Abstract
Purpose
Patellofemoral arthroplasty remains controversial, primarily due to the high failure rates reported with early implants. Numerous case series have been published over the years detailing results of various first- and second-generation implants. The purpose of this work is to summarize results published to date and identify common themes regarding implants, surgical techniques, and indications in order to maximize results of future procedures.
Methods
A comprehensive review of the MEDLINE database was carried out to identify all clinical studies related to patellofemoral arthroplasty.
Results
First-generation resurfacing implants were associated with relatively high failure rates in the medium term. Second-generation implants, with femoral cuts based on TKA designs have yielded more promising medium-term results. Surgical indications are specific and must be carefully followed to minimize poor results. Short-term complications are generally related to patellar maltracking, while long-term complications are generally related to progression of osteoarthritis in the tibiofemoral joint. Implant loosening and polyethylene wear are rarely reported. Short-term results are favourable for new technology including custom implants and computer navigated surgery.
Conclusions
Overall, recent improvements in implant design and surgical techniques have resulted in improvements in short- and medium-term results. More work is required to assess the long-term outcomes of modern implant designs.
Level of evidence
IV.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackroyd CE, Chir B (2005) Development and early results of a new patellofemoral arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:7–13
Ackroyd CE, Newman JH (2003) The Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty: two to five year results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:162–163
Ackroyd CE, Newman JH, Evans R, Eldridge JD, Joslin CC (2007) The Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty: five-year survivorship and functional results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:310–315
Amis AA, Senavongse W, Darcy P (2005) Biomechanics of patellofemoral joint prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:20–29
Arciero RA, Toomey HE (1988) Patellofemoral arthroplasty. A three- to nine-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 236:60–71
Argenson JN, Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac JM (2005) Patellofemoral arthroplasty: an update. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:50–53
Argenson JN, Guillaume JM, Aubaniac JM (1995) Is there a place for patellofemoral arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:162–167
Arumilli BR, Ng AB, Ellis DJ, Hirst P (2010) Unusual mechanical complications of unicompartmental low contact stress mobile bearing patellofemoral arthroplasty: a cause for concern? Knee 17:362–364
Becker R, Ropke M, Krull A, Musahl V, Nebelung W (2008) Surgical treatment of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:443–449
Blazina ME, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W, Broukhim B, Ivey FM (1979) Patellofemoral replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 144:98–102
Board TN, Mahmood A, Ryan WG, Banks AJ (2004) The Lubinus patellofemoral arthroplasty: a series of 17 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:285–287
Butler JE, Shannon R (2009) Patellofemoral arthroplasty with a custom-fit femoral prosthesis. Orthopedics 32:81
Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer R (1990) Patellofemoral arthroplasty. 2–12-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 5:49–55
Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Khefacha A (2005) Long-term results with the first patellofemoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:47–54
Charalambous CP, Abiddin Z, Mills SP, Rogers S, Sutton P, Parkinson R (2011) The low contact stress patellofemoral replacement: high early failure rate. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:484–489
Cobb J, Henckel J, Gomes P, Harris S, Jakopec M, Rodriguez F, Barrett A, Davies B (2006) Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the acrobot system. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:188–197
Cossey AJ, Spriggins AJ (2006) Computer-assisted patellofemoral arthroplasty: a mechanism for optimizing rotation. J Arthroplasty 21:420–427
Dahm DL, Al-Rayashi W, Dajani K, Shah JP, Levy BA, Stuart MJ (2010) Patellofemoral arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 39:487–491
Davies AP, Vince AS, Shepstone L, Donell ST, Glasgow MM (2002) The radiologic prevalence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 402:206–212
Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A (1998) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:63–69
De Cloedt P, Legaye J, Lokietek W (1999) Femoro-patellar prosthesis. A retrospective study of 45 consecutive cases with a follow-up of 3–12 years. Acta Orthop Belg 65:170–175
de Winter WE, Feith R, van Loon CJ (2001) The Richards type II patellofemoral arthroplasty: 26 cases followed for 1–20 years. Acta Orthop Scand 72:487–490
Farr J 2nd, Barrett D (2008) Optimizing patellofemoral arthroplasty. Knee 15:339–347
Feller JA, Bartlett RJ, Lang DM (1996) Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:226–228
Fulkerson JP, Shea KP (1990) Disorders of patellofemoral alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1424–1429
Gadeyne S, Besse JL, Galand-Desme S, Lerat JL, Moyen B (2008) Results of self-centering patellofemoral prosthesis: a retrospective study of 57 implants. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94:228–240
Hassaballa MA, Porteous AJ, Newman JH (2004) Observed kneeling ability after total, unicompartmental and patellofemoral knee arthroplasty: perception versus reality. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:136–139
Hendrix MR, Ackroyd CE, Lonner JH (2008) Revision patellofemoral arthroplasty: three- to seven-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 23:977–983
Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14
Kooijman HJ, Driessen AP, van Horn JR (2003) Long-term results of patellofemoral arthroplasty. A report of 56 arthroplasties with 17 years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:836–840
Krajca-Radcliffe JB, Coker TP (1996) Patellofemoral arthroplasty. A 2- to 18-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 330:143–151
Leadbetter WB, Kolisek FR, Levitt RL, Brooker AF, Zietz P, Marker DR, Bonutti PM, Mont MA (2009) Patellofemoral arthroplasty: a multi-centre study with minimum 2-year follow-up. Int Orthop 33:1597–1601
Leadbetter WB, Mont MA (2009) Patellofemoral arthroplasty: a useful option for recalcitrant symptomatic patellofemoral arthritis. Semin Arthro 20:148–160
Leadbetter WB, Ragland PS, Mont MA (2005) The appropriate use of patellofemoral arthroplasty: an analysis of reported indications, contraindications, and failures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:91–99
Leadbetter WB, Seyler TM, Ragland PS, Mont MA (2006) Indications, contraindications, and pitfalls of patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(Suppl 4):122–137
Levitt RL (1973) A long-term evaluation of patellar prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 97:153–157
Lonner JH (2004) Patellofemoral arthroplasty: pros, cons, and design considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:158–165
Lonner JH (2006) Patellofemoral arthroplasty. In: Scott N (ed) Insall and Scott surgery of the knee, 4th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1440–1454
Lonner JH (2007) Patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:495–506
Lonner JH (2009) Modular bicompartmental knee arthroplasty with robotic arm assistance. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 38:28–31
Lonner JH (2010) Patellofemoral arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 59:67–84
Lonner JH, Mehta S, Booth RE Jr (2007) Ipsilateral patellofemoral arthroplasty and autogenous osteochondral femoral condylar transplantation. J Arthroplasty 22:1130–1136
Lubinus HH (1979) Patella glide-bearing total replacement. Orthopedics 2:119–127
Lustig S, Fleury C, Goy D, Neyret P, Donell ST (2011) The accuracy of acquisition of an imageless computer-assisted system and its implication for knee arthroplasty. Knee 18:15–20
McKeever DC (1955) Patellar prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 37-A:1074–1084
Merchant AC (2005) A modular prosthesis for patellofemoral arthroplasty: design and initial results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:40–46
Mertl P, Van FT, Bonhomme P, Vives P (1997) Femoropatellar osteoarthritis treated by prosthesis. Retrospective study of 50 implants. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 83:712–718
Mofidi A, Bajada S, Holt MD, Davies AP (2011) Functional relevance of patellofemoral thickness before and after unicompartmental patellofemoral replacement. Knee PMID:21498901
Morra EA, Greenwald AS (2006) Patellofemoral replacement polymer stress during daily activities: a finite element study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(Suppl 4):213–216
Newman JH (2007) Patellofemoral arthritis and its management with isolated patellofemoral replacement: a personal experience. Orthopedics 30:58–61
Nicol SG, Loveridge JM, Weale AE, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH (2006) Arthritis progression after patellofemoral joint replacement. Knee 13:290–295
Odumenya M, Costa ML, Parsons N, Achten J, Dhillon M, Krikler SJ (2010) The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: five-year results from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:56–60
Oni OOA (1996) The Leicester patello-femoral joint prosthesis. Knee 3:81–82
Parratte S, Pauly V, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN (2010) Survival of bicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 5 to 23 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:64–72
Parvizi J, Stuart MJ, Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD (2001) Total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated patellofemoral arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:147–152
Paxton EW, Fithian DC (2005) Outcome instruments for patellofemoral arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:66–70
Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)—development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:88–96
Sisto DJ, Sarin VK (2006) Custom patellofemoral arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1475–1480
Smith AM, Peckett WR, Butler-Manuel PA, Venu KM, d’Arcy JC (2002) Treatment of patello-femoral arthritis using the Lubinus patello-femoral arthroplasty: a retrospective review. Knee 9:27–30
Starks I, Roberts S, White SH (2009) The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: independent assessment of early functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:1579–1582
Tauro B, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH, Shah NA (2001) The Lubinus patellofemoral arthroplasty. A five- to ten-year prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:696–701
van Jonbergen HP, Werkman DM, Barnaart AF (2009) Dissociation of mobile-bearing patellar component in low contact stress patellofemoral arthroplasty, its mechanism and management: two case reports. Cases J 2:7502
van Jonbergen HP, Werkman DM, Barnaart LF, van Kampen A (2010) Long-term outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25:1066–1071
van Jonbergen HP, Werkman DM, van Kampen A (2009) Conversion of patellofemoral arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: A matched case-control study of 13 patients. Acta Orthop 80:62–66
van Wagenberg JM, Speigner B, Gosens T, de Waal Malefijt J (2009) Midterm clinical results of the Autocentric II patellofemoral prosthesis. Int Orthop 33:1603–1608
Vermeulen H, De Doncker E, Watillon M (1973) The Mac Keever patellar prosthesis in femoro-patellar arthrosis. Acta Orthop Belg 39:79–90
Walls RJ, Eldridge JD, Mulhall KJ (2007) Patellofemoral arthroplasty: evolving indications, technique, and applications in younger patients. Semin Arthro 18:156–161
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483
Witjes S, Van den Broek C, Koeter S, Van Loon C (2009) Dislocation of the mobile bearing component of a patellofemoral arthroplasty: a report of two cases. Acta Orthop Belg 75:411–416
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lustig, S., Magnussen, R.A., Dahm, D.L. et al. Patellofemoral arthroplasty, where are we today?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20, 1216–1226 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-1948-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-1948-z