Abstract
Background
Chlamydia psittaci (C. psittaci) causes parrot fever in humans. Development of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) enables the identification of C. psittaci.
Methods
This study aimed to determine the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of parrot fever cases in China. A multi-center observational study was conducted in 44 tertiary and secondary hospitals across 14 provinces and municipalities between April 2019 and October 2021.
Results
A total of 4545 patients with complicated or atypical pulmonary infection were included in the study, among which the prevalence of C. psittaci was determined to be 2.1% using mNGS. The prevalence of C. psittaci was further determined across demographic groups and types of specimens. It was significantly higher in patients with senior age (2.6% in those > 50 years), winter-spring (3.6%; particularly in December, January, and February), and southwestern (3.4%) and central and southern China (2.7%) (each P < 0.001). Moreover, the prevalence was the highest in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) (2.9%), compared with sputum (1.1%) and peripheral blood specimens (0.9%). Additionally, co-infection of principal microorganisms was compared. Certain microorganisms were more likely to co-infect in parrot fever cases, such as Candida albicans in BALF (26.7%) and peripheral blood (6.3%), compared with non-parrot fever cases (19.7% and 1.3%); however, they did not significantly differ (each P > 0.05).
Conclusion
Parrot fever remains low in patients with complicated or atypical pulmonary infection. It is likely to occur in winter-spring and southwestern region in China. BALF may be the optimal specimen in the application of mNGS. Co-infection of multiple microorganisms should be further considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
Background
Psittacosis, also known as parrot fever and ornithosis, is a zoonotic infectious disease caused by Chlamydia psittaci (C. psittaci) that is aerobic gram-negative bacterium [1]. Birds are natural hosts of C. psittaci that could spread through feces and respiratory secretions [2]. Humans become infected with C. psittaci through direct contact with infected birds or by inhaling aerosols or dust containing C. psittaci [3]. Furthermore, human-to-human transmission of C. psittaci has been documented [1, 4]. All birds and humans of all ages are susceptible to C. psittaci; however, it is more common in adults, especially those who have contact with pet birds and poultry including pet bird owners, pet store employees, poultry slaughter workers, and veterinarians [5]. Parrot fever is sporadic worldwide, such as the USA [6], Europe [7, 8], Australia [9], and Japan [10]. In China, multiple cases of parrot fever have been increasingly reported in recent years [11, 33]. In our study, we observed highest prevalence of C. psittaci in December, January, and February, which is winter in China. However, parrot fever has been likely to occur in spring and summer in the Netherlands [34]. Another study in the Netherlands further showed that parrot fever occurred significantly higher in spring than that in other seasons [25]. The seasonality may be further studied. Additionally, multiple case reports found that parrot fever might be more common in southwestern China and southern China [12, 35]. Our findings provided similar evidence; however, it might be biased by the difference in the capacity and implementation of mNGS in clinical practice across regions in China. Therefore, it warrants further epidemiological investigation for more evidence.
Moreover, we explored the clinical characteristics of parrot fever. The majority (87.5%) of the parrot fever cases were admitted to the departments of respiratory medicine and intensive care medicine, suggesting they had severe infection. However, in all patients included in our study, complicated or atypical pulmonary infection differed by severity. Pulmonary infection is principal manifestation of parrot fever, so BALF may be recommended for examination. In our study, prevalence of C. psittaci was 2.9% in BALF and 1.1% in sputum, suggesting BALF may be the optimal specimen for examination of C. psittaci. Furthermore, peripheral blood specimens may be optional when respiratory specimens are not available in patients with pulmonary infection [15]. Cell-free DNA of C. psittaci in the cells can be released into peripheral blood after apoptosis in the lungs [36]. Previous study revealed that DNA copies of C. psittaci in BALF were significantly higher than in blood specimens [17]. In our study, we did not find the correlation in the reads of C. psittaci between various types of specimens in 14 cases with both peripheral blood and respiratory specimens. Number of reads is usually related to the collection time and sites of specimens, and possible interaction by co-infection [37]. Nevertheless, detection of C. psittaci in peripheral blood remains crucial for clinical diagnosis, regardless of the number.
Additionally, co-infection of multiple microorganisms was common among the patients with complicated or atypical pulmonary infection. We found Candida albicans was more likely to exist in BALF and peripheral blood specimens in parrot fever cases, while other principal pathogens were likely to be tested in non-parrot fever cases including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Human herpesvirus 1, and Acinetobacter baumannii complex. However, they did not significantly differ between parrot fever cases and non-parrot fever cases. It might be attributable to the fact that these pathogens are very common in pulmonary infection. Notably, we found a higher co-infection prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus and Staphylococcus epidermidis in peripheral blood specimens of parrot fever cases. Epstein-Barr virus is a human herpesvirus that causes systemic infection by infecting B lymphocytes [38]. Staphylococcus epidermidis is a normal bacterial community in the skin mucosa of the body, which might be detected due to contamination during sampling, instead of real blood infection. If multiple pathogens are detected in peripheral blood, it would indicate serious bloodstream infection. Thus, our findings proved parrot fever cases may have multiple co-infections of pathogens, which would exacerbate the disease. Clinical treatment should be tailored based on the co-infection of C. psittaci and other pathogens [39].
This study also had some limitations. First, we included the patients with complicated or atypical pulmonary infection across 14 provinces and municipalities in China. Limited study regions and implementation of mNGS might result in selection bias. Furthermore, complicated or atypical pulmonary infection might differ by severity across the departments and hospitals, due to variation in the judgment of disease severity. Second, we collected only respiratory or peripheral blood specimens in the parrot fever patients. It could not achieve the comparison between various types of specimens for examination of C. psittaci. In addition, we did not detect C. psittaci in pleural fluid, oral and nasolaryngeal secretion, lung tissue, or cerebrospinal fluid, which might underestimate the prevalence. Third, we included basic demographics of the patients, while did not collect more information such as other laboratory testing. Nevertheless, our study had the strength. Compared with case reports, this study illustrated a scenario of parrot fever epidemiology in China based on a 2.5-year observational study of a moderate sample size.
Conclusion
Prevalence of parrot fever remains low and sporadic in China. It was significantly associated with senior age, winter-spring, and certain regions such as southwestern China and central and southern China. Application of mNGS showed an optimal performance for clinical diagnosis in the detection of C. psittaci, particularly in BALF. Moreover, parrot fever cases might have diverse co-infection of other principal pathogens, such as Candida albicans, Epstein-Barr virus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis. It warrants further studies on the influence of co-infection on the disease severity.
Data Availability
The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- C. psittaci :
-
Chlamydia psittaci
- mNGS:
-
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing
- BALF:
-
Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
- CAP:
-
Community-acquired pneumonia
- PCR:
-
Polymerase chain reaction
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
- MIF:
-
Micro-immunofluorescence
References
Balsamo G, Maxted AM, Midla JW, Murphy JM, Wohrle R, Edling TM, Fish PH, Flammer K, Hyde D, Kutty PK, et al. Compendium of Measures to control Chlamydia psittaci infection among humans (psittacosis) and Pet Birds (Avian Chlamydiosis), 2017. J Avian Med Surg. 2017;31(3):262–82.
Hogerwerf L, Roof I, de Jong MJK, Dijkstra F, van der Hoek W. Animal sources for zoonotic transmission of psittacosis: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):192.
McGovern OL, Kobayashi M, Shaw KA, Szablewski C, Gabel J, Holsinger C, Drenzek C, Brennan S, Milucky J, Farrar JL, et al. Use of Real-Time PCR for Chlamydia psittaci detection in human specimens during an outbreak of psittacosis - Georgia and Virginia, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(14):505–9.
Wallensten A, Fredlund H, Runehagen A. Multiple human-to-human transmission from a severe case of psittacosis, Sweden, January-February 2013. Euro Surveill 2014, 19(42).
Vorimore F, Thébault A, Poisson S, Cléva D, Robineau J, de Barbeyrac B, Durand B, Laroucau K. Chlamydia psittaci in ducks: a hidden health risk for poultry workers. Pathog Dis. 2015;73(1):1–9.
Shaw KA, Szablewski CM, Kellner S, Kornegay L, Bair P, Brennan S, Kunkes A, Davis M, McGovern OL, Winchell J, et al. Psittacosis outbreak among workers at Chicken Slaughter plants, Virginia and Georgia, USA, 2018. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25(11):2143–5.
Maffei C, Marracino A, Di Stanislao F, Pauri P, Clementi M, Varaldo PE. Psittacosis in a highly endemic area in Italy. Epidemiol Infect. 1987;99(2):413–9.
Mair-Jenkins J, Lamming T, Dziadosz A, Flecknoe D, Stubington T, Mentasti M, Muir P, Monk P. A psittacosis outbreak among English Office Workers with little or no contact with birds, August 2015. PLoS Curr 2018, 10.
Branley JM, Weston KM, England J, Dwyer DE, Sorrell TC. Clinical features of endemic community-acquired psittacosis. New Microbes New Infect. 2014;2(1):7–12.
Kozuki E, Arima Y, Matsui T, Sanada Y, Ando S, Sunagawa T, Oishi K. Human psittacosis in Japan: notification trends and differences in infection source and age distribution by gender, 2007 to 2016. Ann Epidemiol. 2020;44:60–3.
Gu L, Liu W, Ru M, Lin J, Yu G, Ye J, Zhu ZA, Liu Y, Chen J, Lai G, et al. The application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in diagnosing Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia: a report of five cases. BMC Pulm Med. 2020;20(1):65.
**ao Q, Shen W, Zou Y, Dong S, Tan Y, Zhang X, Yao L, Li Q, Pei W, Wang T. Sixteen cases of severe pneumonia caused by Chlamydia psittaci in South China investigated via metagenomic next-generation sequencing. J Med Microbiol 2021, 70(11).
Hogerwerf L, B DEG, Baan B. Chlamydia psittaci (psittacosis) as a cause of community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiol Infect. 2017;145(15):3096–105.
de Gier B, Hogerwerf L, Dijkstra F, van der Hoek W. Disease burden of psittacosis in the Netherlands. Epidemiol Infect. 2018;146(3):303–5.
Li H, Hao B, Wang Y, Yu D, Chen Z, Du D, **ong J, Li K, Zhang H, Liu X, et al. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia. Clin Respir J. 2022;16(7):513–21.
Chen X, Cao K, Wei Y, Qian Y, Liang J, Dong D, Tang J, Zhu Z, Gu Q, Yu W. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of severe pneumonias caused by Chlamydia psittaci. Infection. 2020;48(4):535–42.
Duan Z, Gao Y, Liu B, Sun B, Li S, Wang C, Liu D, Wang K, Zhang Y, Lou Z, et al. The application value of Metagenomic and Whole-Genome capture Next-Generation sequencing in the diagnosis and epidemiological analysis of psittacosis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:872899.
Schlaberg R, Chiu CY, Miller S, Procop GW, Weinstock G. Validation of Metagenomic Next-Generation sequencing tests for Universal Pathogen Detection. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017;141(6):776–86.
Gu W, Deng X, Lee M, Sucu YD, Arevalo S, Stryke D, Federman S, Gopez A, Reyes K, Zorn K, et al. Rapid pathogen detection by metagenomic next-generation sequencing of infected body fluids. Nat Med. 2021;27(1):115–24.
Miao Q, Ma Y, Wang Q, Pan J, Zhang Y, ** W, Yao Y, Su Y, Huang Y, Wang M, et al. Microbiological Diagnostic performance of Metagenomic Next-generation sequencing when Applied to Clinical Practice. Clin Infect Diseases: Official Publication Infect Dis Soc Am. 2018;67(suppl2):231–s240.
Zhang HC, Ai JW, Cui P, Zhu YM, Hong-Long W, Li YJ, Zhang WH. Incremental value of metagenomic next generation sequencing for the diagnosis of suspected focal infection in adults. J Infect. 2019;79(5):419–25.
Shi Y, Chen J, Shi X, Hu J, Li H, Li X, Wang Y, Wu B. A case of chlamydia psittaci caused severe pneumonia and meningitis diagnosed by metagenome next-generation sequencing and clinical analysis: a case report and literature review. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):621.
Tang J, Tan W, Luo L, Xu H, Li N. Application of Metagenomic Next-Generation sequencing in the diagnosis of Pneumonia caused by Chlamydia psittaci. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(4):e0238421.
Wu HH, Feng LF, Fang SY. Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of severe pneumonia caused by Chlamydia psittaci. BMC Pulm Med. 2021;21(1):300.
Spoorenberg SM, Bos WJ, van Hannen EJ, Dijkstra F, Heddema ER, van Velzen-Blad H, Heijligenberg R, Grutters JC, de Jongh BM. Chlamydia psittaci: a relevant cause of community-acquired pneumonia in two dutch hospitals. Neth J Med. 2016;74(2):75–81.
Smith KA, Bradley KK, Stobierski MG, Tengelsen LA. Compendium of measures to control Chlamydophila psittaci (formerly Chlamydia psittaci) infection among humans (psittacosis) and pet birds, 2005. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005;226(4):532–9.
Rybarczyk J, Versteele C, Lernout T, Vanrompay D. Human psittacosis: a review with emphasis on surveillance in Belgium. Acta Clin Belg. 2020;75(1):42–8.
Huang J, Jiang E, Yang D, Wei J, Zhao M, Feng J, Cao J. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing versus Traditional Pathogen detection in the diagnosis of Peripheral Pulmonary Infectious Lesions. Infect drug Resist. 2020;13:567–76.
Wilson MR, Sample HA, Zorn KC, Arevalo S, Yu G, Neuhaus J, Federman S, Stryke D, Briggs B, Langelier C, et al. Clinical metagenomic sequencing for diagnosis of Meningitis and Encephalitis. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(24):2327–40.
Nieuwenhuizen AA, Dijkstra F, Notermans DW, van der Hoek W. Laboratory methods for case finding in human psittacosis outbreaks: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):442.
Yuan Y, Zhang X, Gui C. Detection of Chlamydia psittaci in both blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid using metagenomic next-generation sequencing: a case report. Med (Baltim). 2021;100(27):e26514.
Laroucau K, Aaziz R, Meurice L, Servas V, Chossat I, Royer H, de Barbeyrac B, Vaillant V, Moyen JL, Meziani F et al. Outbreak of psittacosis in a group of women exposed to Chlamydia psittaci-infected chickens. Euro Surveill 2015, 20(24).
Wannaratana S, Thontiravong A, Amonsin A, Pakpinyo S. Persistence of Chlamydia psittaci in various temperatures and Times. Avian Dis. 2017;61(1):40–5.
Hogerwerf L, Holstege MMC, Benincà E, Dijkstra F, van der Hoek W. Temporal and spatial analysis of psittacosis in association with poultry farming in the Netherlands, 2000–2015. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):519.
Shen L, Tian XJ, Liang RZ, Cheng Y, Kong XL, He F, Zhang C, Wang GA, Li SH, Lu HD, et al. [Clinical and imaging features of Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia: an analysis of 48 cases in China]. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu ** Za Zhi. 2021;44(10):886–91.
Han D, Li R, Shi J, Tan P, Zhang R, Li J. Liquid biopsy for infectious diseases: a focus on microbial cell-free DNA sequencing. Theranostics. 2020;10(12):5501–13.
Pang L, Wu J, Huang A, Wang W, Deng H, Liu J, Wang S, Pan L. [Clinical characteristics of 10 cases of Chlamydia pasittaci pneumonia]. Zhanghua Yi Yuan Gan Ran Xue Za Zhi. 2022;32(18):2762–6.
Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Jiang Y, Wang H. Effects of Epstein-Barr virus infection on liver function in children. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(2):260–5.
Qu J, Zhang J, Chen Y, Huang Y, **e Y, Zhou M, Li Y, Shi D, Xu J, Wang Q, et al. Aetiology of severe community acquired pneumonia in adults identified by combined detection methods: a multi-centre prospective study in China. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2022;11(1):556–66.
Acknowledgements
We thank a lot to the medical staffs across the hospitals in collecting data and specimens for our study, and more important, to their efforts in saving lives and improving health.
Funding
This work was supported by the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (ZD2021CY001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
WH and YL designed the study. FW drafted the main manuscript text. Data collection was carried out by WH, QC, HX, and DH. FW, HW, LZ and LH participated in data cleaning, sorting and analysis. WH, QC, and YL critically revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participle
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Sixth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (no. 2021 − 114). When the patients received the mNGS examination, they had signed informed consents to provide specimens, testing results, and sequencing data for further possible research, with personal identifier removed to protect their privacy. We did not require additional informed consent, as no additional data or personal identifier was collected in this study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, W., Wang, F., Cai, Q. et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of psittacosis among cases with complicated or atypical pulmonary infection using metagenomic next-generation sequencing: a multi-center observational study in China. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 22, 80 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-023-00631-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-023-00631-w