Log in

Closed-Form Solutions for Single-Axis Slew Maneuvers Under a Fixed Final Time Constraint

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses a single-axis rotation problem in diverse space applications. In the problem, spin-to-spin boundary conditions, a finite jerk constraint, and a fixed final time constraint are considered. The objective is to find a path which maximizes the stabilization period under the given state boundary conditions and path inequality constraints. The optimal control problem is converted into a switching time design problem, and the unknown parameters are calculated analytically by solving the quartic, the cubic, or the quadratic equation. The proposed computational procedures are explained through numerical examples and the closed-form solutions are verified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Brazil)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used to support this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Byers RM, Vadali SR, Junkins JL (1990) Near-minimum time, closed-loop slewing of flexible spacecraft. J Guid Control Dyn 13:57–65. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eglynas T, Bogdevicius M, Andziulis A, Jusis M (2017) Trolley motion control based on S-shaped velocity profile for quay crane cargo oscillation comparison. Electron Electr Eng 9:283–288. https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2017.1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hecht NK, Junkins JL (1992) Near-minimum-time control of a flexible manipulator. J Guid Control Dyn 15:477–481. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Miu DK, Bhat SP (1991) Minimum power and minimum jerk position control and its applications in computer disk drives. IEEE Trans Magn 27:4471–4475. https://doi.org/10.1109/20.278666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee D, Bang H (2018) Gimbal-angle vectors of the nonredundant CMG cluster. Int J Aero Space Sci 19:443–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0037-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cho D-H, Kim J-H, Choi H-L, Ahn J (2018) Optimization-based scheduling method for agile earth-observing satellite constellation. J Aerosp Inform Syst 15:611–626. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.I010620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu T-S, Lee T-E (2019) Scheduling dual-armed cluster tools with chamber cleaning operations. IEEE Trans Automat Sci Eng 16:218–228. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2017.2764105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zacharia PTh, Aspragathos NA (2005) Optimal robot task scheduling based on genetic algorithms. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 21:67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2004.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zacharia PTh, **dias E, Aspragathos NA (2013) Task scheduling and motion planning for an industrial manipulator. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 29:449–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2013.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Junkins JL, Rahman ZH, Bang H (1991) Near-minimum-time control of distributed parameter systems: analytical and experimental results. J Guid Control Dyn 14:406–415. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim J-J, Agrawal BN (2006) “Experiments on jerk-limited slew maneuvers of a flexible spacecraft,” AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit. Keystone, CO. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-6187

  12. Bryson AE Jr, Ho Y-C (1975) Applied optimal control, revised printing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315137667

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Ioslovich I (2003) Arbitrary fuel-optimal attitude maneuvering of a non-symmetric space vehicle in a vehicle-fixed coordinate frame. Automatica 39:557–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(02)00247-9

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim BK, Shin KG (1985) Suboptimal control of industrial manipulators with a weighted minimum time-fuel criterion. IEEE Trans Automat Control 30:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1985.1103783

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu S-W, Singh T (1997) Fuel/time optimal control of spacecraft maneuvers. J Guid Control Dyn 20:394–397. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Okubo H, Nagano N, Komatsu N, Tsumura T (1997) Path planning for space manipulators to reduce attitude disturbances. J Guid Control Dyn 20:609–611. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee D, Song Y-J (2019) Spin-to-spin slew maneuvers under spherically constrained angular acceleration. Adv Space Res 64:1274–1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.06.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim D, Leeghim H (2019) Near-minimum-fuel strategy for continuous single-axis maneuvers of a rigid body. Trans Jpn Soc Aero Space Sci 62:169–172. https://doi.org/10.2322/tjsass.62.169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee D, Song Y-J (2019) Single-axis, spin-to-spin slew maneuvers under a finite jerk constraints. J Guid Control Dyn 42:2116–2123. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G004351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Singhose W (2009) Command sha** for flexible systems: a review of the first 50 years. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 10:153–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-009-0084-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Albassam BA (2002) Optimal near-minimum-time control design for flexible structures. J Guid Control Dyn 25:618–625. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mok S-H, Bang H, Lee D (2023) Closed-form solution of attitude command generation for spin-to-spin maneuver. Adv Space Res 71:676–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Burton DM (2011) The history of mathematics: an introduction, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 320–331

    Google Scholar 

  24. Polyanin AD, Manzhirov AV (2006) Handbook of mathematics for engineers and scientists. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, pp 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420010510

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by 2022 Korea Aerospace University Faculty Researchgrant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Joo Song.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Formula of Quartic Equations

In this Appendix, a formula for the below quartic equation is summarized.

$$ ax^{4} + bx^{3} + cx^{2} + dx + e = 0, $$
(A.1)

where \(a = 1\). First, a cubic equation is formulated as follows:

$$ y^{3} + \frac{f}{2}y^{2} + \left( {\frac{{f^{2} - 4h}}{16}} \right)y - \frac{{g^{2} }}{64} = 0, $$
(A.2)

where f, g, and h are as follows:

$$ f = c - \frac{{3b^{2} }}{8}, $$
(A.3)
$$ g = d + \frac{{b^{3} }}{8} - \frac{bc}{2}, $$
(A.4)
$$ h = e - \frac{{3b^{4} }}{256} + \frac{{b^{2} c}}{16} - \frac{bd}{4}. $$
(A.5)

Let \(y_{1}\), \(y_{2}\), and \(y_{3}\) be the roots of the cubic equation in Eq. (A.2), and \(y_{2}\) and \(y_{3}\) be the non-zero roots. Using \(y_{1}\), \(y_{2}\), and \(y_{3}\), the following p, q, r, and s are calculated.

$$ p = \sqrt {y_{2} } , $$
(A.6)
$$ q = \sqrt {y_{3} } , $$
(A.7)
$$ r = - \frac{g}{8pq}, $$
(A.8)
$$ s = \frac{b}{4a}. $$
(A.9)

Four roots denoted by \(x_{1}\), \(x_{2}\), \(x_{3}\), and \(x_{4}\) for the quartic equation in Eq. (A.1) are derived as follows:

$$ x_{1} = p + q + r - s, $$
(A.10)
$$ x_{2} = p - q - r - s, $$
(A.11)
$$ x_{3} = - p + q - r - s, $$
(A.12)
$$ x_{4} = - p - q + r - s. $$
(A.13)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, D., Song, YJ. Closed-Form Solutions for Single-Axis Slew Maneuvers Under a Fixed Final Time Constraint. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 25, 635–646 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-023-00682-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-023-00682-5

Keywords

Navigation