-
Article
Open AccessEvaluating complete remission with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) as a response criterion in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) treated with DNMTI therapy have responses according to the 2006 IWG response criteria. CR responses have had the strongest association with OS. Recently, CR with partial hematol...
-
Article
Differential prognostic impact of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
-
Article
Genomic Landscape and Risk Stratification in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
The advent of next-generation sequencing has allowed for the annotation of a vast array of recurrent somatic mutations across human malignancies, ushering in a new era of precision oncology. Chronic myelomonoc...
-
Chapter and Conference Paper
Argument Strength in Probabilistic Argumentation Using Confirmation Theory
It is common for people to remark that a particular argument is a strong (or weak) argument. Having a handle on the relative strengths of arguments can help in deciding on which arguments to consider, and on w...
-
Chapter and Conference Paper
Addressing Popular Concerns Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination with Natural Language Argumentation Dialogues
Chatbots have the potential of being used as dialogical argumentation systems for behaviour change applications. They thereby offer a cost-effective and scalable alternative to in-person consultations with hea...
-
Article
Clinical, molecular, and prognostic correlates of number, type, and functional localization of TET2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)—a study of 1084 patients
Loss-of-function TET2 mutations (TET2MT) are frequent early clonal events in myeloid neoplasms and are thought to confer a fitness advantage to hematopoietic precursors. This large, multi-institutional study (n =...
-
Chapter and Conference Paper
A Model-Based Theorem Prover for Epistemic Graphs for Argumentation
Epistemic graphs are a recent proposal for prob...
-
Chapter and Conference Paper
Polynomial-Time Updates of Epistemic States in a Fragment of Probabilistic Epistemic Argumentation
Probabilistic epistemic argumentation allows for ...
-
Chapter and Conference Paper
Towards Computational Persuasion via Natural Language Argumentation Dialogues
Computational persuasion aims to capture the human ability to persuade through argumentation for applications such as behaviour change in healthcare (e.g. persuading people to take more exercise or eat more he...
-
Chapter and Conference Paper
Invited Talk: Computational Persuasion with Applications in Behaviour Change
Persuasion is an activity that involves one party trying to induce another party to believe something or to do something. It is an important and multifaceted human facility. Obviously, sales and marketing is h...
-
Chapter and Conference Paper
Strategic Dialogical Argumentation Using Multi-criteria Decision Making with Application to Epistemic and Emotional Aspects of Arguments
Participants in dialogical argumentation often make strategic choices of move, for example to maximize the probability that they will persuade the other opponents. Multiple dimensions of information about the ...
-
Chapter and Conference Paper
Analysis of Medical Arguments from Patient Experiences Expressed on the Social Web
In this paper we present an implemented method for analysing arguments from drug reviews given by patients in medical forums on the web. For this we provide a number of classification rules which allow for the...
-
Chapter and Conference Paper
Updating Probabilistic Epistemic States in Persuasion Dialogues
In persuasion dialogues, the ability of the persuader to model the persuadee allows the persuader to make better choices of move. The epistemic approach to probabilistic argumentation is a promising way of mod...
-
Chapter and Conference Paper
Belief in Attacks in Epistemic Probabilistic Argumentation
The epistemic approach to probabilistic argumentation assigns belief to arguments. This is valuable in dialogical argumentation where one agent can model the beliefs another agent has in the arguments and this...
-
Chapter and Conference Paper
Persuasion Dialogues via Restricted Interfaces Using Probabilistic Argumentation
For persuasion dialogues between a software system and user, a user should be able to present arguments. Unfortunately, this would involve natural language processing which is not viable for this task in the s...
-
Chapter
Supporting Physicians and Patients Through Recommendation: Guidelines and Beyond
The recommendation task, intended as the task of supporting physicians in their activity (and, in particular, in decision making) by providing them indications of the most appropriate way of treating patients,...
-
Chapter and Conference Paper
Representing and Reasoning About Arguments Mined from Texts and Dialogues
This paper presents a target language for representing arguments mined from natural language. The key features are the connection between possible reasons and possible claims and recursive embedding of such co...
-
Chapter and Conference Paper
Using Shapley Inconsistency Values for Distributed Information Systems with Uncertainty
We study the problem of analyzing inconsistency in a distributed information system where the reliability of the sources is taken into account. We model uncertainty by assigning a probability to each source. T...
-
Chapter and Conference Paper
Reasons and Options for Updating an Opponent Model in Persuasion Dialogues
Dialogical argumentation allows agents to interact by constructing and evaluating arguments through a dialogue. Numerous proposals have been made for protocols for dialogical argumentation, and recently there ...
-
Chapter
Aggregation of Clinical Evidence Using Argumentation: A Tutorial Introduction
In this tutorial, we describe a new framework for representing and synthesizing knowledge from clinical trials involving multiple outcome indicators. The framework offers a formal approach to aggregating clini...
