Log in

Regionalism and regional organisations: exploring the dynamics of institutional formation and change in Latin America

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Relations and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Nothing is possible without man; nothing lasts without institutions.

Jean Monnet

Abstract

Two elements define regional integration in Latin America: its extension in time and its plurality. Analyses abound regarding the drivers underlying regional cooperation, the specific institutional design, its effects, and impact. However, studies have not yet provided full answers to the question of how regional institutions emerge and change through time in Latin America. To investigate this rather underexplored issue, I contribute a dynamic analytical framework whereby interests and ideas are taken as factors that interact with each other within a specified institutional environment, thus sha** processes of institutional creation, change and development. The argument advanced is that whereas the role of states and presidents remains constant, ideas and the existing regional organisations face presidents with either limitations or resources depending on the degree of synergy and convergence between states’ material interests and regional ideas and institutions. Based on the particular ideational and institutional configuration, three patterns of change may emerge: creation, conversion, and layering. The paper draws on comparative regionalism and institutionalism studies and empirically explores more than 25 years of regional cooperation in Latin America. Focus is on the comparative assessment of the Common Market of the South and the Union of South American Nations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Similarly, Sbragia (2008) argues that contrary to Western Europe, countries in Latin America (and Asia) faced less incentives for intra-regional trade because of their dependence on extra-regional market exports.

  2. This contrasts with the EU, whose flexible institutional architecture, i.e. ‘variable geometry’, tolerates ‘member states’ divergent preferences, which prevents deadlock and lasting conflict’, and allows ‘the continuous strengthening of the European regional architecture’ (Hofmann and Merand 2012: 173).

  3. Recent research has underscored the relevance of presidents’ ideology in regional cooperation (Jenne et al. 2017; Baracaldo Orjuela and Chenou 2019; Quiliconi and Rivera 2019). However, ideologies ‘provide mental frameworks within which human beings can order and understand the entire world in which they live’, but upon which it is difficult to predict and assess how presidents would attempt to put these ideas into practice and in a particular period (Berman 1998: 20‒21). Conversely, programmatic beliefs ‘are directly relevant only to particular categories of human action’ (ibid.).

  4. This categorisation builds on Streeck and Thelen (2005), who offered a catalogue of commonly observed patterns of change: displacement, layering, drift, conversion, and exhaustion.

  5. These initiatives are variously labelled. In this paper, I refer to this latest trend as post-liberal.

  6. Latin American has been a pioneer in thinking itself as a region: its long history of regionalism and the ideas associated with it go back to the independence years (Fawcett 2005), when the notion of ‘patria grande’ envisioned the creation of a political bloc bringing together all the newly independent countries. By 1950, the structuralist school under the lead of the Economic Commission for Latin America, nurtured the first wave of regionalism, and together with dependency theory, offered the most relevant Latin American contribution to international thinking and practice (Bianculli 2016).

  7. Several regional groups were then established, including Central American Common Market (CACM, 1960), Latin American Free Trade Association (LAFTA, 1960), replaced by Latin American Integration Association (LAIA) in 1980, and Caribbean Free Trade Association (CARIFTA, 1965), which later became Caribbean Community and Common Market (CARICOM, 1973).

  8. Other newcomers included the Association of Caribbean States (ACS, 1994), together with the launch of more than 25 regional agreements, ranging from bilateral and multilateral free trade areas to customs unions with pretensions to become a common market.

  9. Today MERCOSUR includes Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, and Venezuela (suspended for failure to implement accession clauses, including the Protocol of Ushuaia, MERCOSUR’s democratic clause in 2017). Associate members are Bolivia (in accession process since 2013), Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Peru, and Surinam.

  10. In December 1995, after assuming the pro-tempore presidency of the bloc, Carlos Menem instructed public officials and negotiators that his 6-month term of office should be recognised by MERCOSUR’s active external trade agenda, which included negotiations with Bolivia, Chile, the FTAA, and the EU (Cadorin 1996).

  11. MERCOSUR’s main objective was to create a common market while also pursuing ‘economic development with social justice’ in the region (Treaty of Asuncion).

  12. Within the framework of deep structural and trade liberalisation reforms, Argentina introduced the Convertibility Plan that pegged its peso on a one-to-one fixed exchange rate to the United States dollar in 1991.

  13. This was indicated in the preambles of the FTAs with Chile, Colombia, Panama, and Peru and in the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR).

  14. President Néstor Kirchner’s inauguration speech, available at https://www.cfkargentina.com/discurso-de-asuncion-del-presidente-nestor-kirchner-a-la-asamblea-legislativa-el-25-de-mayo-del-2003/ (last accessed on 14 June, 2021).

  15. An initial agreement between Venezuela and Cuba in 2004, ALBA then incorporated Bolivia (2006), Nicaragua (2007); Dominica (2008), Ecuador, Saint Vicent and the Grenadines, Antigua, and Barbuda (2009), Saint Lucia (2013), Federation of Saint Christopher and Nevis (2014). Honduras joined ALBA in 2008, but withdrew in 2010, whereas Ecuador announced its exit in 2018 and Bolivia in 2019.

  16. These included Argentina (2003, 2007, 2011), Bolivia (2006, 2010, 2014), Brazil (2003, 2007, 2011), Ecuador (2007, 2013), Paraguay (2008), Uruguay (2005, 2012, 2015), and Venezuela (1998, 2001, 2007, 2013, 2019).

  17. In 2011, Chile, Colombia, and Peru together with Mexico, established the Pacific Alliance as a liberal and market oriented regional project.

  18. Tratado Constitutivo de la Unión de Naciones Sudamericanas, available at https://web.archive.org/web/20161009121928/http://www.unasur.int/images/descargas/DOCUMENTOS%20CONSTITUTIVOS%20DE%20UNASUR/Tratado-UNASUR-solo.pdf (last accessed on 30 August, 2021).

References

  • Acharya, Amitav. (2007) ‘The Emerging Regional Architecture of World Politics’, World Politics 59(4): 629–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alter, Karen J. and Sophie Meunier (2009) ‘The Politics of International Regime Complexity’, Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alter, Karen J. and Kal Raustiala (2018) ‘The Rise of International Regime Complexity’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science 14(1): 329‒49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Michael N. and Martha Finnemore (1999) ‘The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations’, International Organization 53(4): 699–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Sheri (1998) The Social Democratic Moment: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bianculli, Andrea C. (2016) ‘Latin America’, in Tanja A. Börzel and Thomas Risse, eds, The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism, 154–77, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, Tanja (2013) ‘Comparative Regionalism: European Integration and Beyond’, in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse and Beth A. Simmons, eds, Handbook of International Relations, 503–31, London: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burges, Sean (2007) ‘Building a Global Southern Coalition: The Competing Approaches of Brazil’s Lula and Venezuela’s Chávez’, Third World Quarterly 28(7): 1343–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, Barry and Ole Weaver (2003) Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cason, Jeffrey (2000) ‘On the Road to Southern Cone Economic Integration’, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 42(1): 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabène, Olivier (2009) The Politics of Regional Integration in Latin America: Theoretical and Comparative Exploration, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fioretos, Orfeo (2011) ‘Historical Institutionalism in International Relations’, International Organization 65(2): 367–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardini, Gian Luca (2005) ‘Two Critical Passages on the Road to Mercosur’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 18(3): 405–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, Rita (2013) ‘Venezuela En Unasur: Integración Regional y Discurso Político’ [‘Venezuela in Unasur: Regional Integration and Political Discourse’], Desafíos 25(1): 129‒63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez Mera, Laura (2005) ‘Explaining Mercosur’s Survival: Strategic Sources of Argentina-Brazilian Convergence’, Journal of Latin American Studies 37(1): 109–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grugel, Jean (2004) ‘New Regionalism and Modes of Governance – Comparing US and EU Strategies in Latin America’, European Journal of International Relations 10(4): 603–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Ernst B. (1958) The Uniting of Europe, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanrieder, Tine (2015) International Organization in Time, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hanrieder, Tine and Michael Zürn (2017) ‘Reactive Sequences in Global Health Governance’, in Orfeo Fioretos, ed., International Politics and Institutions in Time, 93‒116, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Randall and Desmond King (2001) ‘Eugenic Ideas, Political Interests, and Policy Variance: Immigration and Sterilization Policy in Britain and the U.S’, World Politics 53(2): 237–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, Björn and Fredrik Söderbaum (2000) ‘Theorising the Rise of Regionness’, New Political Economy 5(3): 457–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, Stéphanie C. (2011) ‘Why Institutional Overlap Matters: CSDP in the European Security Architecture’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 49(1): 101–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, Stéphanie C. and Frédéric Merand (2012) ‘Regional Organizations à La Carte: The Effects of Institutional Elasticity’, in T. V Paul, ed., International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation, 133–57, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, Andrew (1995b) ‘Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective’, in Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell, eds, Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order, 37–73, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jara, Alejandro and Sebastián Herreros (2017) ‘Trade Policymaking in Latin America’, in Kenneth Heydon and Stephen Woolcock, eds, The Ashgate Research Companion to International Trade Policy, 463–82, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenne, Nicole, Luis Leandro Schenoni and Francisco Urdinez (2017) ‘Of Words and Deeds: Latin American Declaratory Regionalism, 1994–2014’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 30(2–3): 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jupille, Joseph, Walter Mattli and Duncan Snidal (2012) Institutional Choice and Global Commerce, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, Peter J. (2005) A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O. (1988) ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches’, International Studies Quarterly 32(4): 379–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapohl, Sebastian (2019) ‘Games Regional Actors Play: Dependency, Regionalism, and Integration Theory for the Global South’, Journal of International Relations and Development 23: 840–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, Finn (2010) ‘Regional Integration: Some Introductory Reflections’, in Finn Laursen, ed., Comparative Integration: Europe and Beyond, 3–20, Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, Andrés (2003) ‘Presidentialism and Mercosur: A Hidden Cause for a Successful Experience’, in Finn Laursen, ed., Comparative Integration: Europe and Beyond, 53–73, Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattli, Walter. (1999) The Logic of Regional Integration. Europe and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, Julia C. and Robert O. Keohane (2014) ‘Contested Multilateralism’, Review of International Organizations 9(4): 385–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Alexander B. (1991) ‘Regions as Social Constructs: The Gap between Theory and Practice’, Progress in Human Geography 15(1): 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolte, Detlef and Nicolás M. Comini. (2016) ‘UNASUR: Regional Pluralism as a Strategic Outcome’, Contexto Internacional 38(2): 545–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S. (1970) ‘Comparing Common Markets: A Revised Neo-Functionalist Model’, International Organization 24(4): 796–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orjuela, David Baracaldo and Jean-Marie Chenou (2019) ‘Regionalism and Presidential Ideology in the Current Wave of Latin American Integration’, International Area Studies Review 22(1): 41–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsini, Amandine, Jean-Frédéric Morin and Oran Young (2013) ‘Regime Complexes: A Buzz, a Boom, or a Boost for Global Governance?’, Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 19(1): 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palestini, Stefano and Giovanni Agostinis (2018) ‘Constructing Regionalism in South America: The Cases of Sectoral Cooperation on Transport Infrastructure and Energy’, Journal of International Relations and Development 21(1): 46–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panke, Diana, Sören Stapel and Anna Starkmann (2020) Comparing Regional Organizations: Global Dynamics and Regional Particularities, Bristol: Bristol University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. Guy (1999) Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism, London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiliconi, Cintia and Renato Rivera (2019) ‘Ideología y Liderazgo en la Cooperación Regional: Los Casos del Consejo Suramericano de Defensa y el Consejo Suramericano sobre el Problema Mundial de las Drogas en Unasur’ [‘Ideology and Leadership in Regional Cooperation: The Cases of the South American Defense Council and the South American Council on the World Drug Problem in Unasur’], Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 28(1): 219–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggirozzi, Pia and Melisa Deciancio (2018) ‘Region Building, Autonomy and Regionalism in South America’, in Anssi Paasi, John Harrison and Martin Jones, eds, Handbook on the Geographies of Regions and Territories, 479-88, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Riggirozzi, Pia and Diana Tussie (2012) The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism. The Case of Latin America, Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Roberto and Juan G. Tokatlian (2016) ‘Contemporary Argentina and the Rise of Brazil’, Bulletin of Latin American Research 35(1): 20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sbragia, Alberta (2008) ‘Review Article: Comparative Regionalism: What Might It Be?’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 46(s1): 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, Philippe C. (1969) ‘Three Neo-Functional Hypotheses about International Integration’, International Organization 23(1): 161–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, Philippe C. (1971) ‘A Revised Theory of Regional Integration’, in Leon N. Lindberg and Stuart A. Scheingold, eds, Regional Integration: Theory and Research, 232–64, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Universtity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang and Kathleen Thelen. (2005) ‘Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies’, in Wolfgang Streeck and Kathleen Thelen, eds, Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, 1–39, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, Kathleen. (2003) ‘How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative-Historical Analysis’, in James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, eds, Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, 208–40, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Graaf, Thijs (2013) ‘Fragmentation in Global Energy Governance: Explaining the Creation of IRENA’, Global Environmental Politics 13(3): 14‒33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Langenhove, Luk (2012) ‘Why We Need to ‘Unpack’ Regions to Compare Them More Effectively’, International Spectator 47(1): 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, Amitav and Alastair Iain Johnston. (2007) ‘Comparing Regional Institutions: An Introduction’, in Amitav Acharya and Alastair Ian Johnston, eds, Crafting Cooperation. Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective, 1–31, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Briceño Ruiz, José and Miriam Gomes Saraiva (2010) ‘Las Diferentes Percepciones Sobre La Construcción Del MERCOSUR En Argentina, Brasil y Venezuela’ [‘Different Perceptions of the Construction of MERCOSUR in Argentina, Brazil and Venezuela’], Foro Internacional L(1): 35–62.

  • Cadorin, Atilio (1996) ‘Menem quiere liderar el Mercosur’ [‘Menem wants to lead Mercosur’], La Nación, 25 March, available at https://www.lanacion.com.ar/politica/menem-quiere-liderar-el-mercosur-nid167428/ (last accessed on 30 August, 2021).

  • Cavarozzi, Marcelo (1998) ‘La Integración Sin Instituciones’ [‘Integration without Institutions’], in Juan Pablo Rodríguez, ed., Comunidad Andina y Mercosur. Desafíos Pendientes de la Integración en América Latina [Andean Community and Mercosur. Pending Integration Challenges in Latin America], 3–16, Bogotá: Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de Colombia, Corporación Andina de Fomento.

  • Esnal, Luis (1999) ‘Reunión en Brasil para salvar el Mercosur’ [‘Meeting in Brazil to save Mercosur’], La Nación, 26 April, available at https://www.lanacion.com.ar/economia/reunion-en-brasil-para-salvar-el-mercosur-nid136245/ (last accessed on 30 August, 2021).

  • Fawcett, Louise (2015) ‘Drivers of Regional Integration: Historical and Comparative Perspectives’, in Louis Brennan and Philomena Murray, ed., Drivers of Integration and Regionalism in Europe and Asia. Comparative Perspectives, 34–51, London: Routledge.

  • Fawcett, Louise (2005) ‘The Origins and Development of Regional Ideas in the Americas’, in Louise Fawcett and Mónica Serrano, eds, Regionalism and Governance in the Americas. Continental Drift, 27‒51, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Fawcett, Louise (1995) ‘Regionalism in Historical Perspective’, in Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell, eds, Regionalism in World Politics. Regional Organization and International Order, 9–36, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Garcia, Marco Aurélio (2010) ‘O Lugar Do Brasil No Mundo – A Política Externa Em Um Momento de Transição’ [‘Brazil's Place in the World - Foreign Policy at a Time of Transition’], in Emir Sader and Marco Aurélio Garcia, eds, Brasil, entre o passado e o futuro [Brazil, between the Past and the Future], 153–76, Sao Paulo: Boitempo.

  • Gardini, Gian Luca (2010) The Origins of Mercosur. Democracy and Regionalization in South America, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Goertz, Gary and Kathy Powers (2014) Regional Governance: The Evolution of a New Institutional Form, Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance, SP IV 2014-106, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

  • Hall, Peter A. (1992) ‘The Movement from Keynesianism to Monetarism: Institutional Analysis and British Economic Policy in the 1970s’, in Sven Steinmo, Kathleen Thelen and Frank Longstreth, eds, Structuring Politics. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, 90–113, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hurrell, Andrew (1995a) ‘Regionalism in the Americas’, in Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell, ed., Regionalism in World Politics. Regional Organization and International Order, 250–82, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • King, Desmond S. (1992) ‘The Establishment of Work-Welfare Programs in the United States and Britain: Politics, Ideas, and Institutions’, in Sven Steinmo, Kathleen Thelen and Frank Longstreth, eds, Structuring Politics. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, 217–50, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kingstone, Peter (2018) The Political Economy of Latin America. Reflections on Neoliberalism and Development after the Commodity Boom, New York and Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Moravcsik, Andrew. (1993) ‘Introduction: Integrating International and Domestic Theories of International Bargaining’, in Peter Evans, Harold K. Jacobson and Robert Putnam, eds, Double-Edged Diplomacy. International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, 3–42, Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Rebossio, Alejandro. (2002) ‘El Mercosur pide ayuda para el país’ [‘Mercosur asks for help for the country’], La Nación, 19 February, available at https://www.lanacion.com.ar/politica/el-mercosur-pide-ayuda-para-el-pais-nid375220/ (last accessed on 30 August, 2021).

  • Sanahuja, José Antonio (2010) ‘La Construcción de Una Región: Suramérica y El Regionalismo Posliberal’ [‘Building a Region: South America and Post-Liberal Regionalism’], in Manuel Cienfuegos and José Antonio Sanahuja, eds, Una Región en Construcción, UNASUR y la integración en América del Sur [A Region under Construction, UNASUR and South American Integration], 87–136, Barcelona: Fundació CIDOB.

  • Sanahuja, José Antonio (2012) ‘Post-Liberal Regionalism in South America: The Case of UNASUR’, EUI RSCAS, 2012/05, Global Governance Programme-13, European, Transnational and Global Governance, available at http://hdl.handle.net/1814/20394 (last accessed on 31 December, 2021).

  • Saraiva, Miriam Gomes (2010) ‘Brazilian Foreign Policy towards South America during the Lula Administration: Caught between South America and Mercosur’, Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 53(spe): 151–68.

  • Schmidt, Vivien A. (2010) ‘Reconciling Ideas and Institutions through Discursive Institutionalism’, in Daniel Béland and Robert Henry Cox, eds, Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, 47–64, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Thelen, Kathleen and Sven Steinmo (1992) ‘Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics’, in Sven Steinmo, Kathleen Thelen and Frank Longstreth, eds, Structuring Politics. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, 1–32, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Veiga, Pedro da Motta and Sandra P. Rios. (2007) O Regionalismo Pós-Liberal Na América Do Sul: Origens, Iniciativas e Dilemas [Post-Liberal Regionalism in South America: Origins, Initiatives and Dilemmas], Santiago, Chile: CEPAL.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank the editors and three anonymous reviewers, whose insightful and detailed comments greatly improved the manuscript. I am also grateful to Miriam Bradley, Robert Kissack and the members of IBEI Research Cluster ‘Norms and Rules in International Relations’ for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this article.

Funding

This research was funded through the project ‘Regional Social Regulation in Latin America: A New Agenda for Development? Prospects and Challenges (SociAL-Reg)’ (CSO2015-66411-P), Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea C. Bianculli.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bianculli, A.C. Regionalism and regional organisations: exploring the dynamics of institutional formation and change in Latin America. J Int Relat Dev 25, 556–581 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-022-00253-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-022-00253-3

Keywords

Navigation