Abstract
I discuss the nature of the moral imperatives that Humanistic Management seems to propose. In particular I discuss whether Humanistic Management should be seen as an inspirational invitation to reimagine how organizations could be conceived and practiced or as a mode of organizing which is mean to replace our current forms of organizing and which we have a moral imperative to adopt.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beauchamp, Tom. 2019. The Principle of Beneficence in Applied Ethics. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. Spring 2019. Meta-physics Research Lab, Stanford University. Url: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/principle-beneficence/ (visited on 03/07/2019).
Heyd, David. 2019. Obligation and Supererogation. In Encyclopedia.com. Url: https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/obligation-and-supererogation (visited on 10/30/2019).
Hill, Thomas E. Jr. 1971. Kant on imperfect duty and supererogation. In Kant-Studien 62, pp. 55–76.
Mejia, Santiago. 2019. Weeding Out Flawed Versions of Shareholder Theory. A Refection on the Moral Obligations That Carry over from Principals to Agents. In: Business Ethics Quarterly 29.4, pp. 519–544.
Pirson, Michael, Mario Vázquez-Maguirre, Canan Corus, Erica Steckler, and Andrew Wicks. 2019. Humanistic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-019-00071-9.
Rainbolt, George. 2000. Perfect and Imperfect Obligations. In: Philosophical Studies 98.3, pp. 233–256.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mejia, S. The Moral Imperatives of Humanistic Management. Humanist Manag J 4, 155–158 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-019-00069-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-019-00069-3