KCNE1 induces fenestration in the Kv7.1/KCNE1 channel complex that allows for highly specific pharmacological targeting

Wrobel, Eva; Rothenberg, Ina; Krisp, Christoph; Hundt, Franziska; Fraenzel, Benjamin; Eckey, Karina; Linders, Joannes T. M.; Gallacher, David J.; Towart, Rob; Pott, Lutz; Pusch, Michael; Yang, Tao; Roden, Dan M.; Kurata, Harley T.; Schulze-Bahr, Eric; Strutz-Seebohm, Nathalie; Wolters, Dirk; Seebohm, Guiscard

doi:10.1038/ncomms12795

KCNE1 induces fenestration in the Kv7.1/KCNE1 channel complex that allows for highly specific pharmacological targeting

Article
Open access
Published: 12 October 2016

Volume 7, article number 12795, (2016)
Cite this article

Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

From

View current issue

KCNE1 induces fenestration in the Kv7.1/KCNE1 channel complex that allows for highly specific pharmacological targeting

Download PDF

Eva Wrobel¹^na1,
Ina Rothenberg¹^na1,
Christoph Krisp²,
Franziska Hundt²,
Benjamin Fraenzel²,
Karina Eckey¹,
Joannes T. M. Linders³,
David J. Gallacher⁴,
Rob Towart⁴,
Lutz Pott⁵,
Michael Pusch⁶,
Tao Yang⁷,
Dan M. Roden⁸,
Harley T. Kurata⁹,
Eric Schulze-Bahr¹,
Nathalie Strutz-Seebohm¹,
Dirk Wolters² &
…
Guiscard Seebohm^1,10

2577 Accesses
17 Altmetric
2 Mentions
Explore all metrics

Abstract

Most small-molecule inhibitors of voltage-gated ion channels display poor subtype specificity because they bind to highly conserved residues located in the channel’s central cavity. Using a combined approach of scanning mutagenesis, electrophysiology, chemical ligand modification, chemical cross-linking, MS/MS-analyses and molecular modelling, we provide evidence for the binding site for adamantane derivatives and their putative access pathway in Kv7.1/KCNE1 channels. The adamantane compounds, exemplified by JNJ303, are highly potent gating modifiers that bind to fenestrations that become available when KCNE1 accessory subunits are bound to Kv7.1 channels. This mode of regulation by auxiliary subunits may facilitate the future development of potent and highly subtype-specific Kv channel inhibitors.

A small-molecule activation mechanism that directly opens the KCNQ2 channel

Article 02 January 2024

The binding and mechanism of a positive allosteric modulator of Kv3 channels

Article Open access 21 March 2024

The Polysite Pharmacology of TREK K2P Channels

Introduction

Voltage-gated potassium (Kv) channels enable the rapid, selective and passive transport of potassium ions through cellular membranes that regulate physiological processes such as ion-coupled transport, hormone secretion, vesicle cycling and cell excitability. Dysfunction of Kv channels causes numerous inherited or acquired channelopathies, and these channels are under investigation as potential therapeutic targets for acquired disease such as cardiac arrhythmia, neurodegenerative diseases and diabetes^{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8}. Kv channel diversity is impressive and is enhanced by the large number of different α-subunits, alternative splicing, post-transcriptional modifications and coassembly of similar but not identical pore forming α-subunits and/or accessory β-subunits to form heteromeric channels^9,10,11. β-subunits modify the pharmacology, subcellular localization, gating and ion selectivity of Kv channels^{12,13,14,15,16}. For example, KCNE1 β-subunits coassemble with Kv7.1 α-subunits to increase current magnitude, slow the rate of activation and remove apparent inactivation gating^17,18,19.

The design of small compound inhibitors of voltage-gated channels with high affinity and subtype specificity has been particularly challenging. Most known small-molecule pore blockers of Kv channels bind to specific residues that line the wall of the central cavity^{20,21,22,23,24}. With few exceptions^25,26, these crucial residues are conserved in most K⁺ channels, complicating the discovery and development of subtype-specific channel inhibitors. Highly potent and selective peptide inhibitors (for example, natural toxins) that bind to a site outside the central cavity (for example, to the outer vestibule) are of limited practical use as therapeutic agents because they require parenteral administration and often have serious undesirable side effects^8,25,27. Investigating the molecular basis of drug binding is also hampered by complicating issues of allosteric effects and studies are often limited to investigating the effects of point mutations on functional measures of drug effects, without directly assessing the site of drug binding.

Here we use multiple complementary approaches to characterize the binding mode of adamantane derivatives that can explain why these compounds are potent inhibitors of Kv7.1/KCNE1 channels. In addition to a conventional mutagenesis-based investigation of drug effects, we have generated an adamantane analog with a cross-linking moiety that allows direct map** of its binding to specific channel peptide segments. Our findings suggest that these adamantanes bind with nanomolar affinity to fenestrations in the Kv7.1 channel that only form when the channel is in a complex with KCNE1 β-subunits. The mechanism of allosteric inhibition described here provides new opportunities for develo** small-molecule inhibitors of heteromeric channels with the desired properties of very-high affinity and specificity.

Results

KCNE1 induces sensitivity of Kv7.1 to inhibition by AC-1

Compounds binding to the central cavity of Kv7.1 have been reported to act on both homomeric Kv7.1 and heteromeric Kv7.1/KCNE1 channels, albeit with varying potency^{20,21,Full size image}

To directly test whether AC-1 preferentially accesses and stabilizes a non-conducting closed state, we applied the compound to oocytes clamped at −80 mV and analysed current inhibition by resuming pulsing after 4.5 min. Current was highly inhibited during the first post-rest pulse, suggesting that AC-1 can access its binding site when the channel is in a closed state (Fig. 2f). Conditioning subthreshold prepulses at 0.2 and 2 Hz also revealed use-dependent drug effects suggesting inhibition in preopen states (Fig. 2g). We also tested the onset of current inhibition during wash-in of AC-1 while holding oocytes at various membrane potentials. The onset of block was significantly faster with the more negative holding potentials, suggesting that the drug interacts preferentially with a closed/pre-open channel state (Supplementary Fig. 3).

Ala scanning of S4, S5, S6 and proximal C terminus of Kv7.1

Ala scanning was previously used to identify specific residues that form the putative binding sites for chromanol and benzodiazepine derivatives that are considered to be classical pore blockers of Kv7.1 channels^20,21. Here we applied Ala scanning to multiple segments of the Kv7.1 α-subunit to identify potential AC-1 interaction sites in the extended pore region of Kv7.1/KCNE1 channels (Fig. 3a). In cases where mutation to Ala precluded channel function, alternative residues were introduced. This approach identified one residue in S4, two in S5, one residue at the base of the pore helix, and seven residues in S6, that markedly reduced AC-1 sensitivity when mutated (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Fig. 4, Table 1). The S6 residues identified by Ala scanning form a cluster in the channel structure, but do not all face the central cavity in three-dimensional (3D) models of open, closed³⁴ or preopen states³⁵. Instead, most of these crucial residues cluster around a ‘window’ formed uniquely in the preopen–closed state model of the Kv7.1/KCNE1 channel³³ (Fig. 3c, magenta residues). This window structure resembles the fenestrations described for the NavAb channel and proposed to be a binding site for local anesthetics that inhibit Nav channels^36,37. Docking of AC-1 to our previously published preopen–closed state model³⁵ and subsequent MD-simulation was performed and indicated that AC-1 was stable in two positions along the longitudinal axis of the fenestrations (Fig. 3d). By contrast, in silico models of the closed and open states do not exhibit clear fenestrations (Supplementary Fig. 5) and thus, AC-1 cannot interact with this cavity in these channel states.

**Figure 3: Putative binding mode of AC-1.**

Table 1 IC₅₀ values for AC-1 determined for mutant Kv7.1/KCNE1 channels (n=3–11).

Full size table

Chemical modification of the AC-1 scaffold

We also investigated the functional effects of a panel of AC-1 analogs³⁰ with chemical modifications at either end of the drug scaffold (Supplementary Table 1). Variation at position Y had little effect on inhibition. Introduction of substituents with variable volume and hydrophobicity at position X showed that small polar substituents reduce inhibition, whereas bulky substituents are tolerated and can increase apparent affinity (Fig. 4a). The potency of ACs was not dependent on hydrophobicity, quantified as logP using the Molinspiration logP calculator (Fig. 4b) or volume (Fig. 4c). Notably, results obtained with AC-9, an isobutyramide analog of the methylsulfonamide AC-2, indicate that the sulfonamide can be replaced with a carboxamide, and that relatively large lipophilic groups can be accommodated. These data clearly show that the AC-1 scaffold can be significantly expanded at either longitudinal end, suggesting that the AC binding site is not precisely length-delimited. We speculate that this SAR argues against the notion of a central cavity-constrained binding site, which would limit the dimensions by which drugs could be expanded while retaining effectiveness.

**Figure 4: Structure activity relationship of adamantane compounds.**

Photoaffinity labelling approach to identify AC interactions

Interpretation of mutagenesis-based investigation of drug binding sites is often hampered by the possibility of secondary allosteric effects that impact drug binding or alter drug response with no change in binding affinity. Therefore, we complemented our mutagenesis and modelling findings by develo** a photoaffinity labelling (PAL)-based approach to directly identify regions of the Kv7.1/KCNE1 complex that interact with the AC compounds. We designed and synthesized an AC-9 analog with a photo-activatable cross-linking moiety that could covalently bind to the Kv7.1/KCNE1 channel complex (Fig. 5a, step 1–2). Labelled channel complexes were purified, and modified peptides were identified using MS/MS spectrometry (Fig. 5a, step 3–4). The diazirine substituted AC analog used for chemical cross linking was synthesized by coupling an NHS-diazirine to the amino group of AC-4 (Fig. 4) to generate AC-10 (Supplementary Fig. 6).

**Figure 5: PAL-based approach to identify AC binding site.**

Diazirines can be activated by UV irradiation at 350 nm, and generate highly reactive carbene species (Supplementary Fig. 6) leading to covalent binding to all natural amino acids^38,39. AC-10 inhibited Kv7.1/KCNE1 channels with an IC₅₀ of 16 nM, indicating that the diazirine adduct does not weaken drug binding. AC-10 did not inhibit homomeric Kv7.1 channels (Fig. 5b, Supplementary Fig. 6c), Due to its very high apparent affinity, the effects of non UV-activated AC-10 could only be partially reversed by washout (40% inhibition after 38 min washout). After UV irradiation, current inhibition by AC-10 was mostly irreversible, suggesting that AC-10 was covalently bound and thus locked the channel in a non-conductive state (75% inhibition after 38 min washout, supplementary Fig. 6d). To achieve equal overexpression of subunits and to facilitate subsequent protein isolation, a bicistronic vector containing the cDNAs of c-myc tagged Kv7.1 and KCNE1 were linked via a T2A peptide sequence (Supplementary Fig. 7, Fig. 5c), a ∼20 amino acid sequence which mediates co-translational cleavage of polyproteins^40,41,42. Transfection of HEK293T cells with this bicistronic vector leads to expression of Kv7.1myc and KCNE1myc proteins that were isolated via affinity chromatography and detected by Western blot analysis using a c-myc or anti-KCNE1 antibody (Fig. 5d). Functional expression of Kv7.1/KCNE1 channels in HEK293T cells was verified by patch clamp experiments (Fig. 5e). AC-10 was applied and covalently bound to channels overexpressed in HEK293T cells by UV irradiation. The tagged channel proteins were then purified on anti-myc columns, digested by trypsin, and the AC-10 modified peptides detected by MS/MS spectrometry (Fig. 6a,b, Supplementary Fig. 8 shows coverage of MS/MS). The only AC-10-modified peptide identified corresponds to the transmembrane helix of the β-subunit KCNE1 (⁴²LEALYVLMVLGFFGFFTLGIMLSYIR⁶⁷, Fig. 6c). Due to limited resolution, it was not possible to explicitly identify a single AC-10-bound amino acid residue. Another consideration is that some flexibility of the diazirine moiety may enable cross-linking at multiple positions in the identified peptide region. Nevertheless, no other labelled peptides (from Kv7.1 or KCNE1) were detected in three experimental trials, suggesting that there is no promiscuous cross-linking of the diazirine compound throughout the channel. Furthermore, when KCNE1 was expressed alone or in complex with Kv2.1, no KCNE1 modification was detected, indicating that both Kv7.1 and KCNE1 are required for AC-10 modification. Spectra for KCNE1 alone or in complex with Kv2.1 do not provide any evidence for modification by AC-10 (Supplementary Fig. 9). Rather, cross-linking with KCNE1 is very specific and reflects cross-linking taking place in a narrowly defined binding orientation that requires co-assembly with Kv7.1.

Cys scanning of the KCNE1 transmembrane segment

The β-subunit KCNE1 markedly increases sensitivity of Kv7.1 channels to classical pore blockers such as chromanol 293B and the benzodiazepine L-7 (refs 20, 21, 29). KCNE1 does not directly participate in binding of these inhibitors, but is thought to facilitate ligand binding to the α-subunit Kv7.1 via an allosteric mechanism²⁹. In contrast, our PAL-based experiments indicate that the transmembrane segment of KCNE1 may be directly involved in binding of AC-1/AC-10. To further investigate whether specific KCNE1 residues interact with AC-1, cysteine substitutions of residues located in the central transmembrane region of KCNE1 (residues 52–58) were generated. Based on response of the mutant channels to 0.3 μM AC-1, Phe54 and Thr58 were identified as crucial residues for AC-1 binding (Fig. 7).

**Figure 7: Single point mutagenesis of the transmembrane region of KCNE1.**

Constrained AC-1 docking

Results from PAL experiments, along with mutational scans of Kv7.1 and KCNE1, were used to facilitate a spatially restrained modelling of AC interaction with the Kv7.1/KCNE1 complex. To generate the model, AC-10 was introduced by swap**/adding atoms in the AC-1–Kv7.1/KCNE1 model shown in Fig. 3c. Next, the distance between the reactive AC-10 group and the side chain of Thr58 was constrained to a distance that allowed for covalent binding. The resulting model shows AC-10 bound in a position within the fenestrations of Kv7.1 (Fig. 8). We also performed 25 nsec simulations (all atoms mobile) on the AC-10–Kv7.1-KCNE1 model, and observed very stable binding in this conformation throughout the simulation. A parallel simulation on the identical Kv7.1-KCNE1 model without AC-10 showed significant fluctuation throughout the channel complex, indicating that AC-10 may stabilize the channel complex (Supplementary Fig. 10).

**Figure 8: Constrained docking of AC-10 to Kv7.1 channel.**

Discussion

Potent inhibition of Kv7.1 channels by ACs requires the presence of KCNE1 β-subunits. KCNE1 subunits modify the gating of Kv7.1 and structural modelling suggests that these β-subunits also induce a structural change in the channel complex that provides a closed state-preferred binding site for the ACs. Several findings suggest that ACs inhibit current by stabilizing a non-conducting closed state rather than by occluding the ion-conducting pore. First, at saturating concentrations, AC-1 causes incomplete inhibition of current unlike the complete inhibition normally observed with a pore blocker. Second, reduced channel inhibition at higher voltages is associated with slowed activation kinetics, and a shifted voltage dependence of activation to more depolarized potentials. Third, inhibition by AC-1 is enhanced when channels are in a closed state (Fig. 2). Gating and AC-1 effects on Kv7.1/KCNE1 channel complexes can be described by a simple scheme (Fig. 9a). In this model, C₁, C₂, C₃ are closed states, O₁, O₂ are open states and C₂* represents a stable (‘inactivated’) closed state. The kinetic behavior of AC-1 is consistent with drug binding leading to stabilization of C₂* (refs 19, 33). In our kinetic model, binding of AC-1 is presumed to decrease the rate-constant from C2* to C2 by 100-fold, largely recapitulating the kinetic effects of the drug (Fig. 9b). An inference from this model is that AC-1 may dissociate from the channel during this C2*→C2 transition, thereby delaying channel activation with little or no effect on deactivation kinetics (Fig. 2). The model also recapitulates a shift of the voltage dependence of activation (Fig. 9c). Other kinetic models in which AC-1 stabilizes more deeply closed states are also compatible with the data, however, stabilization of the preopen closed state model is additionally suggested by in silico MD simulation, and experimental data including a faster onset of block with mild depolarization, and use-dependent inhibition with modest depolarizations (Supplementary Fig. 9, Fig. 2g). Classical inhibitors of Kv7.1 channels such as chromanol 293B and the benzodiazepine L-7 disrupt ion permeation by interacting with the pore-lining S6 segment and the lower pore helix/selectivity filter of the Kv7.1 α-subunit^20,21,28. In contrast to this classic view of pore plugging by a blocker, quinidine allosterically inhibits Kv7.1 channels by binding to a small lateral pocket formed by the S4-S5 linker and S6 (ref. 26). Importantly, all three of these compounds inhibit both homomeric Kv7.1 and heteromeric Kv7.1/KCNE1 channels.

**Figure 9: Markov state modelling of AC-1 inhibition.**

In this study, we identified the binding mode for a new class of specific inhibitors of Kv7.1/KCNE1 channels. We propose that the β-subunit KCNE1 induces the formation of fenestrations in the pore domain of Kv7.1 that are required for binding of AC derivatives. For commonly used inhibitors of Kv7.1 (for example, chromanol 293B), it has been reported that KCNE1 increases drug sensitivity of the channel^20,21 by an allosteric mechanism²⁹, although there is not the same stringent requirement for KCNE1 as we observe for the AC compounds. The formation of lateral fenestrations was seen in a structural model of Kv7.1/KCNE1 representing a preopen-closed state, with the S4 voltage sensors in the up-state and the pore gate (S6-bundle crossing) in a closed state configuration, but no fenestrations were observed in the open channel model³³. A similar fenestration was described in the crystal structure of NavAb, a voltage-gated sodium channel from Arcobacter butzler^34,35, and have been proposed to provide a pathway into the central cavity for local anesthetics. The side pockets described in Kv1.5 channels are smaller than Na_V-fenestrations and appear to permit selective targeting of these channels by Psora-4 (ref. 25). Our scanning mutagenesis experiments identified many residues in the fenestration that are important for AC-1 activity. In addition, residues in S4 (Val241), S5 (Leu271), the base of the pore helix (Thr312), and at the S6 bundle crossing (Ala344) were also identified by this approach. We suspect that the effects of more distant S4 and S5 residues may be allosteric, as we did not observe any indication of drug binding in these regions using the PAL approach. Moreover, the selectivity filter/pore helix structure is allosterically linked to the activation gate (the S6-bundle crossing), along with S4 and S5 (ref. 41). This hypothesis is supported by our in silico observation that AC-10 binding causes structural stabilization (reduced root mean square fluctuation (RMSF)) of the whole Kv7.1/KCNE1 (transmembrane helix) channel complex, indicative of allosteric coupling of drug binding to other channel segments (Supplementary Fig. 9).

Chemical substitutions at either end of the AC scaffold suggest some spatial freedom with regard to potency for inhibition of Kv7.1/KCNE1 channels. This finding is consistent with a horizontal position of AC-1 relative to the pore axis (Fig. 3c). However, based on these experiments it was not possible to determine exactly how far ACs are positioned towards the central cavity or the outer face of the pore domain. The cross linking of AC-10 to the KCNE1 transmembrane α-helix suggests that ACs may bind within the fenestrations, thus stabilizing the channel complexes in a preopen-closed state similar to the 3D model of the Kv7.1/KCNE1 complex proposed in 2011 (ref. 33). KCNE1 Thr58 and Phe54 are located immediately adjacent to the outer fenestration in Kv7.1, consistent with spatial continuity of all the residues identified as important by mutagenesis and, were used to guide a constrained-docking of AC-10 to the Kv7.1/KCNE1 model. AC-10 was modelled to be in a slightly more lateral position within the KCNE1-induced fenestrations in Kv7.1 compared with the initial docking of AC-1 (Figs 3c, 8). Covalent compound binding on ultraviolet radiation allowed for a physical/chemical determination of binding parameters that cannot be achieved solely by the classical mutagenesis scanning approach. Even though no evidence was found in this study, the existence of further lower affinity binding sites in the channel complex cannot be excluded.

The KCNE1 β-subunit induced fenestration and subsequent specific inhibition of hetero-multimeric channels described here for Kv7.1/KCNE1 could also be present in other voltage-gated channels that interact with other KCNE β-subunits. As several channels have been reported to interact with one or more of the five KCNE proteins, we suggest that β-subunit-induced fenestrations may occur in other channels, leading to formation of inhibitor binding sites similar to the one described herein for ACs. In the case of Kv7.1, only KCNE1 has been shown to enable the formation of a highly specific binding site (Fig. 1). Tissue-specific targeting of channels may potentially be achieved by generation of inhibitors acting on channels with highly constrained combinations of Kv and KCNE subunits. In this context, inhibitors with hydrophobic structure similar to adamantane represent a promising new pharmacophore for development of new, highly selective channel inhibitors.

Methods

Chemicals

AC derivates were synthesized at Janssen Pharmaceutica. Syntheses were described in a patent by Jaroskova et al.³⁰. AC-10 was synthetized from condensation of AC4 with SDA (NHS-Diazirine) as shown in supplementary Fig. 7. N-[(1 R,3 S)-5-amino-2-adamantyl]-2-(4-chloro-2-methyl-phenoxy)-2-methyl-propanamide (AC4, 0.050 g, 0.13 mmol) and 3H-diazirine-3-propanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 2,5-dioxo-1-pyrrolidinyl ester (SDA, NHS-Diazirine, Pierce 26167, 0.025 g, 0.11 mmol) were dissolved in dichloromethane (2 ml), triethylamine (0.2 ml, 1.44 mmol) was added, and the mixture was stirred for 48 h at room temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with dichloromethane (10 ml), washed with 1M HCl (2 × 5 ml), 1M NaOH (2 × 5 ml), and saturated brine solution (2 × 5 ml), dried (MgSO₄), and evaporated till dryness. The residue was crystallized from diisoproyl ether, yielding pure AC10 (2-(4-chloro-2-methyl-phenoxy)-2-methyl-N-[(1 R,3 S)-5-[3-(3-methyldiazirin-3-yl)propanoylamino]-2-adamantyl]propanamide, 27.5 mg, 0.056 mmol, 43% yield). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) 0.91 (s, 3H, C(N₂)-CH₃), 1.35 (bd, 2H), 1.45 (s, 6H, 2 × CH₃), 1.50, (t, 2H, J=7 Hz, -CH₂-CH₂), 2.07 (bd, 2H), 1.68-2.05 (m, 11H), 2.24 (s, 3H, Ar-CH₃), 3.71 (bd, 1H, J=5H, CONHCH), 6.75 (1H, d, J=7 Hz, Ar-H), 7.15 (dd, 1H, J=7 Hz, J=1 Hz, Ar-H), 7.25 (s, 1H, CNHCO),7.3 (d, J=5H, CONHCH,) 7.4 (d, J=1 Hz, Ar-H). LC/MS (ESI positive) m/z 487, 489.

Molecular biology, cRNA synthesis

Template cDNAs (wildtype or mutant human Kv7.1 in pSGEM, wildtype human KCNE1 in pSP64) were linearized with a suitable restriction enzyme (Nhe I/pSGEM, Eco RI/pSP64). cRNA was synthesized from 1 μg linearized cDNA by in vitro transcription (mMessage mMachine T7 or SP6 kit, Ambion, Life Technologies Darmstadt, Germany). cRNA concentrations were determined by photometry (Nanodrop, Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany) and cRNA quality was checked by agarose gel electrophoresis.

Oocyte isolation and injection

Oocytes were commercially obtained from EcoCyte Bioscience (Castrop-Rauxel, Germany). Injection of stage 4 or 5 oocytes was performed using a nanoliter injector 2000 (WPI, Berlin, Germany). For standard pharmacological measurements, each oocyte was injected with 5 ng Kv7.1 cRNA alone or with 1 ng KCNE1 cRNA. To investigate the influence of KCNE1 on AC-1 sensitivity of Kv7.1 tetramers, 5 ng Kv7.1 cRNA was injected with different amounts of KCNE1 cRNA (0 ng, 0.005 ng, 0.05 ng, 0.5 ng and 5 ng). Injected oocytes were maintained in an incubator at 17 °C for 4–5 days in standard Barth solution (EcoCyte Bioscience, Castrop-Rauxel, Germany) supplemented with 90 μg ml⁻¹ theophylline, 63 μg ml⁻¹ penicillin, 40 μg ml⁻¹ streptomycin, and 100 μg ml⁻¹ gentamycin until used for two electrode voltage clamp (TEVC) measurements.

Two electrode voltage clamp

TEVC measurements were performed using a TurboTec-10CD amplifier (npi Electronic, Tamm, Germany) and an ITC-16 AD/DA-interface (Instrutech Corporation, Port Washington, New York, USA). Pulse and PulseFit software (HEKA, Lambrecht/Pfalz, Germany) was used for data acquisition and analysis. During TEVC recordings, oocytes were constantly perfused with control solution (ND96, containing in mM: 96 NaCl, 4 KCl, 1.8 CaCl₂, 1 MgCl₂, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.6 supplemented 0.1–0.3% DMSO). AC solutions were freshly prepared in ND96 from a 10 mM DMSO stock solution. Glass capillaries were pulled to a fine point to produce current and voltage electrodes that were back-filled with 3 M KCl. When filled with this solution, electrode resistances ranged from 0.5–1.5 MΩ. Different voltage pulse protocols were used as follows: (1) To study the inhibitory effect of different AC derivatives, Kv7.1/KCNE1 currents were elicited by repetitive 7 s pulses to +40 mV applied every 30 s from a holding potential of −80 mV. (2) To analyse the voltage dependence of channel activation, currents were elicited by 10 s pulses to test voltages between −100 and +60 mV, applied in 20 mV increments from a holding potential of −80 mV. Tail currents were recorded at −120 mV. For control we always expressed KCNE1 alone along mutant channels and mutant currents were only taken into account when it reached at least 2.5- to 3-fold the size of the background Xenopus-Kv7.1/hKCNE1 currents.

Data analysis

Electrophysiological data were analysed using PulseFit software (HEKA, Lambrecht/Pfalz, Germany) and GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, California, USA). Channel inhibition was determined as reduction of whole cell current amplitude at the end of a 7 s test pulse to +40 mV. The concentration of compound that caused half-maximal inhibition (IC₅₀) were determined using the Hill equation: I_drug/I_max=1/(1+[C/IC₅₀]^H), where I_drug is the current amplitude in the presence of the drug, I_max is the current amplitude before drug application, C is the drug concentration and H is the Hill coefficient^1,21,35.

Activation curves were obtained as previously described for Kv7.1 homotetramers⁴². Initial tail currents were normalized to maximal values and plotted against the respective test potential⁴³. Normalized data were fitted to a Boltzmann equation:

V_1/2 is the voltage of half-maximal activation, k is the slope factor, V is the test voltage and A_max and A_min are the maximal and minimal tail current amplitudes. To analyse activation or deactivation kinetics, current traces were fitted to a single exponential function: y=A₀+A × exp(−t/τ), where A is current amplitude, A₀ is the steady-state amplitude and τ is the time constant for activation (τ_activation) or deactivation (τ_deactivation). A linear fit was performed using the linear function of the form y=m × log[AC−1]+b. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad prism. Student’s t-test or a one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnet’s or Tukey’s post hoc test were used. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Cell culture and transfection

HEK293T cells (DSMZ-No. ACC 635) were maintained in DMEM (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) and 1 × non-essential amino acids (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany). For transfection, cells were seeded in 8 cm dishes and grown to 80–90% confluence. Cells were transfected with 12 μg plasmid cDNA (Kv7.1myc-2A-KCNE1myc in pXOOM) using Metafectene Pro (Biontex, Martinsried, Germany). Non-transfected cells served as controls.

PAL with AC-10

For PAL of Kv7.1/KCNE1 channel complexes, transfected HEK293T cells were treated with photoactive AC-10. Non-transfected cells served as a control. In brief, cell culture medium was removed and cells were scrapped off the dish into 1 ml HBSS(−/−) (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany). Cell suspensions of each condition were combined and centrifuged (309g, 5 min). Cells were resuspended in 10 ml ice-cold PBS (PBS in mM: 150 NaCl, 8 Na₂HPO₄, 2 KH₂PO₄), treated with 1 μM AC-10 and kept on ice in the dark for 30 min. After UV-radiation (350 nm) for 5 min, the cell suspension was centrifuged (309g, 5 min, 4 °C) and the packed cells were washed three times with 10 ml ice-cold PBS (309g, 5 min, 4 °C) to remove remaining AC-10. AC-10 labelled Kv7.1 and KCNE1 proteins were purified and analysed using western blot and immunodetection or MS/MS spectrometry.

Cell lysis, affinity chromatography and western blot

For affinity purification of labelled Kv7.1 and KCNE1 proteins, transfected HEK293T cells were mechanically lysed. AC-10 treated or untreated cell suspensions were centrifuged (309g, 5 min, 4 °C) and pellets were resuspended in a five-fold volume of swelling buffer (containing in mM: 10 HEPES, 10 KCl, 1.5 MgCl₂; pH 7.6) supplemented with protease inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany). After another centrifugation step (550g, 5 min, 4 °C), cells were again resuspended in a two-fold volume of swelling buffer and kept on ice for 20 min. Cells were mechanically lysed using a 2 ml Dounce homogenizer (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany). Lysates were centrifuged (859g, 5 min, 4 °C) to remove cell nuclei and supernatants were mixed with one volume 2 × solubilization buffer (2% Triton X-100 in PBS) supplemented with protease inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich). For membrane solubilization, lysates were rotated 30 min at 4 °C and centrifuged (1,700g, 15 min, 4 °C) to remove undissolved fragments. Myc-tagged Kv7.1 was purified using anti-myc 9E10 (kindly provided by Dr Ralf Trippe) coupled protein-A-sepharose beads (Sigma-Aldrich) or anti-myc agarose (Thermo Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany). For purification of KCNE1 anti-KCNE1 (N16) (sc-16796; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany) coupled protein-A-sepharose was used. For coupling of antibodies to protein-A-sepharose beads, 1 ml of each lysate was rotated with the respective antibody for 3 h before 30 μl (50% protein-A-sepharose) was applied. Anti-myc Agarose was added directly to the lysates. After overnight rotation at 4 °C, beads were seeded by centrifugation (425g, 2 min) and washed three times with 600 μl 1 × solubilization buffer. For MS-analysis, beads were resuspended in 25 mM AmBic (ammonium bicarbonate) and proteins were directly digested from the beads using trypsin protease. For Western blot analysis, purified proteins were eluted using 2 × Laemmli buffer. SDS–PAGE was performed using Mini-PROTEAN 3 or Mini-PROTEAN Tetra System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Munich, Germany). Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using Mini Trans-Blot or Trans-Blot Turbo (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Unspecific binding sites were blocked by incubation of membranes with 5% milk powder in TBS-T (TBS-T in mM: 20 Tris-HCl, 140 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween). To detect Kv7.1myc, anti-myc 9E10 was used (3:10,000 in TBS-T). KCNE1 was detected using an antibody against KCNE1 (N16) (sc-16796; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany). Primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4 °C. Before incubation with secondary antibodies, membranes were washed three times with TBS-T (5 min). The secondary antibodies used were horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse (Amersham) and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-goat (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Before detection, membranes were washed four times with TBS-T (5 min) and two times with TBS (5 min). Super Signal West Pico kit was used for detection (Thermo Scientific).

Mass spectrometry

Affinity purified Kv7.1 and KCNE1 proteins were digested from the beads with sequencing grade trypsin (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) overnight in the presence of 1% Rapigest. To quench digestion and degradation of Rapigest formic acid (acid-labile SDS-like detergent, (Waters Corporation, USA) was added. Samples were vacuum concentrated, reconstituted in 10 μl 2% acetonitrile (ACN) and 0.1% FA and loaded onto a self-packed 15 cm, 100 μm inner diameter Luna C18 reversed phase column (3 μm particles, 300 Å; Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany). Peptides were eluted into an LTQ Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) via electrospray ionization (1.8 kV) using an Accela HPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with an effective flow rate of approximately 250 nl min⁻¹ and a 4 h ACN gradient from 5 to 85% ACN optimized for highly hydrophobic peptides. The 20 most intense precursors in the range from 400 to 2,000 m/z with charge stages from 2 to 4 were selected for MS/MS sequencing from a previous survey scan in the Orbitrap mass analyser, fragmented by collision induced dissociation and analysed in the linear ion trap mass analyser. Database searches were performed with the Proteome Discoverer software version 1.3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) deploying the Sequest algorithm and searching against the human SwissProt database (release 15.6/57.6) allowing 10 ppm for precursor mass tolerance and 1.0 Da for fragment ion mass tolerance. Proteins were considered as present in the samples with at least 2 unique peptides with peptide false discovery rate <1% (based on decoy database) identified per peptide. The experiment was repeated three times with similar results. As a negative control, unlabelled channel proteins were analysed.

Molecular modelling

A previously described 3D-model of the Kv7.1/KCNE1 channel was utilized for docking of AC-1 (JNJ303) and AC-10 (ref. 33). AC-1 was docked manually in proximity to the functionally identified key residues. The modelled Kv7.1/KCNE1-AC-1 complex was energy minimized using Yasara Structure 10. In a second approach, AC-10 was generated with a linker corresponding to the UV-reacted compound. The end of the linker (C25) was constrained to a distance of 2±1 Å to the oxygen OG1 in the KCNE1 Thr58 side chain. This positions the reacted linker in a distance to virtually allow for a similar covalent bond with both the side chain oxygen and the side chain carbogen of Thr58. A short all-atoms-mobile MD simulation using force field Amber03 (2 fs time steps) simulation was performed.

Channel state modelling

The basic Markov model has been described before³⁵. This Markov model was modified to recapitulate AC-1 effects best. The exact values are given in the figure legend.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Wrobel, E. et al. KCNE1 induces fenestration in the Kv7.1/KCNE1 channel complex that allows for highly specific pharmacological targeting. Nat. Commun. 7:12795 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12795 (2016).

References

Biervert, C. et al. A potassium channel mutation in neonatal human epilepsy. Science 279, 403–406 (1998).
Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
Browne, D. L. et al. Episodic ataxia/myokymia syndrome is associated with point mutations in the human potassium channel gene, KCNA1. Nat. Genet. 8, 136–140 (1994).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Felix, R. Channelopathies: ion channel defects linked to heritable clinical disorders. J. Med. Genet. 37, 729–740 (2000).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Maljevic, S., Wuttke, T. V., Seebohm, G. & Lerche, H. KV7 channelopathies. Pflugers Archiv. 460, 277–288 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ullrich, S. et al. Effects of I(Ks) channel inhibitors in insulin-secreting INS-1 cells. Pflugers Archiv. 451, 428–436 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Unoki, H. et al. SNPs in KCNQ1 are associated with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes in East Asian and European populations. Nat. Genet. 40, 1098–1102 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wang, Q. et al. Positional cloning of a novel potassium channel gene: KVLQT1 mutations cause cardiac arrhythmias. Nat. Genet. 12, 17–23 (1996).
Article Google Scholar
Wulff, H., Castle, N. A. & Pardo, L. A. Voltage-gated potassium channels as therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 8, 982–1001 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Coetzee, W. A. et al. Molecular diversity of K+ channels. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 868, 233–285 (1999).
Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
Gutman, G. A. et al. International Union of Pharmacology. XLI. Compendium of voltage-gated ion channels: potassium channels. Pharmacol. Rev. 55, 583–586 (2003).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Isacoff, E. Y., Jan, Y. N. & Jan, L. Y. Evidence for the formation of heteromultimeric potassium channels in Xenopus oocytes. Nature 345, 530–534 (1990).
Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
Bett, G. C. & Rasmusson, R. L. Modification of K+ channel-drug interactions by ancillary subunits. J. Physiol. 586, 929–950 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Rettig, J. et al. Inactivation properties of voltage-gated K+ channels altered by presence of beta-subunit. Nature 369, 289–294 (1994).
Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
Pusch, M. Increase of the single-channel conductance of KVLQT1 potassium channels induced by the association with minK. Pflugers Archiv. 437, 172–174 (1998).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Tristani-Firouzi, M. & Sanguinetti, M. C. Voltage-dependent inactivation of the human K+ channel KVLQT1 is eliminated by association with minimal K+ channel (minK) subunits. J. Physiol. 510, Pt 1 37–45 (1998).
Article CAS Google Scholar
McCrossan, Z. A. & Abbott, G. W. The MinK-related peptides. Neuropharmacology 47, 787–821 (2004).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gofman, Y., Shats, S., Attali, B., Haliloglu, T. & Ben-Tal, N. How does KCNE1 regulate the Kv7.1 potassium channel? Model-structure, mutations, and dynamics of the Kv7.1-KCNE1 complex. Structure 20, 1343–1352 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lundby, A., Tseng, G. N. & Schmitt, N. Structural basis for K(V)7.1-KCNE(x) interactions in the I(Ks) channel complex. Heart Rhythm 7, 708–713 (2010).
Article Google Scholar
Wrobel, E., Tapken, D. & Seebohm, G. The KCNE Tango—How KCNE1 Interacts with Kv7.1. Front. Pharmacol. 3, 142 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lerche, C. et al. Chromanol 293B binding in KCNQ1 (Kv7.1) channels involves electrostatic interactions with a potassium ion in the selectivity filter. Mol. Pharmacol. 71, 1503–1511 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Seebohm, G. et al. Molecular determinants of KCNQ1 channel block by a benzodiazepine. Mol. Pharmacol. 64, 70–77 (2003).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Decher, N. et al. Molecular basis for Kv1.5 channel block: conservation of drug binding sites among voltage-gated K+ channels. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 394–400 (2004).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hanner, M. et al. Binding of correolide to the K(v)1.3 potassium channel: characterization of the binding domain by site-directed mutagenesis. Biochemistry 40, 11687–11697 (2001).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mitcheson, J. S., Chen, J., Lin, M., Culberson, C. & Sanguinetti, M. C. A structural basis for drug-induced long QT syndrome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 12329–12333 (2000).
Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
Marzian, S. et al. Side pockets provide the basis for a new mechanism of Kv channel-specific inhibition. Nat. Chem. Biol. 9, 507–513 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yang, T. et al. An allosteric mechanism for drug block of the human cardiac potassium channel KCNQ1. Mol. Pharmacol. 83, 481–489 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lewis, R. J. & Garcia, M. L. Therapeutic potential of venom peptides. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2, 790–802 (2003).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Du, L. P., Li, M. Y., Tsai, K. C., You, Q. D. & **a, L. Characterization of binding site of closed-state KCNQ1 potassium channel by homology modeling, molecular docking, and pharmacophore identification. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 332, 677–687 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lerche, C. et al. Molecular impact of MinK on the enantiospecific block of I(Ks) by chromanols. Br. J. Pharmacol. 131, 1503–1506 (2000).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Jaroskova, L., Linders, J. T. M., Van der Veken, L. J. E., Willemsens, G. H. M. & Bischoff, F. P. N-2 Adamantanyl-2-Phenoxy-Acetamide Derivatives as 11-Beta Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Inhibitors WO 2006024627.
Towart, R. et al. Blockade of the I(Ks) potassium channel: an overlooked cardiovascular liability in drug safety screening? J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 60, 1–10 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Swartz, K. J. & MacKinnon, R. Hanatoxin modifies the gating of a voltage-dependent K+ channel through multiple binding sites. Neuron 18, 665–673 (1997).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kopljar, I. et al. The ladder-shaped polyether toxin gambierol anchors the gating machinery of Kv3.1 channels in the resting state. J. Gen. Physiol. 141, 359–369 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Smith, J. A., Vanoye, C. G., George, A. L. Jr., Meiler, J. & Sanders, C. R. Structural models for the KCNQ1 voltage-gated potassium channel. Biochemistry 46, 14141–14152 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Strutz-Seebohm, N. et al. Structural basis of slow activation gating in the cardiac I Ks channel complex. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 27, 443–452 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Payandeh, J., Scheuer, T., Zheng, N. & Catterall, W. A. The crystal structure of a voltage-gated sodium channel. Nature 475, 353–358 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Payandeh, J., Gamal El-Din, T. M., Scheuer, T., Zheng, N. & Catterall, W. A. Crystal structure of a voltage-gated sodium channel in two potentially inactivated states. Nature 486, 135–139 (2012).
Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
Das, J. Aliphatic diazirines as photoaffinity probes for proteins: recent developments. Chem. Rev. 111, 4405–4417 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Dubinsky, L., Krom, B. P. & Meijler, M. M. Diazirine based photoaffinity labeling. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 20, 554–570 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Donnelly, M. L. et al. The 'cleavage' activities of foot-and-mouth disease virus 2A site-directed mutants and naturally occurring ‘2A-like’ sequences. J. Gen. Virol. 82, 1027–1041 (2001).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Trichas, G., Begbie, J. & Srinivas, S. Use of the viral 2A peptide for bicistronic expression in transgenic mice. BMC Biol. 6, 40 (2008).
Article Google Scholar
Donnelly, M. L. et al. Analysis of the aphthovirus 2A/2B polyprotein 'cleavage' mechanism indicates not a proteolytic reaction, but a novel translational effect: a putative ribosomal ‘skip’. J. Gen. Virol. 82, 1013–1025 (2001).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Henrion, U., Strutz-Seebohm, N., Duszenko, M., Lang, F. & Seebohm, G. Long QT syndrome-associated mutations in the voltage sensor of I(Ks) channels. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 24, 11–16 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grant Se1077(3–3), IMF140919 and IZKF Münster grant See1/012/13 to G.S. and by Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Telethon Italy (grant GGP12008) and the Compagnia SanPaolo (to M.P.). Professor Dr Michael C. Sanguinetti helped writing the manuscript. Professor Michael Hollmann and Dr Ralf Trippe are kindly acknowledged for providing myc 9E10 antibody.

Author information

Eva Wrobel and Ina Rothenberg: These authors contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Institute for Genetics of Heart Diseases (IfGH), University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, D-48149, Germany
Eva Wrobel, Ina Rothenberg, Karina Eckey, Eric Schulze-Bahr, Nathalie Strutz-Seebohm & Guiscard Seebohm
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Ruhr University of Bochum, Universitaetsstrasse 150, Bochum, 44801, Germany
Christoph Krisp, Franziska Hundt, Benjamin Fraenzel & Dirk Wolters
a Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Project Management Office, Janssen Research & Development, Beerse, 2340, Belgium
Joannes T. M. Linders
a Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Safety Pharmacology Research, Translational Sciences, Janssen Research & Development, Beerse, 2340, Belgium
David J. Gallacher & Rob Towart
Institute of Physiology, Ruhr University of Bochum, Universitaetsstrasse 150, Bochum, 44801, Germany
Lutz Pott
Istituto di Biofisica CNR, Via De Marini 6, Genova, I-16149, Italy
Michael Pusch
Departments of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Tao Yang
Departments of Medicine, Pharmacology and Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Dan M. Roden
Department of Pharmacology, University of Alberta, 9-70 Medical Sciences Building, Edmonton, T6G 2R3, Alberta, Canada
Harley T. Kurata
Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research (IZKF), Faculty of Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, D-48149, Germany
Guiscard Seebohm

Authors

Eva Wrobel
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ina Rothenberg
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Christoph Krisp
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Franziska Hundt
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Benjamin Fraenzel
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Karina Eckey
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Joannes T. M. Linders
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
David J. Gallacher
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Rob Towart
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Lutz Pott
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Michael Pusch
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tao Yang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Dan M. Roden
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Harley T. Kurata
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Eric Schulze-Bahr
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Nathalie Strutz-Seebohm
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Dirk Wolters
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Guiscard Seebohm
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

E.W. and I.R. performed the majority of the experiments. G.S. and N.S-.S. conceived the study. E.W., C.K., F.H., B.F. and D.W. performed MS/MS experiments. K.E. performed the patch clamp experiments. G.S. performed the ligand dockings and recordings. J.T.M.L., D.J.G., R.T. and L.P. were involved in the design, synthesis, and testing of the AC derivatives. M.P. performed the Markov modelling. T.Y. performed mutagenesis, G.S., H.T.K., L.P., D.M.R. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guiscard Seebohm.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figure 10 and Supplementary Table 1. (PDF 1646 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wrobel, E., Rothenberg, I., Krisp, C. et al. KCNE1 induces fenestration in the Kv7.1/KCNE1 channel complex that allows for highly specific pharmacological targeting. Nat Commun 7, 12795 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12795

Download citation

Received: 28 May 2015
Accepted: 02 August 2016
Published: 12 October 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12795
Springer Nature Limited

KCNE1 induces fenestration in the Kv7.1/KCNE1 channel complex that allows for highly specific pharmacological targeting

From

Abstract

Similar content being viewed by others

A small-molecule activation mechanism that directly opens the KCNQ2 channel

The binding and mechanism of a positive allosteric modulator of Kv3 channels

The Polysite Pharmacology of TREK K2P Channels

Introduction

Results

KCNE1 induces sensitivity of Kv7.1 to inhibition by AC-1

Ala scanning of S4, S5, S6 and proximal C terminus of Kv7.1

Chemical modification of the AC-1 scaffold

Photoaffinity labelling approach to identify AC interactions

Cys scanning of the KCNE1 transmembrane segment

Constrained AC-1 docking

Discussion

Methods

Chemicals

Molecular biology, cRNA synthesis

Oocyte isolation and injection

Two electrode voltage clamp

Data analysis

Cell culture and transfection

PAL with AC-10

Cell lysis, affinity chromatography and western blot

Mass spectrometry

Molecular modelling

Channel state modelling

Data availability

Additional information

References

Acknowledgements

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Contributions

Corresponding author

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Share this article

Search

Navigation