Abstract
This study presents a microfluidics based cytometry capable of characterizing cell sizes and counting numbers of specific cytosolic proteins where cells were first bound by antibodies labelled with fluorescence and then aspirated into a constriction microchannel in which fluorescent levels were measured. These raw fluorescent pulses were further divided into a rising domain, a stable domain and a declining domain. In addition, antibody solutions with labelled fluorescence were aspirated through the constriction microchannel, yielding curves to translate raw fluorescent levels to protein concentrations. By using key parameters of three domains as well as the calibration curves, cell diameters and the absolute number of β-actins at the single-cell level were quantified as 14.2 ± 1.7 μm and 9.62 ± 4.29 × 105 (A549, ncell = 14 242), 13.0 ± 2.0 μm and 6.46 ± 3.34 × 105 (Hep G2, ncell = 35 932), 13.8 ± 1.9 μm and 1.58 ± 0.90 × 106 (MCF 10 A, ncell = 16 650), and 12.7 ± 1.5 μm and 1.09 ± 0.49 × 106 (HeLa, ncell = 26 246). This platform could be further adopted to measure numbers of various cytosolic proteins, providing key insights in proteomics at the single-cell level.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Quantitative analysis of single-cell protein expressions can provide information in understanding heterogeneities of cells within the fields of immunology and oncology1,2,3. Nowadays, flow cytometers are the golden instruments for quantifying protein numbers at the single-cell level in which cells bound with antibodies labelled with fluorescent or isotope probes travel rapidly through a detection region with corresponding fluorescent levels or isotope numbers measured4,5,6. Based on calibrating microbeads, flow cytometers enable absolute counting of membrane proteins of single cells7,8,9,10, pushing forward the developments of various diseases involving white and red cells5. However, when conventional flow cytometers are leveraged to estimate cytosolic proteins for deep phenoty**11,12 and signaling state characterization13,14,15,16, they are incapable of collecting numbers of specific cytosolic proteins since the corresponding calibration microbeads are missing, severely compromising developments in these fields1,2,3.
Microfluidics is a technology of processing fluids based on microchannels with critical geometries of tens to hundreds of μm17,18. Due to the dimensional comparisons between microfluidics and biological cells, microfluidics has functioned as an enabling platform for single-cell protein analysis19,20. Currently, microfluidic platforms for single-cell protein analysis are divided into miniaturized flow cytometers21,22,23 and microfabricated arrays (e.g., microengraving24,25,26,27,28, barcoding microchips29,30,31,32, western blot of single cells33 and microwells for single-cell isolation and characterization34,35,36,37).
Among these developed microfluidic platforms, microengraving and barcoding microchips can realize absolute measurements of specific cytosolic proteins, by confining single cells in microfabricated domains with targeted proteins captured by antibodies previously coated within the detection areas19,20. However, compared to flow cytometers, these microfluidic approaches have lower throughputs since they are not capable of processing cells continuously. As to the miniaturized flow cytometry, due to the lack of calibration beads, counting of specific cytosolic proteins was not reported by the majority of micro flow cytometry21,22,23. Recently, a modified fluorescent micro flow cytometry was reported, enabling the translation of raw fluorescent signals into specific protein concentrations, which, however, cannot be further translated to absolute numbers due to the lack of the critical information of cell sizes38.
With the purpose of dealing with this problem, this manuscript reports a constriction microchannel based flow cytometer capable of simultaneously characterizing cellular sizes and specific cytosolic proteins. In the modified flow cytometry, cells bound with antibodies labelled with fluorescent probes are deformed through the constriction microchannel with cross-sectional areas smaller than cells where profiles of fluorescence are collected as a function of time, which are further processed to obtain cellular sizes and raw fluorescent intensities. In addition, fluorescent antibodies are aspirated through the constriction microchannel to produce calibration curves. Based on cell sizes, preliminary fluorescent intensities as well as the calibrating curve, counting of specific cytosolic proteins at the single-cell level can be obtained. Compared to well-established flow cytometers, this platform can provide a calibrating strategy of translating preliminary signals into protein numbers. In comparison to other microfluidic systems (e.g., barcoding microchips and microengraving), this study can enable the counting of single-cell cytosolic proteins in a high-throughput manner.
Materials and Methodologies
Materials
If not specifically mentioned, reagents for cell cultures were bought from Life Technologies (USA). Materials used for cellular processing (e.g., protein fixation, membrane penetration, anti-fouling block and intracellular staining) mainly include triton X-100 and bovine serum albumin (BSA) from Sigma-Aldrich (USA) as well as anti β-actin antibody from ABCAM (UK). Materials for microfabrications include photoresist of SU-8 from MicroChem (USA) and elastomer of 184 silicone from Dow Corning (USA).
Working Principle
The developed microfluidic flow cytometer is mainly composed of a constriction microchannel plus a microfabricated chrome window as the detection domain of fluorescence, a LED (light emitting diode) based light source and a PMT (photomultiplier tube) based fluorescent detector (please refer to Fig. 1).
In experiments, individual cells bound with antibodies labelled with fluorescent probes (refer to Fig. 1(A)) are deformed into the constriction microchannel (refer to Fig. 1(B)) and the excited fluorescent signals are captured by PMT (refer to Fig. 1(C)). Because the constriction microchannel is smaller than cells, cells are forced to deform through the constriction microchannel with an elongation length Lc, where the middle portion of the deformed cell fully fills the constriction microchannel38 while both the front and rear surfaces are treated as semi-spheres with diameters the same as the width of constriction microchannel (Wc) (refer to Fig. 1(D)).
The fluorescent profile of a representative cell as a function of time can be divided into three domains (refer to Fig. 1(D)), which includes a rising domain with a time duration of Tr, a stable domain with a fluorescent level of If and a time duration of Ts and a declining domain with a time duration of Td. In the rising domain, there is a gradual increase of fluorescent intensities indicating that the deformed cell with fluorescence labelled antibodies gradually fills the fluorescent detection region defined by the patterned chrome layer where the cellular traveling distance for this domain is mainly the chrome gap (\({G}_{c}+{W}_{c}/2\)). As the deformed cell further moves in the constriction microchannel, there is a duration with a stable fluorescent intensity of If, which indicates the full occupation of the constriction microchannel. The time duration Ts of this section corresponds to the travelling distance of cell elongation minus the width of the constriction microchannel (\({L}_{c}-{W}_{c}-{G}_{c}\)). As for the declining domain with a duration of Td, it corresponds to the gradual decrease in fluorescent intensities for the leaving of the deformed cell with the same travelling distance as \({G}_{c}+{W}_{c}/2\). Based on this analysis, the cell elongation length of Lc can be obtained by interpreting the fluorescent profile as a function of time, which is further translated to the diameters of cells Dc (refer to Fig. 1(D)).
Due to this unique design of cellular full occupations of the constriction microchannel, varied concentrations of antibodies labelled with fluorescent probes are flushed into the constriction microchannel where fluorescent signals are measured to form calibrating curves, illustrating the relation between intensities of fluorescence and concentrations of specific proteins (refer to Fig. 1(F)). Based on raw parameters of Tr, Ts, If, and Td, as well as the calibration curve, cell diameters (Dc) and concentrations of the targeted protein (Cp) per cells were quantified, resulting to the number counting of the targeted protein at the single-cell level (refer to Fig. 1(G)).
Culture, Processing and Characterization of Biological Cells
All cell types were bought from the China Infrastructure of Cell Line Resources (China) and the cell culture was conducted with an incubator of Thermo Scientific (USA) under the conditions of 37 °C and 5% CO2. The adenocarcinomic human alveolar basal epithelial cell type of A549 was seeded in a RPMI-1640 medium plus 10% w/w FBS and 1% w/w antibiotics. The human hepatocellular tumorigenic cell type of Hep G2 was seeded in a DMEM medium plus 10% w/w FBS and 1% w/w antibiotics. The non-tumorigenic human breast epithelial cell type of MCF 10 A was seeded in a DMEM/F-12 medium plus NEAA (1% w/w), HS (5% w/w), insulin (10 μg/ml), EGF (20 ng/ml), cholera toxin (100 ng/ml), hydrocortisone (0.5 μg/ml), and antibiotics (1% w/w). The human cervical tumour cell type of HeLa was seeded in a DMEM medium plus 10% w/w FBS and 1% w/w antibiotics. Prior to experiments, adherent cells in the logarithmic phase (e.g, 24 hours after seeding of A549 and HeLa cells and 48 hours after seeding of Hep G2 and MCF 10 A cells) were trypsinized, centrifuged and resuspended in phosphate buffer saline supplemented with 0.5% bovine serum albumin at a concentration of ~10 million cells per mL.
Intracellular staining of β-actins was realized by using conventional protocols widely used in the experiments of flow cytometers, including major steps of protein fixation and immoblization, membrane penetration and permeabilization, anti-fouling blocking and staining of antibodies. Within this experiment, in the first step of fixation, the cells in suspensions were incubated with 2% formaldehyde (at 4 °C for a duration of 15 min). Then, the cells were incubated with triton X-100 for 15 min at 4 °C with membranes punched with holes. As to percentages of triton X-100, a variety of concentrations were used for comparisons, which were 0.05%, 0.1% and 0.3% for A549 cells; 0.01%, 0.03%, 0.05% and 0.07% for Hep G2 cells; 0.05%, 0.10%, 0.15% and 0.20% for MCF 10 A cells; and 0.05%, 0.10%, 0.15% and 0.20% for HeLa cells.
Then anti-fouling blocking was done using 5% BSA at the room temperature for a duration of 30 min. Furthermore, β-actin antibodies with fluorescent probes at a dilution of 1:100 were applied for cell incubations at a group of time durations (e.g., 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, or 8 hours) under the condition of 37 °C.
To evaluate the results of cellular staining, both bright-field and fluorescent images of stained cells were collected based on a fluorescent microscopy and a CCD (IX 83 and DP73, Olympus, Japan). Stained cells were added on a glass slide and confined to the height of 100 μm with the help of a second cover slide. After placing the slides on the microscope, bright-field and fluorescent pictures were recorded at an exposure time of 40 ms to alleviate the concerns of photobleaching.
Based on bright-field images, the status of cellular aggregations due to excessive membrane penetrations was evaluated to optimize the percentages of triton x-100 used in the step of membrane permeabilization. ImageJ (National Institute of Health, USA) was used to process fluorescent images and extract cellular pixel intensities to optimize the time durations in the step of antibody staining.
Design and MicroFabrication of Constriction Microchannels
Within this platform, constriction microchannels (8 μm in width and 8 μm in height) with 2.5 μm gaps made of chrome were fabricated to count specific type of cytosolic proteins at the single-cell level. The geometries of the constriction microchannel ensure that tumour cells (10–18 μm in diameter) could effectively deform and completely fill the constriction microchannel. Furthermore, at the inlet of the constriction microchannel, a gradual decrease in the channel width was used in this study with the corresponding values changed from 25 μm to 8 μm, decreasing the possibilities of channel blockage by incoming large cells.
Furthermore, the choice of the width of the chrome gap can also affect the diameters of cells that can be measured. In order to quantify cellular diameters, the process of cellular travelling through the chrome gap has to be decoupled into the rising domain, the stable domain and the declining domain. If the gap of the chrome window is too big, small cells cannot fully occupy the detection room, resulting in misleading data. In order to address this issue, 2.5 μm, the minimal feasible gap of chrome based on microfabrication was chosen in this study.
The proposed device was fabricated based on conventional microfabrication techniques in which the patterned PDMS layer including constriction microchannels was peeled away from a SU-8 mold based on twice photolithography. Meanwhile, a layer of chrome was first deposited on a quartz slide, which was further patterned to form gaps and then coated with a thin layer of unpatterned PDMS. Then the patterned PDMS layer and the glass layer with patterned chrome gaps were bonded together after plasma treatment (refer to Supp. Figure 1).
Briefly, SU-8 was spun on a glass slide, exposed without development to form the constriction microchannel (refer to Supp. Figure 1(A)). Then, SU-8 was spun again on the previous layer of photoresist, exposed with alignments and developed to form channels for cell transportations (refer to Supp. Figure 1(B,C)). Monomers and crosslinking agents of PDMS (10:1 by weight) were thoroughly mixed with bubbles removed, and casted on SU-8 molds, which were then put in an oven for crosslinking (overnight at 80 °C). After full crosslinking, the PDMS layers were removed from the mold of SU-8 and a metal puncher was used to form channel inlets and outlets (refer to Supp. Figure 1(D,E)).
Fabrications of chrome windows were realized by conventional microfabrication technologies including chrome sputtering on a quartz slide (refer to Supp. Figure 1(F)), micropatterning of photoresist (refer to Supp. Figure 1(G)), etching of chrome (refer to Supp. Figure 1(H,I)) and coating of an ultra-thin PDMS layer without patterning (refer to Supp. Figure 1(J)). More specifically, monomers and crosslinking agents of PDMS (10:1 by weight) were dissolved in hexane (1:16), thoroughly mixed, degassed, and spin coated on the patterned quartz slides to form a thin PDMS layer with a thickness of 0.8–1 μm. Finally, following the treatment of oxygen plasma, the PDMS layer with constriction microchannels and the chrome layer with microfabricated windows were sealed together (refer to Supp. Figure 1(K,L)).
Platform Operations and Result Analysis
In experiments, the constriction microchannel based microfluidic flow cytometry was rinsed with phosphate buffer saline with 0.5% bovine serum albumin and positioned on a fluorescent microscope (IX 83, Olympus, Japan) for photobleaching of 20 min. In this fluorescent microscope, the LED (M470L3-C1, Thorlabs, USA) with a wavelength of 470 ± 40 nm and an output power of 150 mW was used as the light source. Then stained cells with antibodies labelled with fluorescent probes were aspirated through constriction microchannels using a pressure generator (DPI-610, Druck, UK). Note that different cell types have different distributions of cell diameters and thus aspiration pressures were finely tuned to suck individual cell types through the constriction microchannel, which were 7–10 kPa for A549 cells, 5–7 kPa for Hep G2, 15–20 kPa for MCF 10 A and 15–20 kPa for HeLa cells.
Fluorescence of single cells travelling in the constriction microchannel was measured by the PMT of H10722-01(Hamamatsu, Japan), and then recorded by the DAQ of PCI-6221(NI, USA) at 100 kHz. In the step of calibration, antibody solutions with dilution times of 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000 and 5000 were forced to travel in the constriction microchannels, consistent with experimental conditions of single-cell analysis.
The preliminary data collected by DAQ were further processed based on median filtering (fifty points) to get rid of dark currents generated by PMT. Then, basal signals without cells were represented as average ± standard deviation and electrical pulses with amplitudes higher than average + 3 x standard deviation were regarded as effective events with travelling cells.
These electrical pulses were then divided into three domains based on curve fitting, collecting four key parameters, which are Tr, Ts, Td and If. Then two intermediate parameters of Dc (cell diameters derived from Tr, Ts, Td) and Cp (the concentration of β-actins at the single-cell level derived from If and the calibration curve) were quantified and further translated to np (the absolute number of single-cell β-actins).
Statistics
For each experiment, more than three times were conducted and the results were expressed as average ± standard deviation. Comparison of multiple groups were conducted using ANOVA based Turkey Test and P < 0.05 (*) represented significances with statistical meaning.
Experimental Results with Discussions
As a housekee** protein, β-actin is as an obligatory part of the cell cytoskeleton, playing key roles in maintenance of cellular shape, migration, division, growth and signalling39. Due to their constitutive expressions, β-actins are commonly used as internal controls in western blots based on the assumption that the expression levels of β-actins remain constant from cell to cell, sample to sample, treatment to treatment and patient to patient40,41,42. However, recent studies based on population analysis indicate that the expressions of β-actins can change in response to biochemical stimuli, during growth and differentiation, and in disease states41,43,44,45,46,47,48,49. Whether there also exists expression differences of β-actins among individual cells remains elusive. Thus, in this manuscript, a flow cytometry leveraging constriction microchannels was developed to quantitatively estimate the numbers of single-cell β-actins.
Intracellular Staining of β-Actins
With the purpose of counting the numbers of single-cell β-actins, intracellular staining with β-actin antibodies labelled with fluorescent probes was conducted, including major steps such as protein fixation, membrane penetration, anti-fouling block and staining with antibodies. The use of triton X-100 for membrane permeabilization was optimized to ensure intracellular β-actins were fully exposed. Theoretically, a maximal concentration of triton x-100 should be used to fully penetrate cell membranes without compromising cellular integrities. However, it was observed that high concentrations of triton x-100 lead to severe membrane compromises and cellular aggregations in the following step of antibody staining, which can produce uneven staining at the single-cell level. Thus, in this study, the percentages of triton x-100 were finely tuned for individual cell types, producing the optimal values of 0.05% for A549 cells, 0.03% for Hep G2 cells, 0.1% for MCF 10 A cells and 0.1% for HeLa cells.
Furthermore, in the step of cellular staining with fluorescence labelled antibodies, different incubation times were tested for these four types of cells in order to make sure that the majority of the exposed β-actins were taken by antibodies. As shown in Fig. 2(A), fluorescent images of stained A549, Hep G2, MCF 10 A and HeLa cells were demonstrated where the fluorescent levels of cells after the step of staining were measured as a function of time (refer to Fig. 2(B)).
Four types of cells showed similar trends where the stained fluorescent intensities increased as a function of the incubation time initially, and then saturate after four hours of incubation. Further extensions in the durations of incubation produced no dramatic improvements in the levels of fluorescence, suggesting that the majority of cytosolic β-actins was taken by corresponding antibodies after a four-hour duration of incubations. Note that these fluorescent intensities obtained from microscopic images are “relative” values based on “black balances” of the fluorescent pictures and “zeroing” of the fluorescent intensities of unstained cells of a specific type. Thus, although these fluorescent intensities can demonstrate the trend of antibody staining as a function of time, the obtained fluorescent values of different cell types cannot be effectively compared since they are relative values.
Collection and Processing of Raw Fluorescent Pulses
Stained cells were then aspirated to deform into the constriction microchannel with raw fluorescent levels recorded in a time sequence. Figure 3(A–D) represent raw characterization results of single A549, Hep G2, MCF 10 A and HeLa cells through the constriction microchannel where individual pulse stands for a travelling cell, which was further divided into the rising domain with a time duration of Tr, the stable domain with a fluorescent level of If and a time duration of Ts and the declining domain with a time duration of Td based on curve fitting.
Based on the curve fitting of these fluorescent pulses, several key parameters were further processed. First, the total travelling duration of a cell (Tc) as a sum of Tr, Ts, and Td was calculated, which were 7.8 ± 6.4 ms (A549 cells, ncell = 14 242), 5.7 ± 9.1 ms (Hep G2 cells, ncell = 35 932), 8.7 ± 11.5 ms (MCF 10 A cells, ncell = 16 650) and 7.4 ± 7.7 ms (HeLa cells, ncell = 26 246), respectively. These results indicate that the travelling durations of individual cells were estimated within 10 ms and thus the maximal throughput of this developed platform was estimated to be 100 cells per second (refer to Fig. 4). Since the response times of the PMT were in the range of 10 nm, there is a huge room for further improvement in the throughput of the developed system under the condition that the noises of the PMT can be controlled properly.
For the stable domains of the pulses, the obtained values of If can indicate to an extent the numbers of β-actins, which were quantified as 85 ± 24 mv (A549 cells, ncell = 14 228), 76 ± 26 mv (Hep G2 cells, ncell = 35 932), 146 ± 58 mv (MCF 10 A cells, ncell = 16 650) and 130 ± 36 mv (HeLa cells, ncell = 26246), respectively (refer to Fig. 4). The stable domains suggest that the stage of full occupation of deformed cells within the detection region formed by the constriction microchannel and the chrome window. Since the β-actins were extensively expressed intracellularly, it was assumed that there is an even distribution of fluorescence labelled β-actin antibodies within the detection region, which were confirmed by the low standard deviation to average ratios of individual pulses (e.g., 106 ± 8 mv for an A549 cell and 180 ± 16 mv for a MCF 10 A cell).
Thus calibration curves can be obtained by directly flushing solutions of fluorescence labelled β-actin antibodies with a group of concentrations into the detection region. As shown in Supp. Figure 2, in the calibration curve, there is a linear relationship between the intensities of fluorescence (If) and concentrations of proteins (Cp) where the detection range was 0.001–10 μM. Note that since fluorescent data were measured by PMT, fluorescent signals were averaged in the detection domain. Thus, cytosolic proteins without perfect even distributions can also be characterized by the developed platform under the condition that the standard deviation to average ratios of individual pulses are kept low38.
Furthermore, although fluorescent intensities are deeply affected by environmental media including pH and ionic strengths, the calibrating curve developed in this study may still function well because of the following reasons. After membrane permeability and staining of antibodies, the solutions of antibody staining dominate the components of cytosolic media. In the step of calibration, the antibodies with fluorescent probes are thoroughly mixed in solutions of cell staining and thus the environmental media in experiments and calibrations were comparable.
Meanwhile, the ratios of 2Ts/(Tr + Td) for these four types of cells were quantified as 2.53 ± 1.25 (A549 cells, ncell = 14 242), 1.89 ± 1.32 (Hep G2 cells, ncell = 35 932), 2.32 ± 1.31 (MCF 10 A cells, ncell = 16 650) and 1.66 ± 0.98 (HeLa cells, ncell = 26 246), respectively. Based on the analysis in the section of “Working Principle”, this parameter can be correlated positively with the elongations of individual cells in the constriction microchannel, which can be further translated to cellular diameters (refer to Fig. 4). Note that variations in aspiration pressures, channel geometries, cellular diameters and stiffness, as well as frictions between deformed cells and the walls of constriction microchannels may affect the travelling speeds of cells in the constriction microchannel. Thus, the dimensionless parameter of 2Ts/(Tr + Td) rather than cellular travelling durations (e.g., Ts, Tr, Td) were used for the quantification of cell sizes.
Counting of Single-Cell β-Actins
Based on the translation of preliminary fluorescent data and the calibrating curve, diameters of cells (Dc) and numbers of β-actins at single-cell level (np) were obtained as 14.2 ± 1.7 μm and 9.62 ± 4.29 × 105 (A549, ncell = 14 242), 13.0 ± 2.0 μm and 6.46 ± 3.34 × 105 (Hep G2, ncell = 35 932), 13.8 ± 1.9 μm and 1.58 ± 0.90 × 106 (MCF 10 A, ncell = 16 650), and 12.7 ± 1.5 μm and 1.09 ± 0.49 × 106 (HeLa, ncell = 26 246), respectively (refer to Fig. 5).
In order to validate these bright-field microscopic images of suspended cells before they were flushed into the constriction microchannels were recorded and processed to quantify cell diameters as 15.7 ± 2.6 μm (A549, ncell = 394), 13.9 ± 2.5 μm (Hep G2, ncell = 196), 19.9 ± 3.8 μm (MCF 10 A, ncell = 228), and 14.1 ± 2.7 μm (HeLa, ncell = 269). For A549, Hep G2 and HeLa cells, comparable results were obtained based on these two approaches. For MCF 10 A cells, based on the observations of microscopes, the averaged diameters approached the upper detection limitation of this microfluidic device where large cells are difficult to be aspirated through the constriction microchannel. In comparison to large cells, MCF 10 A cells with small diameters are more prone to be aspirated by the constriction microchannel with higher travelling speeds. Thus, it was speculated that the diameters quantified by the fluorescent pulses were derived from MCF 10 A cells with smaller diameters. These studies further suggest the developed microfluidic platform cannot be used to character cells with diameters much larger than the critical width of the constriction microchannel.
In addition, the numbers of single-cell β-actins of A549 cells were estimated as 9.62 ± 4.29 × 105, consistent with 1) 3.57 ± 0.22 × 106 per cells obtained from conventional enzyme linked immunosorbent assays and 2) ~0.96 × 106 at the single-cell level based on previously developed microfluidic platforms38. Compared to the results of single-cell analysis, conventional enzyme linked immunosorbent assays located a minute higher number of β-actins per cell, indicating that some portions of β-actins are not exposed in the step of intracellular staining, although intracellular staining has been intensively used for deep phenoty**11,12 and signaling state characterization13,14,15,16. In addition, the single-cell β-actin umbers estimated by the microfluidic platform were ten to one hundred folds of the functional proteins which were previously measured20. These results agree with the conventional assumptions that the numbers of β-actins are much higher those of functional proteins.
When the numbers of β-actins at the single-cell level were compared among four types of cells ((9.62 ± 4.29 × 105 (A549), 6.46 ± 3.34 × 105 (Hep G2), 1.58 ± 0.90 × 106 (MCF 10 A), and 1.09 ± 0.49 × 106 (HeLa)), significant differences were located, which suggests that expression differences exist among different cell types of β-actins, and the use of β-actins as the internal controls of western blotting need to be further considered. In addition, for each type of the cell, at the single-cell level, there is also a distribution difference in the expression of β-actins where ratios of the standard deviations to averages were estimated as ~50%, further questioning the proper use of β-actins as the internal control for single-cell analysis.
Conclusion
This manuscript showed the design, fabrication and characterization of a modified flow cytometry leveraging constriction microchannels, in which both cell sizes and counting of β-actins from 10 000 cells were obtained. Future technical improvements may extend multiplex capabilities, enabling the quantitative analysis of multiple types of proteins. In addition, this platform will be used to characterize key proteins such as p53 at the single-cell level, facilitating the study of tumour heterogeneity.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Altschuler, S. J. & Wu, L. F. Cellular heterogeneity: do differences make a difference? Cell 141, 559–563 (2010).
Wu, M. & Singh, A. K. Single-cell protein analysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol 23, 83–8 (2012).
Su, Y., Shi, Q. & Wei, W. Single cell proteomics in biomedicine: High-dimensional data acquisition, visualization, and analysis. Proteomics 17, 1600267 (2017).
De Rosa, S. C., Herzenberg, L. A., Herzenberg, L. A. & Roederer, M. 11-color, 13-parameter flow cytometry: identification of human naive T cells by phenotype, function, and T-cell receptor diversity. Nat Med 7, 245–8 (2001).
Perfetto, S. P., Chattopadhyay, P. K. & Roederer, M. Seventeen-colour flow cytometry: unravelling the immune system. Nature Reviews. Immunology 4, 648–55 (2004).
Spitzer, M. H. & Nolan, G. P. Mass cytometry: single cells, many features. Cell 165, 780–791 (2016).
Zenger, V. E., Vogt, R., Mandy, F., Schwartz, A. & Marti, G. E. Quantitative flow cytometry: inter-laboratory variation. Cytometry 33, 138–45 (1998).
Schwartz, A. & Fernandez-Repollet, E. Quantitative flow cytometry. Clin Lab Med 21, 743–61 (2001).
Marti, G. E., Zenger, V. E., Vogt, R. & Gaigalas, A. Quantitative flow cytometry: history, practice, theory, consensus, inter-laboratory variation and present status. Cytotherapy 4, 97–8 (2002).
Maher, K. J. & Fletcher, M. A. Quantitative flow cytometry in the clinical laboratory. Clinical and Applied Immunology Reviews 5, 353–72 (2005).
Bendall, S. C. et al. Single-cell mass cytometry of differential immune and drug responses across a human hematopoietic continuum. Science 332, 687–96 (2011).
Levine, J. H. et al. Data-driven phenotypic dissection of AML reveals progenitor-like cells that correlate with prognosis. Cell 162, 184–97 (2015).
Bodenmiller, B. et al. Multiplexed mass cytometry profiling of cellular states perturbed by small-molecule regulators. Nat Biotechnol 30, 858–67 (2012).
Mingueneau, M. et al. Single-cell mass cytometry of TCR signaling: amplification of small initial differences results in low ERK activation in NOD mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111, 16466–71 (2014).
Spitzer, M. H. et al. Immunology. An interactive reference framework for modeling a dynamic immune system. Science 349, 1259425 (2015).
Zunder, E. R., Lujan, E., Goltsev, Y., Wernig, M. & Nolan, G. P. A continuous molecular roadmap to iPSC reprogramming through progression analysis of single-cell mass cytometry. Cell Stem Cell 16, 323–37 (2015).
Whitesides, G. M. The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442, 368–73 (2006).
Wootton, R. C. & Demello, A. J. Microfluidics: Exploiting elephants in the room. Nature 464, 839–40 (2010).
Wei, W. et al. Microchip platforms for multiplex single-cell functional proteomics with applications to immunology and cancer research. Genome Medicine 5, 75 (2013).
Yu, J. et al. Microfluidics-based single-cell functional proteomics for fundamental and applied biomedical applications. Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry 7, 275–95 (2014).
Fu, A. Y., Spence, C., Scherer, A., Arnold, F. H. & Quake, S. R. A microfabricated fluorescence-activated cell sorter. Nature Biotechnology 17, 1109–11 (1999).
Huebner A. et al. Quantitative detection of protein expression in single cells using droplet microfluidics. Chemical Communications, pp. 1218–1220, (2007).
Mazutis, L. et al. Single-cell analysis and sorting using droplet-based microfluidics. Nature Protocols 8, 870–891 (2013).
Love, J. C., Ronan, J. L., Grotenbreg, G. M., van der Veen, A. G. & Ploegh, H. L. A microengraving method for rapid selection of single cells producing antigen-specific antibodies. Nature Biotechnology 24, 703–7 (2006).
Bradshaw, E. M. et al. Concurrent detection of secreted products from human lymphocytes by microengraving: cytokines and antigen-reactive antibodies. Clin Immunol 129, 10–8 (2008).
Varadarajan, N. et al. A high-throughput single-cell analysis of human CD8(+) T cell functions reveals discordance for cytokine secretion and cytolysis. J Clin Invest 121, 4322–31 (2011).
Han, Q. et al. Polyfunctional responses by human T cells result from sequential release of cytokines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, 1607–12 (2012).
Varadarajan, N. et al. Rapid, efficient functional characterization and recovery of HIV-specific human CD8+ T cells using microengraving. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, 3885–90 (2012).
Fan, R. et al. Integrated barcode chips for rapid, multiplexed analysis of proteins in microliter quantities of blood. Nat Biotechnol 26, 1373–8 (2008).
Ma, C. et al. A clinical microchip for evaluation of single immune cells reveals high functional heterogeneity in phenotypically similar T cells. Nature Medicine 17, 738–43 (2011).
Shi, Q. et al. Single-cell proteomic chip for profiling intracellular signaling pathways in single tumor cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, 419–24 (2012).
Lu, Y. et al. Highly multiplexed profiling of single-cell effector functions reveals deep functional heterogeneity in response to pathogenic ligands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112, E607–15 (2015).
Hughes, A. J. et al. Single-cell western blotting. Nature Methods 11, 749–55 (2014).
Eyer, K., Kuhn, P., Hanke, C. & Dittrich, P. S. A microchamber array for single cell isolation and analysis of intracellular biomolecules. Lab on a Chip 12, 765–72 (2012).
Eyer, K., Kuhn, P., Stratz, S. & Dittrich, P. S. A microfluidic chip for the versatile chemical analysis of single cells. J Vis Exp, p. e50618, 2013.
Chung, K., Rivet, C. A., Kemp, M. L. & Lu, H. Imaging single-cell signaling dynamics with a deterministic high-density single-cell trap array. Analytical Chemistry, 83, 7044–7052, 2012/11/19 2011.
He, L. et al. An automated programmable platform enabling multiplex dynamic stimuli delivery and cellular response monitoring for high-throughput suspension single-cell signaling studies. Lab on a Chip 15, 1497–1507 (2015).
Li, X. et al. A microfluidic flow cytometer enabling absolute quantification of single-cell intracellular proteins. Lab on a Chip 17, 3129–3137 (2017).
Gunning, P. W., Ghoshdastider, U., Whitaker, S., Popp, D. & Robinson, R. C. The evolution of compositionally and functionally distinct actin filaments. J Cell Sci 128, 2009–19 (2015).
Ferguson, R. E. et al. Housekee** proteins: a preliminary study illustrating some limitations as useful references in protein expression studies. Proteomics 5, 566–71 (2005).
Bauer, D. E., Haroutunian, V., McCullumsmith, R. E. & Meador-Woodruff, J. H. Expression of four housekee** proteins in elderly patients with schizophrenia. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 116, 487–91 (2009).
Ruan, W. & Lai, M. Actin, a reliable marker of internal control? Clin Chim Acta 385, 1–5 (2007).
Verma, A. S. & Shapiro, B. H. Sex-dependent expression of seven housekee** genes in rat liver. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21, 1004–8 (2006).
Kouadjo, K. E., Nishida, Y., Cadrin-Girard, J. F., Yoshioka, M. & St-Amand, J. Housekee** and tissue-specific genes in mouse tissues. BMC Genomics 8, 127–127 (2007).
Lin, J. & Redies, C. Histological evidence: housekee** genes beta-actin and GAPDH are of limited value for normalization of gene expression. Dev Genes Evol 222, 369–76 (2012).
Khan, S. A. et al. Cell-type specificity of beta-actin expression and its clinicopathological correlation in gastric adenocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 20, 12202–11 (2014).
Vigelso, A., Dybboe, R., Hansen, C. N., Dela, F. & Helge, J. W. and A. Guadalupe Grau, GAPDH and beta-actin protein decreases with aging, making Stain-Free technology a superior loading control in Western blotting of human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol (1985) 118, 386–94 (2015).
Yu, S., Hwang, H. E., Yun, N., Goldenring, J. R. & Nam, K. T. The mRNA and protein levels of tubulin and beta-actin are greatly reduced in the proximal duodenum of mice relative to the rest of the small intestines. Dig Dis Sci 60, 2670–6 (2015).
Chen, G. et al. beta-Actin protein expression differs in the submandibular glands of male and female mice. Cell Biol Int 40, 779–86 (2016).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge supports from the 973 Program (2014CB744600), NSFC (61431019 and 61671430), Key Project of CAS (QYZDB-SSW-JSC011), Instrument Program of CAS, Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS, and CAS Interdisciplinary Innovation Team.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
X.L., D.M., J.W. and J.C. designed experiments, X.L., B.F., and L.L. conducted experiments at the single-cell level, X.L., B.F., L.L. and D.C. conducted data analysis, S.C. and D.M. conducted experiments at the population level, X.L., D.M., J.W., and J.C. drafted the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, X., Fan, B., Liu, L. et al. A Microfluidic Fluorescent Flow Cytometry Capable of Quantifying Cell Sizes and Numbers of Specific Cytosolic Proteins. Sci Rep 8, 14229 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32333-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32333-1
- Springer Nature Limited