Abstract
The present work examines the function of differential dissolution in planktic and benthic foraminifera and introduces the major factors that affect dissolution in early Mid-Maastrichtian Event MME and Late Maastrichtian Event LME paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Two observations on foraminifera dissolution in the Dakhla Formation, where planktic foraminifera are more susceptible to dissolution than benthic foraminifera in the Hamama Member of the Jebel Duwi section, Eastern Desert (Egypt). They are characterized by a decline in the planktic/benthic (P/B) ratio and a rise in the agglutinated percentage. The results of those observations are used for revealing foraminiferal dissolution in these two zones (Racemiguembelina fructicosa CF4a and Pseudoguembelina palpebra CF2). During these two zones, there were excessive relative abundances of agglutinated foraminifera, indicating that these two intervals witnessed severe carbonate dissolution. The high total organic carbon (TOC) and low pH due to the presence of a lot of organic matter in the black shale’s of the Dakhla Formation of the upper Maastrichtian age is the explanation for the observed dissolution that has nothing to do with oceanographic or volcanic processes. The presence of pyrite within the black shale interval suggests low oxygen conditions and the potential for meteoric water to react with the pyrite and form sulfuric acid. This acid could dissolve any carbonate material well after the original deposition.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The study of the dissolution of foraminifer tests of the Jebel Duwi section (Fig. 1) has been noticeably neglected in stratigraphic succession in the Eastern Desert. The planktic and calcareous benthic foraminifera are susceptible to dissolution, with planktic foraminifera being more soluble than benthic ones due to the porous chamber walls of planktic forms that evolved to maintain buoyancy in surface waters. The dissolution of planktic foraminifera results in depressed planktic/benthic (P/B) ratios [1,2,3,4,5]. It is widely known that benthics foraminifera tests are much less susceptible to dissolution than planktic [6], and [4,5,6,7,8,9].
The basic assumption in paleoenvironmental reconstructions is that fossil assemblages truthfully mirror the original biocoenosis and underlying environmental signals [10]. However, fossil communities and assemblages contain time-averaged signals, which actually could mainly be driven by contrasts in (temporary) environmental variations [11, 12]. Taphonomic factors, especially selective dissolution, can severely alter the composition of foraminiferal fossil assemblages [2, 13,14,15,16]. Although preferential dissolution in foraminiferal assemblages is widely recognized in modern and quaternary deep-sea sediments [2, 4, 17, 18], the phenomenon is often neglected in studies dealing with older sediments.
For instance, planktic/benthic (P/B) ratios are often employed for paleodepth and sea-level reconstructions [10, 19, 20]. However, since planktic foraminifera are generally more susceptible to dissolution than benthic [21], partial dissolution leads to depressed P/B ratios and potentially underestimated paleodepths.
The Authors study the uppermost Maastrichtian interval hemipelagic foraminiferal assemblage from the Jebel Duwi section of Egypt, to reveal the effects of differential dissolution on the composition of foraminiferal assemblages. This time slice was chosen because dissolution phenomena are a recurrent problem for upper Maastrichtian foraminiferal assemblages, especially in connection with the global warming event known as The Mid-Maastrichtian Event (MME), which began by the end of the early Maastrichtian and persisted till upper zones CF6 to middle CF4a (C31n), and The Late Maastrichtian Event LME, which referred to that the faunal changes began in the latest Maastrichtian CF3–CF1 interval and ended at the Cretaceous/Paleogene K/Pg boundary and therefore spanned the last 450 kyr of the Maastrichtian [22].
However, this warming was attributed to the abrupt reorganization of intermediate oceanic circulation [23], to Ninety East Ridge volcanism [24]. A severe phase of volcanic activity is recorded at DSDP Site 216 beginning ~ 69.5 Ma and spanning zones CF5–CF3. Deccan volcanism started close to the end of the mid-Maastrichtian event at the base of C30n (~ 67.1 Ma, [25]).
The Mid-Maastrichtian Event (MME) marked the early Maastrichtian cooling trend and was related to acme occurrences of inoceramids in intermediate water depths earlier than the extinction of this organism [26]. During the mid-Maastrichtian numerous events provoke the most important oceanographic, climatic, and biotic modifications [23, 26,27,28,29]. The brief reversal in ocean circulation manifested by the shift of intermediate to deep water sources toward high southern latitude sites possibly occurred by tectonic processes [23, 29]. The changes in benthic foraminiferal stable oxygen isotope signatures caused eustatic sea-level falls [28, 30, 31].
The Mid-Maastrichtian Event (MME) was observed in the sedimentary report at the Dakhla Formation (Hamama Member) of the Jebel Duwi section, Eastern Desert (Egypt) during the Racemiguembelina fructicosa CF4a Subzone. The MME in the study area lies within the lower part of the planktic foraminiferal Racemiguembelina fructicosa Subzone (CF4a).
Close to the MME, the more specialized planktic foraminifers start to decrease in diversity and more generalized groups increase, indicating a shift to less oligotrophic conditions, a trend that strongly accelerated near the end of the Maastrichtian [32].
Racemiguembelina fructicosa Subzone marks the Late Maastrichtian Event (LME). Keller et al. [24] suggested that the faunal responses include species dwarfing, reduced populations of specialized species, temporary exclusions, dominance through generalist and/or disaster opportunist species, and general diversity decrease, as observed in the Indian Ocean, Tethys, and South Atlantic Oceans. These authors attributed the reason for this warming to Ninety East Ridge volcanism.
The late Maastrichtian warming event was defined by a global temperature increase of ~ 2.5–5 °C that occurred ~ 150–300 ky before the Cretaceous/Paleogene (K/Pg) mass extinction. This transient warming event has traditionally been associated with a major pulse of Deccan Traps (west-central India) volcanism; however, large uncertainties associated with radiogenic dating methods have long hampered a definitive correlation. The persistent warming trend began near the base of C29r (cycle 18, 355 ky pre-K/Pg) and reached maximum temperatures of 280 ky (an increase of 3.2–4 °C). In deep-sea sections, the onset of Deccan-related climate warming is generally placed at ~ 300 ky pre-K/Pg. High temperatures persisted across the CF2/CF1 boundary (229 ky), then gradually decreased until 70 ky (cycle 3.5), followed by rapid 3– 4 °C cooling by 45 ky (cycle 2.5) persisting until 25 ky (cycle 1.5) [33].
The study of the dissolution of foraminifer’s tests of the Jebel Duwi section (Fig. 1) has been noticeably neglected in stratigraphic succession in the Eastern Desert. The planktic and calcareous benthic foraminifera are susceptible to dissolution, with planktic foraminifera being more soluble than benthic ones due to the porous chamber walls of planktic forms that evolved to maintain buoyancy in surface waters. The dissolution of planktic foraminifera results in depressed P/B ratios [1,2,3,4,5]. It is widely known that benthic foraminifera tests are much less susceptible to dissolution than planktic [4,5,6,7,8,9].
Nguyen and Speijer [34] studied benthic foraminifera dissolution susceptibility to architectural types. It was found that unilocular, uniserial, biserial, triserial, and milioline groups are more dissolvable than trochospirals and planispirals, which can be extra resistant.
Petró et al. [35] introduced a discussion for benthic foraminifera regarding dissolution resistance, and they determined that planktic are more dissolution resistant than benthic. Nguyen et al. [9] determined that Lenticulina is the maximum resistant, accompanied by Gaudryina cf. ellisorae (agglutinated). The high risk of dissolution includes biserial and triserial calcareous benthic forms and porcelaneous kinds. The calcareous rotaliines (Anomalinoides and Cibicidoides) have an intermediate dissolution susceptibility.
This study aims to present the first study of the dissolution of planktic and benthic tests in the composition of foraminiferal assemblages in zones CF4a and CF2 of the Hamama Member (uppermost Maastrichtian interval) of the Duwi section. The study examines the function of differential dissolution in a wide variety of planktic and benthic foraminifera and introduces the major factors that affect dissolution in early Mid-Maastrichtian Event MME and Late Maastrichtian Event LME paleoenvironmental reconstructions.
2 Geological setting and stratigraphy
The Jebel Duwi is located in the eastern part of the Central Eastern Desert of Egypt. This study area is divided into Jebel Duwi and the coastal plain. The former is an elongate NW-trending ridge that drops precipitously to the southwest and slopes slightly to the northeast (Fig. 2). The Duwi area can be seen as tilted faulted blocks dissected by major and minor faults in the Red Sea tectonics (Fig. 2). A major phosphogenic episode occurred during the Late Cretaceous of shallow to the epicontinental shelf of the southern Neo-Tethys Ocean [36]. There is a common association between phosphatic strata and chert and organic-rich sediments (black shales in Duwi) in the Middle East and Egypt. This is interpreted to indicate that phosphorite accumulation is associated with highly productive surface waters, likely caused by upwelling currents [37]. During the Upper Cretaceous, the southern platform of Egypt had epicontinental basins (not deeper than 100–150 m.) consisting of siliciclastic carbonate, marl, limestones, phosphate granules, and chert. The Duwi Formation was laid down in extraordinarily shallow epicontinental-neritic seas that flaked the southern margin of the Tethys Ocean in Egypt [38,39,40].
The marine deposition of Jebel Duwi led to the accumulation and preservation of organic-rich sediment contributing to the dominant formations. The black shales of the Dakhla Formation are assigned to the upper Maastrichtian age [40], presenting an impressive example of a major marine transgression event. Marine transgression during the Late Cretaceous-Early Tertiary times inundated Egyptian territory north to the latitude of Aswan (24N). It became punctuated by minor regressions due to tectonic pulses [41,42,43].
The Dakhla Formation (Maastrichtian-Early Paleocene) was deposited in environments ranging from shore to deep marine [44,45,46,47,48] and reached its maximum thickness at Jebel Duwi (175 m). It consists specifically of organic-rich shale and argillaceous limestone. According to [49], the Dakhla Formation is composed of the lower Hamama Member (Maastrichtian) and the upper Beidaa Shale Member (Lower Paleocene), which are unconformably overlying each other [50].
The lowest beds of the Hamama Member (2–4 m thick) are darkish grey to black organic-rich calcareous clays, a few thin limestone ledges in the mid-section, monotonous greenish to grey marls, and shales with gypsum veins in the upper beds (Fig. 3). The top of the Hamama Member is an erosional surface (hiatus), marked by reworked fossils in a clay matrix, due to the regression phase [51, 52].
Orabi and El Gammal [53] recognized that the boundary between Racemiguembelina fructicosa Subzone (CF4a) and Pseudoguembelina hariaensis zone (CF3) is marked by abrupt thin layers of dark grey shales represented by very small (dwarfed) planktic species of compressed tests and impregnated by reddish colors such as Globigerinelloides spp.
Pseudoguembelina palpebra (CF2) of the late Maastrichtian zone of the Hamama Member is characterized by planktic assemblages, composed of heterohelicids, especially Planoheterohelix globulosa (Ehrenberg). This fauna represents a low diversity species population linked to high-stress environments, that's pretty high TOC, and low pH due to the presence of a lot of organic matter is likely an explanation for the observed dissolution that has nothing to do with oceanographic or volcanic processes. Additionally, the Plummerita hantkeninoides (CF1) zone has dominant planktic foraminifera with very few keeled globotruncanids and is composed of heterohelicids (Fig. 3).
3 Materials and methods
3.1 Foraminiferal study
Quantitatively describe the resolution sampling used to examine foraminifera (planktic and benthic) from the Hamama Member (uppermost Maastrichtian interval). About forty-five rock samples constitute a 50 m thick with appropriate spacing. For this study, we selected only 19 rock samples of an interval representing CF4a–CF1 (22.8 m thick of upper Maastrichtian). In the laboratory, 100 g from each sample was washed through a 63 µm sieve and dried in an oven at a temperature of 50 °C. A > 63 m fraction was used after disaggregation in quantitative foraminiferal studies. Accordingly, quantitative studies were based on representative splits (using a modified Otto microsplitter) of approximately 300 specimens selected from each sample to calculate the planktic/benthic (P/B ratio). Preservation of foraminifera assemblages for the Duwi section is usually favorable, though the dissolution of calcite shell is obvious in a few samples. The numbers of dissolved planktic specimens in all samples have been counted, together with the quantity of dissolved benthic specimens (tests with clear etching) (Table 1). The foraminifera tests were mounted on standard 60-square micropaleontological slides and scanned using a Scanning Electron Microscope of Alexandria University (JSM-IT200, Series Jeol) (Figs. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9).
Shows the dissolution of some planktic foraminifera genera and parasitism. 1. Dissolutions of the last chambers of Heterohelix vistulaensis (Peryt), zone CF4a, sample No. 28. 2. Pitted surface and dissolutions for the Heterohelix labellosa (Nederbragt), zone CF4a, sample No. 31. 3. Pitted surface and dissolutions for the Pseudotextularia nuttalli (Voorwijk), zone CF4, sample No. 29. 4a. Dissolutions of the first weak initial chambers, Globotruncanita conica (White), dorsal view, zone CF4a, sample No. 26. 4b. Enlargement of the initial chambers
Shows the dissolution of some planktic foraminifera genera. 1. Bad preservation very sugary texture abundant holes collapsing chambers and abrasion of the periphery of the test. Planoglobulina multicamerata (De Klasz) zone CF2, sample No. 43. 2. Umbilicus dissolution of Contusotruncana morozovae (Vasilenko), ventral view, zone CF4a, sample No. 27. 3. Bad preservation very sugary texture abundant holes collapsing chambers and abrasion of the periphery of the test. Plummerita hantkeninoides (Brönnimann), dorsal view, zone CF1, sample No. 45. 4. Bad preservation very sugary texture abundant holes collapsing chambers. Rugotruncana subcireummodifer dorsal view, zone CF4a, sample No. 28
Shows the dissolution of some planktic foraminifera genera. 1. Umbilicus dissolution of Rugoglobigerina rugosa (Plummer), ventral view, zone CF4a, sample No. 29. 2. Pitted surface and dissolutions of the Laeviheterohelix turgida Nederbragt, zone CF4a, sample No. 28. 3. Umbilicus dissolution of Gansserina gansseri (Bolli) ventral view, zone CF4a, sample No. 27. 4. Dissolutions hole of Planoglobulina carseyae (Plummer) dorsal view, zone CF4a, sample No. 29
Shows the dissolution of some planktic foraminifera genera. 1. Dissolutions hole of Planoglobulina carseyae (Plummer) ventral view, zone CF4a, sample No. 29. 2. Bad preservation very sugary texture abundant holes collapsing chambers and abrasion of the periphery of the test. Plummerita hantkeninoides (Brönnimann), ventral view. Zone CF1, sample No. 45. 3. Umbilicus dissolution of Rugoglobigerina scotti (Brönnimann), ventral view. Zone CF4a, sample No. 29. 4. Dissolutions of the Gublerina cuvillieri (Kikoine), zone CF4a, sample No. 26
Shows the dissolution of some benthic foraminifera genera. 1. Dissolution hole of the thin wall of Anomalinoides globigeriniformis (Parker and Jones), dorsal view, zone CF4a, sample No. 29. 2. Dissolution hole of early chambers and abrasion of the periphery of the test of Cibicides subcarinatus (Cushman and Deaderick), dorsal view, zone CF2, sample No. 41. 3. Sugary texture and abundant holes surface of Gaudryina (Pseudogaudryina) ellisorae (Cushman), zone CF2, sample No. 41. 4. Abrasion the periphery of the test of Lenticulina navarroensis (Plummer), zone CF2, sample No. 41
Shows the dissolution of some benthic foraminifera genera and parasitism. 1. Pitted surface and dissolutions plus b. Parasitism of the Lenticulina munsteri (Roemer) by Planoglobulina carseyae (Plummer), zone CF4a, sample No. 29. 2. Abrasion the periphery of the test of Neoflabellina rugosa (d’Orbigny), zone CF2, sample No. 41. 3. Dissolution hole of the thin wall of Planulina nacatochensis (Cushman). dorsal view, zone CF4a, sample No. 29. 4. Dissolutions hole of Lagena globosa (Montagu), zone CF4, sample No. 28
The preservation of planktic foraminiferal tests is usually good to moderate in the study area. We picked fragments of planktic foraminiferal tests over the entire 19 sample set and > 63 mm splits for the taphonomic analysis (Table 1). The fragmentation index is a well-known taphonomic proxy of the carbonate saturation state or dissolution of calcium carbonate [54,55,56]. The fragmentation index (FI) measures the percentage of planktic foraminiferal fragments (specimens that include much less than two-thirds of an entire test) based on the total number of whole tests [54]. The dissolution effects upon the composition of planktic foraminifera assemblages have been considerably higher in samples with FI > 40%.
3.2 Determination of total organic carbon (TOC)
Samples representing CF4a–CF1 were chosen to determine (TOC) by using a Hochtemperatur-TOC/TNb-Analysator (LiquiTOC) (Table 1), where about 200 mg of pulverized sample was used. Carbonate was eliminated via treatment with 10% aqueous hydrochloric acid. The residue was used for the determination of TOC via combustion analysis at temperatures attaining 850 °C. The evolved gas (CO2) was recorded as a carbon percentage and was measured quantitatively and concurrently by infrared detectors.
4 Results
4.1 Planktic foraminiferal turnover
The studied planktic foraminiferal assemblages are characterized by a high diversity and a wide range of morphological variability of the tests. The species richness remains very high and ranges between 89 and 104 species per sample. About 61 species belonging to 20 genera were identified in this section (Table 2).
The P/B ratio ranges from 38.8 to 20.6% in Zone CF4a and 30.7–15.1% in Zone CF2 (Table 1), suggesting a relatively stable paleobathymetry throughout the Duwi section. The Maastrichtian planktic foraminiferal ecogroups are well represented by heterohelicids, pseudoguembelinids, globotruncanids, rugoglobigerinids, hedbergellids, and Globigerinelloids (Fig. 3).
Planktics foraminiferal assemblages in the > 63 mm size fraction are dominated by Heterohelicids, with an average of approximately 69.1% (Fig. 3). Other common genera are Globotruncanids (12.5%), Rugoglobigerinids (6.4%), the least abundant genera are Rugoglobigerina (3.5%), Globotruncana (1.9%), and Globotruncanita (1.6%). The other genera that had average relative abundance < 1% are grouped (Table 3) and composed of Abathomphalus, Archaeoglobigerina, Contusotruncana, Globotruncanella, Gansserina, Gublerina, Planoglobulina, Pseudotextularia, Racemiguembelina, Plummerita, Globigerinelloides, Globotruncana, Rugotruncana, Globotruncanita, Spiroplecta, Heterohelix, Laeviheterohelix, Planoheterohelix, Pseudoguembelina, and Rugoglobigerina.
4.2 Planktic foraminiferal fragmentation index (FI)
We have identified FI values higher than 40% in four samples (28, 31, 40, and 41 respectively within the two interval zones CF4a Subzone and CF2 Zone) underneath the Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary K/Pg (Table 1). Large oscillations in the FI are recognized within both these intervals (samples 24–27), suggesting relatively rapid changes in carbonate dissolution intensity. Obviously, the majority of the studied section is below a moderate/strong dissolution restriction where the FI < 40%, particularly in the uppermost Maastrichtian (samples 43–45).
The fragmentation index shows high values of planktic foraminiferal tests at CF4a Subzone and CF2 Zone (Table 1), these episodes are characterized by a very high abundance of the low oxygen tolerant genus Heterohelix, and an increase in the biserial morphotype (intermediate) with elongated terminal chambers (Table 3).
4.3 Distribution of benthic morphogroups
Calcareous benthics foraminifera tests are sensitive to environmental parameters change such as depth, the flux of organic nutrients to the seafloor, oxygen levels of the seafloor, salinity, food quality and quantity, substrate, temperature, etc. [57,58,59,60]. The authors have observed the morphogroup category of [60] in the area under consideration. The morphogroups distribution inside this section is illustrated in Fig. 10.
4.4 Phase of dissolution
Two inferred foraminiferal dissolution phases were observed in the Dakhla Formation (Hamama Member) (Fig. 11). A dissolution examination was performed to evaluate factors that affect the foraminiferal assemblage of the Maastrichtian zones CF4a and CF2. The results confirm that planktic foraminifera are much more susceptible to dissolution than benthic foraminifera. Within Zone CF4a, dissolved planktic constituent range between 4 and 40, while dissolved benthic constituent range between 1 and 21. The total planktic dissolved in zone CF2 ranged between 29 and 40, and the total benthic dissolved ranged between 19 and 25 (Table 1).
4.4.1 First interval (Phase 1)
4.4.1.1 Dissolved planktic foraminifera
In the studied section of Jebel Duwi, there was mainly a decrease in the number of globotruncanids and the dominance of heterohelicids, which are considered opportunistic taxa. The observed low abundance of planktic specimens between zones CF4a and CF3 (Fig. 12) may be due to the presence of pyrite (sample 31) within the black shales’ interval, suggesting low oxygen conditions [61]. Pyrite also suggests the potential for meteoric water to react with the pyrite and form sulfuric acid, which could then dissolve any carbonate material well after the original deposition. The planktic and benthic change indicate a continuous and even increasingly high-stress environment during the CF4a zone, which agrees with many authors [22, 62, 63]. The TOC contents of the black shale samples collected from Hamama Member range between 2.00 and 12.00%, with an average of 4.35% (Table 1). That's pretty high TOC and low pH due to the presence of a lot of organic matter is another likely explanation for the observed dissolution that has nothing to do with oceanographic or volcanic processes (Fig. 12).
4.4.1.2 Dissolution of biserial planktic groups
Quantitative data in phase 1 and phase 2 suggest that the biserial planktic foraminifera (Heterohelix and Pseudotextularia) exhibit the highest dissolution sensitivity followed by the trochospiral forms (Globotruncanita, Contusotruncana, Rugotruncana, Rugoglobigerina, and Gansserina (Figs. 8, 9, 10, 11). These findings agree with different quantitative studies [64,65,66].
4.4.1.3 Dissolved benthic foraminifera
The depletion of oxic conditions may be a premonition of an even more significant future change in global climate, reduction of biodiversity, and accompanying extinction events, which proves the observation of dissolved oxygen (DO) values to be indispensable for modern science and environmental protection [67].
The taxa of the rounded trochospiral morphogroup (RT) are represented in dissolved zones CF4a (71–27 individuals) and CF2 (89–60 individuals) (Fig. 10). The presence of Valvulineria and abundant Gavelinella in this morphogroup is considered the strongest opportunistic fauna [68].
In the dissolved phase of the CF4a Subzone, the plano-convex trochospiral morphogroup (PT) includes 86–51 individuals, while the CF2 Zone includes 124–38 individuals (Fig. 10). This morphogroup is typical of aerobic and eutrophic to mesotrophic environments, and most of these taxa are epifaunal forms [69,70,71].
The taxa of the Lenticular morphogroup (L) are represented in zones CF4a (73–14 individuals) and CF2 (46–22 individuals) of the dissolved phase respectively (Fig. 10). These taxa can be found in sublittoral to upper bathyal and aerobic to dysaerobic conditions [70, 72].
Taxa from the tapered and cylindrical morphogroup (T/C) are found in Zones CF4a (102–54 individuals) and CF2 (120–55 individuals) (Fig. 10). Elongated multiserial forms are found in areas with increased organic flux [73, 74].
In the dissolved phase of the CF4a Subzone, the flattened tapered morphogroup (FT) includes very rare individuals (14–3), while the CF2 Zone is represented by 24–3 (Fig. 10). This morphogroup is characterized by shallow infaunal detrivores and scavengers’ taxa [60].
The taxa of the agglutinated morphogroup are represented in zones CF4a (35–4 individuals) and CF2 (58–8 individuals) (Fig. 10). The presence of agglutinated species and low diversity indicates constant temperature and stagnant water conditions [75]. The assemblage of the Racemiguembelina fructicosa Subzone (CF4a) is mainly represented by arenaceous foraminifera genera (Dorothia and Gaudryina).
The recorded dissolved calcareous benthic assemblage (Figs. 8, 9) is diversified, moderately well-preserved, and represented by the following morphogroups: tapered and cylindrical morphogroup (T/C), plano-convex trochospiral morphogroup (PT), rounded trochospiral morphogroup (RT), lenticular morphogroup (L), and spherical morphogroup of genus Lagena (S), in decreasing order of abundance, and very rare flattened tapered morphogroup (FT). The rounded planispiral morphogroup (RP) does not show any dissolution feature.
Several types of calcareous benthic foraminifera are identified, and some forms show dissolution holes in the early chambers, pitted surfaces, and abrasion at the test margins. The most dissolved benthics foraminifera in this phase is shown in Figs. 8 and 9.
4.4.2 Second interval (Phase 2)
4.4.2.1 Dissolved planktic foraminifera
The planktic forms recorded in CF2 Zone (sample 40–43) are dominated by Planoheterohelix, Heterohelix, Planoglobulina, and Rugoglobigerina, which display dissolution patterns. This section is overlain by a barren interval (sample 42) (Figs. 3, 11). Dissolution leads to decreased diversity and decreased numbers of taxa (Table 3). The dominant planktic dissolved foraminifera are Planoglobulina multicamerate (De Klasz), sample No. 43 (Fig. 5, No. 1) and Plummerita hantkeninoides (Brönnimann), sample No. 45 (Fig. 5, No. 3).
4.4.2.2 Dissolved benthic foraminifera
Phase 2 of carbonate dissolution is characterized by the high content of arenaceous agglutinated forms (Gaudryina and Dorothia), as in the underlying CF4a Zone. Nevertheless, the benthic foraminiferal recorded in the Pseudoguembelina palpebra CF2 Zone are dominated by rich agglutinated genera that display sugary texture, abrasion of the periphery, and dissolution holes in the thin walls of Gaudryina (Pseudogaudryina) ellisorae Cushman, sample No. 41 (Fig. 7, No. 3). Meanwhile, the calcareous forms are moderately preserved and are similar to phase 1.
The calcareous benthic foraminifera are abundant and some forms show abrasion of the periphery of the test of Cibicides subcarinatus Cushman and Deaderick (sample No. 41, Fig. 8, No. 2), Lenticulina navarroensis (Plummer) (sample No. 41, Fig. 8, No. 4), and Neoflabellina rugosa (d'Orbigny) (sample No. 41, Fig. 9, No. 2).
4.5 Conditions favoring agglutinated taxa
The abundance of agglutinated taxa in Subzone CF4a and Zone CF2 is attributed to brackish environments or stagnant conditions [76,77,78]. The increased organic carbon (10.2%-12.0%) in samples 28 (CF4a) and 41 (CF2) respectively (Table 1) implies that the depositional beds in those intervals experienced dysaerobic bottom conditions with decreased pH [79,80,81,82].
The Upper Cretaceous black shales of the area under consideration are characterized by high organic matter, sulfide, and trace element contents [83]. The geochemical and petrographical research revealed that the Cretaceous black shales in the Duwi section were deposited in relatively euxinic to anoxic reducing marine environments.
5 Discussion
5.1 P/B ratios as a dissolution proxy
These zones include, among other possible indicators of dissolution, low P/B ratios, low foraminiferal numbers, an excessive number of arenaceous agglutinated taxa, few numbers of benthic calcareous taxa (unilocular, uniserial, as well as trochospiral) and nonmuricate taxa for the planktic, which also agree with the observations of [34] (Table 1). Parker and Berger [84] interpreted the reduced P/B foraminifera ratios as a reduction in planktic foraminifera because of their susceptibility to dissolution. Meanwhile, [34] interpreted the low P/B ratio as due to benthic foraminiferal abundances, which reflect the supply of organic carbon to the seafloor.
The potential indicators of dissolution can be recognized by the decrease in P/B ratios, decrease in the number of globotruncanids, and dominance of heterohelicids. The increase in Lenticulina indicates that planktic forams are more likely to dissolve than benthic forams [4,5,6, 34].
5.2 Preservation bias in planktic foraminifera
The planktic foraminifera morphology is a key factor governing dissolution susceptibility. Robust “globotruncanids” (Globotruncana spp., Gansserina spp., Rosita spp., Contusotruncana spp.) are more resistant to dissolution than thin-walled morphologies “simple biserial” (e.g., Heterohelix spp.) and “rugoglobigerinids”. This observation is essential to understanding preservation bias amongst exceptional morphologies in planktic foraminifera assemblages [85] (Fig. 13).
The heterohelicids abundances abruptly change from 35 to 60% through the CF3 Zone, and exceed 60% in the CF2 and CF1 zones (Fig. 7). The dominance of heterohelicids has also been recorded in Tunisia, Israel, Italy, Spain, Texas, Denmark [86] and others, suggesting reduced water mass stratification and accelerated low oxygen environments as ecological stress. The Duwi Basin during CF4a and CF2 zones became shallower, with low oxygen contents, low primary production, and low planktic content in the dissolution interval (Fig. 3).
The presence of Pseudotextularia elegans (Rzehak) in the zones CF4a and CF2 indicates a connection of the basin with the warm Tethys [87]. Moreover, the presence of dark grey shales (TOC content ranges between 2 and 12.2%, Table 1) in the upper part of these zones records a sharp decrease in P/B, globotruncanids, rugoglobigerinids, globigerinellids, and heterohelicids (Fig. 11).
5.3 Fragmentation index (FI)
The P/B ratio is unstable along the section (Table 1), indicating a decline in planktic foraminiferal flux to the seafloor as the result of a rapid rise of the lysocline. However, FI indicates relatively poor preservation and high amounts of test dissolution in intervals from CF4a and CF2 below the (K/Pg). This apparent contradiction between FI and P/B ratio could be explained by local surface water becoming more acidic, perhaps due to a short-lived increase in the atmospheric partial pressure of CO2 [56, 88]. The fragmentation records discussed in the present work suggested widespread ocean acidification during the two zones CF4a and CF2 were probably linked to Deccan volcanism.
During CF4a and CF2, the increased fragmentation index (FI) indicates an increased dissolution intensity and/or poor preservation of CaCO3. [89] suggested that lysocline shuffling might be one explanation.
6 Conclusion
-
1.
Two observations on foraminifera dissolution in the Dakhla Formation, where planktic foraminifera are more susceptible to dissolution than benthic foraminifera in the Hamama Member. They are characterized by a decline in the P/B ratio and a rise in the agglutinated percentage. Results of those observations are used for the first time revealing foraminiferal dissolution in these two zones (CF4a and CF2).
-
2.
The Fragmentation index (FI) indicates relatively poor preservation and excessive quantities of test dissolution in Subzone CF4a and Zone CF2 below the K/Pg. This obvious contradiction among FI and P/B ratios could be explained by local surface water becoming more acidic, perhaps due to a short-lived increase in the atmospheric partial pressure of CO2. The fragmentation records in the present work suggested that widespread ocean acidification during the two zones CF4a and CF2 was probably linked to Deccan volcanism.
-
3.
The observed low abundance of planktic specimens between zones CF4a and CF3 may be due to the presence of pyrite within the black shale interval, suggesting low oxygen conditions. Pyrite also suggests the potential for meteoric water to react with the pyrite and form sulfuric acid, which could then dissolve any carbonate material well after the original deposition.
-
4.
The recorded dissolved calcareous benthic assemblage is diversified, moderately well-preserved, and represented by the following morphogroups: tapered and cylindrical morphogroup (T/C), plano-convex trochospiral morphogroup (PT), rounded trochospiral morphogroup (RT), lenticular morphogroup (L), and spherical morphogroup of genus Lagena (S), in decreasing order of abundance, and very rare flattened tapered morphogroup (FT). The rounded planispiral morphogroup (RP) does not show any dissolution feature.
-
5.
The presence of black shales of the Dakhla Formation is assigned to the upper Maastrichtian age. The high total organic carbon (TOC) and low pH due to the presence of a lot of organic matter is another likely explanation for the observed dissolution that has nothing to do with oceanographic or volcanic processes.
Data availability
Data will be made available on reasonable request.
References
Berger WH (1967) Foraminifera ooze, solution at depth. Science 156(3773):383–385
Berger WH (1970) Planktonic foraminifera-selective solution and lysocline. Mar Geol 8(2):111–138
Berger WH (1973) Deep-sea carbonates: pleistocene dissolution cycles. J Foraminifera Res 3:187–195
Peterson LC, Prell WL (1985) Carbonate dissolution in recent sediments of the eastern equatorial Indian Ocean: preservation patterns and carbonate loss above the lysocline. Mar Geol 64(3–4):259–290
Dittert N, Baumann KH, Bickert T, Henrich R, Huber R, Kinkel H, Meggers H (1999) Carbonate dissolution in the deep-sea: methods, quantification and paleoceanographic application. In: Fischer G, Wefer G (eds) Use of proxies in paleoceanography: examples from the South Atlantic. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 255–284
Thunell RC (1976) Optimum indices of calcium carbonate dissolution in deep-sea sediments. Geology 4(9):525–528
Petrizzo MR, Leoni G, Speijer RP, De Bernardi B, Felletti F (2008) Dissolution susceptibility of some Paleogene planktonic foraminifera from ODP site 1209 (Shatsky Rise, Pacific Ocean). J Foraminifera Res 38(4):357–371
Petrizzo MR, Huber BT, Falzoni F, MacLeod KG (2020) Changes in biogeographic distribution patterns of southern mid-to-high latitude planktonic foraminifera during the Late Cretaceous hot to cool greenhouse climate transition. Cretac Res 115:104547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.104547
Nguyen TMP, Petrizzo MR, Speijer RP (2009) Experimental dissolution of a fossil foraminiferal assemblage (Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, Dababiya, Egypt): implications for paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Mar Micropaleontol 73:241–258
Van der Zwaan GJ, Jorissen FJ, De Stigter HC (1990) The depth-dependency of planktonicrbenthic foraminiferal rations; constraints and applications. Mar Geol 95:1–16
Martin RE, Liddell WD (1991) Taphonomy of foraminifera in modern carbonate environments: implication for the formation of foraminiferal assemblages. In: Donovan SK (ed) The processes of fossilization. Belhaven Press, London, pp 170–194
Martin RE (1993) Time and taphonomy: actualistic evidence for the time-averaging of benthic foraminiferal assemblages. In: Kidwell SM, Behrensmayer AK (eds) Taphonomic approaches to time resolution in fossil assemblages. Short courses in Paleontology, 6, 36–55
Thunell RC, Honjo S (1981) Calcite dissolution and the modification of planktonic foraminiferal assemblages. Mar Micropaleontol 6(2):169–182
Martin RE, Wright RC (1988) Information loss in the transition from life to death assemblages of foraminifera in back reef environments, Key-Largo Florida. J Paleontol 62(3):399–410
Le JN, Thunell RC (1996) Modeling planktic foraminiferal assemblage changes and application to sea surface temperature estimation in the western equatorial Pacific Ocean. Mar Micropaleontol 28(3–4):211–229
Speijer RP, Schmitz B (1998) A benthic foraminiferal record of Paleocene sea level and trophic/redox conditions at Gebel Aweina Egypt. Palaeogeogr, Palaeoclimatol, Palaeoecol 137(1–2):79–101
Murray JW, Alve E (1999) Natural dissolution of modern shallow water benthic foraminifera: taphonomic effects on the palaeoecological record. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 146(1–4):195–209
Conan SMH, Ivanova EM, Brummer GJA (2002) Quantifying carbonate dissolution and calibration of foraminiferal dissolution indices in the Somali Basin. Mar Geol 182(3–4):325–349
Collins LS (1993) Neogene paleoenvironments of the Bocas-Del-Toro Basin Panama. J Paleontol 67(5):699–710
Bucefalo PR, Luchetti L (1997) Age and paleontological inferences of the upper Mont Falterona Sandstone Formation (Lonnano member, early Miocene) Northern Apennines. Giorn Geol 59(1–2):143–168
Boltovskoy E, Totah VI (1992) Preservation index and preservation potential of some foraminiferal species. J Foramin Res 22(3):267–273
Punekar J, Mateo P, Keller G (2014) Effects of Deccan volcanism on paleoenvironment and planktic foraminifera: a global survey. The Geological Society of America, Special Paper, p 505
Li L, Keller G, Stinnesbeck W (1999) The Late Campanian and Maastrichtian in northwestern Tunisia: paleoenvironmental inferences from lithology, macrofauna and benthic foraminifera. Cretac Res 20:231–252
Keller G, Punekar J, Mateo P (2016) Upheavals during the late Maastrichtian: volcanism, climate and faunal events preceding the end-Cretaceous mass extinction. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 441:137–151
Schöbel S, de Wall H, Ganerod M, Pandit MK, Rolf C (2014) Magnetostratigraphy and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology of the Malwa Plateau region (northern Deccan Traps), central western India: significance and correlation with the main Deccan large igneous province sequences. J Asian Earth Sci 89:28–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.03.022
MacLeod KG, Huber BT, Ward PD (1996) The biostratigraphy and paleobiogeography of Maastrichtian inoceramids. In: Ryder G, Fastovsky D, Gartner S (eds) Special Paper, 307, The cretaceous-tertiary event and other catastrophes in earth history. Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 361–373
Chauris H, LeRousseau J, Beaudoin B, Propson S, Montanari A (1998) Inoceramid extinction in the Gubbio basin (northeastern Apennines of Italy) and relations with mid-Maastrichtian environmental changes. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 139:177–193
Barrera E, Savin SM (1999) Evolution of Campanian–Maastrichtian marine climates and oceans. In: Barrera E, Johnson CC (eds) Evolution of the cretaceous ocean–climate system. Geological Society of America, Special Paper, 332, 245–282
Friedrich O, Herrle JO, Wilson PA, Cooper MJ, Erbacher J, Hemleben C (2009) Early Maastrichtian carbon cycle perturbation and cooling event: implications from the South Atlantic Ocean. Paleoceanography 24(2):PA2211
Li L, Keller G, Adatte T, Stinnesbeck W (2000) Late Cretaceous sea level changes in Tunisia: a multidisciplinary approach. Geol Soc Lond 157:447–458
Payandeh AR, Justic D, Mariotti G, Huang H, Sorourian S (2019) Subtidal water level and current variability in a bar-built estuary during cold front season: Barataria Bay, Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res Oceans 124(10):7226–7246
Premoli Silva I, Sliter WV (1999) Cretaceous paleoceanography: evidence from planktonic foraminiferal evolution. In: Barrera E, Johnson CC (eds) The evolution of cretaceous ocean-climatic system. Geological Society of America, Special Paper, 332, 301–328
Keller G (2021) Erratum to “Mercury linked to Deccan traps volcanism, climate change and the end-Cretaceous mass extinction 194, 103312.” Glob Planet Change 198:103388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2020.103312
Nguyen TMP, Speijer RP (2014) A new procedure to assess dissolution based on experiments on Pliocene-Quaternary foraminifera (ODP Leg 160, Eratosthenes Seamount, Eastern Mediterranean). Mar Micropaleontol 106:22–38
Petró SM, Pivel MAG, Coimbra CJ (2018) Foraminiferal solubility rankings: a contribution to the search for consensus. J Foramin Res 48(4):301–313
Sheldon RP (1981) Ancient marine phosphorites. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 9:251–284
Glenn CR (2016) Depositional sequences of the Duwi, Sibaiya and phosphate formations, Egypt: phosphogenesis and glauconitization in a Late Cretaceous epeiric sea. Geol Soc Spec Pub 52:205–222
Kerdany MT, Cherif O (1990) Mesozoic. Chapter 22. In: Said R (ed) Geology of Egypt. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, p 727
Glenn CR, Arthur MA (1990) Anatomy and origin of a Cretaceous phosphorite-greensand giant Egypt. Sedimentology 37:123–154
El-Gammal RMH, Orabi HO (2019) Coniacian-late Campanian planktonic events in the Duwi formation, Red Sea region Egypt. J Geol Geophys 8(1):16
Issawi B (1968) The geology of Kurkur-Dungul area. Geological Survey, Egypt, paper 46, p 102
Said R (ed) (1990) The geology of egypt. Balkema, p 734
El-Sabbagh A, Tantawy A, Keller G, Khozyem H, Spangenberg J, Adatte T, Gertsch B (2011) Stratigraphy of the cenomanian-turonian oceanic anoxic event OAE2 in shallow shelf sequences of NE Egypt. Cretac Res 32(6):705–722
Abdel-Malik WM (1982) Calcareous nannoplankton from the sequence between Dakhla and Esna Shale formations (Upper Cretaceous-Lower Eocene) Quseir area Egypt. Rev Espec Micropaleontol 14:73–84
Schrank E (1984) Organic geochemical and palynological studies of Dakhla Shale (Late Cretaceous) in southeast Egypt. Part A—succession of microflora and depositional environment. Berliner Geowissenschaftlichen Abhandlungen 50:189–207
Schrank E (1987) Paleozoic and Mesozoic palynomorphs from Northeast Africa (Egypt and Sudan) with special reference to Late Cretaceous pollen and dinoflagellates. Berliner Geowissenschaftlichen Abhandlungen 75(A1):249–310
El-Kammar AM, Morsy RS, Sharabi S (2013) Biostratigraphical, petrographical and mineralogical characterization of the Upper Cretaceous–Lower Tertiary sedimentary succession of Wassief area, Red Sea, Egypt. Presented and Abstracted in the Annual Meeting of Geological Society, Cairo
El-Kammar MM (2015) Source-rock evaluation of the Dakhla Formation black shale in Gebel Duwi, Quseir area Egypt. J Afr Earth Sci 104:19–26
Abdel Razik T (1972) Comparative studies on the Upper Cretaceous-Early Paleogene 723 sediments on the Red Sea Coast, Nile Valley and Western Desert, Egypt. 9th 708 Arab 724 Petroleum Congress. Algiers 3B:23–71
Masters BA (1984) Comparison of Planktonic Foraminifera at the Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary from the El Horia Shale (Tunisia) and the Esna Shale (Egypt). In: EGPC 7th Exploration Seminar, Cairo, pp 310–324
Issawi B (1972) Review of upper cretaceous-lower tertiary stratigraphy in central and southern Egypt. Am Asso Petrol Geol Bull 56:1448–1463
Garrison RF, Glenn CR, Snavely PD, Mansour SEA (1979) Sedimentology and origin of Upper Cretaceous phosphorite deposits at Abu Tartur, Western Desert Egypt. Ann Geol Surv Egypt 9:261–281
Orabi HO, El Gammal RM (2021) Biostratigraphic and paleoecological significance of benthic foraminiferal morphogroups in the uppermost Turonian–upper Campanian of Gebel Duwi Range, Red Sea Egypt. Arab J Geosci 14:168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06353-z
Berger WH, Bonneau MC, Parker FL (1982) Foraminifera on the deep-sea floor: lysocline and dissolution rate. Oceanol Acta 5:249–258 (0399-1784//249)
Malmgren BA (1987) Differential dissolution of Upper Cretaceous planktonic foraminifera from a temperate region of the South Atlantic Ocean. Mar Micropaleontol 11:251–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8398(87)90001-6
Henehan MJ, Hull PM, Penman DE, Rae JWB, Schmidt DN (2016) Biogeochemical significance of pelagic ecosystem function: an end-Cretaceous case study. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci 371:20150510. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0510
Nagy J, Kaminski MA, Kuhnt W, Bremer MA (2000) Agglutinated foraminifera from neritic to bathyal facies in the Palaeogene of Spitsbergen and the Barents Sea. In: Hart MB, Kaminski MA (eds) Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Agglutinated Foraminifera, 7. Grzybowski Foundation special publication, pp 333–361
Setoyama E, Kaminski M, Tyszka J (2011) The Late Cretaceous –Early Paleocene palaeobathymetric trends in the south-western Barents Sea-Palaeoenvironmental implications of benthic foraminiferal assemblage analysis. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 307:44–58
Setoyama E, Kaminiski MA, Tyszka J (2017) Late Cretaceous–Paleogene foraminiferal morphogroups as palaeoenvironmental tracers of the rifted Labrador margin, northern proto-Atlantic. In: Kaminski MA, Alegret L (eds) Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Agglutinated Foraminifera, vol 22. Grzybowski Foundation special publication, pp 179–220
Stojanova V, Petrov G (2018) Paleoecological significance of benthic foraminiferal fauna from the Ovče Pole Basin Republic of Macedonia. Geologica Macedonica 32(1):45–57
Łukawska-Matuszewska K, Graca B, Brocławik O, Zalewska T (2019) The impact of declining oxygen conditions on pyrite accumulation in shelf sediments (Baltic Sea). Biogeochemistry 142:209–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0530-2
Pardo A, Keller G (2008) Biotic effects of environmental catastrophes at the end of the Cretaceous: Guembelitria and Heterohelix blooms. Cretac Res 29:2058–1073
Keller G, Abramovich S (2009) Lilliput effect in late Maastrichtian planktic foraminifera: response to environmental stress. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 284:47–62
Douglas RG (1973) Benthonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy in the Central North Pacific Leg 17, deep sea Drilling Project. In: Winterer EL, Ewing JI (eds) Deep sea drilling project. Initial Reports 17 (Available from World Wide Web: http://deepseadrilling.org/17/volume/dsdp17-21.pdf
Martin RE, Harris MS, Liddell WD (1995) Taphonomy and time averaging of foraminiferal assemblages in Holocene tidal flat sediments, Bahia la Choya, Sonora, Mexico (northern Gulf of California). Mar Micropaleontol 26(1–4):187–206
Yasuhara M, Hunt G, Cronin TM, Hokanishi N, Kawahata H, Tsujimoto A, Ishitake M (2012) Climatic forcing of Quaternary deep-sea benthic communities in the North Pacific Ocean. Paleobiology 38(1):162–179
Kranner M, Harzhauser M, Beer C, Auer G, Piller WE (2022) Calculating dissolved marine oxygen values based on an enhanced Benthic Foraminifera Oxygen Index. Sci Rep 12:1376. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05295-8
Tyszka J (2009) Foraminiferal response to seasonality modulated by orbital cycles in the Cretaceous mid-latitudes: the Albian record from the Lower Saxony Basin. Palaeogeogr Palaeoecol Palaeoclimatol 276:148–159
Coccioni R, Galeotti S (1993) Orbitally induced cycles in benthonic foraminiferal morphogroups and trophic structure distribution patterns from the L Albian Amadeus segment (Central Italy). J Micropaleontol 12:227–239
Widmark JGV (1997) Deep-sea benthic foraminifera from Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary strata in the South Atlantic taxonomy and paleoecology. Fossils Strata 43:1–94
Grunert P (2011) Integrated facies analysis and stratigraphy of the Early Miocene North Alpine foreland basin (Upper Austria). Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Karl Franzens Universität Graz
Rückheim S, Bornemann A, Mutterlose J (2006) Planktic foraminifera from the mid-Cretaceous (Barremian-early Albian) of the North Sea Basin: palaeoecological and palaeoceanographic implications. Mar Micropaleontol 58:83–102
Nagy J, Gradstein FM, Kaminski MA, Holbourn AE (1995) Foraminiferal morphogroups, palaeoenvironments and new taxa from Jurassic to cretaceous strata of Thakkhola, Nepal. In: Kaminski MA, Geroch S, Gasiński MA (eds) Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Agglutinated Foraminifera, 3. Grzybowski Foundation special publication, pp 181–209
Nagy J, Kaminski MA, Johnsen K, Mitlehner AG (1997) Foraminiferal, palynomorph, and diatom biostratigraphy and paleoenvironments of the Tork Formation: a reference section for the Paleocene–Eocene transition in the western Barents Sea. In: Hass HC, Kaminski MA (eds) Contributions to the micropaleontology and paleoceanography of the northern North Atlantic, Grzybowski Foundation Special Publication, 5, pp 15–38
Haynes JR (1981) Foraminifera. Macimilian Publishers Ltd, London, p 433
Løfaldli M, Nagy J (1980) Foraminiferal stratigraphy of Jurassic deposits on Kongsøya. Svalbard Skr Nor Polarinst 172:63–96
Nagy J, Løfaldli M, Beackstreom SA (1988) Aspects of foraminiferal distribution and depositional conditions in Middle Jurassic to Early Cretaceous shales in eastern Spits Bergen. In: Reogl F, Gradstein FM (eds) Second workshop agglutinated foraminifera, 30. Abhandlungen der geologischen Bundesanstalt, Wien, pp 287–300
Nagy J, Pilskog B, Wilhelmsen R (1990) Facies controlled distribution of foraminifera in the Jurassic North Sea Basin. In: Hemleben C et al. (eds) Paleoecology, biostratigraphy, paleoceanography and taxonomy of agglutinated foraminifera. NATO ASI Series C327. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 621–657
Phleger FB (1960) Foraminiferal population in Laguna Madre, Texas. Sci. Rep. Tohoku University Special, 4, 83–91 (Tohoku)
Murray JW (1967) Living foraminiferids of tidal marshes—a review. J Foram Res 1:153–161
Murray JW (1973) Distribution and ecology of living benthic foraminiferids. Heinemann Educ Book, London, p 274
Bradshaw JS (1968) Environmental parameters and marsh Foraminifera. Limnol Oceanogr 13:26–30
Abou El-Anwar EA (2017) Mineralogical, petrographical, geochemical, diageneses and provenance of the Cretaceous Black Shales, Duwi Formation at Quseir-Safaga, Red Sea Egypt. Egypt J Pet 26(4):915–926
Parker FL, Berger WH (1971) Faunal and solution patterns of planktonic foraminifera in surface sediments of the South Pacific. Deep-Sea Res 18:73–107
Manda S, Punekar J (2020) Experimental validation of the planktic foraminifera fragmentation index as proxy for the end-Cretaceous Ocean Acidification. Mar Micropaleontol 155:101821
Keller G (2002) Guembelitria-dominated planktic foraminiferal assemblages mimic early Danian in Central Egypt. Mar Micropaleontol 47:71–99
Olsson RK, Wright JD, Miller KG (2001) Paleobiogeography of Pseudotextularia elegans during the latest Maastrichtian global warming event. J Foramin Res 31(3):275–282. https://doi.org/10.2113/31.3.275
Henehan MJ, Ridgwell A, Thomas E, Zhang S, Alegret L, Schmidt DN, Rae JWB, Witts JD, Landman NH, Greene SE, Huber BT, Super JR, Planavsky NJ, Hull PM (2019) Rapid ocean acidification and protracted Earth system recovery followed the end-Cretaceous Chicxulub impact. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:22500–22504. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1905989116
Gilabert V, Arz AJ, Arenillas I, Robinson SA, Ferrer D (2021) Influence of the Latest Maastrichtian Warming Event on planktic foraminiferal assemblages and ocean carbonate saturation at Caravaca Spain. Cretac Res 125:104844
Acknowledgements
Great thanks are to Prof Dr. Abd El Rahman Fowler UAE University, Geology Department for greatly hel** to improve the manuscript and useful discussion. We greatly appreciate the organizations that funded our research.
Funding
No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
OHO collecting previous literature—reviewing and continuous follow-up. Of all parts of the research. AMS participation in determining the title of research—collecting. Previous studies—writing research content—identifying and organizing references-adjusting. Research formats in line with the journal.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Orabi, O.H., Hamad, M.M. & Abu Saima, M.M. Foraminifera dissolution phases in the upper cretaceous succession of Jebel Duwi, Egypt. J.Umm Al-Qura Univ. Appll. Sci. 9, 185–203 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43994-023-00034-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43994-023-00034-9