Log in

Prospects of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites for Additive Manufacturing Applications: A Review

  • Technical Article
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of manufacturing processes in various sector applications has increased rapidly to produce precise, superior quality, durable, and cost-effective products. In addition, additive manufacturing (AM) is one of the emerging technologies to manufacture complex-shaped components with more precise and aesthetic shapes in different fields of application. The present paper reviews the prospects of natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites for AM applications, and focuses on critical analysis and graphically representation of research trends of fused deposition modeling (FDM) materials. The results reveal that the mechanical properties of polymers with reinforcements of natural fibers have improved by 20–30% as compared to pure polymers in the field of FDM applications. The structure of the present review contains an introduction, applications, materials, the FDM process, mechanical properties of polymers and polymers with reinforcements of natural fibers, comparative analysis, a summary, conclusions, and future prospects of hybrid materials for various industrial applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting for results and discussions during this study is included in this published article.

References

  1. K.V. Wong and A. Hernandez, ISRN Mech. Eng. 2012, 1 https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/208760 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. O. Abdulhameed, A. Al-Ahmari, W. Ameen, and S.H. Mian, Adv. Mech. Eng. 11, 1 https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018822880 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G.M. Shashi, A.R. Laskar, and H. Biswas, Proc 14th Glob Eng Technol Conf 29-30 December 2017, pp. 1–23 (2017). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12520667

  4. H.K. Chan, J. Griffin, J.J. Lim, F. Zeng, and A.S.F. Chiu, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 205, 156 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.009 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L. van der Elst, C.F. de Lima, M.G. Kurtoglu, V.N. Koraganji, M. Zheng, and A. Gumennik, Adv. Fiber Mater. 3, 59 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42765-020-00056-6 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Picard, A.K. Mohanty, and M. Misra, RSC Adv. 10, 36058 https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA04857G (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R.N. Rajendran Royan, J.S. Leong, W.N. Chan, J.R. Tan, and J.S.B. Shamsuddin, Polymers 13(14), 2289 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13142289 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. T.P. Mpofu, C. Mawere, and M. Mukosera, Int. J. Sci. Res. 3(6), 2148 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Liu, V. Nguyen-Van, B. Panda, K. Fox, A. du Plessis, and P. Tran, 3D Print. Addit. Manuf. 9(1), 12 https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2020.0331 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Bhatia and A.K. Sehgal, Mater. Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.379 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Sun and G. Shang, World J. Eng. Technol. 9(1), 194 https://doi.org/10.4236/wjet.2021.91014 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A.S. Elakkad, Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 8(11), 277 https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6650-3.ch012 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C. Pradeepkumar, S. Karthikeyan, N. Ra**i, S. Budholiya, and S.A. Raj, Mater. Today Proc. 46(17), 8812 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.184 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Jiménez, L. Romero, I.A. Domínguez, M.D.M. Espinosa, and M. Dominguez, Complexity 2019, 1 https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9656938 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Rajan, M. Samykano, K. Kadirgama, W.S.W. Harun, and M.M. Rahman, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 120, 1531 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08860-7 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Bertolino, D. Battegazzore, R. Arrigo, and A. Frache, Addit. Manuf. 40, 101944 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.101944 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Z. Zhang and X. Gao, Polymers 14(6), 1106 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14061106 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Samykano, S.K. Selvamani, K. Kadirgama, W.K. Ngui, G. Kanagaraj, and K. Sudhakar, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 102, 2779 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03313-0 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. K.A. Al-Ghamdi, Int. J. Light Mater. Manuf. 2, 338 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2019.05.004 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Wichniarek, A. Hamrol, W. Kuczko, F. Gorski, and M. Rogalewicz, CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 35, 550 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.08.011 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M.F. Afrose, S.H. Masood, M. Nikzad, and P. Iovenitti, Adv. Mater. Res. 1044–1045, 31 https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1044-1045.31 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Torres, J. Cotelo, J. Karl, and A.P. Gordon, JOM. 67, 1183 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1367-y (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. L. **nhua, L. Shengpeng, L. Zhou, Z. **anhua, C. **aohu, and W. Zhongbin, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 79, 1117 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6893-9 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Li, T. Wang, Q. Li, Z. Yu, and N. Wang, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 94, 381 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0820-1 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. M.A. Elsawy, K.H. Kim, J.W. Park, and A. Deep, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 79, 1346 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.143 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Y. Song, Y. Li, W. Song, K. Yee, K.Y. Lee, and V.L. Tagaralli, Mater. Des. 123, 154 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.051 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M.A. Cuiffo, J. Snyder, A.M. Elliott, N. Romero, S. Kannan, and G.P. Halada, Appl. Sci. 7, 1 https://doi.org/10.3390/app7060579 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. R.A. Wach, P. Wolszczak, and W.A. Adamus, Macromol. Mater. Eng. 303, 1 https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201800169 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. L. Yang, S. Li, Y. Li, M. Yang, and Q. Yuan, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 28, 169 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3784-x (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. A.P. Valerga, M. Batista, J. Salguero, and F. Girot, Materials. 11(8), 1322 https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081322 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. A. Rodríguez-Panes, J. Claver, and A.M. Camacho, Materials. 11(8), 1333 https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081333 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. E. Ivanov, R. Kotsilkova, H. **a, Y. Chen, R. Donato, K. Donato, A. Godoy, R. Di Maio, C. Silvestre, S. Cimmino, and V. Angelov, Appl. Sci. 9(6), 1209 https://doi.org/10.3390/app9061209 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. T. Yao, Z. Deng, K. Zhang, and S. Li, Compos. Part B Eng. 163, 393 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.025 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. J. Kiendl and C. Gao, Compos. Part B Eng. 180, 107562 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107562 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Y. Zhao, Y. Chen, and Y. Zhou, Mater. Des. 181, 108089 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108089 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. V. Harshitha and S.S. Rao, Mater Today Proc. 19, 583 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.737 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. J.C. Camargo, A.R. Machado, E.C. Almeida, and E.M.F.S. Silva, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 103, 2423 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03532-5 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. A.P. Valerga, M. Batista, S.R. Fernandez-Vidal, and A.J. Gamez, Polymers (Basel) 11(3), 566 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11030566 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. R.E. Przekop, M. Kujawa, W. Pawlak, M. Dobrosielska, B. Sztorch, and W. Wieleba, Polymers (Basel) 12(6), 1250 https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM12061250 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. A. Chalgham, A. Ehrmann, and I. Wickenkamp, Polymers (Basel) 13(8), 1239 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081239 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. M.F. Afrose, S.H. Masood, P. Iovenitti, M. Nikzad, and I. Sbarski, Prog. Addit. Manuf. 1, 21 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-015-0002-3 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. M. Samykano, Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 46, 7875 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05617-4 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. C. Benwood, A. Anstey, J. Andrzejewski, M. Misra, and A.K. Mohanty, ACS Omega 3(4), 4400 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b00129 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. S. Wahab, A. Wagiman, and M. Ibrahim, Appl. Mech. Mater. 315, 987 https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.315.987 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. H.L. Tekinalp, V. Kunc, G.M. Velez-Garcia, C.E. Duty, L.J. Love, A.K. Naskar, C.A. Blue, and S. Ozcan, Compos. Sci. Technol. 105, 144 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. F. Ning, W. Cong, J. Qiu, J. Wei, and S. Wang, Compos. Part B Eng. 80, 369 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.013 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. R. Singh, R. Kumar, and N. Ranjan, J. Inst. Eng. Ser. C. 100, 351 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-017-0435-1 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. D. Zhao, X. Cai, G. Shou, Y. Gu, and P. Wang, Key Eng. Mater. 667, 250 https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.667.250 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. M. Kariz, M. Sernek, and M.K. Kuzman, Eur. J. Wood Prod. 74, 123 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-015-0987-9 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. J. Girdis, L. Gaudion, G. Proust, S. Loschke, and A. Dong, JOM 69, 575 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-2213-6 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. K. Pitt, O. Lopez-Botello, A.D. Lafferty, I. Todd, and K. Mumtaz, Compos. Sci. Technol. 138, 32 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.11.008 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. T. Hofstätter, I. W. Gutmann, T. Koch, D. B. Pedersen, G. Tosello, G. Heinz, and H. N. Hansen, Distribution and orientation of carbon fibers in polylactic acid parts produced by fused deposition modeling. In: Proceedings - ASPE/euspen 2016 summer top meeting on dimensional accuracy and surface finish in additive manufacturing, pp. 44–49 (2016)

  53. F. Ning, W. Cong, Y. Hu, and H. Wang, J. Compos. Mater. 51, 451 https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998316646169 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. X. Tian, T. Liu, C. Yang, Q. Wang, and D. Li, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 88, 198 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.032 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. A.L. Duigou, M. Castro, R. Bevan, and N. Martin, Mater. Des. 96, 106 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.018 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. S. Jiří, A. Michal, B. Jiří, S. Martin, H. Jiri, and B. Lubos, Mater. Sci. Forum 862, 174 https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.862.174 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. E. Gkartzou, E.P. Koumoulos, and C.A. Charitidis, Manuf. Rev. 4, 174 https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2016020 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. M. Kariz, M. Sernek, M. Obućina, and M.K. Kuzman, Mater. Today Commun. 14, 135 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2017.12.016 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. D. Filgueira, S. Holmen, J.K. Melbø, D. Moldes, A.T. Echtermeyer, and G.C. Carrasco, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5, 9338 https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02351 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. M. Milosevic, D. Stoof, and K.L. Pickering, J. Compos. Sci. 1(1), 7 https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs1010007 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Y. Tao, H. Wang, Z. Li, P. Li, and S.Q. Shi, Materials (Basel). 10, 1 https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10040339 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. M.A. Osman and M.R.A. Atia, Rapid Prototyp. J. 24, 1067 https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-11-2017-0242 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. T.C. Yang, Polymers 10(9), 976 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10090976 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. H. Liu, H. He, X. Peng, B. Huang, and J. Li, Polym. Adv. Technol. 30, 910 https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.4524 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. N. Ayrilmis, Polym. Test. 71, 163 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.09.009 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. L. Wang, J. Palmer, M. Tajvidi, D.J. Gardner, and Y. Han, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 136, 1069 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7759-9 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. N.A. Nguyen, C.C. Bowland, and A.K. Naskar, Appl. Mater. Today. 12, 138 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2018.03.009 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. H. Long, Z. Wu, Q. Dong, Y. Shen, W. Zhou, Y. Luo, and C. Zhang, Polym. Eng. Sci. 59, 10247 https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.25043 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. A. Kumar, R.K. Ohdar, and S.S. Mahapatra, Mater. Des. 31, 287 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. X. Liu, M. Zhang, S. Li, L. Si, J. Peng, and Y. Hu, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 89, 2387 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9263-3 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. L. Wang, J.E. Sanders, D.J. Gardner, and Y. Han, Prog. Addit. Manuf. 3, 205 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-018-0053-3 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. R. Sharma, R. Singh, R. Penna, and F. Fraternali, Compos. Part B. 132, 237 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.08.021 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. A. Alperen, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 138, 1 https://doi.org/10.1002/app.49709 (2020).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  74. R. Sathyamurthy, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1 https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5536171 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. V. Mazzanti, R. Pariante, A. Bonanno, O. Ruiz, F. Mollica, and G. Fillippone, Compos. Sci. Technol. 180, 51 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.05.015 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. V. Chauhan, T. Kärki, and J. Varis, Chemistry 3(4), 1258 https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry3040091 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. M.N. Ahmad, M.K. Wahid, N.A. Maidin, and M.H.A. Rahman, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-019-00287-w (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. H. Ning, S.B. Pillay, N. Lu, and Y. Yan, J. Compos. Mater. 53, 2119 https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998318822716 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. P. Bazan, D. Mierzwinski, R. Bogucki, and S. Kuciel, Materials 13, 2595 https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13112595 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. N. Lu and S. Oza, Compos. Part B 45, 1651 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.076 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. P.S. Joshi and D.S. Marathe, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 29, 2522 https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684409353815 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. H.U. Zaman, F. Parvin, T. Islam, F. Nigar, R. Islam, and S. Saha, J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 25, 45 https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705711404726 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. M.F. Abdrahman and E.S. Zainudin, Key Eng. Mater. 471–472, 507 https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.471-472.507 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. J.E. Crespo, L. Sanchez, D. Garcia, and J. Lopez, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 27, 229 https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684407079479 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Y. Zheng, D. Wang, and J. Chen, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 38, 20 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.01.023 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. J.E. Crespo, L. Sanchez, D. Garcia, and J. Lopez, J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 22, 259 https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705708091858 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. B.V. Krishna, K.H. Kate, J. Satyavolu, P. Singh, and J.G.D. Tadimeti, Compos. Part B. 174, 106956 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106956 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. D. Depuydt, M. Balthazar, K. Hendrickx, W. Six, E. Ferraris, F. Desplentere, J. Ivens, and A.W.V. Vuure, Polym. Compos. 40(5), 1963 https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.24971 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. E.A. Franco-Urquiza, Y.R. Escamilla, and P.I. Alcántara LIanas, Polymers. 13(19), 3202 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13193202 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. D. Filgueira, S. Holmen, J.K. Melb, D. Moldes, A.T. Echtermeyer, and G.C. Carrasco, Polymers 10, 314 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10030314 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. N.E. Zander, J.H. Park, Z.R. Boelter, and A.M. Gillan, ACS Omega 4, 13888 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b01564 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Jagadish, M. Rajakumaran, and A. Ray, J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 33(3), 342 https://doi.org/10.1177/089270571880 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jagadish.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adapa, S.K., Jagadish Prospects of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites for Additive Manufacturing Applications: A Review. JOM 75, 920–940 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-022-05670-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-022-05670-w

Navigation