Students’ Digital Learning Behavior Using the Mandatory and Non-mandatory Platforms in an Online Learning Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Transformation in Education and Artificial Intelligence Application (MoStart 2024)

Abstract

Student behavior in the online learning environment encompasses a variety of activities, including learning tasks and knowledge assessments supported by e-learning platforms. In this study, we investigated the behavior of 175 first-year undergraduate students enrolled in the Programming 1 course at the Faculty of Science, University of Split, during the academic year 2021/2022. The course curriculum addressed fundamental programming principles and both theoretical and practical aspects of application development utilizing Python. Instructional materials were delivered through the Moodle and CloudMap&Flash online platforms, consisting of four areas and nine instructional units. The instructional approach followed a hybrid model and was conducted between October 4, 2021, and February 20, 2022, spanning four distinct research phases. Our research aimed to elucidate students’ perceptions and engagement levels with online course activities across mandatory and non-mandatory e-learning platforms. To achieve this, we developed an original CAM model incorporating criteria to assess student behavior during learning and knowledge assessment. Our findings indicate a consistent pattern of student engagement with the e-course link, suggesting that activities on the platform are not accessed randomly by students. Moreover, we observed a notable increase in the number of course activities during the mandatory tasks of the initial phase, particularly among students in the Moodle group, compared to the non-mandatory tasks in subsequent phases. Furthermore, a heightened frequency of visits was noted during the formative and summative assessment periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
EUR 64.19
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 79.11
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lu, C., Cutumisu, M.: Online engagement and performance on formative assessments mediate the relationship between attendance and course performance. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 19(1), 1–23 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00307-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu, M.: The relationship between students’ study time and academic performance and its practical significance. BCP Educ. Psychol. 7, 412–415 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamdan, K., Amorri, A.: The Impact of Online Learning Strategies on Students’ Academic Performance. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94425. Submitted: September 1st, 2020 Reviewed: October 11th, 2020 Published: May 18th, 2022 Chapter in Mahruf, M., Shohel, C.: E-Learning and Digital Education in the Twenty-First Century, IntechOpen (2022)

  4. Novak, J.: Clarify with concept maps: a tool for students and teachers alike. Sci. Teach. 58(7), 45–49 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Novak, J.D., Cañas, A.J.: The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. van den Enk, M.C.: Develo** a Tool for Learning Concept Maps (final project thesis), Universiteit Twente, 2 July 2017

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weiand, A., Ludovico, F.M., da Silva Campelo Costa Barceloss, P.: Virtual learning environments in the light of mind maps and flashcards: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Innov. Educ. Res. 7(9) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., et al. (eds.): A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Allyn & Bacon, Boston. (Pearson Education Group) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Colbran, S., Gilding, A., Colbran, S.: The role of digital flashcards in legal education: theory and potential. Eur. J. Law Technol. 5(1) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wadsworth, W.: The Leitner System for flashcards: how to elevate your memory and learning, 10 May 2022. https://examstudyexpert.com/leitner-system/

  11. Huang, Y., Wang, S.: How to motivate student engagement in emergency online learning? Evidence from the COVID-19 situation. High. Educ. 85, 1101–1123 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00880-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferrer, J., Ringer, A., Saville, K., Parris, M.A., Kashi, K.: Students’ motivation and engagement in higher education: the importance of attitude to online learning. High. Educ. 83(2), 317+ (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Landrum, B.: Examining students’ confidence to learn online, self-regulation skills and perceptions of satisfaction and usefulness of online classes. Online Learn. 24(3), 128146 (2020). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i3.2066

  14. Wang, C.-H., Shannon, D.M., Ross, M.E.: Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Educ. 34(3), 302–323 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779

  15. Cole, A.W., et al.: Student predisposition to instructor feedback and perceptions of teaching presence predict motivation toward online courses. Online Learn. 21(4), 245–262 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gushchina, O.M., Ochepovsky, A.V.: Data mining of students’ behavior in E-learning system. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1553, p. 012027 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1553/1/012027

  17. Chen, C.H., Chiu, C.H.: Employing intergroup competition in multitouch design-based learning to foster student engagement, learning achievement, and creativity. Comput. Educ. 103, 99–113 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu, X., Qiu, J., Wu, R.: Research on the relationship between online learning behavior and learning effect of college students in the digital learning environment. In: Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, vol. 543, pp. 377–382 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. The jamovi project: jamovi. (Version 2.3), Computer Software (2022). https://www.jamovi.org

  20. Grubišić, A., et al.: A common model for tracking student learning and knowledge acquisition in different e-Learning platforms. J. E-learning Knowl. Soc. 16(3), 10–23 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Navarro, D.J., Foxcroft, D.R.: Learning Statistics with jamovi: a tutorial for psychology students and other beginners. (Version 0.75) (2022)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Office of Naval Research grant, N00014-20-1-2066 “Enhancing Adaptive Courseware based on Natural Language Processing”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Slavomir Stankov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Stankov, S., Tomaš, S., Vučić, M.M. (2024). Students’ Digital Learning Behavior Using the Mandatory and Non-mandatory Platforms in an Online Learning Environment. In: Volarić, T., Crnokić, B., Vasić, D. (eds) Digital Transformation in Education and Artificial Intelligence Application. MoStart 2024. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 2124. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62058-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62058-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-62057-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-62058-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation