SpringerLink
Log in

Landslide distribution and size versus relative relief (Shaanxi Province, China)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the distribution and size of landslides in relation to relative relief. For this, a landslide inventory map of the area was developed from the interpretation of satellite images and detailed field survey. From this we could map 331 landslides in Ningqing County (Shaanxi Province). By using GIS and statistical approaches, we studied the coupling between landslide size distribution and relative relief. From this the control of relative relief on the rollover effect of the size distribution of landslides is obtained. The result shows that the landslide frequency-relative relief distribution is unimodal, with majority of landslides occurring in areas with relative reliefs in between 300 and 400. The relative number density of landslides decreased with the increase in the relative relief; on the contrary, the average area, average length and average width of landslide increased with the increase in relative relief. The percentage of large-scale landslide increased with the increase of relative relief or vice versa. In addition, the cumulative frequency-area distributions of these landslides empirically agree well with a power-law relation with an exponent of 1.776 above a certain size threshold. Below this value, it exhibited an obvious rollover effect. Further analysis has shown that landslide cumulative frequency-area curve is strongly influenced by relative relief. The rollover effect is more obvious with the increase of relative relief. The exponent of power law correlation gradually increased from 0.993 to 1.872 with increasing relative relief.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander D (1989) Urban landslides. Prog Phys Geogr 13(2):157–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bak P, Tang C, Wiesenfeld K (1988) Self-organized criticality. Phys Rev A 38(1):364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brardinoni F, Church M (2004) Representing the landslide magnitude–frequency relation: Capilano River basin, British Columbia. Earth Surf Proc Land 29(1):115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brardinoni F, Slaymaker O, Hassan MA (2003) Landslide inventory in a rugged forested watershed: a comparison between air-photo and field survey data. Geomorphology 54(3):179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broothaerts N, Kissi E, Poesen J, Van Rompaey A, Getahun K, Van Ranst E, Diels J (2012) Spatial patterns, causes and consequences of landslides in the Gilgel Gibe catchment, SW Ethiopia. CATENA 97:127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucci F, Santangelo M, Cardinali M, Fiorucci F, Guzzetti F (2016) Landslide distribution and size in response to Quaternary fault activity: the Peloritani Range, NE Sicily, Italy. Earth Surf Proc Land 41(5):711–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui DT, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB (2012) Spatial prediction of landslide hazards in Hoa Binh province (Vietnam): a comparative assessment of the efficacy of evidential belief functions and fuzzy logic models. CATENA 96:28–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conforti M, Pascale S, Robustelli G, Sdao F (2014) Evaluation of prediction capability of the artificial neural networks for map** landslide susceptibility in the Turbolo River catchment (northern Calabria, Italy). CATENA 113:236–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF (2001) Frequency-volume relation and prediction of rainfall-induced landslides. Eng Geol 59(3):253–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Li J, Xu ZW (2001) Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environ Geol 40:381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuyii Y (1969) Frequency distribution of the magnitude of landslides caused by heavy rainfall. J Seismol Soc Jpn 22:244–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Glade T (1998) Establishing the frequency and magnitude of landslide-triggering rainstorm events in New Zealand. Environ Geol 35:2–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco R, Giorgio M, Capparelli G, Versace P (2013) Early warning of rainfall-induced landslides based on empirical mobility function predictor. Eng Geol 153:68–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie RH, Evans SG (2004a) Analysis of landslide frequencies and characteristics in a natural system, coastal British Columbia. Earth Surf Proc Land 29(11):1321–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie RH, Evans SG (2004b) Magnitude and frequency of landslides triggered by a storm event, Loughborough Inlet, British Columbia. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 4(3):475–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie RH, Evans SG (2005) The role of magnitude-frequency relations in regional landslide risk analysis. Landslide risk management. AA Balkema, London, pp 375–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie RH, Deadman PJ, Cabrera AR, Evans SG (2008) Exploring the magnitude–frequency distribution: a cellular automata model for landslides. Landslides 5(1):151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: an aid to a sustainable development. Geomorphology 31:181–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Malamud BD, Turcotte DL, Reichenbach P (2002) Power-law correlations of landslide areas in central Italy. Earth Planet Sci Lett 195(3):169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M et al (2008) Distribution of landslides in the Upper Tiber River basin, central Italy. Geomorphology 96(1):105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hungr O, Evans SG, Hazzard J (1999) Magnitude and frequency of rock falls and rock slides along the main transportation corridors of southwestern British Columbia. Can Geotech J 36(2):224–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hungr O, McDougall S, Wise M, Cullen M (2008) Magnitude–frequency relationships of debris flows and debris avalanches in relation to slope relief. Geomorphology 96(3):355–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korup O (2005a) Geomorphic imprint of landslides on alpine river systems, southwest New Zealand. Earth Surf Proc Land 30:783–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korup O (2005b) Distribution of landslides in southwest New Zealand. Landslides 2:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee EM, Jones DKC (2004) Landslide risk assessment. Thomas Telford, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malamud BD, Turcotte DL, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P (2004a) Landslides, earthquakes, and erosion. Earth Planet Sci Lett 229(1):45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malamud BD, Turcotte DL, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P (2004b) Landslide inventories and their statistical properties. Earth Surf Proc Land 29(6):687–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansour MF, Morgenstern NR, Martin CD (2011) Expected damage from displacement of slow-moving slides. Landslides 8(1):117–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey CI, Petley DN, McSaveney MJ (2013) Patterns of movement in reactivated landslides. Eng Geol 159:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oguchi T (1997) Drainage density and relative relief in humid steep mountains with frequent slope failure. Earth Surf Proc Land 22(2):107–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pareek N, Sharma ML, Arora MK (2010) Impact of seismic factors on landslide susceptibility zonation: a case study in part of Indian Himalayas. Landslides 7(2):191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier JD, Malamud BD, Blodgett T, Turcotte DL (1997) Scale-invariance of soil moisture variability and its implications for the frequency-size distribution of landslides. Eng Geol 48(3):255–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roering J (2012) Tectonic geomorphology: landslides limit mountain relief. Nat Geosci 5(7):446–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt KM, Montgomery DR (1995) Limits to relief. Science 270(5236):617–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster RL, Fleming RW (1986) Economic losses and fatalities due to landslides. Bull Assoc Eng Geol 23(1):11–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark CP, Hovius N (2001) The characterization of landslide size distributions. Geophys Res Lett 28(6):1091–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte DL, Malamud BD, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P (2002) Self-organization, the cascade model, and natural hazards. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(suppl 1):2530–2537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Eeckhaut M, Poesen J, Govers G, Verstraeten G, Demoulin A (2007) Characteristics of the size distribution of recent and historical landslides in a populated hilly region. Earth Planet Sci Lett 256(3–4):588–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ (1954) Landslide types and processes. In: Eckel EB (ed) Landslides and engineering practice, special report 28. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, pp 20–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek GF (1984) Preparing a detailed landslide-inventory map for hazard evaluation and reduction. Bull Assoc Eng Geol 21(3):337–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou ZX, Li J, Ren ZY (2012) The relief degree of land surface and population distribution in Guanzhong-Tianshui economic region using GIS. Scientia Geographica Sinica 32(8):951–957

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the International partnership program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. 131551KYSB20160002), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41401602) and Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (Program No.2014JQ2-4021). We warmly thank the anonymous reviewer and the editor, whose constructive and helpful comments substantially improved this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Urban and Environmental Science, Northwest University, **’an, 710127, China

    Haijun Qiu, Sheng Hu, Yuzhu Zhang & Yi He

  2. Institute of Earth Surface System and Hazards, Northwest University, **’an, 710127, China

    Haijun Qiu

  3. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China

    Haijun Qiu, Peng Cui & Amar Deep Regmi

Authors
  1. Haijun Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peng Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amar Deep Regmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sheng Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuzhu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yi He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haijun Qiu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiu, H., Cui, P., Regmi, A.D. et al. Landslide distribution and size versus relative relief (Shaanxi Province, China). Bull Eng Geol Environ 77, 1331–1342 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1121-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1121-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation