Abstract
Objectives
To assess the feasibility of a comprehensive MRI protocol using intrabiliary contrast medium (gadolinium-EOB-DTPA) for evaluation of living liver donors.
Material and methods
In this prospective study, 30 donor candidates for living-related liver transplantation (17 men; 13 women, mean age 37 ± 10.9 years) underwent MRI including MR-angiography (MRA) as well as a conventional T2-weighted MR-cholangiography (MRC) and a contrast-enhanced sequence for depiction of the biliary structures. MRC and MRA images were evaluated for quality on a four-point-scale (score of 0 indicated poor and a score of 3, excellent image quality). Anatomic variants of the arterial, venous, portal venous, and biliary structures were identified.
Results
Image quality was diagnostic in all examinations except for 4 of 30 MRA data sets. Intrahepatic biliary structures, especially with regard to the intrahepatic bile ducts of 2nd and 3rd order could be identified with significantly increased image quality than in conventional T2-weighted MRC sequences (P = 0.005 and P = 0.035). A high percentage rate of anatomic variants regarding the biliary, arterial, venous, and portal venous anatomy was found.
Conclusion
This protocol allows the evaluation of liver donors especially with regard to the biliary structures. However, the depiction of the arterial anatomy requires further technical developments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Strong RW, Lynch SV, Ong TH, et al. (1990) Successful liver transplantation from a living donor to her son. N Engl J Med 322(21):1505–1507
Schroeder T, Malagó M, Debatin JF, et al. (2005) “All-in-one” imaging protocols for the evaluation of potential living liver donors: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomography. Liver Transpl 11(7):776–787
Raia S, Nery JR, Mies S (1989) Liver transplantation from live donors. Lancet 26(2):497–498
Rogiers X, Burdelski M, Broelsch CE (1994) Liver transplantation from living donors. Br J Surg 81:1251–1253
Broelsch CE, Emond JC, Whitington PF, et al. (1989) Application of reduced-size liver transplants as split grafts, auxiliary grafts, and living related segmental transplants. Ann Surg 212:368–375
Hashikura Y, Makuuchi M, Kawasaki S, et al. (1994) Successful living-related partial liver transplantation to an adult patient. Lancet 343:1233–1234
Broelsch CE, Testa G, Alexandrou A, Malago M (2002) Living related liver transplantation: medical and social aspects of a controversial therapy. Gut 50:143–145
Mueller AR, Pascher A, Platz KP, et al. (2003) Immunosuppressive management following intestinal transplantation in adult patients. Transplant Proc 35:2075–2077
Settmacher U, Neuhaus P (2003) Innovations in liver surgery through transplantation from living donors. Chirurgie 74:536–546
Kim SY, Kim KW, Kim MJ, et al. (2007) Multidetector row CT of various hepatic artery complications after living donor liver transplantation. Abdom Imaging 32(5):635–643
Girometti R, Cereser L, Como G, Zuiani C, Bazzocchi M (2008) Biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation: MRCP findings. Abdom Imaging 33(5):542–554
Fan S, Lo C, Liu C, et al. (2000) Safety of donors in live donor liver transplantation using right lobe grafts. Arch Surg 135:336–340
Marcos A, Fisher RA, Ham JM, et al. (1999) Right lobe living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation 68:798–800
Tanaka K, Kiuchi T (2002) Living-donor liver transplantation in the new decade: perspective from the twentieth to the twenty-first century. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:218–222
Testa G, Malago M, Valentin-Gamazo C, Lindell G, Broelsch CE (2000) Biliary anastomosis in living related liver transplantation using the right liver lobe: techniques and complications. Liver Transpl 6:710–714
Tsang LL-C, Chen C-L, Huang T-L, et al. (2008) Preoperative imaging evaluation of potential living liver donors: reasons for exclusion from donation in adult living donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 40:2460–2462
Becker CD, Grossholz M, Becker M, et al. (1997) Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 205:523–530
Lim JS, Kim MJ, Myoung S, et al. (2008) MR cholangiography for evaluation of hilar branching anatomy in transplantation of the right hepatic lobe from a living donor. AJR 191:537–545
Hintze RE, Adler A, Veltzke W, et al. (1997) Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Endoscopy 29:182–187
Holzapfel K, Breitwieser C, Prinz C, Rummeny EJ, Gaa J (2007) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography using gadolinium-EOB-DTPA. Preliminary experience and clinical applications. Radiologe 47:536–544
Carlos RC, Hussain HK, Song JH, Francis IR (2002) Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid as an intrabiliary contrast agent: preliminary assessment. AJR 179:87–92
Michel NA (1955) Blood supply and anatomy of the upper abdominal organs with a descriptive atlas. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, pp 64–69
Yoshida J, Chijiiwa K, Yamaguchi K, Yokohata K, Tanaka M (1996) Practical classification of the branching types of the biliary tree: an analysis of 1, 094 consecutive direct cholangiograms. J Am Coll Surg 182:37–40
Sahani D, Mehta A, Blake M, et al. (2004) Preoperative hepatic vascular evaluation with CT and MR angiography: implications for surgery. RadioGraphics 24:1367–1380
Winter TC III, Nghiem HV, Freeny PC, Hommeyer SC, Mack LA (1995) Hepatic arterial anatomy: demonstration of normal supply and vascular variants with three-dimensional CT angiography. RadioGraphics 15:771–780
Soyer P, Heath D, Bluemke DA, et al. (1996) Three-dimensional helical CT of intrahepatic venous structures: comparison of three rendering techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20:122–127
Sugarbaker PH, Nelson RC, Murray DR, Chezmar JL, Bernardino ME (1990) A segmental approach to computerized tomographic portography for hepatic resection. Surg Gynecol Obstet 171:189–195
Nilsson U (1987) Adverse reactions to iotroxate at intravenous cholangiography. A prospective clinical investigation and review of the literature. Acta Radiol 28:571–575
Schroeder T, Nadalin S, Stattaus J, et al. (2002) Potential living liver donors: evaluation with an all-in-one protocol with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 224(2):586–591
Cheng YF, Chen CL, Huang TL, et al. (2001) Single imaging modality evaluation of living donors in liver transplantation: magnetic resonance imaging. Transplantation 72(9):1527–1533
Goyen M, Barkhausen J, Debatin JF, et al. (2002) Right-lobe living related liver transplantation: evaluation of a comprehensive magnetic resonance imaging protocol for assessing potential donors. Transplantation 8(3):241–250
Lee VS, Morgan GR, Teperman LW, et al. (2001) MR imaging as the sole preoperative imaging modality for right hepatectomy: a prospective study of living adult-to-adult liver donor candidates. AJR 176:1475–1482
An SK, Lee JM, Suh KS, et al. (2006) Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced liver MRI as the sole preoperative imaging technique: a prospective study of living liver donors. AJR 187:1223–1233
Goldman J, Florman S, Varotti G, et al. (2003) Noninvasive preoperative evaluation of biliary anatomy in right-lobe living donors with mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR cholangiography. Transplant Proc 35:1421–1422
Lee VS, Krinsky GA, Nazzaro CA, et al. (2004) Defining intrahepatic biliary anatomy in living liver transplant donor candidates at mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR cholangiography versus conventional T2-weighted MR Cholangiography. Radiology 233(3):659–666
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mangold, S., Bretschneider, C., Fenchel, M. et al. MRI for evaluation of potential living liver donors: a new approach including contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography. Abdom Imaging 37, 244–251 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9736-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9736-7