Log in

Civil society and compliance with constitutions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Politica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Should we consider a civil society a relevant factor in the context of executive’s attitude toward a constitution? The essential goal of the study is to investigate the relationship between a strength of a country’s civil society on constitutional compliance of the executive. To do so, we use data for up to 179 countries from a 30-year period on civil society and compliance with constitutions from the V-Dem project. In a series of dynamic panel regressions, we find that civil society is positively associated with constitutional compliance. This evidence suggests that the validity of constitutional provisions in terms of lawfulness of the executive may be strengthened by civil society. The results of our study provide added value in better understanding the decisions of executives in the perspective of respect for the law. We relate our conclusions regarding ties between politics and the law to previous literature, covering the impact of institutional and social surroundings on the shape of politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source Authors’ own elaboration

Fig. 2

Source Authors’ own elaboration

Fig. 3

Source Authors’ own elaboration

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. V-Dem is a unique collaboration involving over 3200 scholars and other experts relying on a complex research infrastructure to provide data on some 450 indicators (Coppedge et al. 2019). The indicators are divided into factual indicators (sourced from the country surveys), evaluative indicators coded by country experts, composite indices, and data from other sources. Multiple, independent coders are employed for each (evaluative) question along with inter-coder reliability tests built into a custom-designed Bayesian measurement model (Coppedge et al. 2019). A more detailed description of V-Dem and its methodology is presented in the codebook (Coppedge et al. 2020).

References

  • Albert, R., and B.E. Oder. 2018. An unamendable constitution? Unamendability in Constitutional Democracies. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arato, A. 2000. Civil Society, Constitution and Legitimacy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberts, S. 2009. How Constitutions Constrain. Comparative Politics 41 (2): 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M.N., and M. Finnemore. 1999. The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations. International Organization 53 (4): 699–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, R.H., A. Greif, M. Levi, J.-L. Rosenthal, and B.R. Weingast. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Sh. 2013. Ideational Theorizing in the Social Sciences since “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State.” Governance 26 (2): 217–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertelli, A.M., and A.B. Whitford. 2009. Perceiving Credible Commitments: How Independent Regulators Shape Elite Perceptions of Regulatory Quality. British Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 517–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjoernskov, Ch., and J. Mchangama. 2019. Do Social Rights Affect Social Outcomes? American Journal of Political Science 63 (2): 452–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P., and J.R. Subrick. 2003. Rule of Law, Development, and Human Capabilities. Supreme Court Economic Review 10: 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P., Ch. Coyne, and P. Leeson. 2008. Institutional Stickiness and the New Development Economics. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 67 (2): 331–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boix, C., and M.W. Svolik. 2013. The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions, Commitment, and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships. The Journal of Politics 75 (2): 300–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., Ch. Brown, and S. Desposato. 2007. Who Gives, Who Receives, and Who Wins?: Transforming Capital Into Political Change Through Nongovernmental Organizations. Comparative Political Studies 41 (1): 24–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. 1990. The Domain of Constitutional Economics. Constitutional Political Economy 1 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilton, A., and M. Versteeg. 2017. Rights Without Resources: The Impact of Constitutional Social Rights on Social Spending. The Journal of Law and Economics 60 (4): 713–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilton, A., and M. Versteeg. 2020. How Constitutional Rights Matter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coppedge, M., J. Gerring, S.I. Lindberg, S.-E. Skaaning, J. Teorell, D. Altman, M. Bernhard, M.S. Fish, A. Glynn, A. Hicken, C.H. Knutsen, K. McMann, P. Paxton, D. Pemstein, J. Staton, B. Zimmerman, R. Sigman, F. Andersson, V. Mechkova, and F. Miri. 2020. ‘V-Dem Codebook v10.’ Varieties of Democracy (VDem) Project.

  • Coppedge, M., J. Gerring, C.H. Knutsen, J. Krusell, J. Medzihorsky, J. Pernes, S.-E. Skaaning, N. Stepanova, J. Teorell, E. Tzelgov, S.L. Wilson, and S.I. Lindberg. 2019. The Methodology of ’Varieties of Democracy‘(V-Dem). Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/bulletin De Méthodologie Sociologique 143 (1): 107–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, Ch. 1996. Constitutional Premises and Repressive Reality: A Cross-National Time-Series Investigation. Journal of Politics 58 (3): 627–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mesquita, E.B., and M.C. Stephenson. 2007. Regulatory Quality Under Imperfect Oversight. American Political Science Review 101 (3): 605–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L., and L. Morlino, eds. 2005. Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. 2009. Civil Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elazar, D.J. 2017. Covenant and Civil Society. The Constitutional Matrix of Modern Democracy. New Brunswick: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallon, R.H. 2009. Constitutional Constraints. California Law Review 97 (4): 975–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Y. 1997. Democracy, Political Stability and Economic Growth. British Journal of Political Science 27 (3): 391–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavison, R. 2002. What Belongs in a Constitution? Constitutional Political Economy 13 (1): 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, T. 2009. Constitutional Afterlife: The Continuing Impact of Thailand’s Postpolitical Constitution. International Journal of Constitutional Law 7 (1): 83–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, T., and A. Simpser, eds. 2013. Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. 2007. Organized Civil Society and Democratic Legitimacy in the European Union. British Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 333–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, J., and S. Voigt. 2020. Judicial Independence in the EU: A Puzzle. European Journal of Law and Economics 49: 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmke, G., and S. Levitsky. 2004. Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, M., and E. Stolle. 2003. Generating Social Capital: Civil Society and Institutions in Comparative Perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iaryczower, M., P.T. Spiller, and M. Tomassi. 2002. Judicial Independence in Unstable Environments, Argentina 1935–1998. American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 699–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, I.R. 1980. The Essence of Judicial Independence. Columbia Law Review 80 (4): 671–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith, L. 2012. Political Repression: Courts, and the Law. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B., and Ch. Quittkat. 2009. What is Civil Society and Who Represents Civil Society in the EU?—Results of an Online Survey Among Civil Society Experts. Policy and Society 28 (1): 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwok, C.C., and S. Tadesse. 2006. The MNC as an Agent of Change for Host-Country Institutions: FDI and Corruption. Journal of International Business Studies 37 (6): 767–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkins, Ch.M. 1996. Judicial Independence and Democratization: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis. The American Journal of Comparative Law 44 (4): 605–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, D., and M. Versteeg. 2013. Sham Constitutions. California Law Review 101 (4): 863–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marciano, A., ed. 2011. Constitutional Mythologies. New Perspectives on Controlling the State. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marciano, A., A. Melcarne, and G. Ramello. 2019. The Economic Importance of Judicial Institutions, Their Performance and the Proper Way to Measure Them. Journal of Institutional Economics 15 (1): 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, R.H., and J. Nadler. 2008. Coordinating in the Shadow of the Law: Two Contextualized Tests of the Focal Point Theory of Legal Compliance. Law & Society Review 42 (4): 865–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melton, J. 2013. Do constitutional rights matter? The relationship between de jure and de facto human rights protection. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.375.9784&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2021.

  • Metelska-Szaniawska, K. 2016. Economic Effects of Post Socialist Constitutions 25 Years from the Outset of Transition. The Constitutional Political Economy Approach. Brussels: Peter Lang International Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metelska-Szaniawska, K., and J. Lewkowicz. 2020. Post-socialist “Illiberal Democracies”: Do de jure Constitutional Rights Matter? Constitutional Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-020-09316-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migdal, J.S. 2001. State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute Each Other. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, G. 2002. The Disappointments of Civil Society: The Politics of NGO Intervention in Northern Ghana. Political Geography 21 (1): 125–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, J., and S.-E. Skaaning. 2013. Regime Types and Democratic Sequencing. Journal of Democracy 24 (1): 142–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, P. 1997. Conflict, Legitimacy, and Effectiveness: Who Speaks for Whom in Transnational NGO Networks Lobbying the World Bank? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 26 (4): 421–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C. 1987. Institutions, Transaction Costs and Economic Growth. Economic Inquiry 25 (3): 419–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oleart, A., and L. Bouza. 2017. Democracy at Stake: Multipositional Actors and Politicization in the EU Civil Society Field. Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (4): 870–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottaway, M., and T. Carothers, eds. 2000. Funding Virtue: Civil Society Aid and Democracy Promotion. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pejovich, S. 1999. The Effects of the Interaction of Formal and Informal Institutions on Social Stability and Economic Development. Journal of Markets & Morality 2 (2): 164–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., and G. Tabellini. 2004. Constitutions and Economic Policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (1): 75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., and G. Tabellini. 2005. The Economic Effects of Constitutions. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poe, S.C., C.N. Tate, and L.C. Keith. 1999. Repression of the Human Right to Personal Integrity Revisited: A Global Cross-National Study Covering the Years 1976–1993. International Studies Quarterly 43 (2): 291–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R.A. 1998. Creating a Legal Framework for Economic Development. The World Bank Research Observer 13 (1): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J. 1990. The Politics of the Rule of Law. Ratio Juris 3 (3): 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigobon, R., and D. Rodrik. 2005. Rule of Law, Democracy, Openness, and Income. Economics of Transition and Institutional Change 13 (3): 533–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J.A., ed. 2011. Building Global Democracy? Civil Society and Accountable Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnik, J.H. 2011. Justice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society. New Orleans: Quid Pro Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trebilcock, M., and J. Leng. 2006. The Role of Formal Contract Law and Enforcement in Economic Development. Virginia Law Review 92 (7): 1517–1580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Versteeg, M., and E. Zackin. 2016. Constitutions Unentrenched: Toward an Alternative Theory of Constitutional Design. American Political Science Review 110 (4): 657–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, S. 2012. How (Not) to Measure Institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics 9 (1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, S. 2020. Mind the Gap: Analyzing the Divergence Between Constitutional Text and Constitutional Reality. ILE Working Paper Series, 32, 1–59.

  • Weingast, B. 1997. The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law. American Political Science Review 91 (2): 245–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitten-Woodring, J. 2009. Watchdog or Lapdog? Media Freedom, Regime Type, and Government Respect for Human Rights. International Studies Quarterly 53 (3): 595–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2020. World Development Indicators.

  • Wray, S. 1999. On Electronic Civil Disobedience. A Journal of Social Justice 11 (1): 107–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is part of a Beethoven project funded by the Polish National Science Centre (NCN, UMO-2016/23/G/HS4/04371) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, #381589259). The authors would like to thank the editor and anonymous referees for valuable comments. The authors are also grateful to Jan Fałkowski, Jerg Gutmann, Katarzyna Metelska-Szaniawska and Stefan Voigt for helpful suggestions on previous versions of the text. Jacek Lewkowicz gratefully acknowledges the support of the Foundation for Polish Science (FNP).

Disclaimer

The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in the text belong solely to the authors, and not necessarily to the authors’ employer, organization, committee, or other group or individual.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacek Lewkowicz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Description of variables and data sources

Appendix: Description of variables and data sources

Variable name

Description

Source

constitutional compliance

Continuous variable envisaging the extent up to which members of the executive respect the constitution. The higher the value of variable is, the less members of executive violate the constitution

Continuous version of the variable was created from the ordinal variable using the measurement model. The ordinal variable envisages the responses to the following question” Do members of the executive (the head of state, the head of government, and cabinet ministers) respect the constitution?”. Possible responses:

0: Members of the executive violate the constitution whenever they want to, without legal consequences

1: Members of the executive violate most provisions of the constitution without legal consequences, but still must respect certain provisions

2: Somewhere in between (1) and (3). Members of the executive would face legal consequences for violating most provisions of the constitution, but can disregard some provisions without any legal consequences

3: Members of the executive rarely violate the constitution, and when it happens they face legal charges

4: Members of the executive never violate the constitution

Coppedge et al. (2020)

civil society index

Continuous variable envisaging how robust civil society is. The higher the value of variable is, the more robust is civil society in a given country. The index is formed by taking the point estimates from a Bayesian factor analysis model of the indicators for governmental control over entry and exit of CSOs into public life, CSOs’ repression and CSO participatory environment. The construction of the abovementioned indices is presented below

Coppedge et al. (2020)

governmental control over entry and exit of CSOs into public life

Continuous variable envisaging the extent up to which the government achieves control over entry and exit by civil society organizations (CSOs) into public life. Continuous version of the variable was created from the ordinal variable using the measurement model. The ordinal variable envisages the responses to the following question “To what extent does the government achieve control over entry and exit by civil society organizations (CSOs) into public life?”. Possible responses:

 0: monopolistic control,

 1: substantial control,

 2: moderate control,

 3: minimal control,

 4:unconstrained

Coppedge et al. (2020)

CSOs’ repression

Continuous variable envisaging the extent up to which the government attempts to repress civil society organizations (CSOs). Continuous version of the variable was created from the ordinal variable using the measurement model. The ordinal variable envisages the responses to the following question “Does the government attempt to repress civil society organizations (CSOs)?”. Possible responses:

 0: severely,

 1: substantially,

 2: moderately,

 3: weakly,

 4: no

Coppedge et al. (2020)

CSOs’ consultation by policymakers

Continuous variable envisaging the extent up to which the major civil society organizations (CSOs) routinely consulted by policymakers on policies relevant to their members.). Continuous version of the variable was created from the ordinal variable using the measurement model. The ordinal variable envisages the responses to the following question “Are major civil society organizations (CSOs) routinely consulted by policymakers on policies relevant to their members?”. Possible responses:

 0: no,

 1: to some degree,

 2: yes

Coppedge et al. (2020)

regulatory quality

Continuous variable including measures of the incidence of market unfriendly policies such as price controls or inadequate bank supervision, as well as perceptions of the burdens imposed by excessive regulation in areas such as foreign trade and business development

Coppedge et al. (2020)

regime

Discrete variable classifying political regime of a country considering the competitiveness of access to power (polyarchy) as well as liberal principles into one of the following categories:

 0: closed autocracy,

 1: electoral autocracy,

 2: electoral democracy,

 3: liberal democracy

Coppedge et al. (2020)

judicial independence

Continuous variable expressing how often judges' decisions in cases that are salient to the government merely reflect government wishes regardless of judges' sincere view of the legal record. The higher the value of variable is, the less judges’ decisions reflect government wishes. Continuous version of the variable was created from the ordinal variable using the measurement model. The ordinal variable envisages the responses to the following question “When judges not on the high court are ruling in cases that are salient to the government, how often would you say that their decisions merely reflect government wishes regardless of their sincere view of the legal record?”. Possible responses:

 0: Always

 1: Usually

 2: About half of the time

 3: Seldom

Coppedge et al. (2020)

international autonomy

Continuous variable envisaging the extent to which the state is autonomous from the control of other states with respect to the conduct of its foreign policy. The higher the value, the more autonomous the state is. Continuous version of the variable was created from the ordinal variable using the measurement model. The ordinal variable envisages the responses to the following question “Is the state autonomous from the control of other states with respect to the conduct of its foreign policy?”. Possible responses:

 0: Non-autonomous

 1: Semi-autonomous

 2: Autonomous

Coppedge et al. (2020)

political power distribution

Continuous variable envisaging the extent to which political power is distributed according to socioeconomic position? The higher the value, the more equally the power is distributed

Continuous version of the variable was created from the ordinal variable using the measurement model. The ordinal variable envisages the responses to the following question “Is political power distributed according to socioeconomic position?”. Possible responses:

 0: Wealthy people enjoy a virtual monopoly on political power. Average and poorer people have almost no influence

 1: Wealthy people enjoy a dominant hold on political power. People of average income have little say. Poorer people have essentially no influence

 2: Wealthy people have a very strong hold on political power. People of average or poorer income have some degree of influence but only on issues that matter less for wealthy people

 3: Wealthy people have more political power than others. But people of average income have almost as much influence and poor people also have a significant degree of political power

 4: Wealthy people have no more political power than those whose economic status is

Coppedge et al. (2020)

ln gdp pc

Log of gross domestic product per capita

Coppedge et al. (2020)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lewkowicz, J., Lewczuk, A. Civil society and compliance with constitutions. Acta Polit 58, 181–211 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-022-00240-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-022-00240-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation