Log in

Effects of credit on national and agricultural GDP, and poverty: a develo** country perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
SN Business & Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A develo** country's economy, such as Bangladesh's, mainly focuses on agriculture, and credit plays a vital role in economic development and poverty alleviation. Therefore, this study aims to narrate the effects of credit on the national Gross Domestic Product (GDP), agricultural GDP, and poverty. Forty-three years' data (from 1976 to 2018) on credit, GDP, and poverty are collected from different secondary sources, whereas four prominent credit disbursement organizations are considered for this study. A fixed-effect model is employed to reveal the effect of credit. The study finds that credit has significant positive effects on both national and agricultural GDP. An increase in the amount of loans, number of loanees, and number of banks' branches indicate an increasing number of people getting access to finance, which would increase their production-related activities and eventually contributed to increasing GDP. The study also finds that credit has a significant favorable effect on poverty alleviation. The findings highlight the importance of credit in Bangladesh and other emerging economies to flourish the economy and ease poverty. Therefore, the study suggests that financial institutions should expand their credit programs for rural entrepreneurs and farmers to ensure sustainable rural development as well as economic development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Bangladesh Bank annual report 2019

Fig. 2

Source: WDI 2019

Fig. 3

Source: WDI 2019

Fig. 4

Source: BBS 2018a

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data included in the article are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. This study considered only “rural credit”, which is taken by the rural households for the purpose of agricultural activities or operating small and medium business in rural areas. The rural people are in most adverse situation on taking loan because of limited number of credits providing institutions operated in rural areas but the urban manufacturing industries can take loan from any commercial bank or non-bank financial institutions (NBFIs) due to easy accessibility. Therefore, this research particularly focused on rural credit and the institutions provide credit in rural areas.

  2. VIF was 4.12, 5.51 and 1.28 for amount of loan, number of members and number of branches, respectively, in model 1 and 2 while it was 3.24, 5.59 and 5.99 for amount of loan, number of members and number of branches, respectively, in model 3.

  3. Domestic production, investment and consumption influence the others components of national GDP (e.g., government spending, net export, etc.) directly or indirectly.

References

  • Abraham TW (2018) Estimating the effects of financial access on poor farmers in rural northern Nigeria. Financ Innov 4(1):25

    Google Scholar 

  • Afrin S, Islam N, Ahmed S (2010) Microcredit and rural women entrepreneurship development in Bangladesh: a multivariate model. J Bus Manag 16(1):9–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad K, Heng ACT (2012) Determinants of agriculture productivity growth in Pakistan. Int Res J Financ Econ 95:163–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Akhtar S, Li GC, Nazir A, Razzaq A, Ullah R, Faisal M, Raza MH (2019) Maize production under risk: the simultaneous adoption of off-farm income diversification and agricultural credit to manage risk. J Integr Agric 18(2):460–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Akinlo AE (2014) Policy choices and challenges in expanding access to finance for growth in rural Nigeria. Eur J Sustain Dev 3(1):135–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Ampah SN, Ambrose JO, Omagwa JO, Frimpong S (2017) Effect of access to credit and financial services on poverty reduction in central region of Ghana. Int J Bus Soc Sci 8(8):49–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Ara R (2009) A Study on the Impact of Grameen Bank Credit Programme on the Rural Women Beneficiaries in the Modhupur Upazila of Tangail District. Unpublished MS Thesis, Department of Agricultural Finance, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh. pp. 1–58

  • Asteriou D, Hall SG (2007) Applied econometrics: a modern approach. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire, pp 117–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Awad IM, Al Karaki MS (2019) The impact of bank lending on Palestine economic growth: an econometric analysis of time series data. Financ Innov 5(1):14

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangladesh Bank (2019) Annual Report 2018–19. available at: https://www.bb.org.bd/pub/publictn.php. Accessed on May 5, 2020

  • Banu IM (2013) The impact of credit on economic growth in the global crisis context. Procedia Econ Financ 6:25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • BBS (2018b) Statistical Yearbook of Bangladesh-2018. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics Statistics & Informatics Division Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • BBS (2017) Preliminary report on Households Income and Expenditure Survey 2016. Dhaka; 2017. Available: https://catalog.ihsn.org/index.php/catalog/7399/related-materials. Accessed on June 12, 2020

  • BBS (2018) Agriculture and Rural Statistics. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Statistics & Informatics Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Agriculture and rural statistics. Accessed on May 8, 2020

  • BBS (2019) Gross Domestic Product of Bangladesh at Current Prices, 2015–16 to 2018–19. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Statistics & Informatics Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh. http://www.bbs.gov.bd/site/page/dc2bc6ce-7080-48b3-9a04-73cec782d0df/Gross-Domestic-Product-(GDP). Accessed on May 8, 2020

  • BER (2018) Bangladesh Economic Review 2018. Finance Division, Ministry of Finance, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernini C, Brighi P (2018) Bank branches expansion, efficiency, and local economic growth. Reg Stud 52(10):1332–1345

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirkos AY (2014) The impact of microfinance on living standards, empowerment and poverty alleviation of the poor people in Ethiopia, a case study in ACSI. Res J Finance Account 5(13):43–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury MJA, Ghosh D, Wright RE (2005) The impact of micro-credit on poverty: evidence from Bangladesh. Prog Dev Stud 5(4):298–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook RD, Weisberg S (1983) Diagnostics for heteroscedasticity in regression. Biometrika 70(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Develtere P, Huybrechts A (2005) The impact of microcredit on the poor in Bangladesh. Alternatives 30(2):165–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Duican ER, Pop A (2015) The implications of credit activity on economic growth in Romania. Procedia Econom Financ 30:195–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Enimu S, Eyo EO, Ajah EA (2017) Determinants of loan repayment among agricultural microcredit finance group members in Delta state Nigeria. Financ Innov 3(1):21

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrar DE, Glauber RR (1967) Multicollinearity in regression analysis: the problem revisited. Rev Econ Stat 49:92–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdous J (2014) Micro credit program of NGOs in poverty alleviation: an empirical study on some selected NGOs. IOSR J Hum Soc Sci (IOSR-JHSS) 19(9):26–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1984) Multivariate data analysis with readings, 1995. Petroleum Publishing, Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartarska V, Nadolnyak D, Shen X (2015) Agricultural credit and economic growth in rural areas. Agric Financ Rev 75(3):302–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica J Econ Soc 46:1251–1271

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam MA (2014) Importance of agricultural credit for rural development of Bangladesh: a descriptive approach. Int J Bus Econ Res 2(1):68–83. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20140201.18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam MM (2020) Agricultural credit and agricultural productivity in Bangladesh: an econometric approach. Int J Food Agric Econ (IJFAEC) 8:247

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam MM, Azad KMAK (2008) Rural-urban migration and child survival in urban Bangladesh: are the urban migrants and poor disadvantaged? J Biosoc Sci 40(1):83

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam A, Rashid MHU, Hossain SZ, Hashmi R (2020) Public policies and tax evasion: evidence from SAARC countries. Heliyon 6(11):e05449

    Google Scholar 

  • Karim MR, Tania S, Farazi MMR (2012) Role of micro-credit in poverty alleviation of rural poor: evidence from Laxmipur District of Bangladesh. J Bus Technol (dhaka) 7(2):37–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan W, Fatima S, Jamshed M (2017) Agricultural credit-led agricultural growth: a VECM approach. Asian J Agric Ext Econ Sociol 19:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Korkmaz S (2015) Impact of bank credits on economic growth and inflation. J Appl Financ Bank 5(1):51

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloba M, Alhassan AL (2019) Determinants of agri-lending in Kenya. Agric Financ Rev 79(5):598–613

    Google Scholar 

  • McKernan SM (2002) The impact of microcredit programs on self-employment profits: Do noncredit program aspects matter? Rev Econ Stat 84(1):93–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Moahid M, Maharjan KL (2020) Factors affecting farmers’ access to formal and informal credit: evidence from rural Afghanistan. Sustainability 12(3):1268

    Google Scholar 

  • Musau S, Muathe S, Mwangi L (2018) Financial inclusion, GDP, and credit risk of commercial banks in Kenya. Int J Econ Financ 10(3):181–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Nawaz S (2010) Microfinance and poverty reduction: evidence from a village study in Bangladesh. J Asian Afr Stud 45(6):670–683

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogbuabor JE, Nwosu C (2017) The impact of deposit money bank’s agricultural credit on agricultural productivity in Nigeria: evidence from an error correction model. Int J Econ Financ Issues 7(2):513–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomi SS (2019) Impact of microcredit on rural poverty alleviation in the context of Bangladesh. Int J Econ Financ 11(6):70–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Quddus A, Kropp JD (2020) Constraints to agriculture production and marketing in the lagging regions of Bangladesh. Sustainability 12(10):3956

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MW (2011) Policies and performances of agricultural/rural credit in Bangladesh: What is the influence on agricultural production?. Afr J Agric Res 6(31):6440–6452

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman S (2007) The impact of microcredit on poverty and women's empowerment: A case study of Bangladesh. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, School of Economics and Finance, University of Western Sydney, Australia, available at: http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/36990. Accessed on May 8, 2020

  • Rashid MHU (2020) Taxpayer’s attitude towards tax evasion in a develo** country: do the demographic characteristics matter? Int J Appl Behav Econ (IJABE) 9(2):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehman A, Chandio AA, Hussain I, **gdong L (2017) Is credit the devil in agriculture? The role of credit in Pakistan’s agricultural sector. J Financ Data Sci 3(1–4):38–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehman A, Chandio AA, Hussain I, **gdong L (2019) Fertilizer consumption, water availability and credit distribution: major factors affecting agricultural productivity in Pakistan. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 18(3):269–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy MK, Biswas TK (2014) Microcredit and poverty reduction in Bangladesh. ASA Univ Rev 8(1):143

    Google Scholar 

  • Saqib SE, Ahmad MM, Panezai S, Rana IA (2016) An empirical assessment of farmers’ risk attitudes in flood-prone areas of Pakistan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduction 18:107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.06.007

  • Seven U, Tumen S (2020) Agricultural credits and agricultural productivity: Cross-country evidence. Seven, IZA Discussion Paper No. 12930, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3534478. Accessed on December 28, 2020

  • Sharmeen K, Chowdhury ST (2013) Agricultural growth and agricultural credit in the context of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Res Pub J 8(2):174–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipahutar MA (2016) Effects of credit on economic growth, unemployment and poverty. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Kajian Masalah Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan 17(1):37–49

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2019). World Development Indicator (WDI), available at https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=BD Accessed on April 25, 2020

  • Wursten J (2018) XTHRTEST: Stata module to perform Born & Breitung Bias-corrected HR-test for first-order panel serial correlation. Statistical Software Components

  • Yu J, Han X, Chen B, Ren J (2020) Estimating the impact of poverty alleviation microcredit on the income of poor households using the propensity score matching method: evidence from China. Agriculture 10(7):293

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors listed have significantly contributed to the preparation and the writing of this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md. Akhtaruzzaman Khan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roy, T., Hossain, M.E., Jalal, M.J.E. et al. Effects of credit on national and agricultural GDP, and poverty: a develo** country perspective. SN Bus Econ 1, 140 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-021-00146-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-021-00146-6

Keywords

Navigation