Log in

The coupling relationship between urbanization and ecological resilience in the Pearl River Delta

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urban resilience is an emerging research topic of urban studies, and its essence is described by the ability of cities to resist, recover, and adapt to uncertain disturbances. This paper constructs a “Size-Density-Morphology” urban ecological resilience evaluation system, uses a coupling coordination degree model to measure the degree of coupling coordination between urbanization and ecological resilience in the Pearl River Delta from 2000 to 2015, and conducts an in-depth discussion on its spatiotemporal characteristics. The results show the following. (1) From 2000 to 2015, the urbanization level of cities in the study area generally increased while the level of ecological resilience declined. The coupling coordination degree between the two systems decreased from basic coordination to basic imbalance. (2) In terms of spatial distribution, the coupling coordination degree between urbanization and ecological resilience of cities presented a circular pattern that centered on the cities at the estuary of the Pearl River and increased toward the periphery. (3) Ecological resilience sub-systems played variable roles in the coupling coordination between urbanization and ecological resilience. Specifically, size resilience mainly played a reverse blocking role; the influence of morphology resilience was generally positive and continued to increase over time; the effect of density resilience was positive and continued to decline and further became negative after falling below zero. The main pathways for achieving coordinated and sustainable development of future urbanization and ecological resilience in the Pearl River Delta include: leading the coordinated development of regions with new urbanization, improving ecological resilience by strictly observing the three areas and three lines, adapting to ecological carrying capacity, and rationally arranging urban green spaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahern J, 2011. From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(4): 341–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai L, Feng X, Sun R et al., 2018. Coupling analysis of urban resilience level and urbanization quality in Jilin province. Urbanism and Architecture, 15(35): 19–23. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen F, Zhang H, Wu Q et al., 2010. A study on coordinated development of population urbanization and land urbanization in China. Human Geography, 25(5): 53–58. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Fu B, Zhao W, 2008. Source-sink landscape theory and its ecological significance. Frontiers of Biology in China, 3(2): 131–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Lu D, Zhang H, 2009. Comprehensive evaluation and the driving factors of China’s urbanization. Acta Geographica Sinica, 64(4): 387–398. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui M, 2015. The relationship of coupling coordination between urbanization and ecological environment: A case of urban cluster in the Central Plains. Economic Geography, 35(7): 72–78. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui X, Fang C, Liu H et al., 2019. Dynamic simulation of urbanization and eco-environment coupling: A review on theory, methods and applications. Acta Geographica Sinica, 74(6): 1079–1096. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Z, Zhang H, Ye Y, 2019. Urban shrinkage and growth: Measurement and determinants of economic resilience in the Pearl River Delta. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 29(8): 1331–1345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo F, Li C, Chen C et al., 2015. Spatial-temporal coupling characteristics of population urbanization and land urbanization in Northeast China. Economic Geography, 35(9): 49–56. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y, 2007. Theory, Method and Application of Comprehensive Evaluation. Bei**g: Science Press, 70–73. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling C S, 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Fang C, 2003. Analysis of coupling mechanism and rules between urbanization and eco-environment. Geographical Research, 22(2): 211–220. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Li Y, Zhou Y et al., 2012. Investigation of a coupling model of coordination between urbanization and the environment. Journal of Environmental Management, 98: 127–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Zhai GI 2017. China’s urban disaster resilience evaluation and promotion. Planners, 33(8): 5–11. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu K, 2014. Emergence and theory construction of resilient planning in the background of socialist market economy: Based on urban planning practice in Shenzhen (1979–2011). City Planning Review, 38(11): 59–64. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Li W, **e G, 2010. Estimation of China ecological footprint production coefficient based on net primary productivity. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 29(3): 592–597. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Li R, Song X, 2005. Grey associative analysis of regional urbanization and eco-environment coupling in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 60(2): 237–247. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu D, 2007. Urbanization process and spatial sprawl in China. Urban Planning Forum, (4): 47–52. (in Chinese)

  • Lu D, Yao S, Li G et al., 2007. Comprehensive analysis of the urbanization process based on China’s conditions. Economic Geography, 27(6): 883–887. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma Q, Liu K, Liu W et al., 2018. Zoning the ecological red-line in arid and semiarid regions: Taking Yulin City as an example in the context of an integrated multi-planning. Geographical Research, 37(1): 158–170. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Najjar W, Gaudiot J L, 1990. Network resilience: A measure of network fault tolerance. Computers IEEE Transactions on, 39(2): 174–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omer M, Nilchiani R, Mostashari A, 2009. Measuring the resilience of the trans-oceanic telecommunication cable system. IEEE Systems Journal, 3(3): 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ou X, Zhen F, Qin Y et al., 2008. Study on compression level and ideal impetus of regional urbanization: The case of Jiangsu Province. Geographical Research, 27(5): 993–1002. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Park R E, Mckenzie R D, 1987. Urban Sociology. Song Junling et al. trans. Bei**g: Huaxia Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao Y, Xu J, 2015. Understanding urban resilience: A conceptual analysis based on integrated international literature review. Urban Planning International, 30(2): 48–54. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenzhen Academy of Social Sciences (SASS), 2015. Practice in empirical research of Shenzhen urbanization. https://max.book118.com/html/2017/0808/126668775.shtm. (in Chinese)

  • Shi T, 2016. From comprehensive defense to resilient cities: Strategic conception of Shanghai’s city security in the new normal. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, (1): 13–18. (in Chinese)

  • Wackernagel M, Rees W E, 1996. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. Gabriela Island: New Society Publishers, 192–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Holling C S, Carpenter S R et al., 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2): 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Tang N, 2018. Spatio-temporal characteristics and evolution of rural production living-ecological space function coupling coordination in Chongqing Municipality. Geographical Research, 37(6): 1100–1114. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Zou C, Wang Y et al., 2017. Methods to identify the boundary of ecological protection red line regions using GIS: A case study in Chang**, Bei**g. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(18): 6176–6185. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Fang C, Wang Y, 2015. Quantitative investigation of the interactive coupling relationship between urbanization and eco-environment. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35(7): 2244–2254. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Liu Z, Zhang T et al., 2019. The coupling relationship between multi-dimensional urbanization and the service industry: A case study of Guangzhou. Tropical Geography, 39(3): 450–460. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu C, 1991. The core of geographical study: Regional system of man-land relationship. Economic Geography, 11(3): 1–6. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • **nhua News Agency (XNA), 2019. China’s urbanization rate has risen significantly over the past 70 years. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-08/15/content_5421538.htm, 2019-08-15. (in Chinese)

  • **ong D, **an X, Jiang Y, 2003. Discussion on ecological footprint theory applied to regional sustainable development evaluation. Progress in Geography, 22(6): 618–626. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • **u C, Wei Y, Wang Q, 2008. Evaluation of urban resilience of Dalian city based on the perspective of “Size-Density-Morphology”. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(12): 2315–2328. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, 2018. Chinese terrestrial ecosystem service value of spatial data set. Chinese Academy of Sciences, Resources and Environment Science Data Center data registration and publication system. (in Chinese)

  • Xu X, Liu J, Zhang S et al., 2018. China’s multi-period land use land cover remote sensing monitoring dataset (CNLUCC). Chinese Academy of Sciences, Resources and Environment Science Data Center data registration and publication system. (in Chinese)

  • Xu Z, Zhang Z, Cheng G et al., 2003. Ecological footprint calculation and development capacity analysis of China in 1999. Journal of Applied Ecology, 14(2): 280–285. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Zhang Z, Cheng G, 2000. The calculation and analysis of ecological footprints of Gansu Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 55(5): 607–616. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu K, 2005. “Anti-planning” Approach. Bei**g: China Architecture & Building Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu K, Li B, Li D, 2008. Ecological infrastructure approach for regional protection of natural and cultural heritage: A case study of Fujian Wuyi Mountain. City Planning Review, 32(10): 88–91, 96. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Feng X, 2019. A comparative study of urban resilience and economic development level of cities in Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration. Urban Development Studies, 26(1): 82–91. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Yang Q, Min J, 2016. An analysis of coupling between the bearing capacity of the ecological environment and the quality of new urbanization in Chongqing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 71(5): 817–828. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng W, Wang X, Li C, 2007. The spatial disparities of regional comprehensive urbanization level of vice provincial city in China from 1997. Economic Geography, 27(2): 256–260. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Foundation: Ministry of Education Humanities Social Sciences Research Project, No.21YJAZH087; Guangdong Special Support Program; Pearl River S&T Nova Program of Guangzhou, No.201806010187

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaojian Wang.

Additional information

Author

Wang Shaojian (1986-), Associate Professor, specialized in urban geography and regional development. E-mail: 1987wangshaojian@163.com

This paper is initially published in Acta Geographica Sinica (Chinese edition), 2021, 76(4): 973–991.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, S., Cui, Z., Lin, J. et al. The coupling relationship between urbanization and ecological resilience in the Pearl River Delta. J. Geogr. Sci. 32, 44–64 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-022-1935-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-022-1935-3

Keywords

Navigation