Log in

Decision of the water shortage mitigation policy using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

  • Water Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Many regions has been facing formidable freshwater management and planning challenges. Concerns about limited water allocations, conservation of environmental and water qualities and policies for sustainable water use have been increased because rising water demand would cause water shortage in the near future. Therefore, it is necessary to look into possible alternative water resources management plans to mitigate the potential water shortage. However, it is not straightforward to predict and analyze the various situations likely to be occurred in the future. Also, finding an optimal solution among many alternatives to mitigate the water shortage is a complex task. In this study, a methodology of predicting and analyzing the water resources situations in the future using the K-WEAP (Korea Water Evaluation and Planning system) is presented and an optimal alternative is determined using the MCDA (Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis) that takes into account the economic, environmental, and social sectors. The proposed methodology is applied to the Nakdong River basin in South Korea to calculate water budget and possible water shortage. An optimal water shortage mitigation policy for the study basin is also suggested to help decision maker develop long-term water resources management strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmoud, M. R., Fahmy, H., and Labadie, J. W. (2002). “Multicriteria siting and sizing of desalination facilities with geographic information system.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 128, No. 2, pp. 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belton, V. and Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis. An intergrated approach, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Messachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, D. J. and Park, H. K. (2000). “Analysis of water privatization scenarios with mulit-criteria decision techniques.” Journal of Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 175–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckstein, L., Treichel, W., and El Magnouni, S. (1994). “Ranking ground-water management alternatives by multicriterion analysis.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 120, No. 4, pp. 546–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flug, M, Seitz, H. L. H., and Scott, J. F. (2000). “Multicriteria decision analysis applied to Glen Canyon Dam.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 126, No. 5, pp. 270–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goicoechea, A., Stakhiv, E. Z., and Li, F. (1992). “Experimental evaluation of multiple criteria decision models for application to water resources planning.” Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joubert, A. and Pollard, S. (2000). “Using multi-criteria decision analysis in catchment management: A case study of the Sand River, Mpumulanga, South Africa.” African Journal of Aquatic Science, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 238–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joubert, A., Stewart, T. J., and Eberhard, R. (2003). “Evaluation of water supply augmentation and water demand management options for the City of Cape Town.” Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KMOCT (2006). National water resources plan (2006–2020), Korean Ministry of Construction and Transportation.

  • KMOST (2007). Building of value evaluation system of water resources and water related technology, Korean Ministry of Science and Technology.

  • Lee, H. J. and Shim, M. P. (2002). “Decision making for priority of water allocation during drought by analytic hierarchy process.” Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 703–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Statistics Working Paper.

  • Park, T. S. (2002). “The evaluation perspective of stream weight in AHP.” Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 685–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, P., Hansen, E., Zhu, Z., and Stavisky, D. (1992). “Simulation of water supply and demand in the aral sea region.” Water International, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgley, M. A. (1993). “A multicriteria approach to allocation water during drought.” Resources and Optimization, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 135–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B., Slowinski, R., and Treichel, W. (1992). “Multicriteria programming of water supply systems for rural areas.” Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 13–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockholm Environment Institute-Boston Center. (2001). K-WEAP User guide, SEI-US.

  • Tecle, A., Fogel, M., and Duckstein, L. (1988). “Multicriterion selection of wastewater management alternatives.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 114, No. 14, pp. 383–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiessen, E. M. and Loucks, D. P. (1992). “Computer assisted negotiation of multiobjective water resources conflicts.” Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasin, A. -Z., Muhammad, S., Kdeb, A. -J., and Atef, A. -K. (2002). “Application of decision support system for sustainable management of water resources in Azaq Basin-Jordan.” Water International, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 532–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joong Hoon Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choi, SJ., Kim, J.H. & Lee, DR. Decision of the water shortage mitigation policy using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. KSCE J Civ Eng 16, 247–253 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-0008-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-0008-z

Keywords

Navigation