Log in

Sorting sex, controlling sex: Masui Kiyoshi’s chicken research and experimental system, 1915–1950

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Masui Kiyoshi (1887–1981), a prominent Japanese geneticist, is best known for inventing the sex-sorting method of chicks and his contributions to experimental genetics in Japan. Masui drew inspiration from Goldschmidt’s sex determination theory and used chickens, transplantation techniques, and his own “chick sexing” methods in his scientific work. This paper examines the intersection of genetics and industrial breeding by tracing the evolution of Masui’s experimental systems. During the early 20th century, poultry farming emerged as a significant industry in Japan, resulting in the development of standardized organisms and techniques for chicken farming. Masui, a professor at Tokyo Imperial University, collaborated with the Imperial Zootechnical Experimental Station to use these organisms as models for sex determination theory while exploring their further industrial possibilities. First, the paper show how Masui viewed chickens as epistemological objects and transformed his anatomical discoveries into standardized industrial practices. Next, it describes how Masui’s collaboration with German geneticist Richard Goldschmidt led to new academic questions about sex determination mechanisms and how he integrated his knowledge of chicken physiology into his research on “experimental gynandromorphs” to elaborate the theories. Lastly, the paper discusses the biotechnological ideals that Masui aimed to achieve and how they were co-constructed with his mass-production method of intersex chickens from the early 1930s. The trajectory of Masui’s experimental systems highlights the dynamic relationship between agroindustry and genetics in the early twentieth century and demonstrates the ‘biology of history’ in which the biological processes of organisms intertwine with their epistemological history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Historians in Asian studies have focused on the chick sexing has created employment and transnational networks among the Asian diaspora (Azuma, 2009; Itoh, 2001). Meanwhile, animal rights activists have criticized the industrial practice as a brutal art of culling that turns early-age male chicks into feed. According to them, it is “completely standard and acceptable within the commercial egg industry,” to drop the males into a grinder and to relegate females to “a life of cruelty and confinement” (Mercy for Animals, 2012). However, these discussions are slightly outside the scope of this paper.

  2. In Roman notation, Chikusan Shikenjō, the English name “Imperial Zootechnical Experimental Station” is a name used by its own bulletin.

  3. There are some historical studies that extend the concept of experimental systems to discuss the multiplicity of experimental organisms (Creager, 2002; Yi, 2015). For linking this concept to the exploration of sex determination mechanisms, see Dietrich’s work (Dietrich, 2016).

  4. There are not many studies on the relationship between life science and agriculture in post-war East Asia. Recent studies have revealed the impact of changes in genetics and embryology on each country’s biological industry over the second half of the 20th century (Onaga, 2021; Jiang, 2018).

  5. In 1923, before Masui published these results in a paper, an army major of Japan named Iwata Iwao had already reported similar sex differentiation through cloaca for “carrier-pigeons.“ In the case of pigeons, the difference in shape inside the cloaca between males and females was much more pronounced than in chickens (Iwata, 1923). Masui’s speculation might come from this anatomical knowledge.

  6. In colonial Korea, this technique was accepted as a prerequisite for scaling up the poultry industry. Especially, only a few wealthy poultry farmers in Korea were able to leave for Nagoya to learn chick sexing and obtain certificates, which were rare enough to be featured in newspapers. They promoted the hatchery business in their hometown and led the introduction of technologies such as the large-scale incubator (Chosun Ilbo, 1936; 1937).

  7. The first supporters of the society were university researchers and professors. Suzuki Kozo was supported by his teacher Suzuki Umetaro, the expert on beriberi, and Masui was supported by Tokyo’s senior professors Iwasumi Ryoji and Shimamura Torai. Many of their college alumni and station colleagues who worked at the other two imperial universities devoted to agricultural research, Hokkaido and Kyushu, also helped the network expand. All of the students at the Army Veterinary School joined the society because a colleague of Masui named Hatano Tadashi wanted to continue academic exchanges even after moving to the Army Veterinary School. Before the Japanese Society of Animal Science, there were the Society of Agricultural Chemistry and the Society of Veterinary Medicine as the academic societies for agricultural sciences (Masui et al., 1974).

  8. There were several other foreign-learned Japanese biologists who tried to move their research program more experimental fashion. Kjell Ericson showed the figure such as Yatsu Naohide, who became the third director of Misaki station in 1922, taught his students to discover physiological mechanisms instead of collecting and observing. He obtained Ph.D. in Columbia under the direction of Edmund Wilson and Thomas Morgan (Ericson, 2020, pp. 101–102).

References

  • Ankeny, R. A., & Leonelli, S. (2011). What’s so special about model organisms? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 42(2), 313–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ankeny, R. A., & Leonelli, S. (2021). Organisms in experimental research. In R. Michael, M. E. Dietrich, Borrello, & O. Harman (Eds.), Handbook of the historiography of biology (pp. 265–290). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azuma, E. (2009). Race, citizenship, and the “Science of Chick Sexing”: The politics of racial identity among Japanese Americans. Pacific Historical Review, 78(2), 242–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, J. R. (1989). The formation of science in Japan: Building a research tradition. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bay, A. R. (2012). Beriberi in modern Japan: The making of a national disease. University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, W. (2001). Making meat: Science, technology, and American poultry production. Technology and Culture, 42(4), 631–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugos, G. (1992). Intellectual property protection in the American chicken–breeding industry. Business History Review, 66(1), 127–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Husbandry. (1966). Chikusan hattatsu-shi honpen [History of husbandry development: Main volume]. Chūōkōron jigyō shuppan. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Chosun Ilbo (1936). Kodŭnggambyŏlsashihŏme Kimhae Ch’oeilsunssi hapkyŏk. [Choi Il-soon, Gimhae passed the examination for the senior chick-sexer]. 17 October 1936. [In Korean].

  • Chosun Ilbo (1937). Puran’gisŏlch’ik’o immanubuhwa. [200,000 hatches through the installation of hatching machines]. 13 March 1937. [In Korean].

  • Clarke, A. E. (1998). Disciplining reproduction: Modernity, American life sciences, and “the problems of sex. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. E., & Fujimura, J. H. (Eds.). (1992). The right tools for the job: At work in twentieth-century life sciences. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creager, A. N. (2002). The life of a virus: Tobacco mosaic virus as an experimental model, 1930–1965. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creager, A. N., & Landecker, H. (2009). Technical matters: Method, knowledge and infrastructure in twentieth-century life science. Nature Methods, 6(10), 701–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, M. E. (2015). Chicken breeding: The complex transition from traditional to genetic methods in the USA. In D. Phillips, & S. Kingsland (Eds.), New perspectives on the history of life sciences and agriculture (pp. 371–393). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, M. R. (2000). Of moths and men: Theo Lang and the persistence of Richard Goldschmidt’s theory of homosexuality, 1916–1960. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 22(2), 219–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, M. R. (2016). Experimenting with sex: Four approaches to the genetics of sex reversal before 1950. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 38(1), 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domm, L. V. (1927). New experiments on ovariotomy and the problem of sex inversion in the fowl. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 48(1), 31–173.

  • Domm, L. V. (1929). Spermatogenesis following early ovariotomy in the Brown Leghorn fowl. Wilhelm Roux’Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen, 119(1), 171–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, K. (2020). The Misaki Marine Biological Station’s dual roles for zoology and fisheries, 1880s–1930s. In K. S. Matlin, J. Maienschein, & R. A. Ankeny (Eds.), Why study biology by the sea? (pp. 87–115). University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyler, J. M. (2006). De Kruif’s boast: Vaccine trials and the construction of a virus. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 80(3), 409–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujihara, T. (2012). Ine no daitōa kyōeiken: Teikoku nihon no “Midori no kakumei”. [The Greater East Asia Coprosperity Sphere of rice: Imperial Japan’s “Green Revolution”]. Yoshikawa Kōbunkan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudillière, J. P. (2000). Rockefeller strategies for scientific medicine: Molecular machines, viruses and vaccines. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 31(3), 491–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudillière, J. P. (2004). The invisible industrialist. The technological dynamics of 20th century biological research. In K. Grandin, N. Wormbs, & S. Widmalm (Eds.), The science-industry nexus. History, policy, implications (pp. 169–188). Science History Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudillière, J-P. (2005). Better prepared than synthesized: Adolf Butenandt, Schering Ag and the transformation of sex steroids into drugs (1930–1946). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 612–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, C. S. (1934). Sexing baby chicks. Poultry Science, 13(4), 208–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S. F. (1988). Cellular politics: Ernest Everett Just, Richard B. Goldschmidt, and the attempt to reconcile embryology and genetics. In R. Rainger, K. R. Benson, and J. Maienschein (Eds.). American development of biology (pp. 311–346). Rutgers University Press

  • Goldschmidt, R. (1960). In and out of the ivory tower: The autobiography of Richard B. Goldschmidt. University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha, N. (2011). The riddle of sex: Biological theories of sexual difference in the early twentieth-century. Journal of the History of Biology, 44(3), 505–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, J. (1993). Styles of scientific thought: The German genetics community, 1900–1933. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto, J. (1929). Niwatori ni okeru phallus no hatsei ni tsuite [On development of phallus in chicken]. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho, 4, 45–57. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirunagi, K. (2006). Eiga `CHICK SEXING on the development and practise of baby chick sexing method‘(shoseibina shiyūkanbetsu-hō no hatten to sono fukyū) no ori**aru firumu no hakken [Original film of “CHICK SEXING on the development and practise of baby chick sexing method” was found]. Bulletin of the Nagoya University Museum, 22, 65–72. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoda, M. (1934). Wazuka yon kagetsu de hachi jūen no reiki nukiosu ikusei no kotsu [Tips for profit of 80 yen in just four months of breeding sorted male chicks]. Nōgyō Sekai, 29(8), 180–184. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Iida, K. (2015). Genetics and “breeding as a science”: Kihara Hitoshi and the development of genetics in Japan in the first half of the twentieth century. In Denise Phillips, & S. Kingsland (Eds.), New perspectives on the history of life sciences and agriculture (pp. 439–458). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikegami, S. (1996). Nihon de saisho no zaidanhō** `keimeikai’—sono setsuritsu to suii” [Japan’s first foundation “Keimeikai”—its establishment and transition]. Medchem News, 6(4), 9–10. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Imperial University of Tokyo. (1913). Tōkyōteikokudaigaku ichiran jū taishō gan’nen shi taishō 2-nen [Catalog of Imperial University of Tokyo from 1912 to 1913]. Imperial University of Tokyo. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, C. (1893). Studies of reproductive elements. I. Spermatogenesis, ovogenesis and fertilization in Diaptomus. Journal of the College of Science Imperial University of Japan, 5, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itoh, K. (2001). The Japanese community in pre-war Britain: From integration to disintegration. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, I. (1923). Denshobato shiyō ni yoru yakan tsūshin. [Night communication using a message pigeon]. Tori, 3(14), 240–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Japanese Society for the Advancement of Sciences (1943). Nihongakujutsushinkōkai nenpō dai 9-gō [Japanese Society for the Advancement of Sciences Annual Report No. 9]. Tokyo: Japanese Society for the Advancement of Sciences. [In Japanese].

  • Jiang, L. (2018). Crafting socialist embryology: Dialectics, aquaculture and the diverging discipline in Maoist China, 1950–1965. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 40(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, C. (1989). Chikkusekusā no sekai: Hiyokko no me de mita 33-kakoku [World of chick sexers: 33 countries seen by eye of chicks]. Katouyouken. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Keimeikai. (1921). Zaidanhō** keimeikai jigyō hōkoku-sho dai 2-kai Taishō 9-nendo [Keimeikai foundation business report No. 2, 1920]. Keimeikai. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Keimeikai. (1927). Zaidanhō** keimeikai jigyō hōkoku-sho dai 8-kai Taishō 15-nendo [Keimeikai foundation business report No. 8, 1926]. Keimeikai. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmelman, B. A. (1983). The American Breeders’ Association: Genetics and eugenics in an agricultural context, 1903-13. Social Studies of Science, 13(2), 163–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, R. E. (1994). Lords of the fly: Drosophila genetics and the experimental life. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, K. (1949). Yagi kansei no idengakuteki kenkyū [Genetic study of goat intersex]. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho, 19, 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, K. (1952). Studies on intersexuality in milk goats. Idengaku Zasshi, 27(5–6), 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landecker, H. (2016). Antibiotic resistance and the biology of history. Body and Society, 22(4), 19–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Blond, J. (2018). World’s first no-kill eggs go on sale in Berlin. The Guardian, (2018. 12. 22). https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/dec/22/worlds-first-no-kill-eggs-go-on-sa le-in-berlin

  • Lenoir, T. (2010). Epistemology historicized. Making epistemic things. In H. J. Rheinberger (Ed.), An epistemology of the concrete: Twentieth-century histories of life (pp. xi–xix). Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillie, F. R. (1931). Bilateral gynandromorphism and lateral hemihypertrophy in birds. Science, 74(1920), 387–390.

  • Martin, R. D. (1994). The specialist chick sexer. Bernal Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K. (1917). Uma no seishi no seisei (tokuni akusetsusorī senshokutai oyobi sei no kettei-setsu) nit suite [On horse spermatogenesis (especially “accessory” chromosomes and sex determination theory)]. Chuoujuikai Zasshi, 30(5), 319–353. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K. (1919). Kachiku ni okeru seichū hatsuiku no kenkyū dai ni. Ushi no seichū no hatsuiku tokuni seigensaibō no mushi bunretsu narabini senshokutai no setsugō oyobi genus ni tsuite [Research on sperm development in livestock, No.2: Spermatogenesis in bovine, especially on chromosome pairing and reduction in amitosis of spermatogonia]. Chuoujuikai Zasshi, 32(1), 1–28. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K. (1923). Kōtō dōbutsu (chōrui, honyū dōbutsu) ni arawareru, shiyūryōtai wa seibutsugaku-jō ikaga ni mirubeki ka? [How should intersex of higher animals (birds, mammals), be identified in biology?]. Gakugei, 40(500), 85–89. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K. (1927a). Sei no kettei ni Seki suru kenkyū no gaikyō (Chūō jūikai kōshūkai kōen) [Overview of research in sex determination (lecture in Central Research Institute)]. Chuoujuikai Zasshi, 40(1), 29–64. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K. (1927b). Niwatori no chūkan-sei no kenkyū [Intersex research on chicken]. Kakinkai, 17(4), 2–4. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K. (1930). Niwatori ni okeru sei no kettei oyobi bunka ni tsuite (hifu ishoku no jitsuken) [Sex determination and differentiation in chicken (skin transplantation experiment)]. Journal of the Japanese Society of Veterinary Science, 9(1), 80–92. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K. (1931). Sei no kettei ni kansuru kenkyū [Studies on sex determination]. Chuoujuikai Zasshi, 44(8), 662–664. [In Japanese].

  • Masui, K. (1933a). Experimenteller Gynandromorphismus bei Hühnern. Versuche mit Haut-und Gonadentransplantation. Wilhelm Roux’Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen, 128(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K. (1933b). Fushigi! Fushigi!! Mendori ga ondori ni natta [Mysterious! Mysterious!! The hen became a rooster]. Shōnen Kurabu, 20(11). [In Japanese].

  • Masui, K. (1935). Ransō jokyo ni yoro shikei no sei tankan (hakushoku oyobi kasshoku reguhon kōhai 1-dai jatshu ni okeru ransō jokyo no jitsuken [Sex change of female chicken by ovariectomy (ovariectomy experiment on 1st generation hybrid between white and brown Leghorn)]. Dobutsugaku Zasshi, 47(562), 535–548. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K. (1950). Iden no kiso kara mita niwatori no kairyō [Improvement of chickens from basics of genetics]. Niwatorino Kenkyu, 25(1), 16–25. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K. (1951). Seikettei gakusetsu no saikin no sūzei to sono kenkyū no genkyō [Recent trends in sex-determination theory and research on it]. Chikusanno Kenkyu, 5(1), 1–4. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K. (1952). Niwatori ni okeru ransō jokyo ni yoru jikkenteki kansei no kenkyū [Intersex experiment by ovariectomy in chickens]. In Sajirou Makino (Ed.), Saibō-gaku iden-gaku ronbun-shū ka [Proceedings of cytology and genetics, Vol. 2], (pp. 155–162). Hoppō shubbansha. [In Japanese].

  • Masui, K. (1954). Niwatori ni okeru kinkōkeitō no ikusei to sono riyō ni tsuite [Breeding and utilization of inbred strains in chickens]. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho, 25(2–4), 7–16. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K. (1967). Sex determination and sexual differentiation in the fowl. University of Tokyo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K. (1970). Iden gakusha gōrudoshumitto sensei no purofiru [Profile of geneticist Goldschmidt]. Chikusanno Kenkyu, 24(6), 795–799. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K., & Miyamoto, Heiji. (1940). Niwatori ni okeru ransō jokyo ni yoru jitsuken matoma-sei no kenkyū (I. Hakushoku, kasshoku reguhōn oyobi sono kōzatsushu ni okeru **-i-teki kansei [Intersex by ovariectomy in chickens (I. Artificial intersex by ovariectomy in white and brown Leghorn and hybrid between them)]. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho, 12(4), 285–339. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K., & Miyamoto, Heiji. (1942). Niwatori ni okeru ransō jokyo ni yoru jitsuken matoma-sei no kenkyū (II. Ōhanpurimasurokku oyobi ōhanpurimasurokku kasshoku reguhōn kōzatsushu ni okeru ransō jokyo no jitsuken) [Intersex by ovariectomy in chickens (II. Ovariectomy in hybrid between barred-Plymouth Rock and brown Leghorn)]. The Japanese Journal of Genetics, 18(1), 1–25. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K., & Sukeyuki, Ito. (1932). Shoseibina (hakushoku reguhōn-shu) seishoku tokki no keitai nami ni tōkei-teki kenkyū, tokuni shoseibina shiyūkanbetsu ni tsuite no kōsatsu [Statistical study and morphology of reproductive bumps especially in day-old chicks (white Leghorn)]. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho, 5(4), 139–162. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K., & Hashimoto, Juro. (1933). Sexing baby chicks. Journal Printing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K., & Tamura, Yasusige. (1924). Mausu ni okeru seishoku-sen jokyo no fuku** no kōzō ni oyobi bosu eikyō narabini sono saihōgakuteki kenkyū (toku ni fuku** to seishoku-sen tono kinō-teki seki-gakari nit suite [Adrenal gland removal, adrenal structure, boss effect, and cytological study in mouse (especially on functional relationship between adrenal gland and gonad)]. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho, 1, 55–79. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K., & Tamura, Yasusige. (1926). The effect of gonadectomy on the weight of the kidney, thymus, and spleen of mice. Journal of Experimental Biology, 3(3), 207–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K., Hashimoto, J., & Ono, I. (1925). Ondori ni okeru taika kōbi kikan nami ni shoseibina no shiyū no kanbetsu ni tsuite [Rudimental copulatory organ in male chicks and sex-differentiation in day-old chicks]. Chuoujuikai Zasshi, 38(4), 277–287. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Masui, K., et al. (1974). Zadan-kai - Nihon chikusan gakkai no Ayumi tokuni yōranki no omoide o chūshin to shite [Roundtable – first step of the japanese society of Animal Science, especially focusing on memories of the infancy]. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho, 45, 112–118. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, Y. (1979). Factors limiting the development of aquaculture: A Japanese experience. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Technical Report. (1979. 4.).

  • Mercy for Animals (2012). Hatchery horrors: The egg industry’s tiniest victims. https://hatchery.mercyforanimals.org/ Access Date: 09 November 2021.

  • Miller, I. J. (2013). The nature of the beasts: Empire and exhibition at the Tokyo Imperial Zoo. University of California Press.

  • Mitsui Foundation. (1938). Zaidanhō** Mitsuihōonkai jigyō hōkoku shōwa 12-nendo [Mitsui Foundation business report 1937]. Mitsui Foundation. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizuno, H. (2009). Science for the empire: Scientific nationalism in modern Japan. Standford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onaga, L. (2010). Toyama Kametaro and Vernon Kellogg: Silkworm inheritance experiments in Japan, Siam, and the United States, 1900–1912. Journal of the History of Biology, 43(2), 215–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onaga, L. (2015). More than metamorphosis: The silkworm experiments of Toyama Kametarō and his cultivation of genetic thought in Japan’s sericultural practices, 1894–1918. In D. Phillips, & S. Kingsland (Eds.), New perspectives on the history of life sciences and agriculture (pp. 415–437). Springer.

  • Onaga, L. (2021). A matter of taste: Making artificial silkworm food in twentieth-century Japan. In L. Campos, M. Dietrich, T. Saraiva, and C. Young (Eds.). Nature remade (pp. 115–134). University of Chicago Press.

  • Otake, O. (2015). Nihon no kindai jūi-gaku-shi - niwatori no shoseibina no shiyūkanbetsu-hō o kaihatsu - Masui Kiyoshi [Modern history of veterinary medicine in Japan – Dr. Kiyoshi Masui: Development of chick sexing method]. Journal of Animal Clinical Medicine, 24(4), 193–196. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Printing Bureau of Japan (1921). Kanpō 1921-nen 09 tsuki 26-nichi [Official bulletin September 26, 1921]. (pp. 588–589). [In Japanese].

  • Rader, K. (2004). Making mice: Standardizing animals for American biomedical research, 1900–1955. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberger, H. J. (1997). Toward a history of epistemic things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberger, H. J. (2010). An epistemology of the concrete: Twentieth-century histories of life. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. (2004). Introduction: The garden in the machine: Toward an evolutionary history of technology. In R. Susan, Schrepfer, & P. Scranton (Eds.), Industrializing organisms: Introducing evolutionary history (pp. 1–16). Routeledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, H. (2017). Why did Japanese geneticists take a scientific interest in Lysenko’s theories? In William Dejong-Lambert, & N. Krementsov (Eds.), The Lysenko controversy as a global phenomenon, volume 2 (pp. 137–157). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saraiva, T. (2018). Fascist pigs: Technoscientific organisms and the history of fascism. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satzinger, H. (2009). Racial purity, stable genes, and sex difference: Gender in the making of genetic concepts by Richard Goldschmidt and Fritz Lenz, 1916–1936. In S. Heim, C. Sachse, & M. Walker (Eds.), The Kaiser Wilhelm Society under National socialism (pp. 145–170). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengoopta, C. (1998). Glandular politics: Experimental biology, clinical medicine, and homosexual emancipation in fin-de-siecle central Europe. Isis, 89(3), 445–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (2001). A time of crisis: Japan, the great depression, and rural revitalization. Harvard University Asia Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Tokyo. (1985). Tōkyō daigaku hyakunenshi bukyoku-shi 2-ken [University of Tokyo centennial history: Department history Vol.2]. University of Tokyo Press. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • WPC (World’s Poultry Congress). (1927). Report of proceedings of the world’s poultry congress. Ottawa: World’s Poultry Congress.

  • WPC (World’s Poultry Congress). (1936). VI. Weltgeflügelkongress Berlin-Leipzig 1936 [6th World’s poultry congress, Berlin-Leipzig, 1936]. G. Uschmann. [In German].

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, D. (2015). The recombinant university: Genetic engineering and the emergence of Stanford biotechnology. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyoryen Hwang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hwang, K. Sorting sex, controlling sex: Masui Kiyoshi’s chicken research and experimental system, 1915–1950. HPLS 45, 24 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-023-00579-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-023-00579-2

Keywords

Navigation