Diamine vapor treatment of viscoelastic graphene oxide liquid crystal for gas barrier coating

Choi, Seung Eun; Kim, Sung-Soo; Choi, Eunji; Kim, Ji Hoon; Choi, Yunkyu; Kang, Junhyeok; Kwon, Ohchan; Kim, Dae Woo

doi:10.1038/s41598-021-88955-5

Diamine vapor treatment of viscoelastic graphene oxide liquid crystal for gas barrier coating

Article
Open access
Published: 04 May 2021

Volume 11, article number 9518, (2021)
Cite this article

Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Scientific Reports

Diamine vapor treatment of viscoelastic graphene oxide liquid crystal for gas barrier coating

Download PDF

Seung Eun Choi¹,
Sung-Soo Kim²,
Eunji Choi¹,
Ji Hoon Kim¹,
Yunkyu Choi¹,
Junhyeok Kang¹,
Ohchan Kwon¹ &
…
Dae Woo Kim¹

2064 Accesses
7 Citations
Explore all metrics

Abstract

A layered graphene oxide/ethylenediamine (GO/EDA) composite film was developed by exposing aqueous GO liquid crystal (GOLC) coating to EDA vapor and its effects on the gas barrier performance of GO film were systematically investigated. When a GO/EDA coating with a thickness of approximately 1 μm was applied to a neat polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film, the resultant film was highly impermeable to gas molecules, particularly reducing the gas permeance up to 99.6% for He and 98.5% for H₂ in comparison to the neat PET film. The gas barrier properties can be attributed to the long diffusion length through stacked GO nanosheets. The EDA can crosslink oxygen-containing groups of GO, enhancing the mechanical properties of the GO/EDA coating with hardness and elastic modulus values up to 1.14 and 28.7 GPa, respectively. By the synergistic effect of the viscoelastic properties of GOLC and the volatility of EDA, this coating method can be applied to complex geometries and EDA intercalation can be spontaneously achieved through the scaffold of the GOLC.

Improvement in Barrier Properties Using a Large Lateral Size of Exfoliated Graphene Oxide

Article 07 May 2020

Graphene oxide incorporation in lamellar organosiloxane film for improved water vapor barrier property

Article 21 June 2016

Stable graphene oxide-based lyotropic liquid crystals for interfacial lubrication

Article Open access 12 January 2024

Introduction

Impermeable barrier coatings are essential in various applications, such as food packaging, electronic devices, energy storage, membrane, and hydrogen storage^1,2,3,4. Among the various impermeable materials, graphene is an ideal barrier due to its high mechanical strength, chemical stability, and most importantly, its impermeability to all gas molecules even for helium and hydrogen⁵. Graphene is also intrinsically flexible, stretchable, and transparent owing to its atomic-scale thickness^6,7. Considering all these advantages, single-layer graphene synthesized by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) was deposited on polymeric substrates or stacked in the form of a multilayer graphene film⁸. However, the transfer of CVD graphene onto a large area without the formation of cracks is challenging, and the generation of point defects and grain boundaries is unavoidable during the CVD process⁹. In addition, the metal catalyst (usually Cu, Ni, or alloy foil) needs to be removed by an acidic etchant such as FeCl₃, raising critical issues in terms of environmental impact and fabrication costs⁶. Therefore, although CVD graphene could be an ideal gas barrier material, the deposition of defect-free graphene on a large scale onto various substrate geometries remains challenging.

As an alternative, graphene nanosheets including few-layer graphene flakes, graphene oxide (GO), and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) have been frequently hybridized with polymers, inorganic particles, and organic molecules^10,11,12. The incorporation of impermeable fillers with high aspect ratios effectively enhances the gas barrier performance by increasing the diffusion length of permeating gas molecules¹³. Abundant oxygen-containing groups of graphene derivatives are also beneficial to the functionalization of the graphene surface, to enhance the solubility in organic solvents, and to improve the miscibility of graphene with polymer matrix¹⁴. More importantly, the preparation of graphene derivatives, particularly GO, can be scalable to satisfy the demand of nanofillers for composite preparation^{4,Full size image}

To verify the feasibility of our method to produce a uniform GO/EDA coating layer, SEM images were acquired from the GO/EDA coating with 1 h exposure to the EDA vapor (Fig. 1C,D). A uniform GO/EDA coating layer was observed on the nylon substrate (Fig. 1C). The GO sheets were stacked parallel to the substrate (Fig. 1D,E) because the shear coating process aligned the GOLC scaffold in parallel with the substrate³³. The EDS map** of nitrogen marked with red color showed the homogeneous distribution of amine groups, indicating uniform diffusion of EDA molecules into the inner regions of the GOLC. A round morphology was observed between the GO sheets in the magnified cross-sectional SEM images of GO/EDA (Fig. 1E), while the edge of neat GO sheets was sharp (Supplementary Fig. S3). This denoted the presence of EDA surrounding each GO layer, which is stably adhered to the graphene surface even in the high vacuum conditions during the SEM measurements. As shown in the bending test, the GO/EDA coating on the nylon substrate was highly bendable and could be bent to the 5.7 mm diameter of a glass rod (Fig. 1F). This is due to the intrinsic flexible nature of graphene, and this flexibility could be critical in applications such as flexible electronics, food packaging, and gas storage.

The viscoelastic rheological properties are essential for uniform coating of GOLC on complex geometries by using the shear-coating method and to preserve the shape of the GOLC coating during EDA vapor exposure^33,36,37. Primarily, the viscoelastic properties of GOLC were investigated by measuring the GOLC viscosity as a function of the shear rate and concentration (Fig. 2A). The viscosity of GOLC gradually increased with the concentration from 1 to 40 mg/mL. Particularly, the viscosity of GOLC reached 1 × 10³ and 3 × 10³ Pa∙s for 20 and 40 mg/mL, respectively, in static conditions. However, the viscosity of 40 mg/mL GOLC spontaneously decreased to 9 × 10^–1 Pa∙s at a shear rate of 100 s⁻¹, indicating gel-like and shear-thinning viscoelastic behavior; therefore, the viscosity is highly influenced by the shear rate^33,38,39.

The coating process was also conducted with GO solutions of 10, 20, and 40 mg/mL (Fig. 2B). The photographic images of the vials containing the GO solutions show that the 10 mg/mL solution was watery, while GO solutions of 20 mg/mL and 40 mg/mL adhered to the wall of the vials even after turning the vial upside down. This indicates that a solid-like behavior of the GO solutions can be observed at the higher concentrations, as demonstrated by the rheology study shown in Fig. 2A. To reveal the importance of a high viscosity GOLC, the nylon substrates with GOLC coating were tilted at 45° as shown in the second row of the images of Fig. 2B. As expected, the GOLC coating was only preserved for the 40 mg/mL solution, while for lower concentrations the coating flowed to the bottom. Therefore, a higher concentration of GOLC produces better quality GO/EDA films by preserving the shape of the GOLC coating during EDA exposure (the third row of the images of Fig. 2B). This observation is particularly important when GO/EDA coating is applied to objects with a three-dimensional morphology and tilted surfaces such as gas storage tanks.

XRD analysis was conducted to examine the intercalation of EDA into the GOLC scaffold and its interlayer structure (Fig. 3, Supplementary Fig. S4). Figure 3A displays the XRD patterns of GO/EDA coating and Fig. 3B summarizes the corresponding interlayer distance. The interlayer distance of GO was 7.95 Å, which is in agreement with the literature²³. The interlayer distance of the GO/EDA coating was 8.24 Å after 5 min of EDA exposure, indicating the spontaneous intercalation of EDA into the GOLC scaffold. The value increased to 9.24 Å after 1 h of EDA exposure and further increased to 13.7 Å after exposure for 3 h. We want to emphasize that the expanded interlayer spacing is not by the presence of water because all samples were fully dried at 60 °C for 24 h before XRD measurement and neat GO did not show similar expansion of interlayer spacing. The interlayer distance was reduced to 13.1 Å after 1 d of exposure. After 3 d of exposure, the interlayer distance was further decreased and saturated to 11.0 Å at a longer EDA exposure time of 72 h, which is the typical interlayer distance of GO cross-linked with EDA⁴⁰. Considering the length of an EDA molecule (around 3.7 Å) and the thickness of a graphene layer (3.4 Å)²¹, it can be assumed that a double layer of EDA molecules exists between the GO sheets at the low EDA exposure times as described in the inserted scheme of Fig. 3B because excessive EDA can diffuse into the scaffold of GOLC spontaneously. The rearrangement of the EDA molecules may occur at exposure times over 3 h as some of the EDA is possibly consumed in the formation of crosslinking with oxygen-containing groups of GO or unreacted EDA molecules are removed from the composite system with time^33,40. We believe the reduction of GO is not the main reason for the thickness decrease because most of the oxygen-containing groups are detected by XPS even after EDA treatment, which we will deliberate in detail below. Similarly, the increasing thickness of the GO/EDA coating with increased EDA exposure time was observed in the SEM images of the GO/EDA coating (Supplementary Fig. S3). The influence of EDA exposure time on the mechanical and gas barrier properties of the GO/EDA coating will be discussed later.

The chemical structure of the GO/EDA coating was examined using water contact angle measurements, XPS, FT-IR (Fig. 4), and Raman spectroscopy (Supplementary Fig. S5). The water contact angle of GO was 55° and gradually decreased to 39° with increasing EDA exposure time (Fig. 4A). The more hydrophilic surface of the GO/EDA coating can be ascribed to the amine groups of EDA molecules that are bonded to the surface of GO as considering the protonation of amine groups in the presence of water⁴⁰. The FT-IR spectra confirmed the variation of functional groups in GO and GO/EDA coatings, particularly the C=O stretching of amide (1710 cm⁻¹) and C–N stretching (1340 cm⁻¹) (Fig. 4B). The C=O stretching peak became clear as the EDA exposure time increased. This tendency was observed because the amine groups of the EDA and the oxygen-containing groups of GO form an amide bond³³. At the same time, the C–N stretching peak began to appear, which implies the presence of EDA molecules in the GO/EDA coating.

Figure 4C shows the C1s spectra of GO and GO/EDA coating. Typical oxygen-containing groups of C–O (286.8 eV) and C=O (287.9 eV) were detected in the circumstance of the GO coating. A new C–N peak appeared at 285.3 eV after EDA treatment due to the presence of both unreacted amine groups and the amide bonding of EDA. Also, the intensity of the C–O and C=O peaks in the XPS spectra of GO/EDA (1 h) was relatively lower compared to that of the GO peaks because of the partial reduction of oxygen groups in the presence of the alkaline EDA⁴⁰. The reduction mechanism can be a nucleophilic ring-opening reaction in the presence of amines, which means that the amine groups disconnect the oxygen moieties and remain sp² hybridized carbon bonding⁴¹. This partial reduction reaction between GO and EDA was reconfirmed by the Raman spectra, which showed an increased I_D/I_G ratio as the EDA exposure time increased (Supplementary Fig. S5). It is known that the I_D/I_G peak ratio of GO increases by chemical reduction due to the generation of dense and small sp² carbon domains²¹. Based on the aforementioned results, we conclude that EDA crosslinks the GO sheets and also partially reduces GO, thus, the reduction becomes significant at longer EDA exposure times. However, we want to notice that the EDA treatment conditions are not enough to fully reduced GO into rGO as reflected by the presence of oxygen groups in GO/EDA samples (Fig. 4B,C).

The mechanical properties of the GO/EDA coating with various EDA exposure times were measured using the nanoindentation method and compared with a neat GO film (Fig. 5A). The hardness of GO was 0.34 GPa and that for the GO/EDA coatings was 1.14, 0.41, 0.39, and 0.40 GPa for 5 min, 1 h, 3 h, and 24 h of exposure, respectively. The elastic modulus of GO was 8.78 GPa and that of the GO/EDA coatings was 28.7, 8.68, 7.13, and 10.2 for EDA exposure times of 5 min, 1 h, 3 h, and 24 h, respectively. Both hardness and elastic modulus of the GO/EDA coating were relatively higher than those of GO. The highest values of hardness and elastic modulus were observed at EDA vapor exposure for 5 min. It appeared that the mechanical properties of GO were highly enhanced when low amounts of EDA were present to crosslink adjacent GO sheets. In contrast, excessive EDA hindered the crosslinking by decorating the surface of GO as evidenced by the SEM image shown in Fig. 1E.

The mechanical properties of the GO/EDA films (marked with red hexagons) are higher than polymers, polymer composite films, LBL films, and two-dimensional (2D) materials as summarized in Fig. 5B and Supplementary Table S1^{4,33,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55}. The hardness and modulus of polymer were reported as in the range of 20–380 MPa and 0.4–2.9 GPa. The hardness and the modulus of polymer composite films (green triangles) were in the range of 56–1510 MPa and 0.26–7.35 GPa, respectively. As expected, LBL film (blue squares) had better mechanical properties as 240–1150 MPa for hardness and 1.9–17.64 GPa for modulus. Neat 2D materials such as MoS₂ showed hardness and modulus between 600–630 MPa and 7.2–15 GPa, respectively. Although various coating materials generally express adequate mechanical properties, the mechanical properties of GO/EDA coating are excellent particularly at 5 min of EDA exposure time with 1135 MPa for hardness and 28.7 GPa for modulus, which is beneficial for the utilization of the GO/EDA coating in high-pressure conditions such as high-pressure H₂ storage tank.

While GO coating is known as an impermeable gas barrier²³, the stability of GO in water is one of the critical problems associated with the use of the GO film in humid conditions or aqueous solvents⁵⁶. Thereby, the stability of the GO/EDA coating in water, acidic solution, and basic solution was tested as shown in Fig. 6. The concentration of acidic and basic solutions was 1 M, which was controlled by the volumes of HCl and NaOH, respectively. A neat GO film on the nylon substrate was unstable and easily re-dispersed in water due to the abundant oxygen functional groups on the surface of GO⁵⁷. In contrast, GO/EDA coating on the nylon support was stable in water, acidic conditions, and basic conditions even after 15 days of immersion. The stability of the GO/EDA coating can be attributed to the crosslinking between GO sheets and EDA molecules as well as enhanced π–π interaction between partially reduced GO sheets as discussed in Fig. 4.

The gas permeance of GO/EDA coating was measured using a time lag method with the equipment illustrated in Supplementary Fig. S6 (Fig. 7). A 75-μm-thick PET film, one of the most widely used polymers for packaging, was used as a substrate film and the thickness of GO and GO/EDA coating was approximately 1–1.5 μm (Supplementary Fig. S7). First, the variation of the He permeance with EDA exposure time was measured to verify the influence of EDA amounts on the gas permeance of the GO/EDA coating and to evaluate the best GO/EDA structure to block gas permeation (Fig. 7A). (number) denotes the EDA exposure time of GO/EDA sample. The transmembrane pressure was 1 bar and the temperature was 25 °C. As previously reported^23,33, the GO film was highly impermeable to He with a permeance of 9.58 × 10^–12 mol/m² s Pa, which represents a 98.3% reduction to the neat PET film (5.54 × 10^–10 mol/m² s Pa). The He permeances for GO/EDA (5 min), (1 h), (3 h), and (24 h) were 3.60 × 10^–11, 3.75 × 10^–11, 2.85 × 10^–11, and 2.23 × 10^–11 mol/m² s Pa, respectively. Note that the permeance of GO/EDA coating is slightly higher than that of GO coating possibly due to the expanded interlayer spacing in the presence of EDA. Nonetheless, all GO/EDA coatings can enhance barrier properties of PET film, and the best He barrier performance was achieved at 24 h of EDA exposure time, showing a 96.0% reduction compared to the neat PET film.

The neat PET film, neat GO, and GO/EDA (24 h) coating were further tested with several gases including He, H₂, CO₂, N₂, and CH₄ at 1 bar and 25 °C (Fig. 7B). The neat PET film was permeable to all tested gas molecules showing a permeance in the range of 3.87 × 10^–10 mol/m² s Pa (CO₂)–5.54 × 10^–10 mol/m² s Pa (He). Neat GO films were highly impermeable to all gas molecules, showing permeance in the range of 3.46 × 10^–12 mol/m² s Pa (CO₂)–9.58 × 10^–12 mol/m² s Pa (He), which represents a minimum 98.5% reduction for H₂ and up to 99.1% reduction for CO₂ compared to PET. Interestingly, the GO/EDA (24 h) film was also showed its highly impermeable property to different gas molecules with permeance ranging from 2.23 × 10^–11 to 7.12 × 10^–12 mol/m² s Pa. The reduction degree compared to PET was approximately 98.5% for H₂ and 99.0% for CO₂ and the permeance reduction was particularly dramatic for gas molecules lager than He and H₂. As indicated by the permeance tendency of all five gas molecules, the GO/EDA (24 h) film possessed a similar gas barrier performance to that of the neat GO film, which is known to have excellent gas barrier performance²³.

He permeance of GO/EDA (24 h) was also examined by increasing the transmembrane pressure from 1 to 5 bar at room temperature (25 °C) as shown in Fig. 7C. While the He permeance of the neat PET film increased from 5.54 × 10^–10 to 3.06 × 10^–9 mol/m² s Pa for 1 and 5 bar, respectively, the He permeance of GO/EDA (24 h) decreased from 2.23 × 10^–11 to 4.11 × 10^–12 mol/m² s Pa for 1 and 5 bar, respectively, and a similar tendency was detected for neat GO. Therefore, the GO/EDA coating is particularly effective to block gas molecules at high pressure with a 99.3% reduction of He permeance at 5 bar compared to neat PET.

The influence of temperature on the He permeance of the GO/EDA (24 h) film was investigated by increasing the temperature from 25 to 100 °C and back to 25 °C (Fig. 7D). The He permeance of neat GO gradually increased from 9.58 × 10^–12 mol/m² s Pa at 25 °C to 2.59 × 10^–10 mol/m² s Pa at 100 °C as indicated by the blue line in Fig. 7D. The GO/EDA (24 h) film also showed a similar tendency with increased He permeance from 2.23 × 10^–11 to 3.19 × 10^–10 mol/m² s Pa at 25 °C and 100 °C, respectively, which can be attributed to activated gas diffusion at high temperature, as previously reported for a laminated GO film^33,58,59. After cooling to 25 °C, the He permeance of the GO coated film (9.31 × 10^–12 mol/m² s Pa) was nearly the same as the value before heat treatment (9.58 × 10^–12 mol/m² s Pa). In contrast, the He permeance of GO/EDA (24 h) was further reduced to 2.14 × 10^–12 mol/m² s Pa after cooling. Interestingly, this value is even lower than that of neat GO film, emphasizing that the additional heat treatment of GO/EDA (24 h) is effective in further enhancing the gas barrier properties of the GO/EDA coating.

To understand the origin of the enhanced gas barrier properties of GO/EDA (24 h) after heat treatment, additional experiments were conducted as shown in Supplementary Fig. S8. XRD patterns, Raman spectra, FT-IR spectra, and XPS C1s spectra of GO/EDA (24 h) after heat treatment at 100 °C demonstrated a better alignment of the GO nanosheets. This can be explained by the rearrangement of EDA between GO nanosheets, as a narrow interlayer spacing can be formed by the reduction of some of the oxygen-containing groups of GO (Supplementary Fig. S8). In addition, excessive and unreacted EDA molecules can be possibly removed from the composite film. Therefore, the enhanced gas barrier performance of GO/EDA (24 h) after heat treatment can be attributed to the abundantly arranged EDA molecules in the narrow nanochannels of GO, which hinder the diffusion of gas molecules by steric hindrance and hydrogen bonding interaction of polar molecules^3,33,60. In contrast, the low amount of EDA can increase the space of the nanochannels, resulting in faster gas permeation than neat GO, which happens in the case of GO/EDA (5 min) shown in Fig. 7A. Therefore, controlling the interlayer spacing of GO and the amount of intercalated EDA is critical for achieving gas barrier performance.

The barrier performance of the GO/EDA (24 h) film is comparable with previous graphene-based gas barrier coatings as shown in Supplementary Table S2^{3,4,10,13,24,32,61,62,63}. Since experimental conditions such as coating thickness, coating methods, and coating materials are different, it is hard to compare the gas barrier performance directly. Nevertheless, the comparison could be helpful to understand the effectiveness of the GO/EDA coating to block gas molecules. The permeance reduction of He and H₂ was particularly organized because they are the smallest molecules and highly permeable and because there is a growing demand for the hydrogen storage tank with light materials. Simply mixed graphene/polymer coating shows 82–99.9% reduction of H₂ permeance when applied onto PET or nylon substrates^{3,4,10,13,24,32,62,63,64}. As expected, graphene-coatings prepared by LBL methods and neat rGO coating have reported high gas barrier performances with approximately 41.1–99.9% reduction of H₂ and He permeance^24,64. While our GO/EDA coating procedure is simple and readily applicable for coating various objects, the coating surpasses the performances of the aforementioned graphene polymer composites coating with a reduction of 99.6% and 98.5% in the permeances of He and H₂, respectively.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that a highly concentrated GOLC system is effective to prepare composite materials based on graphene/small molecules. Since GOLC facilitates the diffusion of EDA through the macropores of its scaffolds and EDA is highly volatile even at low temperatures, intercalation and crosslinking of EDA between graphene sheets can be achieved spontaneously. Furthermore, the viscoelastic properties of GOLC are beneficial to coat well-aligned graphene sheets on the target surface. The intercalated EDA acts as a cross-linker and as a reducing agent; thus, the GO/EDA coating is highly stable in water, acids, and bases. The gas barrier performance of the GO/EDA film can be enhanced than that of neat GO film when the GO/EDA (24 h) coating was heat-treated at 100 °C. The heat-treated GO/EDA (24 h) film showed a permeance reduction of 99.6% and 98.5% for He and H₂, respectively, at atmospheric conditions compared to a neat PET film. We believe this coating strategy can provide insight into the preparation of other 2D material-based multifunctional composite films and this method is also useful for the fabrication of hydrogen storage containers.

Methods

GO synthesis

Graphite (≤ 20 μm, 99% pure, Sigma Aldrich) was oxidized using a modified Hummer’s method by following the literature²⁷. Graphite (4 g) and KMnO₄ (12 g) were mixed with 150 mL of sulfuric acid (98%). After stirring the solution for 5 h at 35 °C, deionized (DI) water and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) were added in sequence, in an ice bath. The solution was then filtrated with a cellulose filter to remove any remaining acidic solution and washed several times with DI water. The filtrated GO was re-dispersed with DI water and freeze-dried to obtain GO powder.

Fabrication of the GO/EDA film

GO (3 g) was dispersed in 100 mL of DI water by ultrasonication for 3 h to prepare 30 mg/mL of GO solution. At the concentration, LC phase was observed by using polarized optical microscopy³³. A nylon substrate (Sterlitech, 0.1 µm pore diameter) and a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film (75 μm thickness) were coated with GOLC to a thickness of 180 µm. The thickness was controlled using a bar-coater (Yoshimitsu, YBA-7). The substrates coated with GOLC were exposed to EDA vapor generated from an EDA solution (75%, 0.5 mL) for different exposure times (1, 5, and 10 min, 1, 24, 45, and 72 h) at 50 °C. The volatility of EDA accelerates its migration from the EDA solution into the GOLC coating. After exposure to the EDA vapor, the GO/EDA coated substrates were dried at 25 °C for 24 h to remove the excess water.

Gas permeance measurement

Gas permeance was measured by a constant volume and differential pressure method by following the literature^64,65, which is one of the most widely used techniques for measuring gas permeance. Films were placed on a stainless-steel mesh support and fixed using epoxy glue before the measurement. The sample cell was divided into two parts, the film side and mesh side. The mesh was under vacuum while the target gas was flowing on the other side with a flow rate of 20 sccm. The pressure of feed gas was controlled by using a backpressure regulator and a gas cylinder regulator. The vacuum of the permeation side was measured by using a vacuum gauge (Teledyne Hastings Instruments, HVG-2020B). The gas permeance was calculated with the following equation:

$$\text{Permeance}=\frac{{V}_{c}}{R*T*{P}_{a}*A}\frac{dp}{dt}$$

where V_C is the chamber volume of the vacuum side (98.5 mL), A is the effective film area (m²), P_a is the atmospheric pressure or transmembrane pressure (Pa), dp/dt is the pressure variation of the chamber on the vacuum side per unit of time, and R is the gas constant. T is the temperature (K), which was controlled using a convection oven.

Characterization

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained using a Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FE-SEM, JEOL, 7610f-plus). The viscosities of GO solutions were measured with a cone plate geometry (diameter: 40 mm; angle: 1° 58′ 55″) and a Peltier plate temperature system of a discovery hybrid rheometer (DHR-3, TA Instruments) at 25 °C. Flow sweep tests were conducted with shear rates between 10⁻⁵ and 100 s⁻¹ and a fixed truncation gap of 55 μm. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained using a SmartLab (Rigaku, wavelength: 1.54 Å) diffractometer. Water contact angle images were measured using an Attension Theta Lite (Biolin Scientific) optical tensiometer. Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were obtained using a Spectrum 100 (Perkin Elmer, USA). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurement was performed using a K-alpha (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with a Cu(Kα) beam source (wavelength 1.5406 Å). Nanoindentation tests were conducted using a nanoindentation system (Nano Indenter XP, MTS). Raman spectra were obtained using a LabRam Aramis (Horriba Jovin Yvon) with a 532 nm laser.

References

Lai, C. et al. Bio-inspired cross-linking with borate for enhancing gas-barrier properties of poly(vinyl alcohol)/graphene oxide composite films. Carbon 82, 513–522 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Singh Raman, R. K. et al. Protecting copper from electrochemical degradation by graphene coating. Carbon 50, 4040–4045 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yang, Y. H., Bolling, L., Priolo, M. A. & Grunlan, J. C. Super gas barrier and selectivity of graphene oxide-polymer multilayer thin films. Adv. Mater. 25, 503–508 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li, X., Bandyopadhyay, P., Guo, M., Kim, N. H. & Lee, J. H. Enhanced gas barrier and anticorrosion performance of boric acid induced cross-linked poly(vinyl alcohol-co-ethylene)/graphene oxide film. Carbon 133, 150–161 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bunch, J. S. et al. Impermeable atomic membranes from graphene sheets. Nano Lett. 8, 2458–2462 (2008).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kim, K. S. et al. Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes. Nature 457, 706–710 (2009).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ma, Y. & Zhi, L. Graphene-based transparent conductive films: Material systems, preparation and applications. Small Methods 3, 20 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Chen, S. et al. Oxidation resistance of graphene-coated Cu and Cu/Ni alloy. ACS Nano 5, 1321–1327 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kim, D. W., Kim, Y. H., Jeong, H. S. & Jung, H. Direct visualization of large-area graphene domains and boundaries by optical birefringency. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 29–34 (2012).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Layek, R. K., Das, A. K., Park, M. U., Kim, N. H. & Lee, J. H. Layer-structured graphene oxide/polyvinyl alcohol nanocomposites: Dramatic enhancement of hydrogen gas barrier properties. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 20 (2014).
Article Google Scholar
Kim, K. H. et al. The role of layer-controlled graphene for tunable microwave heating and its applications to the synthesis of inorganic thin films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 5556–5562 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Layek, R. K. et al. Layered structure graphene oxide/methylcellulose composites with enhanced mechanical and gas barrier properties. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 13203–13214 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Li, X., Bandyopadhyay, P., Nguyen, T. T., Park, O. & Lee, J. H. Fabrication of functionalized graphene oxide/maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene composite film with excellent gas barrier and anticorrosion properties. J. Membr. Sci. 547, 80–92 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhu, Y. et al. Graphene and graphene oxide: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv. Mater. 22, 3906–3924 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
**ang, C. et al. Functionalized low defect graphene nanoribbons and polyurethane composite film for improved gas barrier and mechanical performances. ACS Nano 7, 10380–10386 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Choi, K. et al. Reduced water vapor transmission rate of graphene gas barrier films for flexible organic field-effect transistors. ACS Nano 9, 5818–5824 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Choi, D., Park, H., Lim, J. H., Han, T. H. & Park, J. Three-dimensionally stacked Al₂O₃/graphene oxide for gas barrier applications. Carbon 125, 464–471 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Tölle, F. J., Gamp, K. & Mülhaupt, R. Scale-up and purification of graphite oxide as intermediate for functionalized graphene. Carbon 75, 432–442 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhong, Y. L., Tian, Z., Simon, G. P. & Li, D. Scalable production of graphene via wet chemistry: Progress and challenges. Mater. Today 18, 73–78 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wei, P. & Bai, S. Fabrication of a high-density polyethylene/graphene composite with high exfoliation and high mechanical performance via solid-state shear milling. RSC Adv. 5, 93697–93705 (2015).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Stankovich, S. et al. Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon 45, 1558–1565 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Geng, Y., Wang, S. J. & Kim, J. K. Preparation of graphite nanoplatelets and graphene sheets. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 336, 592–598 (2009).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nair, R., Wu, H., Jayaram, P., Grigorieva, I. & Geim, A. Unimpeded permeation of water through helium-leak–tight graphene-based membranes. Science 335, 442–444 (2012).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Su, Y. et al. Impermeable barrier films and protective coatings based on reduced graphene oxide. Nat. Commun. 5, 4843 (2014).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kim, H. W. et al. High-performance CO₂-philic graphene oxide membranes under wet-conditions. Chem. Commun. 50, 13563–13566 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pham, V. H. et al. Fast and simple fabrication of a large transparent chemically-converted graphene film by spray-coating. Carbon 48, 1945–1951 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kim, D. W., Choi, J., Kim, D. & Jung, H. Enhanced water permeation based on nanoporous multilayer graphene membranes: The role of pore size and density. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 17773–17781 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pierleoni, D. et al. Graphene-based coatings on polymer films for gas barrier applications. Carbon 96, 503–512 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Cruz-Silva, R. et al. Super-stretchable graphene oxide macroscopic fibers with outstanding knotability fabricated by dry film scrolling. ACS Nano 8, 5959–5967 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Moon, I. K. et al. 2D graphene oxide nanosheets as an adhesive over-coating layer for flexible transparent conductive electrodes. Sci. Rep. 3, 1–7 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kim, J. H. et al. Scalable fabrication of deoxygenated graphene oxide nanofiltration membrane by continuous slot-die coating. J. Membr. Sci. 612, 20 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Liu, H. et al. Layer-by-layer assembled polyelectrolyte-decorated graphene multilayer film for hydrogen gas barrier application. Compos. B. Eng. 114, 339–347 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kim, D. W., Kim, H., **, M. L. & Ellison, C. J. Impermeable gas barrier coating by facilitated diffusion of ethylenediamine through graphene oxide liquid crystals. Carbon 148, 28–35 (2019).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Crisp, M. T. & Kotov, N. A. Preparation of nanoparticle coatings on surfaces of complex geometry. Nano Lett. 3, 173–177 (2003).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Cui, Y., Kumar, S., Rao Kona, B. & van Houcke, D. Gas barrier properties of polymer/clay nanocomposites. RSC Adv. 5, 63669–63690 (2015).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Kim, J. E. et al. Graphene oxide liquid crystals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 3043–3047 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kim, H. et al. Polydopamine-graphene oxide flame retardant nanocoatings applied via an aqueous liquid crystalline scaffold. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1803172 (2018).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Kumar, P., Maiti, U. N., Lee, K. E. & Kim, S. O. Rheological properties of graphene oxide liquid crystal. Carbon 80, 453–461 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sasikala, S. P. et al. Graphene oxide liquid crystals: A frontier 2D soft material for graphene-based functional materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 6013–6045 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Hung, W. et al. Cross-linking with diamine monomers to prepare composite graphene oxide-framework membranes with varying d-spacing. Chem. Mater. 26, 2983–2990 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kim, N. H., Kuila, T. & Lee, J. H. Simultaneous reduction, functionalization and stitching of graphene oxide with ethylenediamine for composites application. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 1349–1358 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Dhakal, H. N., Zhang, Z. Y. & Richardson, M. O. W. Nanoindentation behaviour of layered silicate reinforced unsaturated polyester nanocomposites. Polym. Test. 25, 846–852 (2006).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Das, B., Eswar Prasad, K., Ramamurty, U. & Rao, C. N. Nano-indentation studies on polymer matrix composites reinforced by few-layer graphene. Nanotechnology 20, 125705 (2009).
Article ADS PubMed CAS Google Scholar
King, J. A., Klimek, D. R., Miskioglu, I. & Odegard, G. M. Mechanical properties of graphene nanoplatelet/epoxy composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 128, 4217–4223 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sharma, B., Shekhar, S., Gautam, S., Sarkar, A. & Jain, P. Nanomechanical analysis of chemically reduced graphene oxide reinforced poly (vinyl alcohol) nanocomposite thin films. Polym. Test. 70, 458–466 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Shin, S., Kim, J. S., Kim, S. J., Kim, D. W. & Jung, H. Polybenzoxazole/graphene nanocomposite for etching hardmask. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 75, 296–303 (2019).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhao, X. et al. Alternate multilayer films of poly(vinyl alcohol) and exfoliated graphene oxide fabricated via a facial layer-by-layer assembly. Macromolecules 43, 9411–9416 (2010).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Tang, L., Li, X., Du, D. & He, C. Fabrication of multilayer films from regenerated cellulose and graphene oxide through layer-by-layer assembly. Prog. Nat. Sci. 22, 341–346 (2012).
Article Google Scholar
Wang, N., Ji, S., Zhang, G., Li, J. & Wang, L. Self-assembly of graphene oxide and polyelectrolyte complex nanohybrid membranes for nanofiltration and pervaporation. Chem. Eng. J. 213, 318–329 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hatter, C. B., Shah, J., Anasori, B. & Gogotsi, Y. Micromechanical response of two-dimensional transition metal carbonitride (MXene) reinforced epoxy composites. Compos. B. Eng. 182, 20 (2020).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Panich, N., Wangyao, P., Hannongbua, S., Sricharoenchai, P. & Sun, Y. Effect of polytetrafluoroethylene do** on tribological property improvement of MoS₂ nano-thin films on Ti-substrate. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 16, 88–95 (2007).
CAS Google Scholar
Fang, T. & Chang, W. Nanoindentation characteristics on polycarbonate polymer film. Microelectron 35, 595–599 (2004).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Flores, A. et al. Structure formation in poly(ethylene terephthalate) upon annealing as revealed by microindentation hardness and X-ray scattering. Polymer 46, 9404–9410 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gracias, D. & Somorjai, G. Continuum force microscopy study of the elastic modulus, hardness and friction of polyethylene and polypropylene surfaces. Macromolecules 31, 1269–1276 (1998).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Gupta, T. K., Singh, B. P., Dhakate, S. R., Singh, V. N. & Mathur, R. B. Improved nanoindentation and microwave shielding properties of modified MWCNT reinforced polyurethane composites. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 20 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Nam, Y. T., Choi, J., Kang, K. M., Kim, D. W. & Jung, H. Enhanced stability of laminated graphene oxide membranes for nanofiltration via interstitial amide bonding. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 27376–27382 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Konios, D., Stylianakis, M. M., Stratakis, E. & Kymakis, E. Dispersion behaviour of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 430, 108–112 (2014).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kim, H. W. et al. Selective gas transport through few-layered graphene and graphene oxide membranes. Science 342, 91–95 (2013).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ibrahim, A. & Lin, Y. S. Gas permeation and separation properties of large-sheet stacked graphene oxide membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 550, 238–245 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kim, D. W. et al. Revealing the role of oxygen debris and functional groups on the water flux and molecular separation of graphene oxide membrane: A combined experimental and theoretical study. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 17507–17517 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bandyopadhyay, P. et al. Hexylamine functionalized reduced graphene oxide/polyurethane nanocomposite-coated nylon for enhanced hydrogen gas barrier film. J. Membr. Sci. 500, 106–114 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bandyopadhyay, P., Nguyen, T. T., Li, X., Kim, N. H. & Lee, J. H. Enhanced hydrogen gas barrier performance of diaminoalkane functionalized stitched graphene oxide/polyurethane composites. Compos. B. Eng. 117, 101–110 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pierleoni, D. et al. Selective gas permeation in graphene oxide-polymer self-assembled multilayers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 11242–11250 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kim, D. W., Han, H., Kim, H., Guo, X. & Tsapatsis, M. Preparation of a graphene oxide/faujasite composite adsorbent. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 268, 243–250 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Choi, E. et al. Pore tuning of metal-organic framework membrane anchored on graphene-oxide nanoribbon. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2011146 (2021).
Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support of basic science research program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2019R1A6A1A11055660). This research was also supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) with funding from the Korean Government (MSIT) (NRF-2020R1C1C1003289), Yonsei University Research fund of 2019-22-0012 and an internal Grant (code: 20200543) from the Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Yonsei University, Yonsei-ro 50, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
Seung Eun Choi, Eunji Choi, Ji Hoon Kim, Yunkyu Choi, Junhyeok Kang, Ohchan Kwon & Dae Woo Kim
Carbon Composite Materials Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, 92 Chudong-ro Bongdong-eup, Wanju-gun, Jeollabuk-do, 55324, Republic of Korea
Sung-Soo Kim

Authors

Seung Eun Choi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Sung-Soo Kim
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Eunji Choi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ji Hoon Kim
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yunkyu Choi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Junhyeok Kang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ohchan Kwon
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Dae Woo Kim
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.W.K. designed and supervised the entire experiment; S.E.C. carried out all the experiments; D.W.K. and S.E.C. prepared the manuscript; D.W.K., S.E.C., Y.C. visualized the key idea of the experiment; D.W.K., S.E.C., S.K., J.H.K., J.K. analyzed the data, D.W.K., S.E.C., E.C., O.K. discussed the methodology; all authors discussed the results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dae Woo Kim.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information 1.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choi, S.E., Kim, SS., Choi, E. et al. Diamine vapor treatment of viscoelastic graphene oxide liquid crystal for gas barrier coating. Sci Rep 11, 9518 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88955-5

Download citation

Received: 23 November 2020
Accepted: 20 April 2021
Published: 04 May 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88955-5
Springer Nature Limited

Diamine vapor treatment of viscoelastic graphene oxide liquid crystal for gas barrier coating

Abstract

Similar content being viewed by others

Improvement in Barrier Properties Using a Large Lateral Size of Exfoliated Graphene Oxide

Graphene oxide incorporation in lamellar organosiloxane film for improved water vapor barrier property

Stable graphene oxide-based lyotropic liquid crystals for interfacial lubrication

Introduction

Conclusions

Methods

GO synthesis

Fabrication of the GO/EDA film

Gas permeance measurement

Characterization

References

Acknowledgements

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Contributions

Corresponding author

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Additional information

Publisher's note

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information 1.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Navigation

Diamine vapor treatment of viscoelastic graphene oxide liquid crystal for gas barrier coating

Abstract

Similar content being viewed by others

Improvement in Barrier Properties Using a Large Lateral Size of Exfoliated Graphene Oxide

Graphene oxide incorporation in lamellar organosiloxane film for improved water vapor barrier property

Stable graphene oxide-based lyotropic liquid crystals for interfacial lubrication

Introduction

Conclusions

Methods

GO synthesis

Fabrication of the GO/EDA film

Gas permeance measurement

Characterization

References

Acknowledgements

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Contributions

Corresponding author

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Additional information

Publisher's note

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information 1.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Share this article

Search

Navigation