Abstract
p53, the major tumor suppressor, is frequently mutated in many cancers, and up to 84% of human melanomas harbor wild-type p53, which is considered to be an ideal target for melanoma therapy. Here, we evaluated the antitumor activity of a carbazole derivative, 9-ethyl-9H-carbazole-3-carbaldehyde (ECCA), on melanoma cells. ECCA had a selectively strong inhibitory activity against the growth of BRAF-mutated and BRAF-wild-type melanoma cells but had little effect on normal human primary melanocytes. ECCA inhibited melanoma cell growth by increasing cell apoptosis, which was associated with the upregulation of caspase activities and was significantly abrogated by the addition of a caspase inhibitor. In vivo assays confirmed that ECCA suppressed melanoma growth by enhancing cell apoptosis and reducing cell proliferation, and importantly ECCA did not have any evident toxic effects on normal tissues. RNA-Seq analysis identified several pathways related to cell apoptosis that were affected by ECCA, notably, activation of the p53 signaling pathway. Biochemical assays demonstrated that ECCA enhanced the phosphorylation of p53 at Ser15 in melanoma cells harboring wild-type p53, and importantly, the knockdown or deletion of p53 in those cells counteracted the ECCA-induced apoptosis, as well as senescence. Further investigations revealed that ECCA enhanced the phosphorylation of p38-MAPK and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and treatment with either a p38-MAPK or a JNK inhibitor rescued the cell growth inhibition elicited by ECCA, which depended on the expression of the p53 gene. Finally, the combination of ECCA with a BRAF inhibitor significantly enhanced the growth inhibition of melanoma cells. In summary, our study demonstrates that the carbazole derivative, ECCA, induces melanoma cell apoptosis and senescence through the activation of p53 to significantly and selectively suppress the growth of melanoma cells without affecting normal human melanocytes, suggesting its potential to develop a new drug for melanoma therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The tumor suppressor TP53, discovered 40 years ago, is frequently mutated in human tumors, which not only disables its antitumor function but also increases its tumor-promoting potential1,2. However, a relatively low p53 mutational rate (<20%) was found in human melanomas, which mainly harbor oncogenic BRAF mutations2,3,4. Although p53 is rarely mutated in melanomas, its function is usually inactivated mainly owing to overexpression of the p53-negative regulators MDM2 or MDMX, as well as alterations in the expression of the p53 family member p73 isoform delta Np731,5,6. The reactivation of wild-type p53, which is able to induce cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and cellular senescence in melanoma, has been successfully shown to play an antitumor function3,4. At present, an impressive number of clinical trials of drugs targeting wild-type p53 to treat various tumors including melanoma have been carried out, although most of them are still phase I/II studies1. The main approach developed for the pharmacological reactivation of p53 so far has been to target MDM2 or MDMX, which have also been shown to play important roles in the regulation of various biological functions independent of p531. Therefore, the exploration of new direct and efficient targets on tumor cells with little or no effect on normal cells would be beneficial for melanoma therapy in the future.
Among existing anticancer compounds, carbazole, an aromatic heterocyclic organic compound, has been studied for over half a century. Since murrayanine, a naturally occurring carbazole alkaloid, was first isolated in 19627, a number of structurally diverse carbazole derivatives have been synthesized and are well known for their biological activities, such as anticancer, antioxidant, anti-inflammation, anti-bacterial, and apoptosis inducers8,9,10,11. Importantly, some carbazole derivatives have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be used for the treatment of cancers in different countries, such as Celiptium and Midostaurin, separately focusing on metastatic breast cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML)12. In recent years, although some new carbazole derivatives have been synthesized and their anti-proliferative activities have been observed for melanoma cells13,14,15, no detailed studies of their functions and/or underlying mechanisms in regulating melanoma cell growth have been reported. The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential anti-melanoma function of an N-substituted carbazole derivative, 9-ethyl-9H-carbazole-3-carbaldehyde (ECCA), first synthesized in 201016, and to explore the underlying mechanisms, which might provide a potential opportunity to develop a new drug for the treatment of melanoma in the future.
Materials and methods
Reagents
An ECCA stock solution (50 mM) was prepared by dissolving the compound in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), then diluting it with growth medium to prepare working solutions at the concentrations indicated in the Figures for in vitro studies and with phosphate-buffered saline at a concentration of 7 mM for in vivo studies.
Cell lines and culture
Primary human melanocytes were isolated from adult skin tissues and were cultured according to a previously published protocol17. Melanoma cell lines A375 and WM115 were obtained from iCell Bioscience (Shanghai, China), M14 was from Procell (Wuhan, China), UACC62 and Mel-JUSO were from Hexu Biotechnology (Shanghai, China). All melanoma cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (Gibco, Waltham, MA, United States) medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. All cells were cultured in cell-culture incubators at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
Cell growth assay (CCK8 assay)
Cell viability was measured using a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) (Do**do, Kumamoto, Japan). In all, 2 × 103 melanoma cells per well were plated in 96-well plates and were cultured with the desired concentrations of ECCA as indicated in the Figures. At different time points as indicated, 10 μl CCK8 working solution was added to each well, after which the cells were incubated for 1.5 h at 37 °C. The optical density was measured at a wavelength of 450 nm.
Colony formation assay
In all, 1 × 103 melanoma cells per well were plated in six-well plates and were cultured overnight. The cell-culture medium was replaced with medium containing ECCA at different concentrations as indicated in the Figures every 2 days. On day 10, cells were washed twice with Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) for 20 min and stained with 0.1% crystal violet (Solarbio Science & Technology, Bei**g, China). Cell colonies with more than 50 cells were counted using a microscope.
Ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine (EDU) staining assay
The EDU staining assay was performed using an EDU kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, 5 × 105 cells per well were plated in 24-well plates and were grown overnight. On the second day, the cells were treated with different concentrations of ECCA as indicated in the Figures. At 24 h, 50 µl EDU working solution was added to the culture medium and incubated for 2 h at 37 ˚C. The cells were then washed with ice-cold PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, followed by incubation with 2 mg/ml glycine at room temperature for 5 min and staining with Apollo ® 488 and Hoechst working solution in the dark for 30 min. A BX53-DP80 fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Japan) was used for analysis of the staining.
Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) assay
Total RNAs were extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, United States), then were dissolved in nuclease-free water, followed by measurement of RNA concentrations using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Shanghai, China). Complementary DNA was reverse transcribed from each total RNA using a Takara PrimeScriptTM RT reagent kit (Takara Bio Inc, Shiga, Japan). PCR reactions were performed with Takara SYBRR Premix Ex TaqTM II (Takara Bio Inc.) using a LightCyclerR 480 II (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). One hundred ng of each cDNA in a total of 20 µl qRT-PCR reaction was used for amplification. PCR reactions were carried out at 95 °C for 30 s followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 5 s and at 60 °C for 20 s and ended with an elongation step for 15 s at 72 °C. Ct values were used for quantification and relative mRNA expression levels were calculated by the 2-ΔΔCt method normalized by the human housekee** gene 36β4. PCR primers used are listed in Table S1.
Virus production and infection
The p53-targeting CRISPR-Cas9 plasmid and the corresponding control plasmid were provided by Dr. Paolo Dotto (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA). Lentivirus preparation and infection were performed as previously described18. Lentiviral vectors with corresponding packaging vectors (pCMV-VSV-G and psPAX2) were transfected into HEK 293 cells using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol and virus-containing medium was collected at 24, 48, and 72 h after transfection. For UACC62 cell infection, 3 × 105 cells were seeded into 100 mm cell-culture dishes. On the second day, 6 ml virus-containing medium with 8 μg/ml polybrene were added to the culture medium. After 4–6 h incubation, the virus-containing medium was removed and replaced with normal DMEM culture medium. After 48 h, the infected melanoma cells were selected by culture in 1 μg/ml puromycin for 48 h, and the surviving cells were collected for western blot analysis to validate the deletion efficiency of the p53 gene.
Western blot analysis
To prepare whole-cell protein extracts, the cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and then lysed by radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (RIPA buffer) containing 1% phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and 1% phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Selleckchem, Shanghai, China) for 30 min at 4 °C. They were then centrifuged at 12,000 r.p.m. at 4 °C for 10 min after which the supernatants were collected. Protein concentrations were determined using a BCA protein quantitation kit (Solarbio). Twenty μg protein per lane were separated on 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels (Beyotime) and then were electro-transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Membranes were blocked by 5% bovine serum albumin in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween-20 (TBST), and then were incubated with the specific primary antibodies noted below overnight at 4 ˚C on a gentle shaker. The next day, following washing with TBST three times for 10 min each, the membranes were incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies in buffer for 2 h at room temperature. Finally, the detection was performed with enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (Millipore, St. Louis, MO, United States), and immunoreactive bands were quantified by densitometry analysis using Image J analysis.
The following primary and secondary antibodies were used: Caspase3 (Cell Signaling Technology (CST), Beverly, MA, United States, #9662), cleaved-Caspase3 (CST, # 9664), Caspase8 (CST, #8592), Caspase9 (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom #ab202068), PARP (Proteintech, Manchester, United Kingdom, #13371-1-AP), p53 (Abcam, #ab26), p-p53 (CST, #9284), p38-MAPK (CST, #8690), p-p38-MAPK (CST, #4511), JNK (CST, #9252), p-JNK (CST, #4668), ERK1/2 (CST, #4695), p-ERK1/2 (CST, #4370), p21 (CST, #2946), p16 (Abcam, #ab51243), HRP anti-mouse (CST, #7076), HRP anti-rabbit (CST, #7074).
Flow cytometry (FACS)
UACC62 cells were plated in six-well plates at a density of 3 × 105 cells/well. After incubation with ECCA for 12 h, the cells together with the supernatant were collected, centrifuged, and then incubated in 500 µl binding buffer containing 5 μl Annexin V-FITC and 10 μl PI (BD Biosciences, California, United States) for 10 min in the dark at room temperature, followed by analysis using flow cytometry (FACS Calibur, BD Biosciences).
siRNA transfection
siRNA transfections were performed as described previously19. In brief, UACC62 cells were transfected with siRNA p53 or a scrambled siRNA (control) at a final concentration of 20 nM using Lipofectamine 3000 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. At 72 h, the cells were collected for RT-PCR analysis and for western blot analysis. Three independent siRNAs were used for the knockdown of p53, and the oligo sequences of siRNAs were listed in Table S2.
RNA-Seq analysis
Purified total RNAs of UACC62 cells treated with different conditions and durations were extracted using Trizol reagent and sent to the Bei**g Genomics Institute (BGI, Shenzhen, China) for RNA-Seq analysis using a BGISEQ-500 system after transcription. The quantity of gene expression was calculated by FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million fragments mapped). Genes with log2 (Fold change) >1 and Q < 0.001 were considered as differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Volcano plots, Venn diagrams, Gene Cluster analyses, and enriched KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathway analyses were performed based on DEGs. The RNA-Seq data have been submitted to the SRA (NIH Sequence Read Archive) database, with the SRA accession number PRJNA611509.
In vivo tumor xenograft assay
Eight-week-old female nude/nude mice (Bei**g Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Bei**g, China) were randomly assigned to two groups: a control group (PBS only) or an ECCA treatment group (10 or 50 mg/kg ECCA), and six mice (N = 6) were used for each group. In all, 1 × 106 melanoma cells were injected intradermally into the dorsal skin of each mouse as described previously19, at 4 injection sites for each mouse. The graft procedure was originally developed to be utilized for hair reconstitution assays20, then was modified for tumorigenicity assays, which has been previously described in detail21. PBS or ECCA dissolved in PBS was then injected intraperitoneally in each mouse every day for 3 weeks. Tumor sizes were measured using a caliper every three days, and tumor volumes were calculated according to the formula V = π/6 × L× W × H. Weights of mice were measured three times a week. At 3 weeks, mice were killed and their tumors were collected and weighed. The grafting assays were repeated three times.
Histology and immunofluorescence analysis
Tumor tissues were embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound (Tissue-Tek, California, United States) and frozen. Ten μm cryosections were made for histological analysis following standard protocols. Immunofluorescence staining was performed as previously described22. Briefly, each section was fixed in ice-cold acetone, incubated with blocking buffer (2% bovine serum albumin in PBS containing 5% donkey serum with 0.1% Triton X-100) at room temperature for 1 h, and then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4˚ C. On the second day, the sections were washed three times with PBS and incubated with secondary antibodies in the dark at room temperature. After 1 h, sections were mounted with DAPI (Abcam). A BX53-DP80 immunofluorescence microscope (Olympus) was used for analysis of staining. The following primary and secondary antibodies were used: cleaved-Caspase3 (CST, #9664), Ki67 (Abcam, #15580), DyLight488 goat anti-mouse IgG(H+L) (Multi Science, Zhejiang, China), and DyLight594 goat anti-rabbit IgG(H+L) (Multi Science).
Detection of cellular senescence
Melanoma cells with or without the deletion of p53 were incubated with 5 μM ECCA in six-well plates. After 24 h, cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde. Senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal) was assayed using a senescence β-Galactosidase Staining Kit (Beyotime). Images of five randomly selected fields from each group were analyzed; 500 cells in each group were analyzed, and the data were analyzed for three independent experiments.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software Inc. β) and data are presented as means ± standard deviation (mean + SD). All experiments were performed at least three times. Student’s t test was used to compare two groups; one-way or two-way analysis of variance was used when comparing more than two groups. A p < 0.05 is considered to be statistically significant, which is indicated with “*” in the Figures, and lines were added to the bar graphs to indicate the two groups compared when two specific groups were compared in different conditions.
Results
Treatment with ECCA significantly inhibits human melanoma cell growth, but has little effect on human primary melanocytes in vitro
To determine whether ECCA, which has the chemical structure shown in Fig. S1, affects melanoma cell growth, we chose a variety of human melanoma cell lines (Fig. 1A) with different types of mutations (see Table S3) to be treated with different concentrations of ECCA. At 48 h after treatment, we found that ECCA significantly inhibited the growth of all melanoma cell lines tested at 1 µM no matter whether they harbored a wild-type or a mutated BRAF gene, and the inhibitory effect occurred in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1A), although UACC62 cells were more sensitive to ECCA. UACC62 cells were then treated with ECCA at low concentrations to observe cell growth at earlier time points (Fig. 1B). UACC62 cell growth, even at a low concentration of 0.5 µM ECCA, was significantly suppressed as early as 12 h, and the growth-inhibiting activity of ECCA became more effective with increased time and concentration (Fig. 1B). In order to further determine the selective cellular toxicity of ECCA for melanoma cells, we treated normal human primary melanocytes with this compound, and interestingly, we found that ECCA had no severe cytotoxic effect on human primary melanocytes at low concentrations that significantly inhibit the growth of UACC62 cells (Fig. 1C). To further test the effect of ECCA on melanoma cell growth, colony formation assays showed that the number of colonies formed was significantly reduced at 0.5 µM ECCA (Fig. 1D, E) and at that concentration, EDU staining (Fig. 1F, G) showed that cell proliferation was significantly decreased as well.
Taken together, these data suggest that ECCA significantly inhibits the growth of melanoma cells, but not normal melanocytes in vitro.
Treatment with ECCA induces melanoma cell apoptosis in vitro
To clarify the mechanism of the ECCA-induced cytotoxicity, we next evaluated its effect on cellular death in melanoma cells. We first investigated whether ECCA promoted melanoma cell apoptosis, which is the key type of cancer cell death induced by most antitumor drugs. First, annexin V-FITC/PI double staining with flow cytometric analysis showed that treatment with ECCA markedly increased the proportion of apoptotic UACC62 cells in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 2A, B). Compared with the control group (3.8 ± 3.1%), apoptosis of UACC62 cells was increased to 10.3 ± 1.7%, 25 ± 4.8%, and 43.6 ± 2.8% at doses of 0.5 µM, 1 µM, and 5 µM, respectively. Melanoma cell apoptosis induced by ECCA was further verified using another melanoma cell line, Mel-Juso, which harbors mutated NRAS and wild-type BRAF genes (Fig. 2C, D). The induction of apoptosis usually involves the activation of caspase pathways. Western blot analysis revealed that levels of cleaved-caspase3 (black arrows) and its target protein PARP (red arrows) increased after ECCA treatment, and increased levels of cleaved caspase8 (green arrows) and cleaved caspase9 (blue arrows) were observed as well (Fig. 2E, F). To further confirm the involvement of caspases in ECCA-induced apoptosis, cells were pretreated with a broad-spectrum caspase inhibitor (z-VAD-FMK) at 10 µM for 2 h after which ECCA was added. Pretreatment with z-VAD-FMK significantly blocked apoptosis, 11.4 ± 1.7% vs. 25 ± 4.8%, and 20.2 ± 1.5% vs. 43.6 + 2.8%, at doses of 1 µM and 5 µM ECCA, respectively (Fig. 2G, H). Taken together, these data suggest that treatment with ECCA significantly enhances melanoma cell apoptosis.
ECCA inhibits tumor growth and induces cell apoptosis in vivo
To test whether ECCA also inhibits melanoma cell growth in vivo, we injected UACC62 and Mel-Juso cells subcutaneously into the dorsal skin of nude/nude mice. Four subcutaneous injections of 1 × 106 cells were delivered into each mouse followed by the intraperitoneal injection of 10 mg/kg ECCA to UACC62-xenografted mice or 50 mg/kg ECCA to Mel-Juso xenografted mice every day, with PBS only as a control. We found that treatment with ECCA significantly inhibited tumor growth (Fig. S2A–C). We observed that much smaller tumors formed in the ECCA-treated mice and the average tumor weight were significantly decreased by treatment with ECCA (Fig. 3A, B). Ki67 staining showed that there were significantly fewer proliferative cells, 40 ± 5.2% in ECCA-treated tumors compared to 70 ± 4.5% in PBS-treated tumors (Fig. 3C, D). Staining of cleaved-Caspase3 revealed a significant increase of tumor cell apoptosis, 36 ± 2.6% in the ECCA-treated group compared with 2 ± 0.6% in the control group (Fig. 3E, F). This result was further confirmed by western blot analysis of tumor samples, which showed that levels of the cleaved form of PARP, Caspase9, and Caspase3 were significantly increased in the ECCA-treated group (Fig. 3G, H). These in vivo data support the concept that ECCA induces melanoma cell apoptosis to inhibit tumor growth.
It should be noted that no mice died during the treatment period and there were no abnormalities observed in their behaviors, such as chronic convulsions, anorexia, lethargy, and/or ruffled fur even at a high dose of ECCA (50 mg/kg). The mice treated with ECCA grew normally the same as the control group, and their body weights were not obviously changed during treatment (Fig. S2D). Histological analysis showed that no marked pathological damage occurred in major organs of mice following treatment with ECCA (Fig. S2E). In sum, these results suggest that ECCA did not cause any significant health problems in mice but clearly reduced the growth of xenografted tumors in vivo.
RNA-seq analysis reveals that ECCA activates the p53 signaling pathway
To further explore the possible molecular mechanism by which ECCA induces melanoma cell apoptosis, we analyzed global transcriptome alterations of UACC62 cells at early time points (4 h and 12 h) after ECCA treatment using RNA-seq analysis. There were 72 upregulated genes and 20 downregulated genes for a total of 92 DEGs that were identified between control and ECCA-treated cells at 4 h (Fig. 4A, left panel). Further, 251 upregulated genes and 191 downregulated genes for a total of 442 DEGs were found between control and ECCA-treated cells at 12 h (Fig. 4A, right panel). Among all DEGs, 48 appeared at both time points (Fig. 4B). Gene cluster analysis was performed and the results are shown in Fig. 4C. Furthermore, the enriched KEGG pathways were analyzed and the top 20 pathways involved in these 48 common DEGs between the two groups are shown in Fig. 4D. That analysis revealed that the p53 signaling pathway and the apoptosis pathway were the two most significantly enriched pathways in the ECCA-treated group. The activation of the p53 pathway, which has a key role in the regulation of cell apoptosis, identified by RNA-seq analysis was further validated by qRT-PCR analysis, which showed an increased expression of p53 and its downstream target genes, p21, GADD45A, GADD45B, and PUMA, following treatment with ECCA (Fig. 4E). Taken together, these results suggest that ECCA induces melanoma cell apoptosis mainly through activation of the p53 signaling pathway.
ECCA induces melanoma cell apoptosis through the activation of p53
The tumor suppressor p53, a key protein involved in the induction of cell apoptosis23, has been considered an attractive target for the treatment of various cancers, especially for melanoma. To investigate whether ECCA induces melanoma cell apoptosis through activation of the p53 pathway, we analyzed the phosphorylation status of p53 at Ser15, which has been shown to be phosphorylated and thus activated in cell apoptosis24,25. We found that the expression level of p53 phosphorylated at Ser15 was significantly increased at 6 h after treatment with 5 µM ECCA and was also significantly increased at 24 h following treatment with a lower concentration (0.5 µM) of ECCA (Fig. 5A, B, red arrows) in UACC62 cells, which harbor a wild-type p53 gene. The expression level of p21, a p53 downstream target gene, was also increased in time- and dose-dependent manners (Fig. 5A, B, blue arrows). The increased phosphorylation of p53 at Ser15 by ECCA treatment was verified in other melanoma cells with wild-type p53, but not in cells with mutant p53 (Fig. 5C, D). Interestingly, we noted that the expression levels of total p53 and phosphorylated p53 were different in different cell lines, especially a much higher expression in WM115 cells (Fig. 5C). To further determine whether the inhibitory effect of ECCA on UACC62 cell death was mainly dependent on p53 activation, we knocked down p53 using siRNA technology, and the knockdown efficiency of p53 was confirmed (Fig. S3A, B). Clearly, the knockdown of p53 counteracted the inhibition of melanoma cell growth induced by ECCA (Fig. 5E). To further confirm the role of p53, we created a UACC62 cell line lacking p53 (p53-ko) using CRISPR-Cas9-mediated deletion, and the deletion of p53 protein was confirmed by western blot analysis (Fig. S3C). The viability of p53-ko cells was significantly increased at 24 h after ECCA treatment compared with control cells with wild-type p53 (Fig. 5F). FACS analysis showed that the percentage of apoptotic cells in the p53-ko group was significantly decreased compared to the control group at 12 h after treatment with 5 µM ECCA (Fig. 5G, H).
The activation of p53 has been shown to induce cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and senescence1. Therefore, we expected that ECCA treatment induces melanoma cell senescence by activating p53. Indeed, we found that treatment with ECCA significantly induced melanoma cellular senescence, revealed by β-gal staining, and the induction of senescence was significantly reduced in p53-ko cells after ECCA treatment (Fig. 5I, J). The expression of two senescence markers, p21 and p16, was upregulated in cells following treatment with ECCA but was significantly reduced in p53-ko cells after ECCA treatment (Fig. 5K, L), which further supports the proposal that ECCA induces melanoma cell senescence. Taken together, these results suggest that ECCA inhibits the growth of p53 wild-type melanoma cells by inducing apoptosis, as well as senescence, through activation of the p53 pathway.
ECCA significantly increases the phosphorylation of p38-MAPK and JNK kinases to activate the p53 pathway in melanoma cells
We then explored how ECCA activates the p53 pathway in melanoma cells. Mammalian mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), including p38-MAPK, stress-activated protein kinase [SAPK/c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)] and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), have been shown to be involved in the regulation of p53 during apoptosis26,27. MAP kinases can directly phosphorylate p53 at Ser15 to activate it, and the nuclear translocation of p53 can also be regulated by the MAPK pathway28,29,Full size image
The combination of ECCA with a BRAFV600E inhibitor significantly enhances the growth inhibition of melanoma cells
The activation of p53, which promotes apoptosis, has been proposed to be combined with a BRAF inhibitor, which inhibits cell proliferation, to target two separate pathways to efficiently treat melanoma1,3,4. Therefore, we tested whether the combination of ECCA with a BRAFV600E inhibitor (PLX4302) could enhance the inhibition of melanoma cell growth. Four different melanoma cell lines with wild-type p53 were treated with ECCA alone, with PLX4032 alone, or with a combination of ECCA and PLX4032 (Fig. 7A). Consistent with previous reports, the BRAFV600E inhibitor PLX4302 specifically inhibited the growth of BRAFV600E mutant melanoma cells (UACC62 and A375), but did not significantly affect the growth of melanoma cells (Mel-Juso, WM115) without expression of BRAFV600E (Fig. 7A). Treatment with ECCA suppressed the growth of all four melanoma cell lines tested (Fig. 7A), and treatment with the combination of both compounds strongly enhanced the growth inhibition of melanoma cells with expression of BRAFV600E (Fig. 7A). Western blot analysis confirmed that treatment with PLX4032 alone or with the combination of PLX4302 and ECCA but not with ECCA alone, significantly decreased the activation of Erk. Treatment with ECCA alone or with the combination of ECCA and PLX4302, but not with PLX4302 alone induced the activation of p53 (Fig. 7B–D) in A375 and UACC62 cells. Taken together, these data suggest that the combination of ECCA and a BRAF inhibitor targets two separate pathways (apoptosis and proliferation) to enhance the growth inhibition of BRAFV600E expressing melanoma cells (Fig. 7E).