Disc Damage as a Prognostic and Therapeutic Consideration in the Management of Patients with Glaucoma

  • Conference paper
Pathogenesis and Risk Factors of Glaucoma

Abstract

Some patients with glaucoma do not get worse, some get worse slowly, and some get worse rapidly. It would be desirable to know what characteristics allow accurate prediction of who will not get worse, who will get worse slowly, and who will get worse rapidly. Analyses have been done using various criteria (Table 1). Many of these have been done in an effort to determine what will provide the most sensitive indicator for future worsening of glaucoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 42.79
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 52.74
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Academy of Ophthalmology. (1) Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma (1996). (2) Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Suspect (1995). Preferred Practice Patterns. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study Group (1998) The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 4. Comparison of treatment outcomes within race. Seven-year results. Ophthalmology 105:1146–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson MR, Gaasterland D (1996) Translating research into practice: controlled clinical trials and their influence on glaucoma management. J Glaucoma 5:139–146

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kronfeld PC, McGarry HI (1948) Five year follow up of glaucomas. JAMA 136:957–965

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shiose Y, Kanda T (1974) Quantitative analysis of “optic cup” and its clinical application. Part II. Consideration on clinical cases. Jpn J Clin Ophthalmol. 28:367–374

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jay L, Allan D (1989) The benefit of early trabeculectomy vs conventional management in primary open-angle glaucoma relative to the severity of the disease. Eye 3:528–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Araujo SV, Spaeth GL, Roth SM, Starita RJ (1995) A Ten-year Follow-up on a Prospective, Randomized Trial of Postoperative Corticosteroids after Trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology 102:1753–1759

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Migdal C, Gregory W, Hitchings R (1994) Long-term functional outcome after early surgery compared with laser and medicine in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 101:1651–1656

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Glaucoma Laser Trial Research Group (1990) The Glaucoma Laser Trial (GLT). 2. Results of argon laser trabeculoplasty vs topical medications. Ophthalmology 97:1403–1413

    Google Scholar 

  10. Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group (1999) Results of the Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study. Am J Ophthalmol (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grant WM, Burke JF Jr. (1982) Why do some people go blind from glaucoma? Ophthalmology 89:991–998

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spaeth GL (1994) Reversible changes in the optic disc and visual field in glaucoma. Curr Opinion in Ophthalmol 5:36–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Spaeth GL, Fellman RL, Starita RL et al. (1985) A new management system for glaucoma based on improvement of the appearance of the optic disc or visual field. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 83:269–284

    Google Scholar 

  14. Burgoyne CF, Quigley HA, Thompson HW, Vitale S, Varma R (1995a) Early changes in optic disc compliance and surface position in experimental glaucoma. Ophthalmology 102:1800–1809

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chandler P, Grant WM (1965) Lectures on glaucoma. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, p. 14

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chandler PA (1960) Long-term results in glaucoma therapy. Am J Ophthalmol 49:221–246

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gliklich RE, Steinmann WC, Katz LJ et al. (1987) Primary open-angle glaucoma and visual field changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 12:63

    Google Scholar 

  18. Quigley HA, Adicks EM, Green WR, Maumenee AE (1981) Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma II. The site of injury and susceptibility of damage. Arch Ophthalmol 99:635–649

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Greenidge KC, Spaeth GL, Traverso CE (1985) Change in appearance of the optic disc associated with lowering of intraocular pressure. Ophthalmology 92(7):897–903

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Katz LJ, Spaeth GL, Cantor LB et al. (1989) Reversible optic disc cup** and visual field improvement in adults with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 107:485–492

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Spaeth, G.L., Hwang, S., Gomes, M. (1999). Disc Damage as a Prognostic and Therapeutic Consideration in the Management of Patients with Glaucoma. In: Gramer, E., Grehn, F. (eds) Pathogenesis and Risk Factors of Glaucoma. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60203-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60203-0_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64302-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60203-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation