SpringerLink
Log in

Soziale Robotik und Roboterpsychologie

Was psychologische Forschung zur menschzentrierten Entwicklung robotischer Systeme beiträgt

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Soziale Roboter

Zusammenfassung

Egal in welchem Anwendungsbereich soziale Roboter zum Einsatz kommen, sie sind in jedem Fall dafür gemacht, mit Menschen zu interagieren. Die Psychologie als Wissenschaft menschlichen Denkens, Fühlens und Verhaltens kann im Austausch mit anderen Disziplinen daher wertvolle Beiträge zur Erforschung sozialer Roboter und zum Gelingen von Mensch-Roboter-Interaktion liefern. Ziel dieses Kapitels ist es, einen einführenden Einblick in die Besonderheiten psychologischer Zugänge zur Sozialen Robotik zu geben. Ausgewählte Themenfelder der Roboterpsychologie, darunter Anthropomorphismus, Technologieängstlichkeit oder Vertrauen in Roboter, werden theoretisch und empirisch beleuchtet. Da eine korrekte Einordnung von Forschungsergebnissen immer auch ein Verständnis zugrunde liegender Forschungsmethoden erfordert, geht ein weiterer Abschnitt darauf ein, wie psychologische Vorgänge wissenschaftlich untersucht und gemessen werden können. Mit der Frage „Brauchen Roboter Psychotherapie?“ widmen wir uns abschließend populären Falschvorstellungen zur Roboterpsychologie und diskutieren außerdem Potenziale und Risiken von Robotern als therapeutischen Begleitwerkzeugen.

Wo soziale Roboter sind, sind Menschen. Und wo Menschen sind, ist die Psychologie.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Aiello JR (1987) Human spatial behavior. In: Stokols D. Altman I (Hrsg) Handbook of environmental psychology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Appel M, Weber S, Krause S, Mara M (2016) On the eeriness of service robots with emotional capabilities. In: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Christchurch, S 411–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Appel M, Marker C, Mara M (2019) Otakuism and the appeal of sex robots. Front Psychol 10:569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appel M, Izydorczyk D, Weber S, Mara M, Lischetzke T (2020) The uncanny of mind in a machine: humanoid robots as tools, agents, and experiencers. Comput Human Behav 102:274–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartneck C, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2009) My robotic doppelgänger – a critical look at the uncanny valley. The 18th IEEE international symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Toyama, Japan, S 269–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Belpaeme T (2020) Advice to new human-robot interaction researchers. In: Jost C, Le Pévédic B, Belpaeme T, Bethel C, Chrysostomou D, Crook N, Grandgeorge M, Mirnig N (Hrsg) Human-robot interaction. Evaluation methods and their standardization. Springer International Publishing, Cham, S 355–369

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burleigh TJ, Schoenherr JR, Lacroix GL (2013) Does the uncanny valley exist? An empirical test of the relationship between eeriness and the human likeness of digitally created faces. Comput Human Behav 29:759–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conti D, Cattani A, Di Nuovo S, Di Nuovo A (2019) Are future psychologists willing to accept and use a humanoid robot in their practice? Italian and English students’ perspective. Front Psychol 10:2138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costescu CA, Vanderborght B, David DO (2015) Reversal learning task in children with autism spectrum disorder: a robot-based approach. J Autism Dev Disord 45:3715–3725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Visser EJ, Peeters MM, Jung MF, Kohn S, Shaw TH, Pak R, Neerincx MA (2020) Towards a theory of longitudinal trust calibration in human–robot teams. Int J Soc Robot 12:459–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döring N (2020) Sexpuppen und Sexroboter aus psychologischer und therapeutischer Perspektive; Pathogene und salutogene Nutzungsmuster. In: Bendel O (Hrsg) Maschinenliebe. Liebespuppen und Sexroboter aus technischer, psychologischer und philosophischer Perspektive. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, S 283–301

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Döring N, Bortz J (2016) Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften, 5. Aufl. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Echterhoff G, Bohner G, Siebler F (2006) „Social Robotics“ und Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion. Z Sozialpsychol 37:219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichenberg C (2020) Robotik in der Psychotherapie: Anwendungsfelder–Effektivität–Praxisbeispiele. In Bessere Menschen? Technische und ethische Fragen in der transhumanistischen Zukunft. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, S 97–125

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Epley N, Waytz A, Cacioppo JT (2007) On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol Rev 114(4):864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esterwood C, Essenmacher K, Yang H, Zeng F, Robert L (2021) A meta-analysis of human personality and robot acceptance in human-robot interaction. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’21), May 8–13, 2021, Yokohama, Japan. ACM, New York (New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyssel F (2017) An experimental psychological perspective on social robotics. Robot Auton Syst 87:363–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyssel F, Reich N (2013) Loneliness makes the heart grow fonder (of robots) – on the effects of loneliness on psychological anthropomorphism. In: 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI), Tokyo, S 121–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Galvão Gomes da Silva J, Kavanagh DJ, Belpaeme T, Taylor L, Beeson K, Andrade J (2018) Experiences of a motivational interview delivered by a robot: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 20(5):e116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerrig RJ (2016) Psychologie, 20., akt. und erw. Aufl. Pearson Studium, Hallbergmoos

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford R (2013) Personal space and territoriality. In: Gifford R (Hrsg) Environmental psychology: principles and practice. Optimal Books, Colville, S 123–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall ET (1966) The hidden dimension. Doubleday, Garden City

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider F, Simmel M (1944) An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am J Psychol 57:243–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irfan B, Kennedy J, Lemaignan S, Papadopoulos F, Senft E, Belpaeme T (2018) Social psychology and human-robot interaction: An uneasy marriage. In HRI ’18 Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, S 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173386.3173389

  • John OP, Srivastava S (1999) The big-five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: Pervin LA, John OP (Hrsg) Handbook of personality: theory and research. Guilford Press, New York, S 102–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Kätsyri J, Förger K, Mäkäräinen M, Takala T (2015) A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness. Front Psychol 6:390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein RA, Ratliff KA, Vianello M, Adams RB, Bahník Š, Bernstein MJ, Nosek BA (2014) Investigating Variation in Replicability. Social Psychology 45(3):142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178

  • Koerber M (2018) Theoretical considerations and development of a questionnaire to measure trust in automation. In: Congress of the International Ergonomics Association. Springer, Cham, S 13–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Leichtmann B, Nitsch V (2020a) How much distance do humans keep toward robots? Literature review, meta-analysis, and theoretical considerations on personal space in human-robot interaction. J Environ Psychol 68:101386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leichtmann B, Nitsch V (2020b) Is the Social Desirability Effect in Human–Robot Interaction overestimated? A Conceptual Replication Study Indicates Less Robust Effects. Int J Soc Robot 13:1013–1031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00688-z

  • Leichtmann B, Hartung J, Wilhelm O, Nitsch V (2021) New short scale to measure workers’ attitudes toward the implementation of cooperative robots in industrial work settings: Instrument development and exploration of attitude structure

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang Y, Lee SA (2017) Fear of autonomous robots and artificial intelligence: Evidence from national representative data with probability sampling. Int J Soc Robot 9(3): 379–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0401-3

  • Lischetzke T, Izydorczyk D, Hüller C, Appel M (2017) The topography of the uncanny valley and individuals’ need for structure: a nonlinear mixed effects analysis. J Res Pers 68:96–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDorman KF, Entezari SO (2015) Individual differences predict sensitivity to the uncanny valley. Interact Stud 16:141–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mara M, Appel M (2015a) Effects of lateral head tilt on user perceptions of humanoid and android robots. Comput Human Behav 44:326–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mara M, Appel M (2015b) Science fiction reduces the eeriness of android robots: a field experiment. Comput Human Behav 48:156–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mara M, Meyer K, Heiml M, Pichler H, Haring R, Krenn B, Gross S, Reiterer B, Layer-Wagner T (2021) CoBot Studio VR: a virtual reality game environment for transdisciplinary research on interpretability and trust in human-robot collaboration. In: International Workshop on Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality for HRI (VAM-HRI), HRI’21, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur MB, Reichling DB (2016) Navigating a social world with robot partners: a quantitative cartography of the Uncanny Valley. Cognition 146:22–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister DJ (1995) Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad Manag J 38:24–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori M (1970) Bukimi no tani [The uncanny valley]. Energy 7:33–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Naneva S, Sarda Gou M, Webb TL, Prescott TJ (2020) A systematic review of attitudes, anxiety, acceptance, and trust towards social robots. Int J Soc Robot 12:1179–1201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00659-4

  • Nass C, Moon Y, Carney P (1999) Are people polite to computers? Responses to computer – based interviewing systems. J Appl Soc Psychol 29:1093–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nomura T, Kanda T (2003) On proposing the concept of robot anxiety and considering measurement of it. In: The 12th IEEE international workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003, S 373–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Open Science Collaboration (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349(6251): aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

  • Orne MT (1962) On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. Am Psychol 17:776–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picard RW (2003) What does it mean for a computer to „have“ emotions. In: Trappl R, Petta P, Payr S (Hrsg) Emotions in Humans and Artifacts. MIT Press, Cambridge, S 213–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell AL (2013) Computer anxiety: comparison of research from the 1990s and 2000s. Comput Human Behav 29:2337–2381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rempel JK, Holmes JG, Zanna MP (1985) Trust in close relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol 49:95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal R (1966) Experimenter effects in behavioral research. Appleton-century-crofts, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter JB (1967) A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. J Pers 35(4):651–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x

  • Salem M, Lakatos G, Amirabdollahian F, Dautenhahn K (2015) Would you trust a (faulty) robot?: effects of error, task type and personality on human-robot cooperation and trust. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI’15), Portland, OR, S 141–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Atzert L, Amelang M (2012) Psychologische Diagnostik, 5. Aufl. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scoglio AA, Reilly ED, Gorman JA, Drebing CE (2019) Use of social robots in mental health and well-being research: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 21:e13322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shibata T (2012) Therapeutic seal robot as biofeedback medical device: qualitative and quantitative evaluations of robot therapy in dementia care. Proc IEEE 100(S):2527–2538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U (2011) False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science 22(11):1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632v

  • SoftBank Robotics (2015) SoftBank to launch sales of ‚pepper‘ – the world’s first personal robot that reads emotions. https://www.softbank.jp/en/corp/group/sbm/news/press/2015/20150618_01/. Zugegriffen am 29.03.2021

  • Spielberger CD (1983) Manual for the State-Trait Inventory STAI. Mind Garden, Palo Alto, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein JP, Ohler P (2017) Venturing into the uncanny valley of mind – the influence of mind attribution on the acceptance of human-like characters in a virtual reality setting. Cognition 160:43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stower R, Calvo-Barajas N, Castellano G, Kappas A (2021) A meta-analysis on children’s trust in social robots. Int J Soc Robot:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman D, Aladia S, Malle, BF (2021) Challenges and opportunities for replication science in HRI: a case study in human-robot trust. In: HRI ’21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction, S 110–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Waytz A, Cacioppo J, Epley N (2010) Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspect Psychol Sci 5:219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfert P, Deschuyteneer J, Oetringer D, Robinson N, Belpaeme T (2020) Security risks of social robots used to persuade and manipulate: a proof of concept study. In: Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Cambridge, S 523–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Mollahosseini A, Kargar BAH, Boucher E, Voyles RM, Nielsen R, Mahoor MH (2014) eBear: An expressive Bear-Like robot. 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, Edinburgh, UK, 2014, S 969–974

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Linz, Österreich

    Martina Mara & Benedikt Leichtmann

Authors
  1. Martina Mara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benedikt Leichtmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martina Mara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hochschule für Wirtschaft FHNW, Windisch, Schweiz

    Oliver Bendel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Der/die Herausgeber bzw. der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mara, M., Leichtmann, B. (2021). Soziale Robotik und Roboterpsychologie. In: Bendel, O. (eds) Soziale Roboter. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31114-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31114-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-31113-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-31114-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation