![Loading...](https://link.springer.com/static/c4a417b97a76cc2980e3c25e2271af3129e08bbe/images/pdf-preview/spacer.gif)
-
Article
Open AccessCorrection to: Impact of shared decision making on healthcare in recent literature: a sco** review using a novel taxonomy
-
Article
Open AccessCorrection to: Impact of shared decision making on healthcare in recent literature: a sco** review using a novel taxonomy
-
Article
Open AccessImpact of shared decision making on healthcare in recent literature: a sco** review using a novel taxonomy
Numerous articles and reviews discussed the effects of shared decision making (SDM) on concept-specific and direct outcomes, showing great variety in methodology and results.
-
Article
Open AccessA scattered landscape: assessment of the evidence base for 71 patient decision aids developed in a hospital setting
Recent publications reveal shortcomings in evidence review and summarization methods for patient decision aids. In the large-scale “Share to Care (S2C)” Shared Decision Making (SDM) project at the University H...
-
Article
Economic modeling of risk-adapted screen-and-treat strategies in women at high risk for breast or ovarian cancer
The ‘German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer’ (GC-HBOC) offers women with a family history of breast and ovarian cancer genetic counseling. The aim of this modeling study was to evaluate the...
-
Article
How to weight patient-relevant treatment goals for assessing treatment benefit in psoriasis: preference elicitation methods vs. rating scales
In psoriasis, several patient-relevant treatment goals must be met to be able to consider a treatment beneficial. To assess treatment benefit, the validated questionnaire Patient Benefit Index (PBI) can be use...
-
Article
Assessing the Importance of Treatment Goals in Patients with Psoriasis: Analytic Hierarchy Process vs. Likert Scales
To define treatment benefit, the Patient Benefit Index contains a weighting of patient-relevant treatment goals using the Patient Needs Questionnaire, which includes a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (“not...
-
Article
Cost-effectiveness of different strategies to prevent breast and ovarian cancer in German women with a BRCA 1 or 2 mutation
Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation are at increased risk of develo** breast and/or ovarian cancer. This economic modeling study evaluated different preventive interventions for 30-year-old women with a confir...
-
Article
Open AccessPatients’ Preferences for Outcome, Process and Cost Attributes in Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments
As several studies have been conducted to elicit patients’ preferences for cancer treatment, it is important to provide an overview and synthesis of these studies. This study aimed to systematically review dis...
-
Chapter
Analytic Hierarchy Process
This chapter gives an overview on how the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) methodology can be used to elicit patients’ preferences and presents case studies on how this methodology may inform HTA and HTA-based...
-
Article
How Well Can Analytic Hierarchy Process be Used to Elicit Individual Preferences? Insights from a Survey in Patients Suffering from Age-Related Macular Degeneration
In this study, we tested the feasibility of an interviewer-assisted analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in a special patient population with age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
-
Article
Focus Groups in Elderly Ophthalmologic Patients: Setting the Stage for Quantitative Preference Elicitation
Patients suffering from age-related macular degeneration (AMD) are rarely actively involved in decision-making, despite facing preference-sensitive treatment decisions. This paper presents a qualitative study ...
-
Article
Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Elicit Patient Preferences
In health technology assessment, the evidence obtained from clinical trials regarding multiple clinical outcomes is used to support reimbursement claims. At present, the relevance of these outcome measures for...