Abstract
Major global urbanization has burdened cities, necessitating circular use of scarce resources, demanding superior service delivery for citizens while expecting increased operational efficiency in governance. Responsible use of smart systems like AI, cloud etc. can address contemporary socio-economic-governance problems. Digital technology can integrate various urban functions into a common service delivery platform. Platform-based public services enable resource sharing and circular economy, building smart communities that treat nations as digital enterprises and their citizens as customers while achieving operational efficiency in governance. Integration of several urban functions into a single platform facilitates ubiquitous urban public service delivery and efficient government operations. Digital platforms can be built by horizontal integration of several technologies like analytics, cloud, IOT, blockchain etc. by breaking silos. Multi-functional urban digitization is complex, especially for a diverse country like India; this also requires responsible use of technologies like AI, cloud etc. which use public data. This necessitates a robust and secure transformation architectural framework. Academia, industry, and policy-makers are currently evaluating an Indian city specific adaptation of Enterprise Architecture as a potential urban digital transformation framework. This study produces a design artifact that defines elements of enterprise architecture adaptation for Indian cities. The study recommends cross industry horizontal integration in business architecture by converging urban functions such as mobility, safety, communities etc. The study also suggests horizontally integrated and responsible use of analytics, IOT and cloud in technology architecture to build a uniform urban public service delivery platform. This research uses design science research methodology, which is popular in practice due to its problem-solving approach and emergence in contemporary IS research.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10479-023-05187-8/MediaObjects/10479_2023_5187_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10479-023-05187-8/MediaObjects/10479_2023_5187_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10479-023-05187-8/MediaObjects/10479_2023_5187_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10479-023-05187-8/MediaObjects/10479_2023_5187_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10479-023-05187-8/MediaObjects/10479_2023_5187_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10479-023-05187-8/MediaObjects/10479_2023_5187_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10479-023-05187-8/MediaObjects/10479_2023_5187_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10479-023-05187-8/MediaObjects/10479_2023_5187_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10479-023-05187-8/MediaObjects/10479_2023_5187_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10479-023-05187-8/MediaObjects/10479_2023_5187_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10479-023-05187-8/MediaObjects/10479_2023_5187_Fig11_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdel-Basset, M., Chang, V., Hawash, H., Chakrabortty, R. K., & Ryan, M. (2021). Deep learning approaches for human-centered IoT applications in smart indoor environments: a contemporary survey. In Annals of Operations Research (Issue 0123456789). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04164-3
Akter, S., Michael, K., Uddin, M. R., McCarthy, G., & Rahman, M. (2022). Transforming business using digital innovations: the application of AI, blockchain, cloud and data analytics. Annals of Operations Research, 308(1–2), 7–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03620-w
Anthony Jnr, B. (2021). Managing digital transformation of smart cities through enterprise architecture–a review and research agenda. Enterprise Information Systems, 15(3), 299–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2020.1812006
Alleyne, L. (2021). Using responsible AI to push digital transformation. IT Business Edge. Retrieved September 18, 2022, from https://www.itbusinessedge.com/business-intelligence/using-responsible-ai-to-push-digital-transformation/
Bastidas, V., Reychav, I., Ofir, A., Bezbradica, M., & Helfert, M. (2021). Concepts for Modeling Smart Cities: An ArchiMate Extension. Business and Information Systems Engineering, November. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-021-00724-w
Baiyere, A., Salmela, H., & Tapanainen, T. (2020). Digital transformation and the new logics of business process management. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(3), 238–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1718007
BCG (2018). Is Digital the Answer to Urbanization’s Biggest Problems? https://www.bcg.com/en-in/publications/2018/digital-answer-urbanization-biggest-problems
Burri, M. (2017). Current and emerging Trends in Disruptive Technologies: implications for the Present and Future of EU’s Trade Policy. October: European Parliament.
Buell, R. W., Porter, E., & Norton, M. I. (2021). Surfacing the submerged state: operational transparency increases trust in and engagement with government. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 23(4), 781–802. https://doi.org/10.1287/MSOM.2020.0877
Butterfield, K. F. (2021). Building an Organizational Approach to Responsible AI. MIT Sloan Management Review. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/building-an-organizational-approach-to-responsible-ai/
Castro, C., & Lopes, C. (2021). Digital Government and Sustainable Development. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, February 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00749-2
Carter, L., Yoon, V., & Liu, D. (2022). Analyzing e-government design science artifacts: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 62(April 2021), 102430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.i**fomgt.2021.102430
Choudhuri, B., Maguire, S., & Ojiako, U. (2009). Revisiting learning outcomes from market led ICT outsourcing. Business Process Management Journal, 15(4), 569–587. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150910975543
Choudhuri, B., Srivastava, P. R., Gupta, S., Kumar, A., & Bag, S. (2021). Determinants of Smart Digital infrastructure diffusion for Urban Public Services. Journal of Global Information Management, 29(6), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.295976
Ciasullo, M. V., Troisi, O., Grimaldi, M., & Leone, D. (2020). Multi-level governance for sustainable innovation in smart communities: an ecosystems approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(4), 1167–1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00641-6
Criado, J. I., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2019). Creating public value through smart technologies and strategies: from digital services to artificial intelligence and beyond. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(5), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2019-0178
Dahlman, C., Mealy, S., & Wermelinger, M. (2016). Harnessing the digital economy for develo** countries. OECD Development Centre Working Papers, 334, 1–77.
Deloitte (2021). Tech Trends 2021 (Deloitte Insights). https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/tech-trends.html
Deloitte (2019). The Future of Cities & the power of the ecosystems. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/jp/Documents/public-sector/lg/jp-lg-future-of-cities-power-of-ecosystems-pt.pdf
DigitalIndia (2021). Vision and Vision Areas | Digital India Programme | Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology (MeitY) Government of India. https://www.digitalindia.gov.in/content/vision-and-vision-areas
Duan, Y., **e, Y., & Hu, Y. (2020). The value of personal information in vertically differentiated markets with privacy concerns. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03794-3
Ericsson (2016). Networked Society City Index. https://www.ericsson.com/49ea27/assets/local/reports-papers/networked-society-insights/reports/2016-networked-society-city-index.pdf
Ericsson (2016). The Economics of Networked Society. https://www.ericsson.com/49eb52/assets/local/reports-papers/networked-society-insights/doc/the-economics-of-the-networked-society.pdf
Ericsson (2020). Ericsson Mobility Report November 2020. https://www.ericsson.com/assets/local/reports-papers/mobility-report/documents/2020/november-2020-ericsson-mobility-report.pdf
FICCI (2021). AI and Digital Transformation. https://ficci.in/sector-details.asp?sectorid=127
FinancialExpress (2019). India’s rural-urban divide: Village worker earns less than half of city peer - The Financial Express. https://www.financialexpress.com/economy/indias-rural-urban-divide-village-worker-earns-less-than-half-of-city-peer/1792245/
Fosso-Wamba, S., Queiroz, M. M., & Braganza, A. (2022). Preface: artificial intelligence in operations management. Annals of Operations Research, 308(1–2), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04450-0. 1–6.
Gampfer, F., Jürgens, A., Müller, M., & Buchkremer, R. (2018). Past, current and future trends in enterprise architecture—A view beyond the horizon. Computers in Industry, 100, 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.03.006
Gartner (2021). 5 Trends Drive the Gartner Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies, 2020. https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/5-trends-drive-the-gartner-hype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies-2020
Gartner (2022). Gartner Unveils the Top Eight Cybersecurity Predictions for 2022-23. Gartner News Room. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2022-06-21-gartner-unveils-the-top-eight-cybersecurity-predictio
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are Enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Goldkuhl, G. (2016). E-government design research: towards the policy-ingrained IT artifact. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.05.006
Hazlett, S. A., McAdam, R., & Walker, T. (2013). The role of operations management in public sector policy and practice alignment: a local government analysis. Production Planning and Control, 24(10–11), 988–1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2012.666915
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: a systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science and Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Hirschheim, R. (2019). Against theory: with apologies to feyerabend. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(9), 1338–1355. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00569
Ismagilova, E., Hughes, L., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Raman, K. R. (2019). Smart cities: advances in research—An information systems perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 47(January), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.i**fomgt.2019.01.004
Inigo, E. A., & Blok, V. (2019). Strengthening the socio-ethical foundations of the circular economy: Lessons from responsible research and innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.053
IPPI (2022). Why ‘Responsible AI’ is good for business. Israel Public Policy Institute. https://www.ippi.org.il/why-responsible-ai-is-good-for-business-2/
Janssen, M., & van der Voort, H. (2020). Agile and adaptive governance in crisis response: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information Management, 55(June), 102180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.i**fomgt.2020.102180
Janssen, M., & van den Hoven, J. (2015). Big and open Linked Data (BOLD) in government: a challenge to transparency and privacy? Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 363–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.007
Kotusev, S., & Kurnia, S. (2021). The theoretical basis of enterprise architecture: a critical review and taxonomy of relevant theories. Journal of Information Technology, 36(3), 275–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396220977873
Liu, N., Lin, J., Guo, S., & Shi, X. (2022). Fashion platform operations in the sharing economy with digital technologies: recent development and real case studies. Annals of Operations Research, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04544-3
Liu, W., Long, S., Liang, Y., Wang, J., & Wei, S. (2021). The influence of leadership and smart level on the strategy choice of the smart logistics platform: a perspective of collaborative innovation participation. In Annals of Operations Research (Issue 0123456789). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04063-7
Lim, C., Cho, G. H., & Kim, J. (2021). Understanding the linkages of smart-city technologies and applications: key lessons from a text mining approach and a call for future research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170(June), 120893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120893
Lnenicka, M., & Komarkova, J. (2019). Develo** a government enterprise architecture framework to support the requirements of big and open linked data with the use of cloud computing. International Journal of Information Management, 46(December 2018), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.i**fomgt.2018.12.003
Lukyanenko, R., & Parsons, J. (2020). Design theory indeterminacy: what is it, how can it be reduced, and why did the polar bear drown? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(5), 1343–1369. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00639
McKinsey (2013). Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. In Mckinsey Global Institute.
Mckinsey (2018). Smart cities: Digital solutions for a more livable future. McKinsey & Company, June. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/capital-projects-and-infrastructure/our-insights/smart-cities-digital-solutions-for-a-more-livable-future
MEITY (2018). India Enterprise Architecture Framework V1. Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India. https://www.meity.gov.in/writereaddata/files/IndEA_Framework_1.0.pdf
Morgan, & Stanley (2017). Millennials Drive Economic Growth in India | Morgan Stanley. https://www.morganstanley.com/ideas/India-millennials-growth-sectors
Noura, M., Atiquzzaman, M., & Gaedke, M. (2019). Interoperability in internet of things: Taxonomies and Open Challenges. Mobile Networks and Applications, 24(3), 796–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-018-1089-9
Microsoft (2022). Microsoft Responsible AI Standard, v2. Microsoft. https://blogs.microsoft.com/wp-content/uploads/prod/sites/5/2022/06/Microsoft-Responsible-AI-Standard-v2-General-Requirements-3.pdf
Nadhamuni, S., John, O., Kulkarni, M., Nanda, E., Venkatraman, S., Varma, D., Balsari, S., Gudi, N., Samantaray, S., Reddy, H., & Sheel, V. (2021). Driving digital transformation of comprehensive primary health services at scale in India: an enterprise architecture framework. BMJ Global Health, 6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005242
NASSCOM (2020). Facts & Figures | NASSCOM. https://nasscom.in/knowledge-centre/facts-figures
NeGD (2022). India Enterprise Architecture | Welcome to NeGD | National eGovernance Division (NeGD). https://negd.gov.in/india-enterprise-architecture
Niti Aayog. (2021). Towards Responsible AI for All: Approach Document for India; Part 1- Principles for Responsible AI. February, 64. https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2021-02/Responsible-AI-22022021.pdf
Niti Aayog (2021). Govt driving transition from linear to circular economy. Press Information Bureau. Retrieved April 22, 2022, from https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1705772
Osman, I. H., & Zablith, F. (2020). Re-evaluating electronic government development index to monitor the transformation toward achieving sustainable development goals. Journal of Business Research October. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.027
Pourzolfaghar, Z., Bastidas, V., & Helfert, M. (2020). Standardisation of enterprise architecture development for smart cities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11(4), 1336–1357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-00601-8
Prasad, D., & Alizadeh, T. (2020). What Makes Indian Cities Smart? A Policy Analysis of Smart Cities Mission.Telematics and Informatics, 55(January),101466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101466
Radnor, Z. J., & Noke, H. (2013). Conceptualising and contextualising public sector operations management. Production Planning and Control, 24(10–11), 867–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2012.666884
Rana, N. P., Luthra, S., Mangla, S. K., Islam, R., Roderick, S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Barriers to the development of Smart Cities in Indian Context. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 503–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9873-4
Rejeb, A., Suhaiza, Z., Rejeb, K., Seuring, S., & Treiblmaier, H. (2022). The internet of things and the circular economy: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 350(February), 131439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131439
Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-0-7432-5823-4.
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., Albores, P., & Emrouznejad, A. (2022). Analysis of the adoption of emergent technologies for risk management in the era of digital manufacturing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178(February 2021), 121562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121562
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Cuevas-Romo, A., Chowdhury, S., Díaz-Acevedo, N., Albores, P., Despoudi, S., Malesios, C., & Dey, P. (2022). The role of circular economy principles and sustainable-oriented innovation to enhance social, economic and environmental performance: Evidence from Mexican SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 248(June 2020), 108495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108495
Saura, J. R., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2022). Assessing behavioral data science privacy issues in government artificial intelligence deployment. Government Information Quarterly, January 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101679
Singh, P. (2021). Aadhaar and data privacy: biometric identification and anxieties of recognition in India. Information Communication and Society, 24(7), 978–993. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1668459
Saha, P. (2020). Digital Enterprise Architecture in Government: A Curated Compilation of Practical Guidance. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/digital-enterprise-architecture-government-curated-dr-pallab
Smart Cities Mission (2021). National Urban Digital Mission | Smartcities. https://smartcities.gov.in/nudm
Startup India (2021). Indian Startup Ecosystem. https://www.startupindia.gov.in/content/sih/en/startup-scheme/International/indian-startup-ecosystem.html
Surana, K., Singh, A., & Sagar, A. D. (2020). Strengthening science, technology, and innovation-based incubators to help achieve Sustainable Development Goals: Lessons from India. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120057
The Open Group (2019). Implementing IndEA: A Practical Brief for Senior Government Leaders to Accelerate Digital Transformation. https://publications.opengroup.org/g195
The Open Group (2018). The open group government EA work group. TOGAF | The Open Group Website. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://www.opengroup.org/open-group-government-ea-work-group
United Nations (2020). EGOVKB | United Nations > Data > Country Information. UN E-Government Knowledgebase. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data/Country-Information/id/77-India
United Nations (2018). 68% of the world population projected to live in urban areas by 2050, says UN | United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html
Unhelkar, B., & Arntzen, A. A. (2020). A framework for intelligent collaborative enterprise systems. Concepts, opportunities and challenges. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 32(2), 139–168.
Upadhyay, P., Kumar, A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Adlakha, A. (2022). Continual usage intention of platform-based governance services: a study from an emerging economy. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101651
World Economic Forum (2020). The Impact of 5G: Creating New Value across Industries and Society. World Economic Forum, January, 24. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Impact_of_5G_Report.pdf
Zhang, Y. (2021). Game and coordination of diverse benefits in smart city PPP projects based on evolutionary game. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04290-y
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Choudhuri, B., Srivastava, P.R., Mangla, S.K. et al. Enterprise architecture as a responsible data driven urban digitization framework: enabling circular cities in India. Ann Oper Res (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05187-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05187-8