Abstract
GDI engines commercially existed with spray-guided mode where the fuel injector placed almost vertically and sprayed fuel is occupied throughout the volume of combustion chamber. With the advanced emission norms, NOx and soot emissions control is the major task along with lower fuel consumption. To achieve the advanced emission norms, further modifications are required before or during combustion. Combined air-wall guided mode combustion chamber modification is the advanced stage required for further improvement in mixing and superior combustion. Combined air-wall guided mode involved piston crown shape modification so that the modified shape must impart turbulence effects and divert the fuel/mixture flow towards the spark plug tip to initiate the combustion process. In this study, the combined air-wall-guided mode gasoline direct injection engine was tested with gasoline blends using ethanol, methanol and N-butanol at 20, 35 and 50% proportions under specific fixed conditions: 1500 rpm speed, 10% EGR and FIP of 150 bars with three split injections at 320°, 220° and 100° before TDC at different injection durations. Tests were conducted over these gasoline blend proportions for engine performance and emission characteristics and achieved the beneficial results with E20 gasoline blend over the entire applied torque values. E20 blend develops maximum IMEP of 8.3% at 50% blend proportion and as significant increment of 7.4% at 20% of blend proportion. E20 blended fuel shown a maximum decrement of SFC up to 7.2%. Significant reduction of CO emission up to 11.3% for E20 blend and maximum reduction of 12% for E50 blend. HC emissions were decreased significantly up to 14% for E20 blend and it reached maximum reduction of 20.3% for E50 blend. NOx emissions showed lower concentrations for E20 blend with a decrement of 13.3% and higher for B35 blend. Soot particle emissions were decreased significantly up to 27% for E20 blend and it reached maximum reduction of 33.34% for E50 blend.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-022-21875-7/MediaObjects/11356_2022_21875_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-022-21875-7/MediaObjects/11356_2022_21875_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-022-21875-7/MediaObjects/11356_2022_21875_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-022-21875-7/MediaObjects/11356_2022_21875_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-022-21875-7/MediaObjects/11356_2022_21875_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-022-21875-7/MediaObjects/11356_2022_21875_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-022-21875-7/MediaObjects/11356_2022_21875_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-022-21875-7/MediaObjects/11356_2022_21875_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-022-21875-7/MediaObjects/11356_2022_21875_Fig9_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- GDI:
-
Gasoline direct injection
- SFC:
-
Specific fuel consumption
- bTDC:
-
Before top dead centre
- COP:
-
Coil on plug
- PM:
-
Particulate matter
- CO:
-
Carbon monoxide
- UBHC:
-
Unburned hydrocarbon
- THC:
-
Total hydrocarbon
- DI:
-
Direct injection
- IC:
-
Internal combustion
- NI:
-
National Instruments
- IMEP:
-
Indicated mean effective pressure
- DAQ:
-
Data acquisition
- NOx:
-
Oxides of nitrogen
- μg:
-
Microgram
- FIP:
-
Fuel injection pressure
- cP:
-
Centipoise
- WOT:
-
Wide-open throttle
- cc:
-
Cubic capacity
- GPF:
-
Gasoline particulate filter
- EGR:
-
Exhaust gas recirculation
- CC:
-
Combustion chamber
- CFD:
-
Computational fluid dynamics
- HRR:
-
Heat release rate
- TR:
-
Tumble ratio
- HCCI:
-
Homogeneous charge compression ignition
References
Abdulazeez, A Adisa AB, Dandakouta H (2018) Performance and emissions analysis of N-Butanol blended with gasoline in spark ignition engine. Int J Eng Manag Res 8. https://doi.org/10.31033/ijemr.8.4.19
Coufalik P, Matousek T, Krumal K et al (2019) Content of metals in emissions from gasoline, diesel, and alternative mixed biofuels. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:29012–29019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06144-4
Danaiah P, Kumar PR, Vinay Kumar D (2013) Effect of methanol gasoline blended fuels on the performance and emissions of SI engine. December 2013. Int J Ambient Energy 34(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2012.755609
Duarte GT, de Alencar Naas I, da Silva Lima ND (2021) Estimating the urban environmental impact of gasoline-ethanol blended fuels in a passenger vehicle engine. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:63977–63988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13432-5
Fennell D, Herreros JM, Tsolakis A (2014) Improving gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine efficiency and emissions with hydrogen from exhaust gas fuel reforming. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39(10):5153–5162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.065
Gao Z, Wan H, Ji J (2021) The effect of blend ratio on the combustion process of mutually stratified blended fuels pool fire. Proc Combust Inst 38(3):4995–5003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2020.08.045
Goldsborough SS, Cheng S, Kang D, Saggese C, Wagnon SW, Pitz WJ (2021) Effects of isoalcohol blending with gasoline on autoignition behavior in a rapid compression machine: Isopropanol and isobutanol. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2020.08.027
Gorbatenko I, Tomlin AS, Lawes M (2019) Experimental and modelling study of the impacts of n-butanol blending on the auto-ignition behaviour of gasoline and its surrogate at low temperatures. Proc Combust Inst 37(1):501–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2018.05.089 (ISSN 1540-7489)
Hoang AT, Nizetic S, Pham VV (2021) A state-of-the-art review on emission characteristics of SI and CI engines fueled with 2, 5-dimethylfuran biofuel. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:4918–4950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11629-8
Iliev S (2020) Investigation of the gasoline engine performance and emissions working on methanol-gasoline blends using engine simulation. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92858
Iodice P, Langella G, Amoresano A (2017) Ethanol in gasoline fuel blends: effect on fuel consumption and engine out emissions of SI engines in cold operating conditions. Appl Therm Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.11.090
Karthic SV, Senthil Kumar M, Nataraj G, Pradeep P (2020) An assessment on injection pressure and timing to reduce emissions on diesel engine powered by renewable fuel. J Clean Prod. 255: 120186, ISSN 0959-6526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120186
Karthikeyan A, Venkatesh D, Ramkumar T (2017) Experimental investigation on spark ignition engine using blends of bio-ethanol produced from citrus peel wastes. Int J Ambient Energy 38(2):112–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2015.1048900
Khan TMY (2020) A review of performance-enhancing innovative modifications in biodiesel engines. Energies 13:4395. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13174395
Khuong LS, Masjuki HH, Zulkifli NWM, Niza Mohamad E, Kalam MA, Abdullah Alabdulkarem A, Arslan MH, Mosarof AZ, Syahira MJ (2017) Effect of gasoline bio-ethanol blends on the properties and lubrication characteristics of commercial engine oil. Royal Soc Chem 7:15005–15019
Kumar S (2020) Piston crown profile modifications for various combustion mode strategies of modified GDI engine towards NOx and PM reduction. Int J Automot Sci Technol 4(4):289–294. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..796526
Lapointe S, Zhang K, McNenly MJ (2018) Reduced chemical model for low and high-temperature oxidation of fuel blends relevant to internal combustion engines. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.139
Liu H, Wang X, Zhang D, Dong F, Liu X, Yang Y, Huang H, Wang Y, Wang Q, Zheng Z (1845) Investigation on blending effects of gasoline fuel with N-butanol, DMF, and ethanol on the fuel consumption and harmful emissions in a GDI vehicle. Energies 2019:12. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12101845
Mishra PC, Kar SK, Mishra H (2018) Effect of perforation on exhaust performance of a turbo pipe type muffler using methanol and gasoline blended fuel: a step to NOx control. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.236
Nagareddy S et al (2022) Combustion chamber geometry and fuel supply system variations on fuel economy and exhaust emissions of GDI engine with EGR. Therm Sci 26(2A):1207–1217. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI211020358N
Ribeiro CB, Martins KG, Gueri MVD et al (2018) Effect of anhydrous ethanol/gasoline blends on performance and exhaust emission of spark-ignited non-road engines. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:24192–24200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2476-2
Saggese C, Thomas CM, Wagnon SW, Kukkadapu G, Cheng S, Kang D, Goldsborough SS, Pitz WJ (2021) An improved detailed chemical kinetic model for C3–C4 linear and iso-alcohols and their blends with gasoline at engine-relevant conditions. Proc Combust Inst 38(1):415–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2020.07.023 (ISSN 1540 7489)
Sameeth Raj R, Lesslins Raja Deva Doss S, Surendar N, Gowthaman S (2019) Effect of pre-heated air on spark ignition engine fuelled with petrol-ethanol blends. Int J Recent Technol Eng (IJRTE) 8:4S2
Shivakumar N, Jayaseelan GAC, Parthiban A, Akshay. (2020) Ignition timing and fuel injection timing control using arduino and control drivers. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 993:012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/993/1/012019
Scott A, Oze C, Shah V et al (2021) Transformation of abundant magnesium silicate minerals for enhanced CO2 sequestration. Commun Earth Environ 2:25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00099-6
Shukla MK, Singh E, Singh N, Singal SK (2014) Prospects of 2, 5-dimethylfuran as a fuel: physico-chemical and engine performance characteristics evaluation. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 17(3):459–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-014-0305-3
Tamilvanan A, Balamurugan K, Ashok B et al (2021) Effect of diethyl ether and ethanol as an oxygenated additive on Calophyllum inophyllum biodiesel in CI engine. Environ Sci Pollut Res 33880–33898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10624-3
Tamilvanan A, Ashok B, Mohanraj T, Jayalakshmi P, Dhamodharan P, Sakthivel R (2022) Chapter 5 - Effect of engine operating parameters in NOx reduction, NOx Emission Control Technologies in Stationary and Automotive Internal Combustion Engines. Elsevier. 125–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823955-1.00005-X.
Tibaquira JE, Huertas JI, Ospina S, Quirama LF, Niño JE (2018) The effect of using ethanol-gasoline blends on the mechanical, energy and environmental performance of in-use vehicles. Energies 11:221. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11010221
Turner JWG, Pearson RJ, Dekker E, Iosefa B, Johansson K, Bergström K (2013) Extending the role of alcohols as transport fuels using iso-stoichiometric ternary blends of gasoline. Ethanol Methanol Appl Energy 102:72–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.07.044
Verma K, Gaur S, Akram T et al (2021) Emissions from homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) engine using different fuels: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15602-x
Xu H, Wang C (2016) A comprehensive review of 2,5-dimethylfuran as a biofuel candidate. In Biofuels from Lignocellulosic Biomass: Innovations beyond Bioethanol 105–129. (Biofuels from Lignocellulosic Biomass: Innovations beyond Bioethanol). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527685318.ch5.
Yanju W, Shenghua L, Hongsong Li, Rui Y, Jie L, Ying W (2008) Effects of methanol/gasoline blends on a spark ignition engine performance and emissions. Energy Fuels 22:1254–1259
Zheng X, Zhang S, Wu Y, Xu G, Hu J, He L, Wu X, Hao J (2018) Measurement of particulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emissions from gasoline light-duty passenger vehicles. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.078
Zhang L, Lin J, Qiu R (2021) Characterizing the toxic gaseous emissions of gasoline and diesel vehicles based on a real-world on-road investigation. J Clean Prod 286: 124957, ISSN 0959-6526, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124957
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Shivakumar N: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, resources, data curation, writing—original draft, review and editing, visualization. Dr. Kumaresan G: investigation, supervision, project administration, writing—review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The authors declare that the submitted manuscript is original. They acknowledge the current review has been conducted ethically, and the final shape of the research has been agreed upon by all authors.
Consent to participate
The authors consent to participate in this research study.
Consent for publication
All the authors consent to publish the current research in the ESPR journal.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nagareddy, S., Govindasamy, K. Influence of fuel system variations on performance and emission characteristics of combined air-wall-guided mode modified GDI engine with alcoholic fuels and exhaust gas recirculation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 61234–61245 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21875-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21875-7