Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Dear Editor,
We thank Professor Bennett Andrassy et al. for their interest in our recent article “Deep Neuromuscular Block Attenuates Chronic Postsurgical Pain and Enhances Long-Term Postoperative Recovery After Spinal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial” [1]. They raised a meaningful question which is of great significance to our research. So we hope to help readers better understand our study through this reply.
First of all, we must admit that the concern highlighted by Andrassy et al. is reasonable. In patients diagnosed with lumbar degenerative diseases, the comparative efficacy of lumbar decompression alone versus lumbar decompression plus fusion on postoperative pain, disability scores, and other associated outcomes is controversial and inconclusive [2,3,4,5]. The proportions of these two surgery types between the deep neuromuscular block (DNMB) and moderate neuromuscular block (MNMB) groups in our study were indeed not consistent. Although only seven patients more in the MNMB group received lumbar fusion than the DNMB group, and the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.292), the surgery type may still serve as a confounding factor within this study.
However, we consulted a statistician, and the impact of this confounding factor should be handled by regression instead of subgroup analyses. So we conducted a logistic regression which included the intervention (DNMB vs MNMB) and surgery type (decompression alone vs decompression plus fusion) as independent variables, and the incidence of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) as the dependent variable. The result indicated that, after adjusting for the influence of different surgery type proportions among the two groups, the protective effect of DNMB on CPSP remained unchanged (odds ratio, 0.54; 95% CI 0.30–0.96; P = 0.035). Also the incidence of CPSP was similar among the two surgery types (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% CI 0.54–2.19; P = 0.816) (Table 1).
Subgroup analyses, mentioned by Andrassy et al. in their letter, are often conducted to investigate the effect of interventions in different patient subsets. Because of false negatives induced by inadequate statistical power, subgroup analyses can mostly only provide exploratory results [6]. Nonetheless, considering the potential difference among the two surgery approaches, we also performed subgroup analyses based on Prof. Andrassy’s advice. In patients who underwent lumbar decompression plus fusion surgery, the incidence of CPSP was significantly lower in the DNMB group than in the MNMB group (26.6% vs 44.2%, P = 0.02). While in patients who underwent lumbar decompression alone, the incidence of CPSP was comparable among the groups (36.0% vs 36.8%, P = 0.95). This is a result that can be expected, because only 44 out of 209 recruited patients in our study received lumbar decompression surgery. In this context, even though the difference truly existed, it could not be found because of the inadequate statistical power. Furthermore, our result also indicated that the interaction between intervention and surgery type was insignificant (P interaction = 0.297), thus we believe that deep neuromuscular block could help alleviate the CPSP in the total population (including patients who received lumbar decompression surgery) (Table 2).
In summary, after conducting logistic regression and subgroup analyses, we found that different surgery types exerted little impact in this study, and demonstrated the robustness of the primary result.
Once again, we deeply thank Prof. Andrassy et al. for their contribution to this discussion. Their questions and insights about our study have helped us to improve our research and make it even more meaningful.
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Tang X, Wu Y, Chen Q, Xu Y, Wang X, Liu S. Deep neuromuscular block attenuates chronic postsurgical pain and enhances long-term postoperative recovery after spinal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Pain Ther. 2023;12:1055–64.
Donnarumma P, Tarantino R, Nigro L, et al. Decompression versus decompression and fusion for degenerative lumbar stenosis: analysis of the factors influencing the outcome of back pain and disability. J Spine Surg. 2016;2:52–8.
Inose H, Kato T, Yuasa M, et al. Comparison of decompression, decompression plus fusion, and decompression plus stabilization for degenerative spondylolisthesis: a prospective randomized study. Clin Spine Surg. 2018;31:E347–E352.
Pranata R, Lim MA, Vania R, Bagus Mahadewa TG. Decompression alone compared to decompression with fusion in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Int J Spine Surg. 2022;16:71–80.
Wei FL, Zhou CP, Gao QY, et al. Decompression alone or decompression and fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. EClinicalMedicine. 2022;51:101559.
Burke JF, Sussman JB, Kent DM, Hayward RA. Three simple rules to ensure reasonably credible subgroup analyses. BMJ. 2015;351:h5651.
Authorship
All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship of this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.
Funding
This study was supported by the Natural Science Research Fund of Higher Education Institutions in Jiangsu Province (22KJA320007). No funding or sponsorship was received for this study or publication of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors carefully read the letter by Prof. Andrassy et al. JG, QC, and YX searched relevant literature. YW and XT performed the statistical analyses and wrote the manuscript. SL and XW revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Yan Wu, **hui Tang, Jie Guo, Qingsong Chen, Yuqing Xu, **nghe Wang, and Su Liu declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article is based on a previously conducted study and does not contain any new study with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, Y., Tang, X., Guo, J. et al. A Response to: Letter to the Editor Regarding “Deep Neuromuscular Block Attenuates Chronic Postsurgical Pain and Enhances Long-Term Postoperative Recovery After Spinal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial”. Pain Ther 12, 1469–1471 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-023-00556-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-023-00556-4