Abstract
The growing emphasis on institutional internationalization has been noticeable in Canadian higher education and has contributed to the increasing enrolment of international students and created heterogenous socio-linguistic institutional landscapes across the nation, as discussed by Guo and Guo (Studies in Higher Education, 42(5), 851-868, 2017). Viewing international learners’ linguacultural diversity as a resource and a source of empowerment, this paper demonstrates how multiliteracies-enhanced teaching practices can empower learners’ linguistic, cultural, and intellectual strengths and their transnational identities in a content and language integrated learning (CLIL)-based English for academic purposes (EAP) course in a Canadian university. Drawing upon frameworks of multiliteracies/pluriliteracies pedagogy, the article showcases how three researchers structured their innovative and inclusive instructional course design to facilitate learners’ multiliteracies development through a two-year action research project. To facilitate learners’ in-depth discussions with course materials and connect them with their own transnational journey and cross-cultural experiences, learners were invited to participate in a series of experiential education (EE)-integrated and multimodal tasks such as identity texts and multimedia blog reflections. With evident testimonies from interviews, questionnaires, and student work samples, the study highlights that these innovative and inclusive tasks that center on multimodality for multiliteracies engagement create inclusive space for learners to serve as both knowledge-providers with their familiar intellectual fields and knowledge-seekers for new information. The study implies that critical teaching needs to orient learners to critical perspectives in their learning as global citizens, who move away from colonial relations of power dominated in EAP learning around the world and advocate for their plurilingual and pluricultural selves by embracing diversity in their academic endeavors.
摘要
加拿大的高等教育對機構國際化的重視越發明顯,促使國際學生的入學率不斷提升,並在全國形成了異質性的社會語言機構現象(Guo & Guo, 2017)。本文將國際學生的語言文化多樣性視為一種資源和賦權的來源,展示了加拿大大學中內容和語言整合學習(CLIL)學術英語(EAP)的課程,強化多元素養的教學實踐如何增強學習者的語言、文化和智力優勢及其跨國認同。本文以多元素養的教學法框架,展示了三位研究人員透過一個為期兩年的行動研究計畫,建構其創新與包容的教學課程設計,以促進學習者的多元素養發展。為促進學習者對教材的深度討論,並將其自身跨國旅程和跨文化經驗連結起來,學習者被邀請參與一系列的融合式體驗教育(EE)和多模態的任務,例如身份認同的文本和多媒體部落格的反思。本研究透過訪談、問卷調查和學生的作品樣本清楚地證明這些標榜多模態的多元素養參與之創新、包容學習任務,為學習者創造了包容性的空間,使他們既是其熟悉知識領域的知識提供者,也是新訊息的知識尋求者。本研究指出批判性教學需要引導學習者在學習成為全球公民時,朝批判性的角度邁進,擺脫世界各地EAP學習中佔主導地位的殖民權力關係,並透過學習者在學術上的努力來擁抱多樣性,以提倡其多語言及多文化的自我。
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42321-023-00154-9/MediaObjects/42321_2023_154_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42321-023-00154-9/MediaObjects/42321_2023_154_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42321-023-00154-9/MediaObjects/42321_2023_154_Fig3_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alidou, H., & Glanz, C. (2015). Action research to improve youth and adult literacy: Empowering learners in a multilingual world. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.
Anderson, C. R., & McLachlan, S. M. (2016). Transformative research as knowledge mobilization: Transmedia, bridges, and layers. Action Research. SAGE Journal, 14(3), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503156166
Bennet, A., Bennet, D., Fafard, K., Fonda, M., Lomond, T., Messier, L., & Vaugeois, N. (2007). Knowledge mobilization in the social sciences and humanities. Mqi Press.
Blackstone, B., Spiri, J., & Naganuma, N. (2007). Blogs in English language teaching and learning: Pedagogical uses and student responses. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 6(2), 1–20.
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge.
Cazden, C., Cope, B., Fairclough, N., Gee, J., Kalantzis, M., Kress, G., et al. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard educational review, 66(1), 60–92. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
Cenoz, J. (2015). Content-based instruction and content and language integrated learning: The same or different? Language, culture and curriculum, 28(1), 8–24.
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
Coffey, S. (2015). Reframing teachers' language knowledge through metaphor analysis of LP. The Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12235
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL- Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.
Cummins, J. (2009). Transformative multiliteracies pedagogy: School-based strategies for closing the achievement gap. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 11(2), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.5555/muvo.11.2.2420352213232u47
Cummins, J., & Early, M. (2010). Identity texts: The collaborative creation of power in multilingual schools. Trentham Books Ltd..
Davis, A. (2018). The Black woman native speaking subject: Reflections of a Black female professor in Canada. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture and Social Justice, 39(1), 70–78.
Forbes, K., Evans, M., Fisher, L., Gayton, A., Liu, Y., & Rutgers, D. (2021). Develo** a multilingual identity in the languages classroom: The influence of an identity-based pedagogical intervention. The Language Learning Journal, 49(4), 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2021.1906733
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed: 30th anniversary edition. London, UK: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Gagné, A., Kalan, A., & Herath, S. (2022). Critical action research challenging neoliberal language and literacies education: Auto and duoethnographies of global experiences. Peter Lang Publishing.
Gao, Y. (2021). How do language learning, teaching, and transnational experiences (re)shape an EFLer’s identities? A critical ethnographic narrative. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211031211
García, O. (2011). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. John Wiley & Sons.
García, O., & Otheguy, R. (2020). Plurilingualism and translanguaging: Commonalities and divergences. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1598932
Ghosh, S., & Wang, L. (2003). Transnationalism and identity: A tale of two faces and multiple lives. Canadian Geographer, 47(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-0064.00022
Godley, J. (2018). Everyday discrimination in Canada: Prevalence and patterns. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 111–142. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs29346
Government of Canada (2019). Canada’s international education strategy [government report]. https://www.international.gc.ca/education/report-rapport/strategy-strategie-2014/index.aspx?lang=eng”
Graz Group. (2015). The Graz group model: Map** pluriliteracies development: A pluriliteracies approaches to teaching for learning. European Centre for. Modern Languages https://pluriliteracies.ecml.at/
Guo, Y., & Guo, S. (2017). Internationalization of Canadian higher education: Discrepancies between policies and international student experiences. Studies in Higher Education, 42(5), 851–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1293874
Haque, E. (2012). Multiculturalism within a bilingual framework: Language, race, and belonging in Canada. University of Toronto Press.
Kong, Y. (2021). The role of experiential learning on students’ motivation and classroom engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.771272
Kubota, R. (2016). The multi/plural turn, postcolonial theory, and neoliberal multiculturalism: Complicities and implications for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 37(4), 474–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu045
Kusters, A., & De Meulder, M. (2019). Language portraits: Investigating embodied multilingual and multimodal repertoires. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3239
Lasagabaster, D. (2018). Fostering team teaching: Map** out a research agenda for English-medium instruction at university level. Language Teaching, 51(3), 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000113
Lau, S. M. C. (2018). Stickiness of language and culture: Identity in the making. Belonging https://bild-lida.ca/blog/uncategorized/stickiness-of-language-and-culture-identity-in-the-making-by-sunny-man-chu-lau/?fbclid=IwAR2DL4ydUaeFHCJ6-oAPWzcKjbTn9n3rLpE4PDPxqAzWbKHT’eKIfF-B651w#more-2488
Lau, S. M. C. (2020). Emotional labour in critical language teaching and research: The power of feeling in collaborative action research. In K. W. Clausen & G. Black (Eds.), The future of action research in education: A Canadian perspective (pp. 158–170). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Lau, S. M. C., & Van Viegen, S. (2020). Plurilingual pedagogies: An introduction. In S. M. C. Lau & S. Van Viegen (Eds.), Plurilingual Pedagogies: Critical and Creative Endeavors for Equitable Language in Education (pp. 3–22). Springer Nature.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. University of Cambridge Press.
Lin, A. M. (2019). Theories of trans/languaging and trans-semiotizing: Implications for content-based education classrooms. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1515175
Meyer, O., & Coyle, D. (2017). Pluriliteracies teaching for learning: Conceptualizing progression for deeper learning in literacies development. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2017-0006
Meyer, O., Coyle, D., Halbach, A., Schuck, K., & Ting, T. (2015). A pluriliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning–map** learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000924
Ortaçtepe, D. (2013). This is called free-falling theory not culture shock!: A narrative inquiry on second language socialization. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 12(4), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2013.818469
Rosa, J., & Flores, N. (2017). Unsettling race and language: Toward a raciolinguistic perspective. Language in Society, 46(5), 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000562
Saldana, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications.
Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language learning. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). Continuum.
UNESCO. (2018). Preparing teachers for global citizenship education a template. Available at https://bangkok.unesco.org/content/preparing-teachers-global-citizenship-education-template
Walcott, R. (2014). The book of others (Book IV): Canadian multiculturalism, the state, and its political legacies. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 46(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1353/ces.2014.0018
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Harvard Business Press.
Yang, S.-H. (2009). Using blogs to enhance critical reflection and community of practice. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 11–21.
Zaidi, Z., Verstegen, D., Naqvi, R., Dornan, T., & Morahan, P. (2016). Identity text: An educational intervention to foster cultural interaction. Medical Education Online, 21(1), 33135. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.33135
Availability of Data and Materials
Not applicable.
Funding
This study was funded by York University's Academic Innovation Fund (2020-2022) and York University Faculty Association Teaching-Learning Development Grant (2020-2022).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally to this work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
Ethics approval for the study was granted by the Human Participants Research Review Committee at York University. Research informants gave informed consent to participate in the study and to include student course work samples and interview data in the publication.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Song, H., Makinina, O. & Ng, J. Multiliteracies-Enhanced Practices as Empowerment Pedagogy for Teaching Transnational English Language Learners in a CLIL-Based EAP Course in Canada. English Teaching & Learning 47, 403–427 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-023-00154-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-023-00154-9