA). Cleaner Environmental Systems 2:100011, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Improta G, Russo MA, Triassi M, Converso G, Murino T, Santillo LC (2018) Use of the AHP methodology in system dynamics: Modelling and simulation for health technology assessments to determine the correct prosthesis choice for hernia diseases. Mathematical Biosciences 299:19–27, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2018.03.004

    Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ishak A, Asfriyati, Akmaliah V (2019) Analytical hierarchy process and PROMETHEE as decision making tool: A review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 505(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/505/1/012085

  • Jaramillo P, Nazemi A (2018) Assessing urban water security under changing climate: Challenges and ways forward. Sustainable Cities and Society 41:907–918, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson CE, Holz LM, Hardy MJ, Kuczera G (2005) Integrated Urban Water Management: Combining Multi-Criterion Optimization and Decision Analysis

  • Jensen O, Wu H (2018) Urban water security indicators: Development and pilot. Environmental Science and Policy 83:33–45, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Zevenbergen C, Ma Y (2018) Urban pluvial flooding and stormwater management: A contemporary review of China’s challenges and “sponge cities” strategy. In Environmental Science and Policy 80:132–143, Elsevier Ltd., DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.016

  • Kenabatho PK, Montshiwa MM (2005) Integrated water resources management as a tool for drought planning and management in botswana: A diagnostic approach. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning 1(1), https://www.witpress.com

  • Khaira A, Dwivedi RK (2018) A state of the art review of analytical hierarchy process. Materials Today: Proceedings 5, https://www.sciencedirect.comwww.materialstoday.com/proceedings

  • Kim H, Son J, Lee S, Koop S, van Leeuwen K, Choi YJ, Park J (2018) Assessing urbanwater management sustainability of a megacity: Case study of Seoul, South Korea. Water (Switzerland) 10(6), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w10060682

  • Koop SHA, Grison C, Eisenreich SJ, Hofman J, van Leeuwen KJ (2022) Integrated water resources management in cities in the world: Global solutions. Sustainable Cities and Society 86, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104137

  • Kuhn Y (2010) Water-Sensitive Urban Design: An Integral Piece of Ecological Sustainable Development.

  • Lerer S, Arnbjerg-Nielsen K, Mikkelsen P (2015) A map** of tools for informing water sensitive urban design planning decisions—questions, aspects and context sensitivity. Water 7(12):993–1012, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w7030993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Dong M, Wong T, Wang J, Kumar AJ, Singh RP (2018) Objectives and indexes for implementation of sponge cities-A case study of Changzhou City, China. Water (Switzerland) 10(5), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w10050623

  • Li W, Jiao K, Bao Z, **e Y, Zhen J, Huang G, Fu L (2017) Chance-constrained dynamic programming for multiple water resources allocation management associated with risk-aversion analysis: A case study of Bei**g, China. Water (Switzerland) 9(8), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w9080596

  • Lolli F, Ishizaka A, Gamberini R (2014) New AHP-based approaches for multi-criteria inventory classification. International Journal of Production Economics 156:62–74, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.05.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroneze MM, Zepka LQ, Vieira JG, Queiroz MI, Jacob-Lopes E (2014) A tecnologia de remoção de fósforo: Gerenciamento do elemento em residuos industriais. Revista Ambiente e Agua 9(3): 445–458, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4136/1980-993X

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng C, Wang X, Li Y (2018) An optimization model for water management based on water resources and environmental carrying capacities: A case study of the Yinma River Basin, Northeast China. Water (Switzerland) 10(5), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w10050565

  • Miao H, Li D, Zuo Q, Yu L, Fei X, Hao L (2019) A scenario-based optimization model for planning sustainable water-resources process management under uncertainty. Processes 7(5), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7050312

  • Mielby S, Sandersen PBE (2017) Development of a 3D geological/hydrogeological model targeted at sustainable management of the urban water cycle in Odense City, Denmark. Procedia Engineering 209:75–82, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra AK, Masoodi M, Poyil RP, Tewari NK (2018) Water demand and waste management with respect to projected urban growth of Gurugram city in Haryana. Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 7(3):336–343, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjbas.2018.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell VG (2006) Applying integrated urban water management concepts: A review of Australian experience. Environmental Management 37(5):589–605, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0252-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moeinaddini M, Khorasani N, Danehkar A, Darvishsefat AA, Zienalyan M (2010) Siting MSW landfill using weighted linear combination and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methodology in GIS environment (case study: Karaj). Waste Management 30(5):912–920, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mulatu K (2017) Evaluation of water supply and demand: The case of Shambu town, Western Oromia, Ethiopia. International Journal of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering 9(5):96–101, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/ijwree2016.0699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman JP, Dandy GC, Maier HR (2014) Multiobjective optimization of cluster-scale urban water systems investigating alternative water sources and level of decentralization. Water Resources Research 50(10):7915–7938, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015233

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuis E, Cuppen E, Langeveld J, de Bruijn H (2021) Towards the integrated management of urban water systems: Conceptualizing integration and its uncertainties. Journal of Cleaner Production 280, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124977

  • NIUA & UNESCO (2021) A Qualitative Framework to Evaluate the Extent of Integrated Urban Water Management in Indian Cities Applying the Framework to Delhi

  • Nunes RTS, Prodanoff JHA, Nunes B, Freitas MAv (2011) Incorporating Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) practices into the planning context: the conceptual case for lot-scale developments. Transactions on Ecology and The Environment 167:1743–3541, DOI: 10.2495/11

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell EC, Netusil NR, Chan FKS, Dolman NJ, Gosling SN (2021) International perceptions of urban blue-green infrastructure: A comparison across four cities. Water (Switzerland) 13(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13040544

  • OECD (2014) Integrated Water Resources Management in Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia European Union Water Initiative National Policy Dialogues progress report 2013

  • Ossadnik W, Schinke S, Kaspar RH (2016) Group Aggregation techniques for analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: A comparative analysis. Group Decision and Negotiation 25(2):421–457, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-015-9448-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özerol G, Dolman N, Bormann H, Bressers H, Lulofs K, Böge M (2020) Urban water management and climate change adaptation: A self-assessment study by seven midsize cities in the North Sea Region. Sustainable Cities and Society 55, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102066

  • Pacheco E, Finotti A (2014) Interfaces between traditional urban drainage systems and water resources: Case study — Rio Tavares and Morro das Pedras watersheds, Florianópolis, Brazil. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 182:187–199, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2495/WP140171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2017) An evolutionary perspective on water governance: From understanding to transformation. Water Resources Management 31(10):2917–2932, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1727-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parekh H, Yadav K, Yadav S, Shah N (2015) Identification and assigning weight of indicator influencing performance of municipal solid waste management using AHP. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 19(1):36–45, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-2356-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parween S, Sinha RC (2023) Identification of indicators for develo** an integrated study on urban water supply system, planning, and management. Journal of Environmental Engineering 149(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/joeedu.eeeng-7062

  • Pincetl S, Porse E, Mika KB, Litvak E, Manago KF, Hogue TS, Gillespie T, Pataki DE, Gold M (2019) Adapting urban water systems to manage scarcity in the 21st century: The case of los angeles. Environmental Management 63(3):293–308, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1118-2

    Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Quan HC, Lee BG (2012) GIS-based landslide susceptibility map** using analytic hierarchy process and artificial neural network in Jeju (Korea). KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 16(7):1258–1266, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1242-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahmat ZG, Niri MV, Alavi N, Goudarzi G, Babaei AA, Baboli Z, Hosseinzadeh M (2017) Landfill site selection using GIS and AHP: a case study: Behbahan, Iran. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 21(1):111–118, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0296-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathnayaka K, Malano H, Arora M (2016) Assessment of sustainability of urban water supply and demand management options: A comprehensive approach. Water (Switzerland) 8(12), MDPI AG, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w8120595

  • Ridwansyah I, Fakhrudin M, Wibowo H, Yulianti M (2018) Application of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to predict the impact of best management practices in Jatigede catchment area. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 118(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/118/1/012030

  • Rodríguez MI, Cuevas MM, Martínez G, Moreno B (2014) Planning criteria for water sensitive urban design. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 191:1579–1591, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2495/SC141342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohr HE, Fourie W (2014) Securing water sustainability through innovative spatial planning. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 191:283–293, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2495/SC140241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation (Decision Making Series) McGraw-Hill, New York, ISBN-978-0070543713

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty RW (1987) The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling 9(5):161–176

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2004) Decision making-the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 13(1):1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL, Katz JM (1990) How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. In European Journal of Operational Research 48

  • Sadhwani K, Eldho TI, Jha MK, Karmakar S (2022) Effects of dynamic land use/land cover change on flow and sediment yield in a monsoon-dominated tropical watershed. Water (Switzerland) 14(22), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w14223666

  • Sahoo S, Dhar A, Debsarkar A, Pradhan B, Alamri AM (2020) Future water use planning by water evaluation and planning system model. Water Resources Management 34(15):4649–4664, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02680-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleem A, Mahmood I, Sarjoughian H, Nasir HA, Malik AW (2021) A Water Evaluation and Planning-based framework for the long-term prediction of urban water demand and supply. Simulation 97(5):323–345, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549720984250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapkota M, Arora M, Malano H, Moglia M, Sharma A, George B, Pamminger F (2015) An overview of hybrid water supply systems in the context of urban water management: Challenges and opportunities. Water (Switzerland) 7(1):153–174, MDPI AG, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w7010153

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuetze T, Chelleri L (2013) Integrating decentralized rainwater management in urban planning and design: Flood resilient and sustainable water management using the example of coastal cities in The Netherlands and Taiwan. Water (Switzerland) 5(2):593–616, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w5020593

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabani M, Gharneh NS, Niaki STA (2020) Planning for urban water supply-demand portfolio using a hybrid robust stochastic optimization approach. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply 20(8):3433–3448, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.257

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabani M, Shams Gharneh N, Akhavan Niaki ST (2021) A sustainable urban water management model under uncertainty: a case study. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 32(2):376–397, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-09-2020-0187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shandas V, Parandvash GH (2010) Integrating urban form and demographics in water-demand management: An empirical case study of Portland, Oregon. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37(1):112–128, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b35036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharvelle S, Reichel B, Roesner LA (2012) Application of the Integrated Urban Water Model to Evaluate Most Appropriate Water Conservation Practices under Varying Hydrologic Conditions

  • Silva SP, Teixeira BAN (2019) Modelling system dynamics to evaluate urban water supply management and production of future scenarios. Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering 13(2):317–328, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4090/juee.2019.v13n2.317328

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • SIWI (2020) Principles and Practices of Integrated Water Resources Management Workplace-based Professional Training, https://www.siwi.org

  • Stringer LC, Mirzabaev A, Benjaminsen TA, Harris RMB, Jafari M, Lissner TK, Stevens N, Tirado-von der Pahlen C (2021) Climate change impacts on water security in global drylands. One Earth 4(6):851–864, Cell Press, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.05.010

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Torres López S, Barrionuevo M de los A, Rodríguez-Labajos B (2023) A new operational approach for understanding water-related interactions to achieve water sustainability in growing cities. Environment, Development and Sustainability 25(1):122–137, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02045-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touch T, Oeurng C, Jiang Y, Mokhtar A (2020) Integrated modeling of water supply and demand under climate change impacts and management options in tributary Basin of Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia. Water (Switzerland) 12(9), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092462

  • Turcksin L, Bernardini A, Macharis C (2011) A combined AHP-PROMETHEE approach for selecting the most appropriate policy scenario to stimulate a clean vehicle fleet. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences 20:954–965, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valli P, Jeyasehar CA (2012) Analytical Hierarchy Process based equipment selection method for construction project using MATLAB tool. International Journal of Advanced Technology in Civil Engineering 232–237, DOI: https://doi.org/10.47893/ijatce.2012.1036

  • van der Steen P, Howe C (2009) Managing water in the city of the future; Strategic planning and science. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology 8(2):115–120, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-009-9154-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik MO, Sucu S, Cappon HJ, Chen WS, Martinson DB, Ouelhadj D, Rijnaarts HHM (2021) Mathematically formulated key performance indicators for design and evaluation of treatment trains for resource recovery from urban wastewater. Journal of Environmental Management 282, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111916

  • Varouchakis EA, Yetilmezsoy K, Karatzas GP (2019) A decision-making framework for sustainable management of groundwater resources under uncertainty: Combination of Bayesian risk approach and statistical tools. Water Policy 21(3):602–622, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2019.128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner PD, Kumar S, Schneider K (2013) An assessment of land use change impacts on the water resources of the Mula and Mutha Rivers catchment upstream of Pune, India. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 17(6):2233–2246, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2233-2013

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace S, Biggs T, Lai CT, McMillan H (2021) Tracing sources of stormflow and groundwater recharge in an urban, semi-arid watershed using stable isotopes. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 34, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100806

  • Walsh CL, Blenkinsop S, Fowler HJ, Burton A, Dawson RJ, Glenis V, Manninga LJ, Jahanshahi G, Kilsby CG (2016) Adaptation of water resource systems to an uncertain future. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 20(5):1869–1884, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1869-2016

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Hou B, Jiang D, **ao W, Wu Y, Zhao Y, Zhou Y, Guo C, Wang G (2016) Optimal allocation of water resources based on water supply security. Water (Switzerland) 8(6), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w8060237

  • Wang J, Xue F, **g R Lu Q, Huang Y, Sun X, Zhu W (2021) Regenerating sponge city to sponge watershed through an innovative framework for urban water resilience. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(10), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105358

  • Wang JW, Cheng CH, Huang KC (2009) Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing Journal 9(1):377–386, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2008.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Water Partnership Program, & World Bank (2016) Mainstreaming Water Resources Management in Urban Projects: Taking an Integrated Urban Water Management Approach

  • Wong THF (2004) Integrated approach to Urban stormwater management. BMP Technology in Urban Watersheds 24–35, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784408728

  • World Bank (2021) A National Framework for Integrated Urban Water Management in Indonesia, https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/water/publication/a-national-framework-for-integrated-urban-water-management-in-indonesia

  • Xu Y, Li W, Ding X (2017) A stochastic multi-objective chance-constrained programming model for water supply management in **aoqing River watershed. Water (Switzerland) 9(6), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w9060378

  • Xu Z, Yao L, Chen X (2020) Urban water supply system optimization and planning: Bi-objective optimization and system dynamics methods. Computers and Industrial Engineering 142, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106373

  • Yalçintaş M, Bulu M, Küçükvar M, Samadi H (2015) A framework for sustainable urban water management through demand and supply forecasting: The case of Istanbul. Sustainability (Switzerland) 7(8): 11050–11067, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su70811050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yifru BA, Mitiku DB, Tolera MB, Chang SW, Chung IM (2020) Groundwater potential map** using SWAT and GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 24(8): 2546–2559, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-0168-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Younos T, Lee J, Parece T (2019) Twenty-first century urban water management: the imperative for holistic and cross-disciplinary approach. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 9(1):90–95, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-018-0524-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Fu D, Wang Y, Singh RP (2017) Detailed Sponge City planning based on hierarchical fuzzy decision-making: A case study on Yangchen Lake. Water (Switzerland) 9(11), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w9110903

  • Zhou X, Wang F, Huang K, Zhang H, Yu J, Han AY (2021) System dynamics-multiple objective optimization model for water resource management: A case study in jiaxing city, china. Water (Switzerland) 13(5):1–19, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13050671

    Google Scholar 

  • Zischg J, Rauch W, Sitzenfrei R (2018) Morphogenesis of urban water distribution networks: A spatiotemporal planning approach for cost-efficient and reliable supply. Entropy 20(9), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/e20090708

  • Zyoud SH, Fuchs-Hanusch D (2017) A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques. Expert Systems with Applications 78:158–181, Elsevier Ltd., DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not Applicable

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shama Parween.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parween, S., Sinha, R.C. An Analytical Hierarchy Process Approach for Prioritization of Objectives and Parameters for an Integrated Urban Water Management. KSCE J Civ Eng 28, 1566–1579 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-1019-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-1019-2

Keywords

Navigation