Patellofemoral Arthroplasty. Pearls and Pitfalls

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Anterior Knee Pain and Patellar Instability
  • 624 Accesses

Abstract

A possible treatment of patello-femoral osteoarthritis (PF-OA) is the replacement of the anterior compartment of the knee by a patello-femoral arthroplasty (PFA). An adequate patient selection is essential to use PFA with good results. The preoperative study of the patient should confirm that femoro-tibial compartments are undamaged and it should also rule out the presence of severe limb malalignment. A careful surgical technique is also important to obtain satisfactory results: contemporary PFAs have instruments that make the technique reproducible, but attention must be paid to some technical details, such as the correct rotation of the onlay trochlear component, the adequate choice of the size, and the placement of the trochlear component with an adequate degree of flexion. An increase of the anterior space of the knee caused by an insufficient bone resection in the trochlea or the patella should be avoided. The results of contemporary PFAs appear to be clearly superior to those of the models used some decades ago. PFAs have some advantages over total knee arthroplasties (TKA): a faster postoperative recovery, less early complications as bleeding or infection and slightly superior functional results and range of motion. Nevertheless, the revision rate of PFAs (lower than many years ago) is still higher than that of TKAs. The most common cause of PFA failure is the progression of osteoarthritis to the other knee compartments, but revision of the PFA is in most cases a simple surgery with reproducible results. In conclusion, the use of PFA is a useful treatment in isolated PF-OA, especially in relatively young patients. In elderly patients, the use of TKA is recommended because of the more predictable results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davies AP, Vince AS, Shepstone L, Donell ST, Glasgow MM. The radiologic prevalence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;402:206–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lonner JH, Bloomfield MR. The clinical outcome of patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2013;44:271–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Grelsamer RP, Stein DA. Patellofemoral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1849–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tauro B, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH, Shah NA. The Lubinus patellofemoral arthroplasty. A five to ten year prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001;83-B:696–701.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amis AA, Senavongse W, Darcy P. Biomechanics of patellofemoral joint prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436:20–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dejour D, Saffarini M, Malemo Y, Pungitore M, Valluy J, Nover L, Demey G. Early outcomes of an anatomic trochlear-cutting patellofemoral arthroplasty: patient selection is key. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27:2297–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Borus T, Brilhault J, Confalonieri N, Johnson D, Thienpont E. Patellofemoral joint replacement, an evolving concept. Knee. 2014;21(Suppl 1):S47-50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ackroyd CE, Newman JH, Evans R, Eldridge JD, Joslin CC. The Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty: five-year survivorship and functional results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:310–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lustig S, Magnussen RA, Dahm DL, Parker D. Patellofemoral arthroplasty, where are we today? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:1216–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leadbetter WB, Seyler TM, Ragland P, Mont MA. Indications, contraindications and pitfalls of patellofemroal arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) (Suppl 4) 2006;88: 122–137.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rezzadeh K, Behery OA, Kester BS, Dogra T, Vigdorchik J, Schwarzkopf R. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: short-term complications and risk factors. J Knee Surg. 2020;33(9):912–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tishelman JC, Pyne A, Kahlenberg CA, Gruskay JA, Strickland SM. Obesity does not affect patient-reported outcomes following patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1713862. Online ahead of print.

  13. Remy F. Surgical technique in patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105(1S):S165–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Baker JF, Caborn DN, Schlierf TJ, Fain TB, Smith LS, Malkani AL. Isolated patellofemoral joint arthroplasty: can preoperative bone scans predict survivorship? J Arthroplasty. 2020;35:57–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fulkerson JP, Becker GJ, Meaney JA, Miranda M, Folcik MA. Anteromedial tibial tubercle transfer without bone graft. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18:490–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lennox IA, Cobb AG, Knowles J, Bentley G. Knee function after patellectomy. A 12- to 48-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:485–487.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yercan HS, Ait Si Selmi T, Neyret P. The treatment of patellofemoral osteoarthritis with partial lateral facetectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436:14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mont MA, Haas S, Mullick T, Hungerford DS. Total knee arthroplasty for patellofemoral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1977–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Parvizi J, Stuart MJ, Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD. Total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated patellofemoral arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:147–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 15th Annual Report 2018. https://www.hqip.org.uk/resource/national-joint-registry-15th-annual-report-2018.

  21. Dy CJ, Franco N, Ma Y, Mazumdar M, McCarthy MM, Gonzalez Della Valle A. Complications after patello-femoral versus total knee replacement in the treatment of isolated patello-femoral osteoarthritis. A meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:2174–2190.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dahm DL, Al-Rayashi W, Dajani K, Shah JP, Levy BA, Stuart MJ. Patellofemoral arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010;39:487–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Odgaard A, Madsen F, Kristensen PW, Kappel A, Fabrin J. The mark coventry award: patellofemoral arthroplasty results in better range of movement and early patient-reported outcomes than TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476:87–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Thienpont E, Lonner JH. Coronal alignment of patellofemoral arthroplasty. Knee. 2014;21(Suppl 1):S51–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Benazzo F, Rossi SM, Ghiara M. Partial knee arthroplasty: patellofemoral arthroplasty and combined unicompartmental and patellofemoral arthroplasty implants–general considerations and indications, technique and clinical experience. Knee. 2014;21(Suppl 1):S43–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lonner J. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. Pros, cons, design considerations. Clin Orthop. 2004;428:158–165.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dai Y, Diao N, Lin W, Yang G, Kang H, Wang F. Patient-reported outcomes and risk factors for decreased improvement after patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bernard CD, Pareek A, Sabbag CM, Parkes CW, Krych AJ, Cummings NM, Dahm DL. Pre-operative patella alta does not affect midterm clinical outcomes and survivorship of patellofemoral arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29:1670–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Blazina ME, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W, Broukhim B, Ivey FM. Patellofemoral replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;144:98–102.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bunyoz KI, Lustig S, Troelsen A. Similar postoperative patient-reported outcome in both second generation patellofemoral arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty for treatment of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27:2226–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Imhoff AB, Feucht MJ, Bartsch E, Cotic M, Pogorzelski J. High patient satisfaction with significant improvement in knee function and pain relief after mid-term follow-up in patients with isolated patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27:2251–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kamikovski I, Dobransky J, Dervin GF. The clinical outcome of patellofemoral arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34:2914–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Van Jonbergen H-P, Poolman RW, van Kampen A. Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. A systematic review of treatment options using the GRADE approach. Acta Orthopedica. 2010;81:199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rammohan R, Gupta S, Lee PYF, Chandratreya A. The midterm results of a cohort study of patellofemoral arthroplasty from a non-designer centre using an asymmetric trochlear prosthesis. Knee. 2019;26:1348–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Romagnoli S, Marullo M. Mid-term clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes of 105 Gender-specific patellofemoral arthroplasties, with or without the association of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:688–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lewis PL, Tudor F, Lorimer M, McKie J, Bohm E, Robertsson O, Makela KT, Haapakoski J, Furnes O, Bartz-Johannessen C, Nelissen RGHH, Van Steenbergen LN, Fithian DC, Prentice HA. Short-term revision risk of patellofemoral arthroplasty is high: an analysis from eight large arthroplasty registries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478:1222–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Joseph MN, Achten J, Parsons NR, Costa ML; PAT Trial Collaborators. The PAT randomized clinical trial. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B:310–318.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Peng G, Liu M, Guan Z, Hou Y, Liu Q, Sun X, Zhu X, Feng W, Zeng J, Zhong Z, Zeng Y. Patellofemoral arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):264.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Fredborg C, Odgaard A, Sørensen J. Patellofemoral arthroplasty is cheaper and more effective in the short term than total knee arthroplasty for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis: cost-effectiveness analysis based on a randomized trial. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B: 449–457.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mofidi A, Bajada S, Holt MD, Davies AP. Functional relevance of patellofemoral thickness before and after unicompartmental patellofemoral replacement. Knee. 2012;19:180–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bendixen NB, Eskelund PW, Odgaard A. Failure modes of patellofemoral arthroplasty-registries vs. clinical studies: a systematic review. Acta Orthop. 2019;90:473–478.

    Google Scholar 

  42. van der List JP, Chawla H, Villa JC, Pearle AD. Why do patellofemoral arthroplasties fail today? A systematic review Knee. 2017;24:2–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Feucht MJ, Cotic M, Beitzel K, Baldini JF, Meidinger G, Schöttle PB, Imhoff AB. A matched-pair comparison of inlay and onlay trochlear designs for patellofemoral arthroplasty: no differences in clinical outcome but less progression of osteoarthritis with inlay designs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:2784–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hendrix MR, Ackroyd CE, Lonner JH. Revision patellofemoral arthroplasty: three- to seven-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:977–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. van Jonbergen HP, Werkman DM, van Kampen A. Conversion of patellofemoral arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: a matched case-control study of 13 patients. Acta Orthop. 2009;80:62–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Hinarejos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hinarejos, P. (2023). Patellofemoral Arthroplasty. Pearls and Pitfalls. In: Sanchis-Alfonso, V. (eds) Anterior Knee Pain and Patellar Instability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09767-6_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09767-6_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09766-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09767-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation