Mean Variance Portfolio Allocation

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Finance
  • 3817 Accesses

Abstract

The basic rules of balancing the expected return on an investment against its contribution to portfolio risk are surveyed. The related concept of Capital Asset Pricing Model asserting that the expected return of an asset must be linearly related to the covariance of its return with the return of the market portfolio if the market is efficient and its statistical tests in terms of Arbitraging Price Theory are also surveyed. The intertemporal generalization and issues of estimation errors and portfolio choice are discussed as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 533.93
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 802.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Best, M.J. and Grauer, R.R. (1991). “On the sensitivity of mean variance efficient portfolios to changes in asset means: some analytical and computational results.” The Review of Financial Studies, 4(2): 315–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, F. (1971). “Capital market equilibrium with restricted borrowing.” Journal of Business, 45: 444–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britten-Jones, M., (1999). “The sampling error in estimates of mean efficient portfolio weight.” The Journal of Finance, 54(2): 655–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.Y., Lo, A. W., and MacKinley, A.C. (1997). The Econometrics of Financial Markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, Vijay K. (1991). “Mean variance revisited: near optimal portfolios and sensitivity to input variations.” Russell Research Commentary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, V.K. and Ziemba, W.T. (1993). “The effect of errors in mean, variances, and covariances on optimal portfolio choice.” Journal of Portfolio Management, Winter, 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, G. (1984). “A unified beta pricing theory.” Journal of Economic Theory, 34: 13–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Santis, G., Litterman, B., Vesval, A., and Winkelmann, K. (2003). “Covariance Matrix Estimation,” in Modern Investment Management, B. Litterman and the Quantitative Resources Group, Goldman Sachs Asset Management (ed.) Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dybvig, P.H. (1985). “An explicit bound on individual assets’ deviation from APT pricing in a finite economy.” Journal of Financial Economics, 12: 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dybvig, P.H. and Ross, S.A. (1985). “Yes, the APT is testable.” Journal of Finance, 40: 1173–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F. (1996). “Multifactor portfolio efficiency and multifactor asset pricing.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(4): 441–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurter, G. M., Phillips, H.E., and Seagle, J.P. (1971). “Portfolio selection : the effects of uncertain means, variances, and covariances.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 6(5): 1251–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M.R. (1982). “Multivariate tests of financial models: a new approach.” Journal of Financial Economics, 10: 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M.R., Ross, S.A., and Shanken, J. (1989). “A test of efficiency of a given portfolio.” Econometrica, 57: 1121–4152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt, M. and Titman, S. (1987). “The relation between mean-variance efficiency and arbitrage pricing.” Journal of Business, 60(1): 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, P. (1986). “Bayes-Stein estimation for portfolio analysis.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 21(3): 279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R.W. and Bawa, V.S. (1976). “The effect of estimation risk on optimal portfolio choice.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lintner, J. (1965). “The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1): 13–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litterman, B. and the Quantitative Resources Group, Goldman Sachs Asset Management (2003). Modern Investment Management. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H.M. (1952). “Portfolio selection.” The Journal of Finance, 7: 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H.M. (1959). Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments, New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschak, J. (1938). “Money and the theory of assets.” Econometrica, 6: 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.C. (1973). “An intertemporal capital asset pricing model.” Econometrica, 41: 867–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaud, R.O. (1989). “The Markowitz optimization enigma: Is ‘optimized’ optimal ?” Financial Analysis Journal, 45: 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll, R. and Ross, S.A. (1980). “An empirical investigation of the arbitrage pricing theory.” Journal of Finance, 33: 1073–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R. (1977). “A critique of the asset pricing theory’s tests, part 1: One past and potential testability of the theory.” Journal of Financial Economics, 4: 129–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stambaugh, R.F. (1982). “On the exclusion of assets from tests of the two parameter model.” Journal of Financial Economics, 10: 235–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanken, J. (1982). “The arbitrage pricing theory: Is it testable?” Journal of Finance, 37(5): 1129–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanken, J. (1985). “Multivariate tests of the zero-beta.” Journal of Financial Economics, 14: 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W.F. (1964). “Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk.” Journal of Finance, 19: 425–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd edn. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, G. (1991). “Small samples tests of portfolio efficiency.” Journal of Financial Economics, 30: 165–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng Hsiao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Hsiao, C., Wang, SH. (2013). Mean Variance Portfolio Allocation. In: Lee, CF., Lee, A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Finance. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5360-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5360-4_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5359-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5360-4

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation