Kang N, Liu CQ. Towards landscape visual quality evaluation: methodologies, technologies, and recommendations. Ecol Ind. 2022;142: 109174.
Article
Google Scholar
Setijanti P, Defiana I, Setyawan W, Silas J, Firmaningtyas S, Ernawati R. Traditional settlement livability in creating sustainable living. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;179:204–11.
Article
Google Scholar
Sauer, C. The morphology of landscape. The cultural geography reader. Routledge, 2008: 108–116.
Wang YC, Shi YS, Chen T. Research progress and prospects of traditional territory cultural landscape. J Tongji Univer. 2009;20(1):18–24.
Google Scholar
Buhalis D, Leung XY, Fan D, Darcy S, Chen G, Xu F, Tan GWH, Farmaki A. Tourism 2030 and the contribution to the sustainable development goals: the tourism review viewpoint. Tourism review. 2023;78(2):293–313.
Article
Google Scholar
Kang N, **e GH, Liu CQ. Assessment of society’s perceptions on cultural ecosystem services in a cultural landscape in Nanchang, China. Sustainability. 2023;15(13):10308.
Article
Google Scholar
Zhou X, Tan ZM, Chen SQ. The experience evaluation of urban landscape of historical & cultural blocks based on eye-tracking: a case study of Yong qing fang. Guangzhou Chinese Landscape Architec. 2023;39(12):54–9.
Google Scholar
Misthos LM, Krassanakis V, Merlemis N, Kesidis AL. Modeling the visual landscape: a review on approaches, methods and techniques. Sensors. 2023;23(19):8135.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
López-Santiago CA, Oteros-Rozas E, Martín-López B, Plieninger T, Martín EG, González AJ. Using visual stimuli to explore the social perceptions of ecosystem services in cultural landscapes: the case of transhumance in Mediterranean Spain. Eco Soc. 2014;19(2):16.
Google Scholar
Daniel TC, Vining J. Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality. Behavior and the natural environment. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1983: 39–84.
Arriaza M, Cañas-Ortega JF, Cañas-Madueño JA, Ruiz-Aviles P. Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan. 2004;69(1):115–25.
Article
Google Scholar
Daniel TC. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landsc Urban Plan. 2001;54(1–4):267–81.
Article
Google Scholar
Dallimer M, Tinch D, Hanley N, Irvine KN, Rouquette JR, Warren PH, Maltby L, Gaston KJ, Armsworth PR. Quantifying preferences for the natural world using monetary and nonmonetary assessments of value. Conservat Bio. 2014;28(2):404–13.
Article
Google Scholar
Pazhouhanfar M, Kamal M. Effect of predictors of visual preference as characteristics of urban natural landscapes in increasing perceived restorative potential. Urban Forest Urban Green. 2014;13(1):145–51.
Article
Google Scholar
Berto R. Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. J Environ Psychol. 2005;25(3):249–59.
Article
Google Scholar
Schüpbach B, Kay S. Validation of a visual landscape quality indicator for agrarian landscapes using public participatory GIS data. Landsc Urban Plan. 2024;241: 104906.
Article
Google Scholar
Berleant, A. The aesthetics of environment. Temple University Press, 2010.
Wan C, Shen GQ, Choi S. Eliciting users’ preferences and values in urban parks: evidence from analyzing social media data from Hong Kong. Urban Forest Urban Green. 2021;62: 127172.
Article
Google Scholar
Zube EH, Sell JL, Taylor JG. Landscape perception: research, application and theory. Landscape Plann. 1982;9(1):1–33.
Article
Google Scholar
Hanley N, Mourato S, Wright RE. Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental evaluation? J Econ Surveys. 2001;15(3):435–62.
Article
Google Scholar
Tieskens KF, Van Zanten BT, Schulp CJE, Verburg PH. Aesthetic appreciation of the cultural landscape through social media: an analysis of revealed preference in the Dutch river landscape. Landsc Urban Plan. 2018;177:128–37.
Article
Google Scholar
Li S, Yang B. Social media for landscape planning and design: a review and discussion. Landsc Res. 2022;47(5):648–63.
Article
Google Scholar
Chen D, Long X, Li Z, Liao C, **e C, Che S. Exploring the determinants of urban green space utilization based on microblog Check-In data in Shanghai, China. Forests. 2021;12(12):1783.
Article
Google Scholar
Zhu J, Xu C. Sina microblog sentiment in Bei**g city parks as measure of demand for urban green space during the COVID-19. Urban Forest Urban Green. 2021;58: 126913.
Article
Google Scholar
Hamstead ZA, Fisher D, Ilieva RT, Wood SA, McPhearson T, Kremer P. Geolocated social media as a rapid indicator of park visitation and equitable park access. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 2018;72:38–50.
Article
Google Scholar
Bruzzese S, Ahmed W, Blanc S, Brun F. Ecosystem services: a social and semantic network analysis of public opinion on Twitter. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(22):15012.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Van Berkel DB, Tabrizian P, Dorning MA, Smart L, Newcomb D, Mehaffey M, Neale A, Meentemeyer RK. Quantifying the visual-sensory landscape qualities that contribute to cultural ecosystem services using social media and LiDAR. Ecosyst Serv. 2018;31:326–35.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Zhang ZD, Xu CY, Gong L, Cai BJ, Li CC, Huang GY, Li B. Assessment on structural quality of landscapes in green space of Bei**g suburban parks by SBE method. Scientia Silvae Sinicae. 2011;47(8):53–60.
Google Scholar
Wartmann FM, Frick J, Kienast F, Hunziker M. Factors influencing visual landscape quality perceived by the public. Results from a national survey. Land Urban Plann. 2021;208:104024.
Article
Google Scholar
Ma B, Hauer RJ, Xu C, Li W. Visualizing evaluation model of human perceptions and characteristic indicators of landscape visual quality in urban green spaces by using nomograms. Urban Forest Urban Green. 2021;65: 127314.
Article
Google Scholar
Cassatella C, Peano A. Landscape indicators. Springer, 2011.
Medeiros A, Fernandes C, Gonçalves JF, Farinha-Marques P. Research trends on integrative landscape assessment using indicators–a systematic review. Ecol Ind. 2021;129: 107815.
Article
Google Scholar
Lee DK, Ok JH, Hong CS, Youn SW, Park CS, Yoo HS. A study on assessment and classification about rural landscape resources-centered on comprehensive development project of Rural village. J Korean Soc Of Rural Plann. 2005;11(2):21–34.
Google Scholar
Birks M, Mills J. Grounded theory: A practical guide. Sage, 2015.
Cao H, Wang M, Su S, Kang M. Explicit quantification of coastal cultural ecosystem services: a novel approach based on the content and sentimental analysis of social media. Ecol Ind. 2022;137: 108756.
Article
Google Scholar
Linders D. From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Gov Inf Q. 2012;29(4):446–54.
Article
Google Scholar
Charalabidis Y, Loukis NE, Androutsopoulou A, Karkaletsis V, Triantafillou A. Passive crowdsourcing in government using social media. Transform Govern People Process Policy. 2014;8(2):283–308.
Google Scholar
Brabham DC. Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: an introduction and cases. Convergence. 2008;14(1):75–90.
Article
Google Scholar
Van Zanten BT, Van Berkel DB, Meentemeyer RK, Smith JW, Tieskens KF, Verburg PH. Continental-scale quantification of landscape values using social media data. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113(46):12974–9.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Xu J, Xu J, Gu Z, Chen G, Li M, Wu Z. Network text analysis of visitors’ perception of multi-sensory interactive experience in urban forest parks in China. Forests. 2022;13(9):1451.
Article
Google Scholar
Chen Y, Parkins JR, Sherren K. Using geo-tagged Instagram posts to reveal landscape values around current and proposed hydroelectric dams and their reservoirs. Landsc Urban Plan. 2018;170:283–92.
Article
Google Scholar
Kowkabi L. The fundamental characteristics of the rural landscape through application of grounded theory (case study: historic village of Furg). J Environ Stud. 2020;45(4):693–709.
Google Scholar
Wolf ID, Stricker HK, Hagenloh G. Interpretive media that attract park visitors and enhance their experiences: A comparison of modern and traditional tools using GPS tracking and GIS technology. Tourism Manage Perspect. 2013;7:59–72.
Article
Google Scholar
Pardo-García S, Mérida-Rodríguez M. Measurement of visual parameters of landscape using projections of photographs in GIS. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 2017;61:56–65.
Article
Google Scholar
Panero J, Zelnik M. Human dimension and interior space: a source book of design reference standards. Watson-Guptill, 1979.
Hosmer Jr DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
Lee W, Lam SK, Zhang Y, Yang R, Cai J. Review of methodological workflow, interpretation and limitations of nomogram application in cancer study. Radiat Med Protect. 2022;3(4):200–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Lv X, McCabe S. Expanding theory of tourists’ destination loyalty: the role of sensory impressions. Tour Manage. 2020;77: 104026.
Article
Google Scholar
Zhang L, Zhang J, Liu B. Landscape context perception value of traditional village: a study based on tourist behavior preference. Chinese Landscape Archi. 2017;33(8):92–6.
Google Scholar
Coeterier JF. Lay people’s evaluation of historic sites. Landsc Urban Plan. 2002;59(2):111–23.
Article
Google Scholar
Cañas I, Ayuga E, Ayuga F. A contribution to the assessment of scenic quality of landscapes based on preferences expressed by the public. Land Use Policy. 2009;26(4):1173–81.
Article
Google Scholar
Ratliff F. Contour and contrast. Proc Am Philos Soc. 1971;115(2):150–63.
Google Scholar
O’Connor Z. Colour, contrast and gestalt theories of perception: the impact in contemporary visual communications design. Color Res Appl. 2015;40(1):85–92.
Article
Google Scholar
Kaplan R, Kaplan S. The experience of nature a psychological perspective. USA: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
Google Scholar
Purcell AT, Lamb RJ. Preference and naturalness: An ecological approach. Landscape Urban Plann. 1998;42(1):57–66.
Article
Google Scholar
Kaplan R, Kaplan S, Ryan R. With people in mind: design and management of everyday nature. J Environ Psychol. 1998;21(4):325–7.
Google Scholar
Bjerke T, Østdahl T, Thrane C, Strumse E. Vegetation density of urban parks and perceived appropriateness for recreation. Urban Forest Urban Green. 2006;5(1):35–44.
Article
Google Scholar
Zhang Z, Wu M. Study on the carrier element system of “Nostalgic Landscape.” Chinese Landsc Archit. 2019;35(11):97–101.
Google Scholar
Piorr HP. Environmental policy, agri-environmental indicators and landscape indicators. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2003;98(1–3):17–33.
Article
Google Scholar
Baddeley AD, Andrade J. Working memory and the vividness of imagery. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000;129(1):126.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gao Y, Zhang T, Zhang W, Meng H, Zhang Z. Research on visual behavior characteristics and cognitive evaluation of different types of forest landscape spaces. Urban Forest Urban Green. 2020;54: 126788.
Article
Google Scholar
Rainero C, Modarelli G. The attractive power of rural destinations and a synergistic community cooperative approach: a “tourismability” case. Sustainability. 2020;12(17):7233.
Article
Google Scholar
Fang Y, Liu J. Cultural landscape evolution of traditional agricultural villages in North China—Case of Qianzhai Village in Shandong Province. Chin Geogra Sci. 2008;18:308–15.
Article
Google Scholar
Wheeler R. Mining memories in a rural community: Landscape, temporality and place identity. J Rural Stud. 2014;36:22–32.
Article
Google Scholar
Maly M, Dalmage H, Michaels N. The end of an idyllic world: nostalgia narratives, race, and the construction of white powerlessness. Crit Sociol. 2013;39(5):757–79.
Article
Google Scholar
Quercia D, Schifanella R, Aiello LM. The shortest path to happiness: Recommending beautiful, quiet, and happy routes in the city. Proceedings of the 25th ACM conference on Hypertext and social media. 2014.
Kim JH. The antecedents of memorable tourism experiences: The development of a scale to measure the destination attributes associated with memorable experiences. Tour Manage. 2014;44:34–45.
Article
Google Scholar