Enhancing Learning Through Formative Assessment: Evidence-Based Strategies for Implementing Learner Reflection in Higher Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Perspectives on Higher Education

Part of the book series: Knowledge Studies in Higher Education ((KSHE,volume 11))

  • 331 Accesses

Abstract

Reflection is irrefutably one of the key concepts of education theory, and its importance and benefits have been widely explored and recognized across disciplines. The ability of learners to reflect critically through control over their own learning and construct knowledge and of instructors to modify practices that promote transformative learning (Mezirow, Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass, 1991) and support self-regulated, autonomous learners have been recognized as essential in higher education. However, a review of the literature from the past few decades shows that the learner-, situation-, and context-dependent nature of reflection remains obscure to most educators in both implementing reflective learning and assessing reflective thinking. The key challenge in using learner reflection for assessment for learning lies in measuring transformative learning, owing to a lack of “explicit and direct attention to the process of evaluating [it]” (Cranton & Hoggan, Handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Jossey-Bass, 2012, p. 531). Within the context of two institutions that prioritize integrating experiential learning (Kolb, Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, 1984), where critical analysis and synthesis of observations and reflections derived from concrete learning experiences are central and fundamental, this chapter aims to connect insights from theory, research, and direct experience to practices instructors can use to inform their own teaching by addressing thorny issues pertaining to implementing and assessing reflection. These insights transcend any single task, course, or program in higher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 128.39
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 171.19
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 171.19
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alhemaid, A. (forthcoming). Develo** speaking strategies among adult English-as-an-additional-language learners in performing the IELTS speaking tasks, mediated by audio tape-recorded and video-stimulated individual verbal reflection. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria].

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., et al. (2013). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. (Abridged edition). Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, V., Sheehan, S., & Munro, S. (2019). What does language assessment literacy mean to teachers? ELT Journal, 73(2), 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 3(1), 7–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colley, B. M., Bilics, A. R., & Lerch, C. M. (2012). Reflection: A key component to thinking critically. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombe, C. (2018). An A to Z of second language assessment: How language teachers understand assessment concepts. The British Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(1), 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranton, P., & Hoggan, C. (2012). Evaluating transformative learning. In E. Taylor & P. Cranton (Eds.), Handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 520–535). Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A., & Misailidi, P. (2010). Trends and prospects in metacognition research. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, S., & Davidi, I. (2005). After-event reviews: Drawing lessons from successful and failed experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 857–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fund, Z., Court, D., & Kramarski, B. (2002). Construction and application of an evaluative tool to assess reflection in teacher-training courses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(26), 485–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galante, A. (2021). Translation as a pedagogical tool in multilingual classes: Engaging the learners’ plurilingual repertoire. In Á. Carreres, M. Noriega-Sánchez, & L. P. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Translation and plurilingual approaches to language teaching and learning: Challenges and possibilities (pp. 106–123). John Benjamins Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, O. (2009). Education, multilingualism and translanguaging in the 21st century. In A. K. Mohanty, M. Panda, R. Phillipson, & T. Skutnabb-Kangas (Eds.), Multilingual education for social justice: Globalising the local (pp. 128–145). Orient Black Swan.

    Google Scholar 

  • George Brown College. (2019). Imagining possibilities: Vision 2030. Strategy 2022. https://www.georgebrown.ca/media/3281/view

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, L.-S. (2010). Do different modalities of reflection matter? An exploration of adult second-language learners’ reported strategy use and oral language production. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 245–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, L.-S. (2012). Use of oral reflection in failitating graduate EAL students’ oral-language production and strategy use: An empirial action research study. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), Article 27. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol6/iss2/27/

  • Huang, L.-S. (2017). Three ideas for implementing learner reflection. Faculty Focus. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-and-learning/three-ideas-implementing-learner-reflection/

  • Huang, L.-S. (2018). A call for critical dialogue: EAP assessment from the practitioner’s perspective in Canada. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 35, 70–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, L.-S. (2021). Improving learner reflection for TESOL: Pedagogical strategies to support reflective learning. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., & Wong, F. K. Y. (2008). A four-category scheme for coding and assessing the level of reflection in written work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(4), 369–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatri, R. (2018). The efficacy of academic reading strategy instruction among adult English as an additional language students: A professional development opportunity through action research. TESL Canada Journal, 35(2), 78–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kind, S., Irwin, R., Grauer, K., & De Cosson, A. (2005). Medicine wheel imag(in)ings: Exploring holistic curriculum perspectives. Art Education, 58(5), 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2017). Experiential learning theory as a guide for experiential educators in higher education. Experiential Learning & Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreber, C., Klampfleitner, M., McCune, V., Bayne, S., & Knottenbelt, M. (2007). What do you mean by “authentic”? A comparative review of the literature on conceptions of authenticity in teaching. Adult Education Quarterly, 58(1), 22–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulasegaram, K., & Rangachari, P. K. (2018). Beyond “formative”: Assessments to enrich student learning. Advances in Physiology Education, 42(5), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, K. (2016). Assessing reflection in English enhancement courses: Teachers’ views and development of a holistic framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 854–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loone, A., Joy Cumming, van Der Kleij, F., & Harris, K. (2017). Reconceptualising the role of teachers as assessors: Teacher assessment identity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1268090

  • Looney, J. (Ed.). (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittler, P. (1973). Assessment for learning in the mentally handicapped. Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, Q. D., Fernanandez, N., Karsenti, T., & Charlin, B. (2014). What is reflection? A conceptual analysis of major definitions and a proposal of a five-component model. Medical Education, 48, 1176–1189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD/CERI. (n.d.). Assessment for learning: Formative assessment. OECD/CERI International Conference, “Learning in the 21st Century: Research, Innovation and Policy.” https://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40600533.pdf

  • Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422/full

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, K. A., & Kajder, S. (2010). Eliciting and assessing reflective practice: A case study in web 2.0 technologies. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 218–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlovich, K., Collins, E., & Jones, G. (2009). Develo** students’ skills in reflective practice: Design and assessment. Journal of Management Education, 33(1), 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltier, J. W., Hay, A., & Drago, W. (2005). The reflective learning continuum: Reflection on reflection. Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 250–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poldner, E., Simons, P. R. J., Wi**gaards, G., & van der Schaaf, M. F. (2012). Quantitative content analysis procedures to analyse students’ reflective essays: A methodological review of psychometric and edumetric aspects. Education Research Review, 7(1), 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. A., Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Rust, F., Snowden, J. B., Gordon, E., Gutierrez, C., & Pacheco, A. (2005). Assessment. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 275–326). Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Victoria. (2018). A strategic framework for the University of Victoria: 2018–2023. https://www.uvic.ca/strategicframework/assets/docs/strategic-framework-2018.pdf

  • Villarroel, V., Benavente, M., Chuecas, M. J., & Bruna, D. (2020). Experiential learning in higher education: A student-centered teaching method that improves perceived learning. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 17(5), Article 8. https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol17/iss5/8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (2017). Embedded formative assessment (2nd ed.). Solution Tree.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wium, A.-M., & du Plessis, S. (2016). The usefulness of a tool to assess reflection in a service-learning experience. AJHPE, 8(2), 178–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-Shih Huang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Huang, LS., Khatri, R., Alhemaid, A. (2023). Enhancing Learning Through Formative Assessment: Evidence-Based Strategies for Implementing Learner Reflection in Higher Education. In: Stephen, J.S., Kormpas, G., Coombe, C. (eds) Global Perspectives on Higher Education. Knowledge Studies in Higher Education, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31646-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31646-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-31645-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-31646-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation