Abstract
The reliable landslide hazard assessment entails a robust understanding of frequency-magnitude analysis of the landslide inventory. Previous studies proposed that the landslide frequency-size distribution follows a power-law distribution even though 75–90% of data deviated from the power-law fit. This deviation from the power-law fit was ubiquitous in various landslide studies irrespective of their triggering factor, spatial and temporal resolution of the landslide inventory and geological and morphological settings of the area. This study conducted a detailed frequency-size distribution of the landslides at four different locations in India’s Himalayan regions to check the validity of power law to represent the landslide data. The landslide inventory of Kathua, Shimla, Pithoragarh and Darjeeling regions are complied, consisting of 1942, 905, 2151 and 393 landslide events, respectively. The landslide frequency distribution is tested for the power-law, exponential and lognormal distribution. After a detailed statistical analysis, our finding suggests that medium-large landslide size events follow a power-law distribution, accounting for 8–25% of the total data; the rest deviates significantly from the power-law fit and follows a lognormal distribution. The cut-off between the lognormal and power-law distributions, or the minimum size for medium-large landslides, is 102.9–104.3 m2. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) and Lilliefors tests are used to validate the findings. This study provides insight into the landslide size probability distribution in different locations situated in India’s Himalayan regions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akgun A, Gorum T, Nefeslioglu HA (2020) November. Landslide size distribution characteristics of Cretaceous and Eocene flysch assemblages in the Western Black Sea Region of Turkey. In Workshop on World Landslide Forum (pp. 299–303). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60227-7_33
Askarinejad A, Akca D, Springman SM (2018) Precursors of instability in a natural slope due to rainfall: a full-scale experiment. Landslides 15(9):1745–1759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-0994-0
Auddy S, Basu S, Kudoh T (2019) The transition from a lognormal to a power-law column density distribution in molecular clouds: an imprint of the initial magnetic field and turbulence. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 881(1):L15. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab3416
Bak P, Chen K, Creutz M (1989) Self-organised criticality in the Game of Life. Nature 342(6251):780–782
Bak P, Tang C, Wiesenfeld K (1987) Self-organised criticality: an explanation of the 1/f noise. Phys Rev Lett 59(4):381
Basu S, Gil M, Auddy S (2015) The MLP distribution: a modified lognormal power-law model for the stellar initial mass function. Mon Not R Astron Soc 449(3):2413–2420. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv445
Brabb EE (1984) Innovative approaches to landslides hazard map**: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Landslides. 307–324
Campus M, Sanna M, Scanu G, Di Salvo R, De Pau L, Satta D, ..., Roggio T (2020) Impact of almond variety on “amaretti” cookies as assessed through image features modeling, physical chemical measures and sensory analyses. Foods 9(9):1272.https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9091272
Carlson JM, Doyle J (1999) Highly optimised tolerance: a mechanism for power laws in designed systems. Phys Rev E 60(2):1412. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.60.1412
Chaytor JD, Uri S, Solow AR, Andrews BD (2009) Size distribution of submarine landslides along the US Atlantic margin. Mar Geol 264(1–2):16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2008.08.007\
Chen CW, Oguchi T, Hayakawa YS, Saito H, Chen H (2017) Relationship between landslide size and rainfall conditions in Taiwan. Landslides 14(3):1235–1240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0790-7
Clauset A, Shalizi CR, Newman ME (2009) Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev 51(4):661–703
Coe JA (2020) Bellwether sites for evaluating changes in landslide frequency and magnitude in cryospheric mountainous terrain: a call for systematic, long-term observations to decipher the impact of climate change. Landslides, pp.1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01462-y
Corominas J, Mavrouli O, Ruiz-Carulla R (2018) Magnitude and frequency relations: are there geological constraints to the rockfall size? Landslides 15(5):829–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0910-z
Corral Á, González Á (2019) Power law size distributions in geoscience revisited. Earth and Space Science 6(5):673–697. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EA000479
De Blasio FV (2011) Introduction to the physics of landslides: lecture notes on the dynamics of mass wasting. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1122-8
Depicker A, Jacobs L, Mboga N, Smets B, Van Rompaey A, Lennert M, Wolff E, Kervyn F, Michellier C, Dewitte O, Govers G (2021) Historical dynamics of landslide risk from population and forest-cover changes in the Kivu Rift. Nature Sustainability, pp.1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00757-9
Dikshit A, Sarkar R, Pradhan B, Segoni S, Alamri AM (2020) Rainfall induced landslide studies in Indian Himalayan region: a critical review. Appl Sci 10(7):2466. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072466
Dilley M (2005) Natural disaster hotspots: a global risk analysis (Vol. 5). World Bank Publications.
Eeckhout J (2009) Gibrat’s law for (all) cities. American Economic Review 94(5):1429–1451. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828043052303
Evans IS (2003) Scale-specific landforms and aspects of the land surface. Concepts and Modelling in Geomorphology: International Perspectives, Terrapub, pp. 61–84.
Evans SG (2006) Single-event landslides resulting from massive rock slope failure: characterising their frequency and impact on society. In Landslides from massive rock slope failure (pp. 53–73). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4037-5_2.
Fisher RAŽ (1912) On an absolute criterion for fitting frequency curves. Messenger of Mathematics 41 155–160. wCP1in Bennet Ž1971., vol. 1.x
Frank SA (2016) The invariances of power law size distributions. F1000Research 5. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9452.3
Fujii Y (1969) Frequency distribution of the magnitude of the landslides caused by heavy rainfall. J Seismol Soc Jpn 22:244–247
Gabaix X (1999) Zipf’s law for cities: an explanation. Q J Econ 114(3):739–767
Gibrat R (1931) Les inégalits économiques. Sirey
Guo CW, Huang YD, Yao LK, Alradi H (2017) Size and spatial distribution of landslides induced by the 2015 Gorkha earthquake in the Bhote Koshi river watershed. J Mt Sci 14(10):1938–1950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4140-y
Guthrie RH, Deadman PJ, Cabrera AR, Evans SG (2008) Exploring the magnitude–frequency distribution: a cellular automata model for landslides. Landslides 5(1):151–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-007-0104-1
Guzzetti F, Malamud BD, Turcotte DL, Reichenbach P (2002) Power-law correlations of landslide areas in central Italy. Earth Planet Sci Lett 195(3–4):169–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00589-1
Harp EL, Keefer DK, Sato HP, Yagi H (2011) Landslide inventories: the essential part of seismic landslide hazard analyses. Eng Geol 122(1–2):9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.06.013
Hergarten S (2002) Self organised criticality in earth systems (Vol. 2, No. 2). Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04390-5
Hergarten S (2003) Landslides, sandpiles, and self-organised criticality. Nat Hazard 3(6):505–514. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-3-505-2003
Hosking JR (1990) L-moments: analysis and estimation of distributions using linear combinations of order statistics. J Roy Stat Soc: Ser B (methodol) 52(1):105–124
Hu Q, Zhou Y, Wang S, Wang F (2020) Machine learning and fractal theory models for landslide susceptibility map**: case study from the **sha River Basin. Geomorphology 351:106975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106975
Huang Y, Yao L (2021) Size distribution law of earthquake-triggered landslides in different seismic intensity zones. Nonlinear Process Geophys 28(2):167–179. https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-167-2021
Iverson RM (2005) Regulation of landslide motion by dilatancy and pore pressure feedback. J Geophys Res: Earth Surf 110(F2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JF000268
Jafarimanesh A, Mignan A, Danciu L (2018) Origin of the power-law exponent in the landslide frequency-size distribution. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions 2018:1–28. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2018-167
Jain S, Khosa R, Gosain AK (2021) Landslides hazard map** using high-resolution satellite data. In: Latha Gali M., Raghuveer Rao P. (eds) Geohazards. lecture notes in civil engineering, vol 86. Springer, Singapore, pp 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6233-4_7
Kasai M, Yamada T (2019) Topographic effects on frequency-size distribution of landslides triggered by the Hokkaido Eastern Iburi Earthquake in 2018. Earth, Planets and Space 71(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-019-1069-8
Katz O, Aharonov E (2006) Landslides in vibrating sand box: what controls types of slope failure and frequency magnitude relations? Earth Planet Sci Lett 247(3–4):280–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.05.009
Keefer DK, Larsen MC (2007) Science, pp.1136–1138.
Kelsey HM, Coghlan M, Pitlick J, Best D (1995) Geomorphic analysis of streamside landslides in the Redwood Creek basin, northwestern California, in Geomorphic Processes and Aquatic Habitat in the Redwood Creek Basin, Northwestern California, US Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap., vol. 1454‐J, pp. 1– 12.
Kumar N, Lenka NK, Ibrahim M (2016) A report on macro-scale (1:50,000) landslide susceptibility map** in parts of Toposheets Nos.78a /11, 12, 8 &7 in East, South and West Districts, Sikkim. Geological Survey of India.
Kumar P (2010) Landslide hazard zonation on meso scale of Pithoragarh Area, Pithoragarh District, Uttarakhand with special reference to slope stability. Geological Survey of India.
Kyselý J, Picek J (2007) Probability estimates of heavy precipitation events in a flood-prone central-European region with enhanced influence of Mediterranean cyclones. Adv Geosci 12:43–50
Larsen IJ, Montgomery DR, Korup O (2010) Landslide erosion controlled by hillslope material. Nat Geosci 3:247–251. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo776
Lazoglou G, Anagnostopoulou C (2017) An overview of statistical methods for studying the extreme rainfalls in Mediterranean. Proceedings 1(5):681. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecas2017-04132
Levy M (2009) Gibrat’s law for (all) cities: comment. American Economic Review 99(4):1672–1675. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.4.1672
Li Z, Shi W, Lu P, Yan L, Wang Q, Miao Z (2016) Landslide map** from aerial photographs using change detection-based Markov random field. Remote Sens Environ 187:76–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.10.008
Lilliefors HW (1967) On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. J Am Stat Assoc 62(318):399–402
Majtán S, Omura H, Morita K (2002) Fractal dimension as an indicator of probability for landslides in North Matsuura, Japan. GEOGRAFICKY CASOPIS SLOVENSKEJ AKADEMIE VIED 54:5–20
Malamud BD, Turcotte DL, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P (2004) Landslide inventories and their statistical properties. Earth Surf Proc Land 29(6):687–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1064
Mandelbrot BB (1997) States of randomness from mild to wild, and concentration from the short to the long run. In Fractals and Scaling in Finance (pp. 117–145). Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2763-0_5
Mandotra V., Khan I. (2016) A report on macro-scale (1:50,000) landslide susceptibility map** in parts of Toposheet Nos. 43p/02 And 43p/06, Samba and Kathua Districts, Jammu and Kashmir (J&K). Geological Survey of India.
Marin RJ (2020) Physically based and distributed rainfall intensity and duration thresholds for shallow landslides. Landslides 17(12):2907–2917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01481-9
Medwedeff WG, Clark MK, Zekkos D, West AJ (2020) Characteristic landslide distributions: an investigation of landscape controls on landslide size. Earth Planet Sci Lett 539:116203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116203
Meena SR, Ghorbanzadeh O, van Westen CJ, Nachappa TG, Blaschke T, Singh RP, Sarkar R (2021) Rapid map** of landslides in the Western Ghats (India) triggered by 2018 extreme monsoon rainfall using a deep learning approach. Landslides 1-14.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01602-4
Mitzenmacher M (2004) A brief history of generative models for power law and lognormal distributions. Internet Mathematics 1(2):226–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427951.2004.10129088
Montroll EW, Shlesinger MF (1982) On 1/f noise and other distributions with long tails. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 79(10):3380–3383. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.79.10.3380
Montroll EW, Shlesinger MF (1983) Maximum entropy formalism, fractals, scaling phenomena, and 1/f noise: a tale of tails. J Stat Phys 32(2):209–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01012708
Musakkal NFK, Chin SN, Ghazali K, Gabda D (2018) A penalised likelihood approach to model the annual maximum flow with small sample sizes. Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences. 13(4):563–566
National Landslide Risk Management Strategy (2019) A publication of the National Disaster Management Authority, Government of India. New Delhi.
Othman AA, Gloaguen R (2013) River courses affected by landslides and implications for hazard assessment: a high resolution remote sensing case study in NE Iraq–W Iran. Remote Sensing 5(3):1024–1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5031024
Pelletier JD, Malamud BD, Blodgett T, Turcotte DL (1997) Scale-invariance of soil moisture variability and its implications for the frequency-size distribution of landslides. Eng Geol 48(3–4):255–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(97)00041-0
Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (2007) Numerical recipes, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, The art of scientific computing
Qiu H, Cui P, Regmi AD, Hu S, Wang X, Zhang Y (2018) The effects of slope length and slope gradient on the size distributions of loess slides: field observations and simulations. Geomorphology 300:69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.10.020
Qiu H, Hu S, Yang D, He Y, Pei Y, Kamp U (2021) Comparing landslide size probability distribution at the landscape scale (Loess Plateau and the Qinba Mountains, Central China) using double Pareto and inverse gamma. Bull Eng Geol Env 80(2):1035–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-02037-w
Rana K, Ozturk U, Malik N (2021) Landslide geometry reveals its trigger. Geophysical Research Letters, e2020GL090848. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090848
Ríos PL, Conduit GJ (2019) Tail-regression estimator for heavy-tailed distributions of known tail indices and its application to continuum quantum Monte Carlo data. Phys Rev E 99(6):063312. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.99.063312
Sachs MK, Yoder MR, Turcotte DL, Rundle JB, Malamud BD (2012) Black swans, power laws, and dragon-kings: earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, landslides, wildfires, floods, and SOC models. The European Physical Journal Special Topics 205(1):167–182. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01569-3
Shanmugam G, Wang Y (2015) The Landslide Problem. J Palaeogeogr 4(2):109–166. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1261.2015.00071
Šimková T (2018) L-moment homogeneity test in trivariate regional frequency analysis of extreme precipitation events. Meteorol Appl 25(1):11–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1664
Stark CP, Guzzetti F (2009) Landslide rupture and the probability distribution of mobilised debris volumes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 114(F2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001008
Stark CP, Hovius N (2001) The characterisation of landslide size distributions. Geophys Res Lett 28(6):1091–1094. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL008527
Taleb NN (2020) Statistical consequences of fat tails: real world preasymptotics, epistemology, and applications. ar**v preprint ar**v:2001.10488
Tanyaş H, Allstadt KE, van Westen CJ (2018a) An updated method for estimating landslide-event magnitude. Earth Surf Proc Land 43(9):1836–1847. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4359
Tanyaş H, van Westen CJ, Allstadt KE, Jibson RW (2018b) Factors controlling landslide frequency–area distributions. Earth Surf Proc Land 44(4):900–917. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4543
Tebbens SF (2020) Landslide scaling: a review. Earth and Space Science, 7(1), p.e2019EA000662. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000662
Trigila A, Frattini P, Casagli N, Catani F, Crosta G, Esposito C, Iadanza C, Lagomarsino D, Mugnozza GS, Segoni S, Spizzichino D (2013) Landslide susceptibility map** at national scale: the Italian case study. In Landslide science and practice (pp. 287–295). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31325-7_38
Turcotte DL, Malamud BD (2004) Landslides, forest fires, and earthquakes: examples of self-organised critical behavior. Physica A 340(4):580–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2004.05.009
Singh VP, Das KP (2016) Characterisation of the tail of river flow data by generalised pareto distribution. Journal of Statistical Research 48–50(2):55–70
Van Den Eeckhaut M, Poesen J, Govers G, Verstraeten G, Demoulin A (2007) Characteristics of the size distribution of recent and historical landslides in a populated hilly region. Earth Planet Sci Lett 256(3–4):588–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.01.040
van Veen M, Hutchinson DJ, Kromer R, Lato M, Edwards T (2017) Effects of sampling interval on the frequency-magnitude relationship of rockfalls detected from terrestrial laser scanning using semi-automated methods. Landslides 14(5):1579–1592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0801-3
Xu C, Xu X, Yao X, Dai F (2014) Three (nearly) complete inventories of landslides triggered by the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan Mw 7.9 earthquake of China and their spatial distribution statistical analysis. Landslides 11(3):441–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0404-6
Zhang F, Kang C, Chan D, Zhang X, Pei X, Peng J (2017) A study of a flowslide with significant entrainment in loess areas in China. Earth Surf Proc Land 42(14):2295–2305. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4184
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jain, S., Khosa, R. & Gosain, A.K. Impact of landslide size and settings on landslide scaling relationship: a study from the Himalayan regions of India. Landslides 19, 373–385 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01794-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01794-3