SpringerLink
Log in

The Blow Fly Waltz: Field and Laboratory Observations of Novel and Complex Dipteran Courtship Behavior

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Complex courtship has been well documented in the Diptera. However, studies have focused on a limited number of taxa and mostly using lab populations, where behavior can differ substantially compared to nature. To broaden our understanding of dipteran courtship, studies are required in a wider range of species, across both wild and captive populations. The blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) include some of the most commonly encountered flies, yet courtship has been documented in less than 1% of species and is reported to be brief and simple throughout the family. To further investigate blow fly courtship, and to assess the effect of captivity on behavior, this study aimed to document the courtship of a habitat specialist that is endemic to Australasia, Chrysomya flavifrons. Video footage of wild and captive groups was recorded and analyzed using behavioral analysis software. The specific aims were 1) to quantify the behavioral sequences that constitute courtship and 2) to compare courtship between wild and captive flies. We found that the courtship behavior of Ch. flavifrons was complex and stereotyped, consisting of five discrete behaviors, which starkly contrasts with the simple courtship observed in most calliphorids. All of these stereotyped behaviors were observed in both wild and captive groups. However, the proportion of time males spent on these behaviors differed substantially. These findings highlight that blow fly courtship behavior may be more complex than currently perceived, and that careful consideration should be given to the influence of the laboratory environment in future studies of fly behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcock J, Pyle DW (1979) The complex courtship behavior of Physiphora demandata (F.) (Diptera: Otitidae). Ethology 49:352–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartell RJ, Shorey HH, Barton Browne L (1969) Pheromonal stimulation of the sexual activity of males of the sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina (Calliphoridae) by the female. Anim Behav 17:576–585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benelli G, Romano D (2019) Looking for the right mate—what do we really know on the courtship and mating of Lucilia sericata (Meigen)? Acta Trop 189:145–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bennet-Clark H, Leroy Y, Tsacas L (1980) Species and sex-specific songs and courtship behavior in the genus Zaprionus (Diptera-Drosophilidae). Anim Behav 28:230–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop YMM, Fienberg SE, Holland PW (1975) Discrete multivariate analysis: theory and practice. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Briceño RD, Ramos D, Eberhard WG (1996) Courtship behavior of male Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in captivity. Fla Entomol 79:130–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buellesbach J, Vetter SG, Schmitt T (2018) Differences in the reliance on cuticular hydrocarbons as sexual signaling and species discrimination cues in parasitoid wasps. Front Zool 15:22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth NJ, Byrne PG, Keller PA, Wallman JF (2018) Body odor and sex: do cuticular hydrocarbons facilitate sexual attraction in the small hairy maggot blowfly? J Chem Ecol 44:248–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne PG, Rice GR, Rice WR (2008) Effect of a refuge from persistent male courtship in the Drosophila laboratory environment. Integr Comp Biol 48:e1–e1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chelbi I, Bray D, Hamilton J (2012) Courtship behavior of Phlebotomus papatasi the sand fly vector of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Parasite Vector 5:179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Lee AY, Bowens NM, Huber R, Kravitz EA (2002) Fighting fruit flies: a model system for the study of aggression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:5664–5668

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Colgan PW (1978) Quantitative ethology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell AE, Shorey HH (1975) The courtship behavior of the house fly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 68:152–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook DF (1992) The effect of male size on receptivity in female Lucilia cuprina (Diptera: Calliphoridae). J Insect Behav 5:365–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichorn C, Hrabar M, Van Ryn EC, Brodie BS, Blake AJ, Gries G (2017) How flies are flirting on the fly. BMC Biol 15:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing AW (1983) Functional aspects of Drosophila courtship. Biol Rev 58:275–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frantsevich L, Gorb S (2006) Courtship dances in the flies of the genus Lispe (Diptera: Muscidae): from the fly's viewpoint. Arch Insect Biochem 62:26–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Girling RD, Carde RT (2006) Analysis of courtship behavior of the navel orangeworm, Amyelois transitella (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), with a commentary on methods for the analysis of sequences of behavioral transitions. J Insect Behav 19:497–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman JM, Roy AK (1990) Sequential analysis: a guide for behavorial researchers. Cambridge University Press, New York

  • Greenspan RJ, Ferveur J-F (2000) Courtship in Drosophila. Annu Rev Genetics 34:205–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guillot FS, Brown HE, Broce AB (1978) Behavior of sexually active male screwworm flies. Ann Entomol Soc Am 71:199–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes KF, Birch MC (1984) Mate-locating and courtship behaviors of the artichoke plume moth, Platyptilia carduidactyla (Lepidoptera: Pterophoridae). Environ Entomol 13:399–408

  • Hegde S, Chethan B, Krishna M (2005) Mating success of males with and without wing patch in Drosophila biarmipes. Indian J Exp Biol 45:902–909

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones SD, Byrne PG, Wallman JF (2014) Mating success is predicted by the interplay between multiple male and female traits in the small hairy maggot blowfly. Anim Behav 97:193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones SD, Wallman JF, Byrne PG (2015) Do male secondary sexual characters correlate with testis size and sperm length in the small hairy maggot blowfly? Zoology 118:439–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones SD, Byrne PG, Wallman JF (2017) Exploring the influence of individual courtship behaviors on male mating success in a blow fly. J Insect Behav 30:528–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohl J, Huoviala P, Jefferis GSXE (2015) Pheromone processing in Drosophila. Curr Opin Neurobiol 34:149–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kutty SN, Pape T, Wiegmann Brian M, Meier R (2010) Molecular phylogeny of the Calyptratae (Diptera: Cyclorrhapha) with an emphasis on the superfamily Oestroidea and the position of Mystacinobiidae and McAlpine's fly. Syst Entomol 35:614–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lance D, McInnis D, Rendon P, Jackson C (2000) Courtship among sterile and wild Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in field cages in Hawaii and Guatemala. Ann Entomol Soc Am 93:1179–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavigne R (1970) Courtship and predatory behavior of Cyrtopogon auratus and C. glarealis (Diptera: Asilidae). J Kansas Entomol Soc 43:163–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Liimatainen J, Hoikkala A, Aspi J, Welbergen P (1992) Courtship in Drosophila montana: the effects of male auditory signals on the behavior of flies. Anim Behav 43:35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markow TA (1988) Reproductive behavior of Drosophila melanogaster and D. nigrospiracula in the field and in the laboratory. J Comp Psychol 102:169–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markow TA, Hanson SJ (1981) Multivariate analysis of Drosophila courtship. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78:430–434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews RW, Matthews JR (2009) Nesting behavior of Abispa ephippium (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Eumeninae): extended parental Care in an Australian Mason Wasp. Psyche 2009:15

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoni V, Anfora G, Virant-Doberlet M (2013) Substrate vibrations during courtship in three Drosophila species. PLoS One 8:e80708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Parker G (1968) The sexual behavior of the blowfly, Protophormia terrae-novae R.-D. Behavior 32:291–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Péter A (2017) Solomon Coder. https://solomoncoder.com

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

  • Reitz SR, Adler PH (1991) Courtship and mating behavior of Eucelatoria bryani (Diptera: Tachinidae), a larval parasitoid of Heliothis species (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 84:111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revadi S, Lebreton S, Witzgall P, Anfora G, Dekker T, Becher PG (2015) Sexual behavior of Drosophila suzukii. Insects 6:183–196

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Romano D, Canale A, Benelli G (2015) Do right-biased boxers do it better? Population-level asymmetry of aggressive displays enhances fighting success in blowflies. Behav Process 113:159–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saarikettu M, Liimatainen JO, Hoikkala A (2005) Intraspecific variation in mating behavior does not cause sexual isolation between Drosophila virilis strains. Anim Behav 70:417–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadowski JA, Moore AJ, Brodie ED III (1999) The evolution of empty nuptial gifts in a dance fly, Empis snoddyi (Diptera: Empididae): bigger isn't always better. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:161–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadowski JA, Grace JL, Moore AJ (2002) Complex courtship behavior in the striped ground cricket, Allonemobius socius (Orthoptera: Gryllidae): does social environment affect male and female behavior? J Insect Behav 15:69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz TD, Fincke OM (2009) Structural colours create a flashing cue for sexual recognition and male quality in a Neotropical giant damselfly. Funct Ecol 23:724–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto-Yéber L, Soto-Ortiz J, Godoy P, Godoy-Herrera R (2019) The behavior of adult Drosophila in the wild. PLoS One 13:e0209917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spofford M, Kurczewski F (1985) Courtship and mating behavior of Phrosinella aurifacies Downes (Diptera: Sarcophagidae: Miltogramminae). P Entomol Soc Wash 87:273–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanger-Hall KF, Lloyd JE (2015) Flash signal evolution in Photinus fireflies: character displacement and signal exploitation in a visual communication system. Evolution 69:666–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoffolano JG, Schauber E, Yin C-M, Tillman JA, Blomquist GJ (1997) Cuticular hydrocarbons and their role in copulatory behavior in Phormia regina (Meigen). J Insect Physiol 43:1065–1076

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stucky BJ (2016) Eavesdrop** to find mates: the function of male hearing for a cicada-hunting parasitoid fly, Emblemasoma erro (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). J Insect Sci 16:68–68

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas ML, Simmons LW (2011) Short-term phenotypic plasticity in long-chain cuticular hydrocarbons. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 278:3123-3128

  • Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trabalon M, Campan M, Clément J-L, Thon B, Lange C, Lefevre J (1988) Changes in cuticular hydrocarbon composition in relation to age and sexual behavior in the female Calliphora vomitoria (Diptera). Behav Process 17:107–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hateren J, Hardie R, Rudolph A, Laughlin S, Stavenga D (1989) The bright zone, a specialized dorsal eye region in the male blowfly Chrysomyia megacephala. J Comp Physiol A 164:297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Schilcher F (1976) The role of auditory stimuli in the courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Anim Behav 24:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall R, Langley PA (1993) The mating behavior of tsetse flies (Glossina): a review. Physiol Entomol 18:211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warton DI, Hui FKC (2011) The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology. Ecology 92:3–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wicker-Thomas C (2007) Pheromonal communication involved in courtship behavior in Diptera. J Insect Physiol 53:1089–1100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh S-D, True JR (2014) The genetic architecture of coordinately evolving male wing pigmentation and courtship behavior in Drosophila elegans and Drosophila gunungcola. G3 (Bethesda, Md) 4:2079–2093

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh SD, Liou SR, True JR (2006) Genetics of divergence in male wing pigmentation and courtship behavior between Drosophila elegans and D. gunungcola. Heredity 96:383–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by The Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment and The Ecological Society of Australia. We also thank Andrej Enriquez, Martin Butterworth, and Blake Dawson for their efforts with field work, and Nikolas Johnston for formatting assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Sustainable Ecosystem Solutions, School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia

    Nathan J. Butterworth, Phillip G. Byrne & James F. Wallman

Authors
  1. Nathan J. Butterworth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Phillip G. Byrne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James F. Wallman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathan J. Butterworth.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(AVI 237028 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Butterworth, N.J., Byrne, P.G. & Wallman, J.F. The Blow Fly Waltz: Field and Laboratory Observations of Novel and Complex Dipteran Courtship Behavior. J Insect Behav 32, 109–119 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-019-09720-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-019-09720-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation