Abstract
Poverty remains a significant global challenge, despite ongoing efforts throughout history to address it. China’s fight against poverty, as part of global poverty governance efforts, has yielded valuable insights and examples for anti-poverty strategies, propelling changes within the global poverty governance system. This paper conducts a review of post-1978 anti-poverty research covering China’s ethnic minority regions, roughly dividing the research history into three distinct phases: 1978–2012, 2013–2020, and post-2020. The research findings at each stage are summarized in terms of research topics, perspectives, and paradigms. Based on these findings, the paper provides a forward-looking outlook on future research into anti-poverty efforts in China’s ethnic minority regions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Throughout the course of human civilization, poverty has been a consistent socio-economic phenomenon manifesting in various social forms. As such, poverty reduction has become a major concern and topic of research across the world. The United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development has set its primary goal as eradicating poverty in all its forms, aiming to eliminate extreme poverty for all people everywhere by 2030. In countries around the world, addressing poverty among minority groups stands out as the top priority of poverty governance and is a matter of significant government concern. In the United States, poverty is often regarded as disproportionately affecting non-white populations. Among the 75 million impoverished people in Brazil, the majority comprises Afro-Indians, Indians, and pure black people. In Australia, which has been described by sociologists as “an ethnic mosaic,” the indigenous communities constitute a significant portion of the socially disadvantaged population. While these groups differ broadly from China’s ethnic minorities in terms of their histories, social statuses, and political empowerment, they share certain similarities in terms of their living environments, social resource allocation, and socioeconomic status. They have all suffered, or are suffering from severe poverty.
In 1989, ** emphasized in his speech that genuine equality can only be achieved once all individuals enjoy an equal level of economic and cultural development. As such, national efforts to eradicate poverty have begun to shift towards minority areas (**. 1992. 巩固民族大团结的基础——关于促进少数民族共同繁荣富裕问题的思考(Strengthening the great unity of all ethnic groups—reflections on promoting the common prosperity of ethnic minorities). In: Up and out of poverty. Fuzhou: Fujian People’s Publishing House, 118–120." href="/article/10.1186/s41257-023-00096-x#ref-CR87" id="ref-link-section-d192039872e328">1992). From the contiguous areas of extreme poverty that were designated in 2011 by the Chinese government, to the 420 National-level impoverished counties that were removed from the poverty list in 2020, such ethnic minority areas, where extreme povertyFootnote 1 was concentrated, have been a cornerstone of the poverty alleviation and development program. According to “The Outline for Development-oriented Poverty Reduction in China’s Rural Areas (2011–2020)”, the Chinese government has designated 14 contiguous areas of extreme poverty throughout the country, of which 11 are ethnic minority areas. In 2015, The Decision on Resolutely Winning the Battle Against Poverty (2015) was released. Consequently, the central government of China escalated its investment in poverty alleviation within ethnic minority areas, aiming to bridge the development gap with non-ethnic minority areas by accelerating poverty reduction in the minority areas. This approach aimed to aid ethnic minority areas in esca** poverty as scheduled, thereby joining other areas in achieving moderate prosperity towards common prosperity.Footnote 2 From 2016 to 2020, the per capita income of the poor population of China’s ethnic minority areas saw an increase of 156% from 4,239 yuan to 10,770 yuan. This reflects the successful lifting of 31.21 million people out of poverty based on current standards, effectively eliminating both absolute poverty and overall regional poverty and realizing universal moderate prosperity.
The matter of poverty alleviation in China’s ethnic minority areas not only presents a major practical challenge for the entire Chinese population but also represents an important theoretical subject within academic circles in China. Over various historical periods, Chinese scholars have developed nuanced understandings of poverty in China’s ethnic minority areas, conducting extensive analyses and producing different interpretations of the root causes of poverty and the anti-poverty strategies that could alleviate it, leading to fruitful research outcomes. This paper reviews and consolidates the anti-poverty research on China’s ethnic minority areas conducted by Chinese academic circles since the implementation of China’s reform and opening-up policy in 1978. Further, it offers a perspective on future research into the issue of poverty reduction in China’s ethnic minority areas.
Methodology
This paper conducts a comprehensive literature review and analysis of anti-poverty research on China’s ethnic minority areas conducted by Chinese academic circles since the 1970s. Specifically, this paper divides the research into three chronological phases: 1978–2012, 2013–2020, and post-2020, and summarizes the research results at each stage, examining the research topic, perspectives, and paradigms. On this basis, the paper identifies gaps and shortcomings in the existing body of anti-poverty research into China’s ethnic minority areas and proposes recommendations for deepening and expanding such research.
Results and discussion
Anti-poverty research into China’s ethnic minority areas from 1978 to 2012
Thanks to the economic development and poverty alleviation policies implemented by successive Chinese governments, China’s rural economy has experienced rapid development since reform and opening up in 1978. This has resulted in a substantial reduction in the rural poor population, decreasing from 250 million in 1978 to 40.07 million in 2008. However, the overall progress in poverty alleviation within ethnic minority areas has been less substantial. According to The Rural Poverty Monitoring Results of Ethnic Autonomous Areas in 2007 published by the National Ethnic Affairs Commission (NEAC) of China, ethnic autonomous areas accounted for as much as 52.3% of China’s rural poor population. In essence, China’s poor population has become increasingly concentrated in ethnic minority areas. This issue has garnered widespread attention from Chinese academic circles, leading to an increased number of scholars exploring the conditions and causes of poverty, as well as the strategies for its reduction in China’s ethnic minority areas during this period.
Over the 34-year period from 1978 to 2012, it is worth noting that the concepts of poverty, national poverty alleviation policies, and socio-economic development have all undergone distinct phases of development. Regarding the concept of poverty, from 1978 to 1990, the academic community’s understanding of poverty primarily centered on economic aspects, with absolute poverty as the main focus. This perspective also formed the basis of the Chinese government’s anti-poverty policies and initiatives during this period. Since the 1990s, there has been a gradual shift in the academic definition of poverty from a purely economic dimension to having both economic and social dimensions. However, most of the Chinese government’s anti-poverty policies and practices continued to adhere to the standards of the previous stage (Chen 1986). Some scholars have suggested cultivating multi-level commodity and factor markets across various economic sectors, tailored to local conditions, with a continued focus on improving market functionality (Yang 1994). The second approach recognizes the value of technology in the battle against poverty. For some scholars, science and technology constitute the driving force behind rapid economic development in China’s ethnic minority areas (Huang 2016). In line with these adjustments in the poverty alleviation agenda, model transformation, and the enrichment of related policies, Chinese scholars have embarked on a reevaluation of the poverty and anti-poverty challenges in China’s ethnic minority areas in this new era. The focus has gradually shifted towards targeted poverty alleviation and eradication. In parallel, the research paradigm has been enhanced, with enriched research content and diversified perspectives.
Refined research paradigm: taking into account both the whole and the individual (2013–2020)
Compared to the previous stage, Chinese scholars at this stage had begun to pay closer attention to the complex and diverse individual variations in poverty across China’s ethnic minority areas, while also examining the broader poverty problem in these areas.
Comprehensive anti-poverty research on China’s ethnic minority areas
The holistic research paradigm analyzes the multifaceted aspects of poverty, and the systems, approaches, and principles of poverty alleviation comprehensively across China’s impoverished ethnic minority areas. Overall, poverty in these areas is marked by historical complexity, vulnerability, and sensitivity (Li 2016). It manifests as a web of spatial poverty, institutional poverty, capacity poverty, and cultural poverty, all intricately interwoven among China’s ethnic minority areas (Yuan 2016). In such areas, the targeted poverty alleviation model offers the advantages of precision and efficiency, addressing the limitations of the previous poverty alleviation system. These limitations include slow institutional change, high reliance on formal institutional channels, challenges in managing principal-agent relationships, and potential conflicts between informal institutions, such as moral norms and formal poverty alleviation mechanisms (Zhao et al. 2017). Regarding poverty alleviation principles, the targeted approach in China’s ethnic minority areas should adhere to the five new principles of development: “innovation, coordination, green, open, and shared” (Zhu et al. 2016). Some scholars have proposed that poverty alleviation and development in the concentrated contiguous ethnic minority areas facing extreme poverty in China should follow the philosophy of inclusive green development, considering their unique development characteristics (Zheng 2016).
Micro-level investigation of individual differences in poverty alleviation in China’s ethnic minority areas
The micro research paradigm focuses research on the targeted poverty alleviation of specific villages in China or a certain ethnic group. In a case study of a village in southern **njiang, Kong Lingying and others analyzed practical challenges associated with aligning targeted poverty alleviation projects with impoverished villages. They identified these challenges as stemming from the dual influence of local dynamics and the multiple organizations’ logic at various levels under the project system (Kong et al. 2017). Li Hui summarized the outcomes and challenges of targeted poverty alleviation in Village A of Linxia County. Based on a comprehensive review of the targeted practices, Li gave recommendations in three areas: enhancing the targeted poverty alleviation policies’ specificity, innovating targeted poverty alleviation measures, and fostering a shift in the poverty alleviation mindset (Li 2017). Zhu Yufu and Wu Shuhua conducted research on the targeted poverty alleviation of Monba and Lhoba ethnic groups, which both have small populations. They concluded that the targeted poverty alleviation of such small ethnic groups in China should develop distinctive industries based on the unique resource endowments of these groups in China (Zhu and Wu 2018).
Research focus: targeted poverty alleviation in China’s ethnic minority areas (2013–2020)
During this stage, Chinese scholars conducted extensive and in-depth discussions on targeted poverty alleviation in China’s ethnic minority areas, exploring various dimensions such as precise identification, targeted assistance, key contributors, and performance evaluation.
Precise identification of poverty in China’s ethnic minority areas
The prevailing method for measuring poverty involves calculating poverty incidence based on income and consumption (Yang et al. 2015). However, scholars argue that employing uniform indicators to identify poverty in China’s ethnic minority areas may not be suitable, given the complex array of contributing factors (Liu et al. 2018). Liu **aomin holds that rural poverty in China’s ethnic minority areas is more multidimensional than that in non-ethnic minority areas (Liu 2017). Building on this insight, she proposed the adoption of a multidimensional poverty index (MPI) system for China’s ethnic minority areas. This system assesses the poverty of farmers from various angles, including education, geographic terrain, susceptibility to natural disasters, and fixed asset ownership (Liu 2017). Another study by Wu **umin and others analyzed poverty among impoverished rural households in China’s ethnic minority areas. Their analysis utilized survey data collected from 3,260 impoverished rural households in 163 villages. The focus was on poverty indicators such as housing conditions, access to fuel, educational opportunities, and labor capacity (Wu et al. 2016). In addition, some scholars incorporated capacity poverty and rights-based poverty of impoverished households in China’s ethnic minority areas into the multidimensional indicators of poverty. This approach further explained the internal intricacies of multidimensional poverty (Wang and Gao 2019).
Targeted assistance for poverty alleviation in China’s ethnic minority areas
Post-2013, research conducted by Chinese academics on targeted assistance in China’s ethnic minority areas has primarily focused on aspects such as economic development, education, financial measures, and improvement in living conditions.
First, industry-based poverty alleviation has emerged as a crucial strategy. The development of characteristic industries based on local resource endowments is essential for the development and the poverty alleviation of ethnic minority regions in China (Chen 2017). Based on the survey data of 341 impoverished households across three ethnic autonomous counties in Guizhou Province, Liu Weibai and others examined the impact of poverty alleviation policies through economic development on the livelihood strategies and well-being of impoverished rural households in China’s ethnic minority areas. They employed statistical methods like the Probit model and the generalized exact matching method (Liu et al. 2019). Their findings revealed that this policy facilitated the favorable transformation of the livelihood of farmers, increased value-adding labor productivity, and raised wealth-seeking motivation among poor households. Consequently, poverty levels were reduced, vulnerability decreased, both among the impoverished and those who had escaped poverty (Li and Lu 2020). On the basis of the significant role of this policy in poverty reduction, scholars have further explored various approaches and strategies for poverty alleviation via the promotion of economic development in China’s ethnic minority areas. Zhang Qi and others proposed that targeted poverty alleviation should “mobilize poor households, rural economic organizations, enterprises, and the government as an organic whole to secure the high-quality supply of capital, technology, labor, system, land, and ethnic characteristic resources” (Zhang et al. 2019). Moreover, in an era of rapid development of science and technology represented by the Internet, an increasing number of scholars have highlighted the important role of Internet technology in creating new economic activity for poverty alleviation in China’s ethnic minority areas (Wang and Wu 2016; Mo and Zhang 2017; Zheng 2018a, b).
Tourism has emerged as a critical industry and major research focus for Chinese scholars within the context of poverty alleviation driven by economic development in China’s ethnic minority areas. Shu ** unique tourism products, and establishing robust ecological compensation mechanisms (Wang and Wang 2018). Simultaneously, the integration of ethnic culture into tourism should be encouraged through the revitalization and industrialization of ethnic festival culture, ethnic plant culture, commercial cultural heritage, etc.Footnote 4 (Zhang 2020).
Second, education-based poverty alleviation has also been advocated for. Some scholars believe that the key to fighting poverty in China’s ethnic minority regions is to “support self-confidence before poverty reduction”. They stress the importance of increasing the accessibility of education in these areas and enhancing the human capital of the impoverished. Wang Sangui and others advocate for a combination of cultivating self-confidence and improving educational opportunities to alleviate poverty (Wang et al. 2019). Implementing targeted measures to develop education can empower impoverished individuals to develop themselves and cultivate their inner drive to escape poverty. Chen Lipeng and others conducted an analysis of two typical education-based models of poverty alleviation in Inner Mongolia and Guangxi as examples: comprehensive education spanning from preschool to vocational education and targeted educational assistance (Chen et al. 2017). Based on the research on Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture of Sichuan Province, Wu Benjian and others proposed a high-quality poverty alleviation approach for China’s severely impoverished ethnic minority areas by reforming and improving the education model to support “diversified subjects, full coverage, and flexible forms” (Wu et al. 2019).
Third, living conditions should be improved for poverty alleviation. Enhancing the living conditions of impoverished households is another important strategy for realizing poverty reduction objectives and ultimately modernizing ethnic minority areas in China. Fang Sumei summarized the model of Huanjiang Maonan Autonomous County in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region as “supporting science and technology, improving the self-development capacity of farmers, innovating governance of migrant communities, and considering local realities” (Fang 2018). However, some scholars have raised concerns about the problems that persist in the process of improving living conditions for impoverished households in China’s ethnic minority areas. These challenges encompass poor awareness regarding the importance of improving living conditions for the impoverished population, a substantial funding gap for improving living conditions, and limited follow-up support for impoverished households (Wei and Song 2018). Ding Bo suggests that poor households go through stages of spatial deconstruction, rupture, and reconstruction during the process of improving their living environments. It is necessary to take multiple measures to help poor households adapt to new living environments and achieve internal development in new communities (Ding 2020). Scholars have also emphasized that when improving living environments, the agency of the recipients must also be considered, to stimulate the internal motivation of the poor, and respect the traditional culture and customs of ethnic minorities (Li and Zhang 2017).
Fourth, financial measures have been adopted for poverty alleviation. As an important model for development-oriented poverty alleviation, financial measures provide financial support for enhancing rural infrastructure, fostering characteristic industries, and assisting impoverished households in areas like farming and children’s education. This approach is widely recognized as the most effective way to help China’s ethnic minority areas to overcome poverty (Gao 2016). It emphasizes the precise alignment of financial services with characteristic industries, which is of great practical significance for targeted poverty alleviation and eradication in China’s ethnic minority areas (Sun 2016). However, improperly implemented financial measures will produce various adverse consequences. For instance, the practice of “interest to support the principal,” which involves accumulating debt, may trap poor households in a cycle of credit-induced poverty when they struggle to repay the principal on time (Shi 2019). In addition, it is unlikely that the problem of poverty in China’s ethnic minority areas can be fundamentally resolved by sole reliance on fiscal and financial support (Lu et al. 2016). Therefore, credit services aimed at poverty alleviation in China’s ethnic minority areas should prioritize empowering households to enhance their self-reliance and development capacity (Gao 2016). Fiscal and financial policies for supporting agriculture should be combined with favorable services offered by financial institutions to bolster the capacity for independent development of China’s poor ethnic minority areas (Sun 2016). In addition, it is necessary to further establish and improve risk and supervision mechanisms for financial measures aimed at poverty alleviation (Yang and Li 2019).
Acknowledging special participants in the battle against poverty in China’s ethnic minority areas
The engagement of rural elites in poverty alleviation in China’s ethnic minority areas has garnered attention in research. Studies have emphasized that rural elites make significant unique contributions to improving the effectiveness of poverty alleviation in these regions (Wu 2019). Their engagement can create an “elite assistance” effect by leveraging their own capital advantages and the formal power structures and kinship habits existing in specific fields (Liu and Liu 2021). However, some scholars have argued that the participation of rural elites in poverty alleviation has led to the appropriation of resources meant for poverty alleviation in collaboration with village-level organizations (Kong et al. 2017). To address this issue, they have proposed the establishment of a robust rural governance system that combines the principles of self-governance, law, and virtue, while cultivating civic awareness among villagers (Wang and Liu 2020). Additionally, the role of the resident first secretaryFootnote 5 has been highlighted. Resident first secretaries play a crucial role in directly assisting the impoverished at the grassroots level in China’s targeted poverty alleviation strategy (He et al. 2018). In essence, this collaborative anti-poverty governance mechanism, with the first secretary acting as a bridge, leverages the strengths of each entity, including capital, information, resources, and technology, through equal dialogue and consultation among various entities with a common goal (Li et al. 2020).
Poverty alleviation performance evaluation
Zhao Lihong and others developed a comprehensive performance evaluation index system to assess the effectiveness of poverty alleviation efforts in China’s ethnic minority areas. Their system covered dimensions related to the economy, society, and poverty. To evaluate the performance of poverty alleviation and development in these areas, they applied the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) (Zhao et al. 2018). Li Jun and others established an evaluation system that comprised five primary indicators including poverty alleviation performance, poverty alleviation accuracy, infrastructure, public services, and internal driving force. The system also included 17 secondary indicators, and 50 tertiary indicators to provide a comprehensive assessment (Li et al. 2018). Based on the data from a 2014 survey in ethnic minority areas of China, Liu ** used time-series principal component analysis to evaluate the performance of poverty alleviation and development in China’s ethnic minority areas. Their evaluation considered factors related to poverty foundation, human development, and production environment (Jiao and Xu 2015).
Diversified research perspectives: multiple dimensions such as gender, capital and space (2013–2020)
At this stage, research on poverty in China’s ethnic minority areas extended into economic and sociological perspectives. For instance, researchers applied the “interphase operation” theory from ethnic economics to assess the advantages and disadvantages of poverty alleviation policies in these areas (He 2018). They also utilized sociological theories, including social action theory, to examine the system of targeted poverty alleviation through compulsory education in China’s concentrated contiguous areas of extreme poverty (Li 2019). Additionally, various research perspectives, including gender, space, and capital were introduced into studies. For example, Li Zhuo and Zuo Ting conducted an anti-poverty study of China’s ethnic minority areas through a gender lens, finding that China’s current targeted poverty alleviation strategy overlooks gender inequalities within families (Li and Zuo 2018). Their findings suggested a need to prioritize addressing women’s poverty, targeting the specific needs of women in China’s severely impoverished areas, and enhancing the leadership roles of women in development initiatives. He ** and ** discussed the characteristics and causes of poverty among ethnic minority women in China, proposing poverty alleviation concepts and mechanisms centred on women’s participation (He and ** **ang. 2019. 当前少数民族女性贫困研究的进路与拓展 (The approach and expansion of the current research on the poverty of minority women). Journal of South-Central Minzu University (humanities and Social Sciences) 5: 72–77." href="/article/10.1186/s41257-023-00096-x#ref-CR20" id="ref-link-section-d192039872e823">2019). Some scholars examined the battle against poverty from the perspective of capital, emphasizing the pivotal role of social capital in addressing deep poverty in China’s ethnic minority areas (Cheng 2020). Furthermore, some scholars investigated poverty alleviation in China’s ethnic minority areas through the lens of spatial poverty theory. Zhang Lijun and others highlighted that the spatial poverty of ethnic minority areas in western China is rooted in the “geographical capital” structure, characterized by spatial barriers created by nature and relative differences in social-spatial layout. These barriers result in unequal distribution of social resources and opportunities across different areas (Zhang et al. 2015). Similarly, **ang Linglin and others noted the spatial distribution patterns of impoverished ethnic minority areas in southwest China, where there is a significant overlap between impoverished areas, ecologically vulnerable regions, and ethnic areas (**ang et al. 2013). Furthermore, Ou Haiyan and Huang Guoyong explored the relationship between natural geographical conditions and poverty and concluded that the natural geographical environment significantly affects farmers’ income and the rural poverty rate in China (Ou and Huang 2015).
Further acknowledgment of the particularities of China’s ethnic minority areas in alleviating poverty (2013–2020)
Targeted poverty alleviation efforts in China’s ethnic minority areas have taken ethnic unity into consideration. The goal of eradicating poverty in these areas and promoting unity among all ethnic groups are logically compatible in five aspects: goals, implementing bodies, target groups, work methods, and performance evaluation (You et al. 2018). Scholars like Wu Yujun and He **e observed that equal citizenship is fundamental to targeted poverty alleviation in China’s ethnic minority areas, as it can bolster the national identity of ethnic minorities (Wu and He 2019). Analyzing anti-poverty practices in ethnic areas over the past seven decades, Liu **aomin has examined interactions, exchanges, and integration among all ethnic groups. It was found that national policy support and social assistance, including pairing-off assistance, collaboration between eastern and western regions and targeted assistance, have deepened ethnic interactions, communication, and integration and ultimately fostered unity and common prosperity of all ethnic groups in China (Liu 2019). Contrastingly, scholars have recognized the great value of unique local knowledge in poverty alleviation efforts in China’s ethnic minority areas (Zuo et al. 2019). Some scholars have proposed that the formulation of poverty alleviation policies and programs for China’s ethnic minority areas should take into full account the religious beliefs and cultural traditions of ethnic minorities, gradually pushing for the “secularization” of religions (Li and **ng 2018); Others have recommended guiding the involvement of religious circles in targeted poverty alleviation and eradication efforts, to enhance their sense of identity and belonging to the Chinese nation (Li and Geng 2018).
The experience of poverty alleviation with Chinese characteristics gained in ethnic minority areas (2013–2020)
Wang Yanzhong and Ding Sai summarized the practices of poverty alleviation in China’s ethnic minority areas in four aspects: a) Attaching great importance to the fight against poverty and setting clear goals and responsibilities at various levels; b) Increasing financial investment and consolidating resources from across the country to enhance the quality and efficiency of poverty alleviation efforts; c) Applying innovative methods of poverty alleviation tailored to local conditions, driving overall economic and social development alongside poverty alleviation, and establishing a robust and stable long-term mechanism of poverty alleviation; and d) Promoting poverty alleviation through the CPC building, employing a range of measures such as paired-up assistance, resident teams, and targeted assistance from the CPC, government and military entities, as well as enterprises, and public institutions at all levels. These efforts aimed to bolster self-confidence, enhance capabilities, and encourage multi-party collaboration to combat poverty (Wang and Ding 2020).
Some scholars have further refined the experiences of targeted poverty eradication in China’s ethnic minority areas, focusing on modernizing the governance system and capacity in the new era. They argue that the key to precision poverty alleviation in these areas lies in promoting progressive practices through “precision” thinking. This involves balancing national coordinated development and regional differential development, while effectively managing the relationship among the country, ethnic regions, and the world. They advocate for the creation of a “multi-party collaborative” pattern (Shao et al. 2020). Lu Ni and Zhang Jijiao have proposed a poverty alleviation model that integrates the protection of intangible cultural heritage with poverty alleviation and development, based on the neoclassical structural–functional theory (Lu and Zhang 2020).
Post-2020 anti-poverty research into China’s ethnic minority areas
In 2020, China achieved a significant milestone by successfully eliminating overall regional poverty, marking a resounding victory in the fight against poverty. The path leading from poverty alleviation to rural revitalization has become the essential route for advancing socialism with Chinese characteristics, eliminating poverty, enhancing the well-being of the people, and gradually realizing common prosperity. In the wake of this achievement, Chinese scholars have shifted their focus towards other topics including the vulnerability and risk associated with a potential return to poverty among previously impoverished populations in ethnic minority areas, governance strategies for addressing relative poverty and multidimensional poverty to further promote common prosperity within ethnic minority areas, as well as the sustained reinforcement of poverty alleviation accomplishments and its effective integration with the broader goals of rural revitalization.
Research on the vulnerability of populations transitioning out of poverty and the risk of returning to poverty in China’s ethnic minority areas during the transition period (2020– ) Footnote 6
Ai Bin and others conducted an analysis using 2020 data from China’s dynamic management system of healthcare services for poverty alleviation. They examined the vulnerability of populations lifted out of poverty in China’s ethnic minority areas across three exposure factors: region, age, and education. The study also considered the sensitivity factors of technology gap, funding gap, disease, and resilience (Ai et al. 2021). Huang Guoqing and others developed a poverty-returning risk assessment system for households that had been lifted out of poverty in China’s ethnic minority areas. This system, based on the livelihood vulnerability analysis framework, found that human and financial risks are the primary contributors to the risk of returning to poverty (Huang et al. 2021). Geng **n categorized the risk of returning to poverty in China’s ethnic minority areas into four types: capacity deficit, policy-related, environmental, and developmental. The study highlighted the significant influence of factors such as ethnicity, literacy, household attributes, and the causes of poverty on the likelihood of returning to poverty (Geng 2020).
The transformation of poverty governance in China’s ethnic minority areas in the post-poverty era (2020– )
As the problem of unbalanced and inadequate development persists after 2020, poverty governance in China’s ethnic minority areas has shifted its focus from addressing basic survival challenges to fostering development and ensuring equitable sharing of the fruits of development (Zheng 2018a, b). Furthermore, the emphasis has transitioned from primarily tackling income poverty to addressing multidimensional poverty, and from a rural-centric approach to poverty alleviation to promoting coordinated urban–rural development (Wang and **g 2020). Ju Ying and others highlighted that relative poverty in China’s formerly deeply impoverished areas is a result of various factors, including resources, culture, the market, as well as the quality of the impoverished population (Ju et al. 2021). Consequently, poverty governance in China’s formerly deeply impoverished areas during the post-poverty era should be grounded in multidimensional poverty theory and support the sustainable development of these areas by guarding against and resolving natural risks, fostering industrial development, enhancing human capital, and improving social security mechanisms (Geng and Wang 2021).
Facilitating effective consolidation of poverty alleviation achievements with rural revitalization (2020– )
Problem analysis
In the post-poverty era, China’s ethnic minority areas, particularly those that were formerly severely impoverished, faced a range of challenges, such as low quality of economic development, cultural weaknesses, heightened pressure on ecological preservation, deficiencies in basic public services, talent shortages (Li Chungen and Chen Wenmei 2021), subpar living conditions and quality of life, implicit resistance stemming from ethnic and cultural diversity (Wang and He 2021), and inefficient institutional mechanisms (Ma **mei 2020).
Exploration of approaches
Advocates of various cultural avenues have proposed that the key to effectively linking poverty alleviation achievements with rural revitalization in China’s ethnic minority areas lies in promoting the flow and connectivity of factors, based on internal resource endowments and external social resource networks. This approach seeks to facilitate the natural connection between the “natural order” within rural society and the “constructive order” embedded in the outside world (Geng 2021). Additionally, the contribution of rural cultural heritage, represented by traditional ethnic festivals, to rural revitalization is worth special attention (Zhang and Hou 2020). The ecological approach emphasizes the significance of ecological revitalization in consolidating poverty alleviation achievements and facilitating the effective linkage with rural revitalization in China’s ethnic minority areas. Leveraging the advantage of local natural ecological culture, based on local natural ecological space and cultural fields, can provide guaranteed institutional support for ecological revitalization, achieving effective linkage by means of institutional guidance, industrial alignment, and technological innovation (Zhou 2021). In the third approach, scholars with an industrial sector-centric perspective positioned industries as fundamental drivers in consolidating poverty alleviation achievements and promoting effective linkage with rural revitalization in China’s ethnic minority areas. They advocate for cultivating and develo** industrial forms with competitive advantages in accordance with the “market logic + government logic” idea. This is based on the local endowment structure of production factors such as resources, labor, capital, and entrepreneurship, so as to realize rural revitalization and common prosperity in China’s ethnic minority areas (Zhu 2020).
Summary of local experiences
Drawing on the micro-level survey data of 1,143 households in 85 villages of 10 provinces in western China, Wang Zhizhang and Yang Zhihong explored approaches to integrating poverty alleviation and rural revitalization in western China. Their findings emphasize the need to optimize the linkage mechanism, establish a robust foundation for industrial development, enhance rural governance and ecological progress, and foster a culture of shared prosperity to facilitate positive interaction between the two (Wang and Yan 2020). Other scholars have conducted research on the linkage between poverty alleviation and rural revitalization in a single region (province and ethnic group) in China. For instance, Mo Jianlin examined practices in Tuyao settlements in Hezhou City and recommended that ethnic minority areas in western China should leverage their unique natural resource and cultural resources to promote the transformation and upgrading of traditional industries according to local conditions as a long-term development and revitalization approach (Mo 2021). Wu Dongmei argued that the effective linkage between poverty alleviation and rural revitalization in Tibet should prioritize institutional mechanisms, with poverty reduction practices smoothly transitioning through revitalization across industry, organization, ecology, culture, and talent (Wu 2021).
Conclusion and outlook
Over the course of more than 40 years, since China launched its reform and opening-up policy in 1978, Chinese academics have conducted fruitful research on poverty reduction in China’s ethnic minority areas. The outcomes of this research have not only been highly valuable in sha** poverty reduction practices in China’s ethnic minority areas under the new development paradigm but also hold importance as a reference point for global poverty governance efforts. Nevertheless, it should be noted that anti-poverty research on China’s ethnic minority areas still exhibits several shortcomings, primarily in three aspects. First, a significant portion of research is largely policy-oriented, with limited theoretical development. While the existing body of research on poverty reduction in China’s ethnic minority areas has practical significance, it is largely centered on interpreting China’s poverty alleviation policies and lacks substantial theoretical development. As a result, a native theoretical framework and academic schools in this field are yet to be formed. Second, research outcomes are relatively scattered and lack systematic cohesion. Poverty reduction in China’s ethnic minority areas is a systematic project, involving multiple stakeholders, strategies, and interrelated factors that form a cohesive whole. However, most of the existing studies focus on isolated elements within the battle against poverty, failing to construct a logical framework that encompasses the multi-faceted nature of the challenge. Third, research on the disparities in poverty reduction across China’s ethnic minority areas is insufficient. Existing studies do not delve deeply into poverty reduction strategies beyond achieving specific poverty alleviation targets in China’s ethnic minority areas. Furthermore, these studies do not adequately account for the regional, phased, complex, and dynamic characteristics of rural revitalization. This gap results in a lack of practical and targeted institutional analyses, mechanism construction, and policy design for effectively linking poverty alleviation with rural revitalization.
As China embarks on a new mission to build a modern socialist nation comprehensively, the need to promote the common prosperity of all ethnic groups in China becomes even more pronounced. Future research on poverty reduction in China’s ethnic minority areas needs to further deepen and expand upon the following aspects. First, the focus of research should shift from mere policy interpretation to the construction of an academic discourse system. Through map** patterns, enhancing mechanisms, and increasing the benefits of poverty reduction in China’s ethnic minority areas, research should establish an innovative theoretical framework for poverty reduction and enrich the theoretical models for poverty reduction and common prosperity in China’s ethnic minority areas. This effort will contribute to the construction of a unique theoretical discourse system with Chinese characteristics, concerning poverty reduction, outcome consolidation, and common prosperity in ethnic areas. Second, research should prioritize the mitigation of risks associated with returning to poverty and address issues of relative poverty and multidimensional poverty in China’s ethnic minority areas. Additionally, research should also investigate the internal drivers and sustainable development of China’s ethnic minority areas following the withdrawal of external assistance. Given the increasing frequency of unexpected disasters in recent years, more attention should be paid to the vulnerability, recovery, and resilience of China’s ethnic minority areas in the face of unexpected disasters. This entails investigation into the post-disaster restoration of living structures, production systems, and social frameworks in these areas, so as to provide recommendations that bolster their resilience and disaster preparedness, reducing vulnerability. Third, research should adopt both macro and micro perspectives, considering both holistic and individual viewpoints, while taking into account the the particularities and distinctions of ethnic minority areas, especially those inhabited by smaller ethnic minority groups in China (Zhang 2015). By doing so, researchers can develop practical models with regional characteristics for effectively linking poverty alleviation achievements with rural revitalization in China’s ethnic minority areas. Special attention should be paid to ethnic interactions, exchanges, and integration during the process of promoting rural revitalization and common prosperity in China’s ethnic minority areas, thereby strengthening the sense of community within the Chinese nation and exploring a path toward common prosperity centered on development, stability, and integration.
Availability of data and materials
The data used and analyzed in the study are available from the author on reasonable request.
Notes
The concept of “extreme poverty” involves two dimensions: policy level and academic level. The concept of “extreme poverty” in this article mainly refers to a policy expression, which appears in Chinese government documents, leaders’ speeches, and government department work reports. It initially originated from the regional units that were determined as priority for poverty alleviation work based on a comparison of the economic and social conditions across the country. On November 21, 2017, the Chinese government issued The Implementation Opinions on Supporting Poverty Alleviation in Extreme Poverty Areas, which clearly defined the concrete category of extreme poverty areas, including “Three Regions and Three Prefectures” and Poverty-stricken counties with a poverty ratio exceeding 18% and poverty-stricken villages with a poverty ratio exceeding 20%.
“Moderate prosperity” is a unique concept in China. It refers to “further improvement in the quality of life with sufficient food and clothing on the basis of meeting the basic needs”. Chinese scholar Chen Youhua pointed out that moderate prosperity is a concept used by the Chinese people to measure the quality of life, describing a state of life with a living standard between basic and affluent (Chen 2004). “Common prosperity” is an important feature of Chinese-style modernization and an essential requirement of socialism. It is the prosperity for all the people, in both material and spiritual life.
The names of Chinese scholars in the main text of this paper follow the Chinese rule of Chinese surnames first.
“Tourism revitalization” refers to the static protection of tourism resources and the dynamic exploitation and utilization, reproduction, inheritance, and development of tourism resources in the process of boosting tourism, emphasizing spatial coordination and integrated development in the holistic protection of culture.
Resident first secretaries are the officials of the Communist Party of China selected from governments, public institutions, and state-owned enterprises to serve as first secretaries in poor villages. They work to promote rural revitalization on all fronts and consolidate and expand the achievements in poverty alleviation.
A five-year transition period will be set for countries that have shaken off poverty, according to the Opinions of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council on Comprehensively Promoting Rural Revitalization and Accelerating the Modernization of Agriculture and Rural Areas. During this period, the major assistance policies will remain unchanged to gradually realize a smooth transition from concentrated support for poverty eradication to push for comprehensive rural revitalization.
References
Ai, Bin, Chen **e, and Jiapeng Chen. 2021. 我国少数民族脱贫人口过渡期脆弱性研究 (Study on the vulnerability of poverty alleviation in China). Journal of Minzu University of China (philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 5: 134–141.
Cai, Shuliang. 1990. 民族地区科技扶贫的制约因素 (Restrictive factors of poverty alleviation through science and technology in ethnic areas). Stockbreeding Market 2: 145–147.
Chen, Youhua. 2004. 全面小康社会建设评价指标体系研究 (Research on establishing assessment indicator system about construction of the well-to-do society. Sociological Study 1: 90–98.
Chen, Canhuang. 2017. 民族地区特色产业精准扶贫的逻辑起点、现实困境与路径选择 (Targeted poverty alleviation of characteristic industries in ethnic areas: Logical starting point, realistic dilemma and path choice). Economic Forum 12: 133–136.
Chen, Lipeng, Ting Ma, and Qiang Zhou. 2017. 我国民族地区教育扶贫的主要模式、存在问题与对策建议——以内蒙古、广西为例 (Modes, problems, and countermeasure of poverty alleviation through education in ethnic regions of China——Taking Inner Mongolia and Guangxi as examples). Journal of Research on Education for Ethnic Minorities 6: 35–41.
Chen, Aimin, Zhuo Wang, ** **e. Chengdu: Sichuan University Press: 60–85.
Cheng, Zhuo. 2020. 社会资本视角下破解西部民族地区农村深度贫困难题的路径选择 (The path to solve the problem of deep poverty in rural areas in western ethnic minority areas from the perspective of social capital). Southwest Finance 9: 38–48.
Cheng, Housi, Wenda Qiu, and Dewen Zhao. 1999. 边缘与“孤岛”——关于云南少数民族地区贫困成因的一种解释 (Marginality and “isolated island” — An explanation of the causes of poverty in Yunnan minority areas). China Rural Survey 6: 45–51.
Cui, Yuanpei, Jianzhong Wang, and QingLin Xue. 2019. 新**成立70年扶贫政策演变与设计 (The evolution and design of China’s poverty alleviation policy in the past 70 years). Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business (comprehensive Edition) 4: 66–71.
Ding, Bo. 2020. 新主体陌生人社区: 民族地区易地扶贫搬迁社区的空间重构 (New subject stranger communities: Spatial reconstruction of relocated poor populations from inhospitable areas communities in ethnic areas). Guangxi Ethnic Studies 1: 56–62.
Fang, Sumei. 2018. 易地搬迁与民族地区反贫困实践——以广西环江毛南族自治县为例 (Relocation and anti-poverty practice in ethnic areas—Taking Guangxi Huanjiang Maonan autonomous county as an example). Journal of Southwest Minzu University (humanities and Social Science) 9: 8–15.
Feng, Ying. 2010. 贫困定义的演化及对**贫困问题的思考 (The evolution of poverty definition and reflections on China’s poverty problems). Economic Research Guide 18: 6–8.
Gao, Tianyue. 2016. 贵州民族地区金融精准扶贫的难点及对策研究 (Research on difficulties and countermeasures of financial targeted poverty alleviation in Guizhou ethnic areas). Heilongjiang National Series 4: 71–75.
Geng, **n. 2020. 民族地区返贫风险与返贫人口的影响因素分析 (An analysis of risks and factors influencing the people returning to poverty in ethnic minority areas). Journal of Yunnan Minzu University (philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 5: 68–75.
Geng, Da. 2021. 民族地区脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴有效衔接的文化路径——基于一个少数民族村寨的文化扶贫实践 (A cultural path to effectively link poverty alleviation and rural revitalization—Cultural poverty alleviation practice in a minority village). Thinking 5: 130–139.
Geng, **n, and Cenyu Wang. 2021. 相对贫困阶段巩固脱贫攻坚成果的困难与对策——以原深度贫困地区四川省阿坝县为例 (Difficulties and countermeasures of consolidating defiovement in relative poverty stage—As an example of Aba county, Sichuan Province in the original deep poor area). Decision & Information 8: 57–66.
Guo, Peixia. 2007. 论民族地区反贫困目标瞄准机制的重新建构 (On the reconstruction of the targeting mechanism of anti-poverty in ethnic areas). Journal of Socialist Theory Guide 10: 15–17.
Guo, Peixia. 2008. 经济社会学视野: “少数民族贫困”的研究方法与重心建构 (From the perspective of economic sociology: Research methods and focus construction of “ethnic poverty”). Guizhou Social Sciences 9: 73–76.
He, Zhimin. 2018. 相际经营: 民族地区精准扶贫政策实践的新思路 (Interdependent management: Ideas for establishing precise poverty alleviation policies in ethnic areas). Journal of Guizhou Normal University (social Sciences) 2: 78–84.
He, **, and De** **"> Google Scholar
He, **ng, Wenlu Li, Pan He, and Guo’an Chen. 2018. 民族地区精准扶贫中驻村第一书记工作成效及对策研究——以四川省若尔盖县为例 (Study on the achievements and countermeasures of the First Secretary of the village in the precise poverty alleviation in ethnic areas—Taking Zoige County of Sichuan Province as an Example). Forward Position 6: 29–34.
Hu, Lingming. 1989. 民族地区扶贫工作若干问题的探讨 (Discussion on several issues of poverty alleviation in ethnic areas). Minzu Tribune 1: 7–12.
Hu, An’gang, and Jun Wen. 2004. 西部开发与民族发展 (The development west regions and nationalities development). Journal of Northwest Minzu University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 3:30-58.
Huang, Jianying. 1993. 科技是加速民族地区经济发展的主要动力 (Science and technology are the main driving force to accelerate the economic development of ethnic areas). Journal of **zang Minzu University (philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 3: 81–85.
Huang, Songwen. 2004. 西部民族地区农村反贫困的思路 (Thoughts on anti-poverty in rural areas of Western ethnic areas). Academic Forum 4: 95–98.
Huang, Guoqing, Yi Liu, and Pengfei Shi. 2021. 民族地区脱贫户返贫风险评估与预警机制构建 (Research on construction of returning to poverty risk assessment and early warning mechanism of poverty-relieved households in ethnic areas). Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition) 4:79–88+182–183.
Jiang, **ming, and Hangyan Jiang. 2007. 西部民族地区反贫困机制存在的问题与对策 (Problems and countermeasures of anti-poverty mechanism in western ethnic areas). Economic Review Journal 4: 34–36.
Jiao, Keyuan, and Xu. Yan**. 2015. 少数民族贫困县扶贫开发绩效评价的实证研究——基于时序主成分分析法的应用 (The empirical research on poverty alleviation performance evaluation of the minority poverty counties: Based on the principal component analysis method). Northwest Population Journal 1: 91–96.
Ju, Ying, Zhihui Jiang, and Jun **e. 2021. 南疆深度贫困地区相对贫困治理路径研究——以和田洛浦县为例 (Research on the path of relative poverty control in the deep poverty areas in Southern **njiang—A case study of Luopu County in Hotan). Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences 7: 251–254.
Kong, Lingying, Tao Zheng, and Zhui Liu. 2017. 集中连片民族特困地区精准扶贫项目实践困境与原因阐释——基于南疆地区S县W村的项目案例 (The practical difficulties and reasons of the targeted poverty alleviation project in concentrated and contiguous ethnic areas with special poverty—Based on the project case of W Village, S County, South **njiang). Issues in Agricultural Economy 10: 35–43.
Lang, Weiwei. 2000. 反贫困的民族社会学思考——以川甘滇藏区为例 (National sociological thinking on anti-poverty—Taking Sichuan, Gansu, Yunnan and Tibet as an example). New Horizons from Tianfu 1: 67–76.
Li, Ruihua. 2010. 构建少数民族贫困县贫困评估指标体系的必要性及思路 (The necessity and thinking of constructing the poverty assessment index system in the poor counties of ethnic minorities). Economic Forum 2: 40–42.
Li, Deying. 2016. 民族地区贫困的多维特征及精准扶贫对策 (Multi-dimensional characteristics of poverty in ethnic areas and targeted poverty alleviation strategies). Economic Research Guide 8: 28–29.
Li, Hui. 2017. 民族地区精准扶贫的调查与思考——以临夏县A村为例 (An investigation and a reflection on accurate poverty alleviation in minority regions—Taking a village in Linxia County as an example). Journal of Northwestern Ethnic Studies 4: 237–241.
Li, Fang. 2019. 集中连片特困地区义务教育精准扶贫制度模式研究——基于帕森斯的社会行动理论 (Targeted poverty alleviation system of compulsory education in contiguous destitute areas: Based on Talcott Parsons’s social theory). Journal of East China Normal University (educational Sciences) 2: 116–126.
Li, Chungen, and Wenmei Chen. 2021. 推进西部少数民族地区经济社会发展的实施难点与政策重点 (Implementation difficulties and policy priorities in promoting economic and social development in western minority areas). Shandong Social Sciences 3: 133–137.
Li, Junjie, and **n Geng. 2018. 民族地区深度贫困现状及治理路径研究——以“三区三州”为例 (Study on the current situation deep poverty and the path of governance in ethnic areas: Taking “Three Districts and Three Prefectures” as an example). Ethno-National Studies 1: 47–57+124.
Li, Junqing, and Juan **ang. 2018. 民族地区贫困成因及其治理 (The special factors of poverty in ethnic minority areas and its governance). Chinese Public Administration 10: 57–61.
Li, Yushan, and Lu. Yuanquan. 2020. 产业扶贫政策能降低脱贫农户生计脆弱性吗?——政策效应评估与作用机制分析 (Can industrial poverty alleviation policies reduce the livelihood vulnerability of out-of-poor farmers?—Policy effect evaluation and mechanism analysis). Public Finance Research 5: 63–77.
Li, Yujun, and Jijiao Zhang. 2017. 易地扶贫搬迁必须发挥受扶主体的能动性——基于贵州黔西南州的调查及思考 (The initiative of the supported subject must be brought into play in the relocation of poverty relief from other places—Based on the investigation and thinking of Qianxinan Prefecture, Guizhou). Journal of South-Central Minzu University (humanities and Social Sciences) 5: 156–159.
Li, Zhuo, and Ting Zuo. 2018. 深度贫困地区妇女反贫困的逻辑路径探析——基于社会性别视角的分析 (Analysis on logical path of women’s anti-poverty in poverty stricken areas from gender perspective). Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (social Science Edition) 9: 1–5+17.
Li, Jia, Li. Tian, and Lei Wang. 2017. 连片特困民族地区旅游精准扶贫机制研究——以四川藏区为例 (A study on the targeted poverty alleviation mechanism of tourism in consecutive poor ethnic areas—Taking the Tibetan region of Sichuan as an example). Journal of Southwest Minzu University (humanities and Social Science) 6: 116–121.
Li, Jun, Yongchang Luo, and Zhongbin Li. 2018. 民族村寨精准扶贫的效果评价指标体系研究 (Research on the effect evaluation index system of targeted poverty alleviation in ethnic villages). Journal of China Three Gorges University (humanities & Social Sciences) 1: 70–75.
Li, Jun, Rui Gong, and Shi **ang. 2020. 乡村振兴视域下西南民族村寨多元协同反贫困治理机制研究——基于第一书记驻村的分析 (Research on the multi-coordinated anti-poverty governance mechanism of southwest ethnic villages from the perspective of rural revitalization—Based on the analysis of the first secretary in the village). Journal of Southwest Minzu University (humanities and Social Science) 1: 194–202.
Liao, Yang. 2010. 民族地区贫困村寨参与式发展的人类学考察——以广西龙胜龙脊壮寨旅游开发中的社区参与为个案 (Participative development of a poverty-stricken village in Chinese ethnic area—A case study of community participation in tourism development of Older Zhuang Village of Longji, Longsheng Each Ethnic Autonomous County, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region). Guangxi Ethnic Studies 1: 45–50.
Liu, **aomin. 2017. 多维贫困视角下的民族地区精准扶贫——基于CHES2011数据的分析 (The accurate poverty alleviation in ethnic region in the perspective of multidimensional poverty: An analysis based on CHES2011 data). Ethno-National Studies 1: 36–46+124.
Liu, **aomin. 2019. 民族地区反贫困70年的实践与启示——基于民族交往交流交融视角 (The practice and implication of 70 years’ anti-poverty projects ethnic minority areas: From the perspective of ethnic communication and exchange). Guizhou Ethnic Studies 11: 61–69.
Liu, **aomin, and Shiyao Liu. 2021. 乡村精英带动扶贫的实践逻辑——一个基于场域理论解释湘西Z村脱贫经验的尝试 (Practical logic of rural elite driving poverty alleviation—An attempt to explain the poverty alleviation experience of Z Village in Western Hunan based on field theory). Journal of Minzu University of China (philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 2: 74–85.
Liu, Yan, Fan Li, and Shulong Dou. 2018. 民族地区精准扶贫研究:综述与展望 (Research on targeted poverty alleviation in ethnic areas: Summary and prospect). Social Welfare 8: 32–38.
Liu, Weibai, **aoyuan Yu, and Pengju Yuan. 2019. 产业扶贫对民族地区贫困农户生计策略和收入水**的影响 (The impact of industrial poverty alleviation on livelihood strategies and income levels of poor farmers in ethnic areas). Economic Geography 11: 175–182.
Liu, **aomin. 2016. 农户满意度视角的民族地区农村扶贫开发绩效评价研究——基于2014年民族地区大调查数据的分析 (An empirical analysis on the performances of poverty alleviation and development project in ethnic areas from the perspective of rural households’ satisfaction: Based on the “survey in ethnic minority areas of China” conducted in 2014). Ethno-National Studies 2:29–41+124.
Lu, Jianbiao. 2011. 关于民族贫困地区扶贫路径选择的理性思考 (Rational thinking on the choice of poverty alleviation path in ethnic poor areas). Inquiry into Economic Issues 5: 150–154.
Lu, Ni, and Jijiao Zhang. 2020. 新古典“结构-功能论”: 非遗传统民族技艺助力民族地区精准扶贫的经验和启发 (Neo-classic structure-function theory: Experiences and implication from targeted poverty alleviation through Minority People’s craftsmanship on the intangible cultural heritage list in minority areas). Journal of Guizhou Minzu University (philosophy and Social Sciences) 3: 68–99.
Lu, Mingning, Lu. Chen, and Fu. Liu. 2016. 基于信贷交易合约模型的民族地区农村金融扶贫研究——以四川省凉山彝族自治州为例 (Research on rural financial poverty alleviation in ethnic areas based on credit transaction contract model—Taking Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture of Sichuan Province as an example). Rural Economy 9: 80–83.
Ma, Yin. 1986. 发展商品经济是各民族繁荣发展的必经阶段 (Develo** commodity economy is the necessary stage for the prosperity and development of all nationalities). Ethno-National Studies 1: 46–51.
Ma, **mei. 2020. 乡村振兴与脱贫攻坚有效衔接路径研究——以滇黔桂石漠化片区为例 (Approaches to effective integration between rural vitalization and poverty alleviation: A case study of the desertification areas of Yunnan, Guangxi and Guizhou). Journal of Yunnan Normal University (humanities and Social Sciences Edition) 3: 84–91.
Mo, Jianlin. 2021. 一个深度贫困民族地区如何实现脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴的有效衔接?——基于贺州市“土瑶”聚居区的实地调研 (How can a deeply poverty-stricken ethnic area achieve an effective connection between poverty alleviation and rural revitalization—Based on the field survey of the “Tuyao” settlement in Hezhou). Rural Economy and Science-Technology 10: 202–204.
Mo, Guanghui, and Yuxue Zhang. 2017. 大数据背景下的精准扶贫模式创新路径——精准扶贫绩效提升机制系列研究之十(Innovation path of targeted poverty alleviation model under the background of big data—the tenth part of a series of studies on the performance improvement mechanism of targeted poverty alleviation). Theory and Reform 1: 119–124.
Ou, Haiyan, and Guoyong Huang. 2015. 自然地理环境贫困效应实证分析——基于空间贫困理论视角 (An empirical analysis of natural geography environment and poverty effect: From the perspective of space poverty theory). Journal of Anhui Agricultural University (soc. sci. ) 1:13–19.
Shao, Peng, Ronghua Zhang, and Lei Tao. 2020. 精准推进新时代民族地区治理体系和治理能力现代化研究——对民族地区精准脱贫实践经验的思考 (Accurately promote the modernization of governance system and governance capacity in ethnic areas in the new era: Reflections on the practical experience of precise poverty alleviation in ethnic areas). Guizhou Ethnic Studies 12: 64–70.
Shen, Qiu. 2017. **农村扶贫政策的历史演变和扶贫实践研究反思 (Reflections on the historical evolvement of poverty alleviation policy in rural China and the practice of poverty alleviation). Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics 1: 91–100.
Shi, Yuanyuan. 2019. 新贫困陷阱: 少数民族地区信贷扶贫政策反思 (New poverty trap: Policy reflection on credit poverty alleviation in minority areas). Journal of South China Agricultural University (social Science Edition) 2: 27–34.
Shu, **aolin. 2016. 新时期民族地区旅游引领产业群精准扶贫机制与政策研究 (Research on the mechanism and policy of targeted poverty alleviation of tourism leading industry groups in ethnic areas in the new era). Journal of Southwest Minzu University (humanities and Social Science) 8: 130–136.
Song, Caifa, and Lisha Zhou. 2010. 民族地区反贫困发展机制研究——以新疆和田地区墨玉、策勒、洛浦三县为例 (Research in anti-poverty development mechanism in ethnic-minority region—the cases of Moyu, Cele and Luopu Counties of Hotan Prefecture in point). Journal of **njiang Normal University (social Sciences) 12: 19–24.
Sun, Guanghui. 2016. 民族地区金融服务与特色产业精准扶贫耦合模式探索 (On coupling mode of financial service in ethnic regions and well-targeted poverty alleviation of feature industry). Journal of Northwest Minzu University (philosophy and Social Sciences) 3: 154–159.
Tang, Jian, and **aoqing Li. 2006. 关于西部少数民族地区农村反贫困的战略性思考 (Strategic thinking on rural anti-poverty in Western minority areas). Gansu Agriculture 12: 134.
Tang, Chao, Mingzhong Luo, and Weikun Zhang. 2019. 70年来**扶贫政策演变及其优化路径 (Evolution and optimization path of China’s poverty alleviation policy in past 70 years). Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management 3: 283–292.
Tong, Yufen, and Haixia Wang. 2006. **西部少数民族地区人口的贫困原因及其政策启示 (The causes of poverty of ethnic population in Western-China and its policy implication). Population & Economics 1: 7–12.
Wang, Laixi. 2007. 西部民族地区“富饶的贫困”之经济学解说 (An economic interpretation of “rich poverty” in Western ethnic areas). Social Science Front 5: 71–79.
Wang, Yanzhong, and Sai Ding. 2020. 民族地区脱贫攻坚的成效、经验与挑战 (Results, experience and challenges of poverty alleviation in ethnic areas). Journal of Southwest Minzu University (humanities and Social Science) 11: 8–16.
Wang, Sanxiu, and **ang Gao. 2019. 民族地区农村居民多维贫困的分层逻辑、耦合机理及精准脱贫——基于2013年**社会状况综合调查的分析 (Stratified logic, coupling mechanism and targeted poverty alleviation of rural residents’ multidimensional poverty in ethnic areas—Based on an analysis of the Chinese Social Survey in 2013). Journal of Minzu University of China (philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 1: 19–30.
Wang, Zhengwu, and Yuankai He. 2021. “四力”同构: “十四五”时期民族地区乡村振兴的困境与出路 (Isomorphism of “four forces”: Ethnic areas in the 14th Five-Year Plan period dilemma and outlet of rural revitalization). Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (social Science Edition) 4: 77–85.
Wang, Jiabin, and Huilan **g. 2020. 后扶贫时代青海涉藏地区的相对贫困及其治理机制构建 (The relative poverty and its governance mechanism construction in Qinghai Tibetan-related areas in the post-poverty alleviation era). Qinghai Social Sciences 5: 54–61.
Wang, **gxin, and Huibai Liu. 2020. 精英俘获视域下云南精准扶贫探析 (An analysis of targeted poverty alleviation in Yunnan from the perspective of elite capture). Journal of Southwest Forestry University (social Sciences) 3: 20–24.
Wang, Zhizhang, and **g Wang. 2018. 基于可持续发展的少数民族地区旅游扶贫绩效评价研究 (Performance evaluation of pro-poor tourism in ethnic minority areas of China based on sustainable development). Journal of Yunnan Minzu University (philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 5: 89–97.
Wang, Zhizhang, and Zhihong Yang. 2020. 西部地区脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴战略的融合之路——基于10省85村1143户的微观调查数据 (The way to integrate the strategy of poverty alleviation and rural revitalization in the western regions: Based on the micro-survey data of 11143 households in 85 villages of 10 provinces). Journal of Jishou University (social Sciences) 2: 71–81.
Wang, Jieyong, Yufu Chen, and Maochao Yan. 2016. 我国精准扶贫政策及其创新路径研究 (Research on the targeted measures of poverty alleviation and its innovative ways in China). Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences 3: 289–295.
Wang, Sangui, Jun Hu, and Wuda Xu. 2019. 民族地区脱贫攻坚“志智双扶”问题研究 (Research on“will-wisdom poverty alleviation” in ethnic minority areas). Journal of South China Normal University (social Science Edition) 6: 5–11+191.
Wang, Jun, and Haiyan Wu. 2016. “互联网+”背景下精准扶贫新方式研究 (The new ways of precise poverty alleviation under the background of “internet+”). Reformation & Strategy 12:111–114.
Wei, Wensong, and Caifa Song. 2018. 民族地区易地扶贫搬迁方略的实施及法治举措探讨 (Discussion on the implementation of the strategy of poverty alleviation and relocation in ethnic areas and the legal measures). Social Sciences in Guangxi 7: 120–124.
Wen, Jun. 1998. **民族经济政策的形成、演变与评价 (The formation, evolution and evaluation of China’s national economic policy). Ethno-National Studies 6:13-26.
Wu, Zeyu. 2019. 少数民族地区精准扶贫的路径——基于乡村精英参与的视角 (Study on the path of precise poverty alleviation in minority areas—The perspective of rural elite participation). Journal of Tianshui College of Administration 4: 60–64.
Wu, Dongmei. 2021. 西藏脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴战略有效衔接研究 (Study on the effective connection between poverty alleviation and rural revitalization strategy in Tibet). The Theoretical Platform of Tibetan Development 2: 67–72.
Wu, Yujun, and **e He. 2019. 国家认同视域下的民族地区精准扶贫问题 (Targeted poverty alleviation in ethnic minority areas from the perspective of national identity). Guizhou Ethnic Studies 9: 40–45.
Wu, **umin, Linmei Mao, and Zhiyi Meng. 2016. 民族地区建档立卡户多维贫困程度测量研究——来自163个村3260户贫困户的证据 (A study on the measurement of Multi-dimensional poverty of filing and check-in households in ethnic areas—Evidence from 3260 poor households in 163 villages). Journal of Southwest Minzu University (humanities and Social Science) 11: 146–153.
Wu, Benjian, Ling Luo, and Lei Wang. 2019. 深度贫困民族地区的教育扶贫: 机理与路径 (Educational poverty alleviation in poverty-stricken ethnic areas: Mechanism and path). Journal of Northwestern Ethnic Studies 3: 97–108.
**. 1992. 巩固民族大团结的基础——关于促进少数民族共同繁荣富裕问题的思考(Strengthening the great unity of all ethnic groups—reflections on promoting the common prosperity of ethnic minorities). In: Up and out of poverty. Fuzhou: Fujian People’s Publishing House, 118–120.
**ang, Linglin, **ang Deng, and **aosong Qu. 2013. 西南少数民族地区贫困的时空演化——基于110个少数民族贫困县的实证分析 (The spatiotemporal evolution of poverty in Southwest ethnic minority areas: An empirical analysis based on 110 poverty-stricken ethnic minority counties). Journal of Southwest Minzu University (humanities and Social Science) 2: 124–129.
Xu, Guiheng. 2010. 西部少数民族地区贫困问题新解 (A new interpretation of the poverty problem in the western minority areas). China’s Ethnic Groups 11: 66–67.
Yang, Jianqiang. 1994. 市场机制和宏观调控相结合 加快民族地区经济发展 (Combining market mechanism with macro-control to accelerate economic development in ethnic areas). Journal of Tsinghua University (philosophy and Social Sciences) 1: 6.
Yang, Yanzhao. 2005. 民族地区贫困原因与扶贫对策 (The causes of poverty in ethnic areas and the countermeasures for poverty alleviation). Theory Monthly 3: 33–35.
Yang, Mengyuan, and Hui Li. 2019. 金融支持视角下云南少数民族地区可持续脱贫路径研究 (On the Paths of sustainable poverty alleviation in ethnic minority areas of Yunnan Province from the perspective of financial support). Journal of Yunnan Minzu University (philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 3: 107–113.
Yang, Hao, Tianhui Zhuang, and Sangui Wang. 2015. 少数民族贫困测量:理论和实践 (Poverty measurement of ethnic minorities: Theory and practice). Journal of Southwest Minzu University (humanities and Social Science) 9: 33–40.
Ye, **aowen. 1994. 论民族地区缩小差距加快发展问题 (On narrowing the gap and accelerating the development in ethnic Areas). Ethno-National Studies 4: 11.
You, Jun, **aobing Li, and Jilong Li. 2018. 试析民族地区脱贫攻坚与民族团结进步创建工作的逻辑契合——以湖南省湘西土家族苗族自治州为例 (An analysis of the logical conjunction between poverty alleviation in ethnic areas and the construction of national unity and progress: A case study of **angxi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture in Hunan Province). Journal of Jishou University (social Sciences) 6: 102–108.
Yuan, Linjun. 2016. 民族地区的贫困问题与反贫困战略 (Poverty problems and anti-poverty strategies in ethnic areas). Administration Reform 4: 59–63.
Zhang, Junpu. 2008. 西北民族地区农村贫困原因的社会学分析——以甘肃省东乡族自治县为例 (Sociological analysis of the causes of rural poverty in Northwest Ethnic Areas—Taking Dongxiang Autonomous County of Gansu Province as an example). Inner Mongolia Social Sciences 3: 90–93.
Zhang, Jijiao. 2015. 民族地区社会治理研究动态 (Research trends of social governance in ethnic areas). Minzu Tribune 3: 5–9.
Zhang, Jijiao. 2020. “文旅融合发展”专题研究 (A special research on “integrated development of culture and tourism”). Guizhou Ethnic Studies 12: 139.
Zhang, Jijiao, and Da Hou. 2020. 民族传统节日: 结构遗产的“传统-现代”转型与文旅融合发展 (Ethnic traditional festivals: “tradition-modern” transformation and development of cultural and tourism integration of structural heritage). Guizhou Ethnic Studies 12: 140–147.
Zhang, Lijun, Yiming Dong, and Shi Han. 2015. 西部民族地区空间贫困陷阱分析 (An analysis of spatial poverty traps in Western ethnic regions). Ethno-National Studies 1: 25–35+124.
Zhang, Qi, Tao Zhang, and Shengnian He. 2019. 供给侧改革视角下民族地区产业精准扶贫的路径探索 (Exploring the path of industrial targeted poverty alleviation in ethnic areas from the perspective of supply-side reform). Journal of Southwest Minzu University ( Humanities and Social Science) 1: 97–104.
Zhao, Sijun. 1986. 民族地区扶贫刍议 (On poverty alleviation in ethnic areas). Guizhou Ethnic Studies 1: 23–26.
Zhao, Henan, Anshi Hou, and Yu Qi. 2017. 民族地区“精准扶贫”的实施难点与改进建议——基于四省民族贫困区的调查 (Implementation difficulties and improvement suggestions of “targeted poverty alleviation” in ethnic areas—Based on the survey of ethnic poverty areas in four provinces). Study and Practice 2: 51–60.
Zhao, Lihong, Qingfeng Hou, and Zheng Cheng. 2018. 精准扶贫视角下民族地区扶贫绩效评估研究 (Performance evaluation of poverty alleviation on the perspective of targeting on minority areas). Tian** Agricultural Sciences 3: 37–42.
Zheng, **aoyun. 1989. 对云南民族地区贫困问题的思考 (Reflections on poverty in Yunnan ethnic areas). Academic Exploration 2: 19–21.
Zheng, Changde. 2003. **西部民族地区贫困问题研究 (A study on poverty problem in the west minority region of China). Population & Economics 1: 7–11.
Zheng, Changde. 2016. 基于包容性绿色发展视域的集中连片特困民族地区减贫政策研究 (Research on poverty reduction policies in concentrated and contiguous poverty-stricken ethnic areas based on the perspective of inclusive green development). Journal of South-Central Minzu University (humanities and Social Sciences) 1: 115–121.
Zheng, Zhilai. 2018b. “互联网+”视角下民族地区特色产业精准扶贫发展路径创新 (Development path innovation of targeted poverty alleviation with industry with ethnic features in minority areas under the perspective of “Internet +”). Contemporary Economic Management 7: 35–39.
Zheng, Changde. 2018a. 2020年后民族地区贫困治理的思路与路径研究 (A research on the ways of thinking about and methods for poverty control in ethnic areas post 2020). Journal of Ethnology 6:1–10+95–9
Zhou, Wuyang. 2021. 生态振兴: 民族地区巩固拓展脱贫攻坚成果的绿色路径 (Ecological revitalization: The green path to consolidating and popularizing the achievements of poverty alleviation in ethnic minority regions of China). Journal of Yunnan Minzu University ( Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 5: 72–77.
Zhu, Haibo, and Fengying Nie. 2020. 深度贫困地区脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴有效衔接的逻辑与路径——产业发展的视角 (The logic and path of effective integration for poverty alleviation and rural revitalization in deep poverty areas: Perspective of industrial development). Journal of Nan**g Agricultural University ( Social Sciences Edition) 3: 15–25.
Zhu, Yufu, and Wu. Shuhua. 2018. 人口较少民族精准扶贫须走特色经济之路——以西**口较少民族门巴族、珞巴族为例 (The road of characteristic economy taken by ethnic minorities with population: Taking Menba and Luoba People in Tibet as examples). Guangxi Ethnic Studies 5: 112–118.
Zhu, Mingxi, Qiaobin Feng, and Peixia Guo. 2008. 从扶贫看少数民族地区“新农村建设”的艰巨性和复杂性 (The difficulty and complexity of “new rural construction” in ethnic minority areas from the perspective of poverty alleviation). Review of Economic Research 4: 2–23.
Zhu, Hui, Guanghui Mo, and Yu. Zekun. 2016. 新发展理念与少数民族地区精准扶贫的契合及实践策略——精准扶贫绩效提升机制系列研究之四 (The new development concept and the precise poverty alleviation in minority areas and its practical strategies—Upgrading mechanism of precise poverty alleviation performance IV). Reformation & Strategy 12: 43–47+124.
Zhuang, Tianhui, and Jun Zhang. 2012. 民族地区扶贫开发研究——基于致贫因子与孕灾环境契合的视角 (Research on poverty alleviation and development in minority areas under the fit of impoverishment factors and hazard inducing environment). Issues in Agricultural Economy 8: 50–55+111.
Zuo, Ting, Zhuo Li, and Mengyuan Zhao. 2019. 少数民族地区贫困人口减贫与发展的内生动力研究——基于文化视角的分析 (Study on the endogenous motivation of poverty reduction and development of poverty-stricken population in ethnic minority areas—An analysis based on cultural perspective). Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics 6: 85–91.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This paper is a phased result of the Project of the National Social Science Fund of China "Study on the Poverty Governance Experience and Sustainable Development of Dulong and Nu Autonomous County in Gongshan" (Project No.: 20BMZ136), the major project of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences National condition survey "Research on poverty reduction due to epidemic in ethnic areas and the support of people in special difficulties" (Project No.: GQZD2021004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Shiyao Liu completes the writing of the article. The author read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
I have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, S. Research on anti-poverty efforts in China’s ethnic minority areas since the 1970s. Int. j. anthropol. ethnol. 7, 17 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-023-00096-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-023-00096-x