Abstract
Objectives
To determine the incremental value of hepatobiliary-phase-MRC (HBP-MRC) added to T2-magnetic resonance cholangiography (T2-MRC) for evaluating biliary anatomy in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and to correlate T2+HBP-MRC findings with surgical results.
Methods
A total of 276 donors who underwent T2 and gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI before right hemihepatectomy for LDLT between January and December 2016 were retrospectively enrolled. Two reviewers evaluated biliary anatomy classification using T2-MRC in the first session and T2+HBP-MRC in the second session. The sensitivity, specificity, and confidence level (5-point scale) of T2-MRC and T2+HBP-MRC for variant biliary anatomy were evaluated. The agreement rates between MRC and operative cholangiography for each biliary anatomy classification and the underestimation rates for multiple bile duct openings (BDOs) for both MRC techniques were evaluated.
Results
Of the 276 donors, variant biliary anatomy was observed in 36.2% (100/276). T2+HBP-MRC showed a significantly higher sensitivity for diagnosing variant biliary anatomy than T2-MRC alone (99.0% [99/100] vs. 89.0% [89/100], p = 0.006), with better observer confidence level (4.9 ± 0.3 vs. 4.6 ± 0.7, p < 0.001) and inter-observer agreement (kappa, 0.902 vs. 0.730). Compared with T2-MRC alone, T2+HBP-MRC provided significantly higher agreement with operative cholangiography in biliary anatomy classification (98.6% [272/276] vs. 89.9% [248/276], p < 0.001), and significantly lower underestimation rate for multiple BDOs (5.8% [16/276] vs. 9.4% [26/276], p = 0.002).
Conclusion
T2+HBP-MRC might be considered than T2-MRC alone, as a better depiction of biliary anatomic variations, correlated with surgical findings.
Key Points
•T2+HBP-MRC predicted variant biliary anatomy more accurately than T2-MRC alone.
•T2+HBP-MRC might have clinical usefulness by reducing the underestimation rate of multiple bile duct openings, which requires more complicated biliary anastomoses.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- BDO:
-
Bile duct opening
- CBD:
-
Common bile duct
- CHD:
-
Common hepatic duct
- HBP-MRC:
-
T1-weighted hepatobiliary-phase magnetic resonance cholangiography
- LDLT:
-
Living donor liver transplantation
- LHD:
-
Left hepatic duct
- OPC:
-
Operative cholangiography
- PV:
-
Portal vein
- RAHD:
-
Right anterior hepatic duct
- RHD:
-
Right hepatic duct
- RPHD:
-
Right posterior hepatic duct
- T2-MRC:
-
T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography
- T2+HBP-MRC:
-
Combination of T2-MRC and HBP-MRC
References
Brown RS Jr, Russo MW, Lai M et al (2003) A survey of liver transplantation from living adult donors in the United States. N Engl J Med 348:818–825
Kochhar G, Parungao JM, Hanouneh IA, Parsi MA (2013) Biliary complications following liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 19:2841–2846
Umeshita K, Fujiwara K, Kiyosawa K et al (2003) Operative morbidity of living liver donors in Japan. Lancet 362:687–690
Puente SG, Bannura GC (1983) Radiological anatomy of the biliary tract: variations and congenital abnormalities. World J Surg 7:271–276
Russell E, Yrizzary JM, Montalvo BM, Guerra JJ Jr, al-Refai F (1990) Left hepatic duct anatomy: implications. Radiology 174:353–356
Song GW, Lee SG, Hwang S et al (2007) Preoperative evaluation of biliary anatomy of donor in living donor liver transplantation by conventional nonenhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography. Transpl Int 20:167–173
Fulcher AS, Szucs RA, Bassignani MJ, Marcos A (2001) Right lobe living donor liver transplantation: preoperative evaluation of the donor with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:1483–1491
An SK, Lee JM, Suh KS et al (2006) Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced liver MRI as the sole preoperative imaging technique: a prospective study of living liver donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1223–1233
Rosch T, Meining A, Frühmorgen S et al (2002) A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP, MRCP, CT, and EUS in biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 55:870–876
Lee MS, Lee JY, Kim SH et al (2011) Gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for biliary and vascular evaluations in preoperative living liver donors: comparison with gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 33:149–159
Lee Y, Kim SY, Kim KW et al (2015) Contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography with Gd-EOB-DTPA for preoperative biliary map**: correlation with intraoperative cholangiography. Acta Radiol 56:773–781
Cai L, Yeh BM, Westphalen AC, Roberts J, Wang ZJ (2017) 3D T2-weighted and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 3D T1-weighted MR cholangiography for evaluation of biliary anatomy in living liver donors. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42:842–850
Santosh D, Goel A, Birchall IW et al (2017) Evaluation of biliary ductal anatomy in potential living liver donors: comparison between MRCP and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42:2428–2435
Kang HJ, Lee JM, Yoon JH et al (2018) Additional values of high-resolution gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR cholangiography for evaluating the biliary anatomy of living liver donors: comparison with T2-weighted MR cholangiography and conventional gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR cholangiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 47:152–159
Lim JS, Kim MJ, Myoung S et al (2008) MR cholangiography for evaluation of hilar branching anatomy in transplantation of the right hepatic lobe from a living donor. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:537–545
Mangold S, Bretschneider C, Fenchel M et al (2012) MRI for evaluation of potential living liver donors: a new approach including contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography. Abdom Imaging 37:244–251
Kinner S, Steinweg V, Maderwald S et al (2014) Comparison of different magnetic resonance cholangiography techniques in living liver donors including Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced T1-weighted sequences. PLoS One 9:e113882
Uysal F, Obuz F, Uçar A, Seçil M, Igci E, Dicle O (2014) Anatomic variations of the intrahepatic bile ducts: analysis of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in 1011 consecutive patients. Digestion 89:194–200
Takeishi K, Shirabe K, Yoshida Y et al (2015) Correlation between portal vein anatomy and bile duct variation in 407 living liver donors. Am J Transplant 15:155–160
Jhaveri KS, Guo L, Guimarães L (2017) Current state-of-the-art MRI for comprehensive evaluation of potential living liver donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 209:55–66
Papanikolaou N, Prassopoulos P, Eracleous E, Maris T, Gogas C, Gourtsoyiannis N (2001) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography versus heavily T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography. Invest Radiol 36:682–686
Lee VS, Krinsky GA, Nazzaro CA et al (2004) Defining intrahepatic biliary anatomy in living liver transplant donor candidates at mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR cholangiography versus conventional T2-weighted MR cholangiography. Radiology 233:659–666
Carlos RC, Hussain HK, Song JH, Francis IR (2002) Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid as an intrabiliary contrast agent: preliminary assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:87–92
Kishi Y, Imamura H, Sugawara Y et al (2010) Evaluation of donor vasculobiliary anatomic variations in liver graft procurements. Surgery 147:30–39
Kitami M, Takase K, Murakami G et al (2006) Types and frequencies of biliary tract variations associated with a major portal venous anomaly: analysis with multi-detector row CT cholangiography. Radiology 238:156–166
Dulundu E, Sugawara Y, Sano K et al (2004) Duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in adult living-donor liver transplantation. Transplantation 78:574–579
Ikegami T, Soejima Y, Taketomi A et al (2008) Hilar anatomical variations in living-donor liver transplantation using right-lobe grafts. Dig Surg 25:117–123
Funding
This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (no. 2017R1E1A1A03070961).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Kyoung Won Kim.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
One of the authors (Sang Hyun Choi) has significant statistical expertise.
Informed consent
The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of this study.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board.
Methodology
• Retrospective
• Observational
• Performed at one institution
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 20 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choi, S.H., Kim, K.W., Kwon, HJ. et al. Clinical usefulness of gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI for evaluating biliary anatomy in living donor liver transplantation. Eur Radiol 29, 6508–6518 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06292-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06292-8